journal article·2021-05-28Open access

Dentinal Microcracks after Root Canal Instrumentation Using Instruments Manufactured with Different NiTi Alloys and the SAF System: A Systematic Review

Kashmira Sawant, Ajinkya M. Pawar, Kulvinder Singh Banga, Ricardo Machado, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Anand Marya, Pietro Messina, Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this systematic analysis was to assess the prevalence of dentinal microcracks at various levels (3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex) after using instruments made with conventional, R-Phase, and M-Wire NiTi alloys and the SAF system. Materials and Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in the databases Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. To arrange search methods, “MeSH” terms and/or keywords typically associated with the subject were paired with the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR.” Additional searches were conducted on the websites of four separate endodontic journals. After reading the titles and excluding duplicates, 1000 of the 1343 documents originally found were eliminated. Upon reviewing the abstracts, 310 of the remaining 343 experiments were also eliminated. Based on qualifying requirements, only 13 of the remaining 33 articles were included in the qualitative review. Results: All systems triggered dentinal microcracks; however, when chemo-mechanical preparation was performed using Self-Adjusting File (SAF) and systems manufactured with R-phase technology—K3XF and Twisted File Adaptive (TFA)—less of these defects were found when compared to those manufactured with traditional NiTi—ProTaper Universal and Mtwo—and with M-Wire—ProTaper Next, Reciproc, and WaveOne. Conclusions: A lower prevalence of dentinal microcracks was observed after using SAF and endodontic systems manufactured with R-phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Occupational health in dentistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai 400034, Maharashtra, India

Clinical Practice Limited to Endodontics, Navegantes 88370-100, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Conservative Dentistry Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia

Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Orthodontics, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh 55 180, Cambodia

Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Disciplines, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects10.4103/1305-7456.175682 ↗
2. Endodontic procedures for retreatment of periapical lesions
3. Hargreaves, K.M., and Berman, L.H. (2015). Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp Expert Consult, Elsevier Health Sciences.
4. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023 ↗
5. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028 ↗
6. How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures?10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0076 ↗
7. The importance of chemomechanical preparation of the root canal10.1016/0030-4220(55)90303-0 ↗
8. Cleaning and shaping the root canal10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00677-2 ↗
9. The evolution of modern non-iatrogenic root canal preparation techniques
10. Nickel-titanium: Options and challenges10.1016/j.cden.2003.11.001 ↗
11. Shaping ability of 0.04 and 0.06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00256.x ↗
12. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals10.1097/00004770-200204000-00014 ↗
13. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals10.1067/moe.2003.92 ↗
14. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys—A review10.1111/iej.12924 ↗
15. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007 ↗
16. Berendt, C. (2007). Method of Preparing Nitinol for Use in Manufacturing Instruments with Improved Fatigue Resistance. (US20070072147A1), U.S. Patent.
17. Numeric comparison of the static mechanical behavior between ProFile GT and ProFile GT series X rotary nickel-titanium files10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.018 ↗
18. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.004 ↗
19. Mechanical behavior of M-Wire and conventional NiTi wire used to manufacture rotary endodontic instruments10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.004 ↗
20. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.010 ↗
21. A study of electrical resistivity, internal friction and shear modulus on an aged Ti49Ni51 alloy10.1016/0956-7151(90)90137-6 ↗
22. Phase transformation behaviour and bending property of twisted nickel-titanium endodontic instruments10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01818.x ↗
23. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: Respecting the root canal anatomy--a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.036 ↗
24. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: Removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.037 ↗
25. Procedural errors during root canal preparation using rotary NiTi instruments detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography10.1590/S0103-64402010000600011 ↗
26. Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
27. “Dentinal microcracks after root canal preparation” a comparative evaluation with hand, rotary and reciprocating instrumentation
28. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: A prospective study10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.002 ↗
29. Prevalence and Reasons for Extraction of Endodontically Treated Teeth in Adult Nigerians10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2451 ↗
30. Reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Greece: A five-year follow-up study10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00004.x ↗
31. Joanna Briggs Institute (2014). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual, Joanna Briggs Institute. The Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Evidence.
32. In vitro comparative evaluation of dentinal microcracks formation during root canal preparation by different nickel-titanium file systems10.4103/sej.sej_23_17 ↗
33. Effect of Root Canal Preparation Techniques on Crack Formation in Root Dentin10.1016/j.joen.2018.12.018 ↗
34. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: Reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.045 ↗
35. Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.015 ↗
36. Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.019 ↗
37. The effects of different nickel-titanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation10.4103/1305-7456.149638 ↗
38. Comparison of incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with continuous rotation and reciprocating instrumentation10.1016/j.sdj.2015.09.003 ↗
39. Evaluation of dentinal defects during root canal preparation using thermomechanically processed nickel-titanium files10.4103/ejd.ejd_254_16 ↗
40. To compare the Incidence of Dentinal Cracks after Instrumentation with Rotary, Reciprocating Twisted File Adaptive System10.5005/jp-journals-10063-0020 ↗
41. Comparison of dentinal and apical crack formation caused by four different nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating systems in large and small canal10.4012/dmj.2015-197 ↗
42. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: An SEM study10.1111/iej.12197 ↗
43. Incidence of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with ProTaper Gold, Profile Vortex, F360, Reciproc and ProTaper Universal instruments10.1111/iej.12541 ↗
44. Evaluation of the incidence of microcracks caused by Mtwo and ProTaper Next rotary file systems versus the self-adjusting file: A scanning electron microscopic study10.4103/JCD.JCD_70_17 ↗
45. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464 ↗
46. Evolution of Nickel-titanium Alloys in Endodontics10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2181 ↗
47. Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems10.26650/eor.201972917418 ↗
48. Comparison of microcomputed tomography, cone beam tomography, stereomicroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy techniques for detection of microcracks on root dentin and effect of different apical sizes on microcrack formation10.1002/jemt.23341 ↗
49. Analysis of factors related to extraction of endodontically treated teeth10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.017 ↗
50. Evaluation of related factors in the failure of endodontically treated teeth: A cross-sectional study10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.029 ↗
51. Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. A meta-analysis10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.07.006 ↗
52. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00495.x ↗
53. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x ↗
54. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x ↗
55. Variations in cyclic fatigue resistance among ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels10.1111/iej.12471 ↗
56. Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and waveOne reciprocating instruments10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.041 ↗
57. Evaluation of the Efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc File Systems in the Removal of Root Filling Material: An Ex Vivo Micro-Computed Tomographic Study10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.005 ↗
58. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.037 ↗
59. Apically extruded debris after retreatment procedure with Reciproc, ProTaper Next, and Twisted File Adaptive instruments10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.003 ↗
60. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.038 ↗
61. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments10.1111/iej.12572 ↗
62. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 2: Mechanical analysis10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.028 ↗
63. Preparation of extracted natural human teeth for SEM investigations10.1016/0142-9612(95)92119-Q ↗
64. Reimer, L., and Pfefferkorn, G. (2013). Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie, Springer.
65. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests10.1016/j.crad.2005.04.013 ↗