Show source-provided references
2. Endodontic procedures for retreatment of periapical lesions
3. Hargreaves, K.M., and Berman, L.H. (2015). Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp Expert Consult, Elsevier Health Sciences.
4. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis
10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023 ↗9. The evolution of modern non-iatrogenic root canal preparation techniques
13. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals
10.1067/moe.2003.92 ↗15. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods
10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007 ↗16. Berendt, C. (2007). Method of Preparing Nitinol for Use in Manufacturing Instruments with Improved Fatigue Resistance. (US20070072147A1), U.S. Patent.
17. Numeric comparison of the static mechanical behavior between ProFile GT and ProFile GT series X rotary nickel-titanium files
10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.018 ↗18. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments
10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.004 ↗23. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: Respecting the root canal anatomy--a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation
10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.036 ↗24. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: Removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study
10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.037 ↗25. Procedural errors during root canal preparation using rotary NiTi instruments detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography
10.1590/S0103-64402010000600011 ↗26. Detection of Procedural Errors during Root Canal Instrumentation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
27. “Dentinal microcracks after root canal preparation” a comparative evaluation with hand, rotary and reciprocating instrumentation
31. Joanna Briggs Institute (2014). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual, Joanna Briggs Institute. The Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Evidence.
32. In vitro comparative evaluation of dentinal microcracks formation during root canal preparation by different nickel-titanium file systems
10.4103/sej.sej_23_17 ↗36. Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments
10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.019 ↗37. The effects of different nickel-titanium instruments on dentinal microcrack formations during root canal preparation
10.4103/1305-7456.149638 ↗38. Comparison of incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with continuous rotation and reciprocating instrumentation
10.1016/j.sdj.2015.09.003 ↗39. Evaluation of dentinal defects during root canal preparation using thermomechanically processed nickel-titanium files
10.4103/ejd.ejd_254_16 ↗41. Comparison of dentinal and apical crack formation caused by four different nickel-titanium rotary and reciprocating systems in large and small canal
10.4012/dmj.2015-197 ↗42. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: An SEM study
10.1111/iej.12197 ↗43. Incidence of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with ProTaper Gold, Profile Vortex, F360, Reciproc and ProTaper Universal instruments
10.1111/iej.12541 ↗44. Evaluation of the incidence of microcracks caused by Mtwo and ProTaper Next rotary file systems versus the self-adjusting file: A scanning electron microscopic study
10.4103/JCD.JCD_70_17 ↗47. Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems
10.26650/eor.201972917418 ↗48. Comparison of microcomputed tomography, cone beam tomography, stereomicroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy techniques for detection of microcracks on root dentin and effect of different apical sizes on microcrack formation
10.1002/jemt.23341 ↗54. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth
10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x ↗55. Variations in cyclic fatigue resistance among ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels
10.1111/iej.12471 ↗57. Evaluation of the Efficacy of TRUShape and Reciproc File Systems in the Removal of Root Filling Material: An Ex Vivo Micro-Computed Tomographic Study
10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.005 ↗59. Apically extruded debris after retreatment procedure with Reciproc, ProTaper Next, and Twisted File Adaptive instruments
10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.003 ↗60. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography
10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.038 ↗61. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments
10.1111/iej.12572 ↗64. Reimer, L., and Pfefferkorn, G. (2013). Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie, Springer.