journal article·2020-11-05Open access

Enhancing English-Learning Performance through a Simulation Classroom for EFL Students Using Augmented Reality—A Junior High School Case Study

Yuh-Shihng Chang, Chao-Nan Chen, Chia-Ling Liao

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 21

Abstract

In non-English-speaking countries, students learning EFL (English as a Foreign Language) without a “real” learning environment mostly shows poor English-learning performance. In order to improve the English-learning effectiveness of EFL students, we propose the use of augmented reality (AR) to support situational classroom learning and conduct teaching experiments for situational English learning. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the learning performance of EFL students can be enhanced using augmented reality within a situational context. The learning performance of the experimental student group is validated by means of the attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction (ARCS) model. According to statistical analysis, the experimental teaching method is much more effective than that of the control group (i.e., the traditional teaching method). The learning performance of the experimental group students is obviously enhanced and the feedback of using AR by EFL students is positive. The experimental results reveal that (1) students can concentrate more on the practice of speaking English as a foreign language; (2) the real-life AR scenarios enhanced student confidence in learning English; and (3) applying AR teaching materials in situational context classes can provide near real-life scenarios and improve the learning satisfaction of students.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · Mobile Learning in Education · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, No.57, Sec. 2, Zhongshan Rd., Taiping Dist., Taichung 41170, Taiwan

Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan

Lishin Junior High School, 236, Jiati Road, Dali Dist., Taichung 41170, Taiwan

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Van Diggelen, M.R., and Bruns, M. (July, January 29). Towards a vision for industrial design education. Proceedings of the 43rd SEFI Annual Conference, Orléans, France.
2. Reconsidering research on learning from media10.3102/00346543053004445 ↗
3. Using animations to help students learn computer algorithms10.1518/0018720024497637 ↗
4. Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts10.1080/09588221.2015.1016438 ↗
5. Chang, Y.-S., Hu, K.-J., Chiang, C.-W., and Lugmayr, A. (2020). Applying Mobile Augmented Reality (AR) to Teach Interior Design Students in Layout Plans: Evaluation of Learning Effectiveness Based on the ARCS Model of Learning Motivation Theory. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20010105 ↗
6. Shadiev, R., and Yang, M. (2020). Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12020524 ↗
7. A study of the facilitation of cross-cultural understanding and intercultural sensitivity using speech-enabled language translation technology10.1111/bjet.12648 ↗
8. Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 ↗
9. The viability of computer mediated communication in the Korean secondary EFL classroom
10. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.Y., Huang, Y.M., and Liu, C.J. (2016). Investigating applications of speech totext recognition for face to face seminar to assist learning of non-native English participants. Technol. Pedagog. Educ.10.1080/1475939X.2014.988744 ↗
11. Improving speaking skills through instruction in oral classroom participation10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02452.x ↗
12. Critical issues of m-learning: Design models, adoption processes, and future trends
13. Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter?10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007 ↗
14. To activate English learning: Listen and speak in real life context with an AR featured u-learning system
15. The Case for Using Duolingo as Part of the Language Classroom Experience
16. GSMA (2020, June 12). The Mobile Economy 2019. Available online: https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/?file=b9a6e6202ee1d5f787cfebb95d3639c5&download.
17. Taiwan Communication Survey (TCS) (2020, June 15). The Survey on Mobile Phone Usage Habits of Taiwanese. Available online: http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/epaper/%E7%AC%AC90%E6%9C%9F20190815.htm.
18. Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 201210.1017/S0958344014000287 ↗
19. Early foreign language learning: Implementation of a project in a game-based context10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.575 ↗
20. Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: Implications for educational game design10.1007/s11423-007-9076-z ↗
21. Attewell, J., Da Bormida, G., Sharples, M., and Savill-Smith, C. (2003). Motivation in mobile modern foreign language learning. MLEARN: Learning with Mobile Devices, Learning and Skills Development Agency.
22. Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023 ↗
23. Folmar, D. (2015). Game It Up: Using Gamification to Incentivize Your Library, Rowman & Littlefield.
24. Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching, Longman.
25. Pawlak, M. (2012). Comprehensible pragmatics: Where input and output come together. New Perspectives on Individual Differences in Language Learning and Teaching, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-20850-8 ↗
26. Lightbown, P.M., and Spada, N. (2006). How Languages are Learned, Oxford University Press.
27. Soler, E.A., and Jorda, M.P.S. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0 ↗
28. Ambient Insight (2020, June 12). The 2016–2021 Worldwide Self-paced eLearning Market: Global eLearning Market in Steep Decline. Available online: https://uhlberg-advisory.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/AmbientInsight_The-2016-2021_Worldwide_Self-paced-eLearning_Market.pdf.
29. A review of mobile language learning applications: Trends, challenges and opportunities10.4995/eurocall.2016.6402 ↗
30. Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts10.1080/09588221.2012.733711 ↗
31. Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes10.1017/S0958344014000159 ↗
32. Brisk, M., Burgos, A., and Hamerla, S. (2003). A Window into the World of Bilingual Learners. Situational Context of Education, Routledge.10.4324/9781410609847 ↗
33. Swartz, R.J., and Parks, S. (1994). Infusing the Teaching of Critical and Creative Thinking into Content Instruction, Critical Thinking & Software.
34. MIT (2020, June 13). Introducing TEAL (Technology-Enabled Active Learning). Available online: http://icampus.mit.edu/teal/.
35. Schrier, K. (2006). Using augmented reality games to teach 21st century skills. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators Program (SIGGRAPH ‘06), Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/1179295.1179311 ↗
36. A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018 ↗
37. Augmented reality in the classroom10.1109/MC.2012.111 ↗
38. Augmented reality: A new way of seeing10.1038/scientificamerican0402-48 ↗
39. Augmenting reality: A new paradigm for interacting with computers
40. Khan, D., Rehman, I., Ullah, S., Ahmad, W., Cheng, Z., Jabeen, G., and Kato, H. (2019). A Low-Cost Interactive Writing Board for Primary Education using Distinct Augmented Reality Markers. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11205720 ↗
41. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., and Kishimo, F. (November, January 31). Augmented Reality: A Class of Displays on the Reality- Virtual Continuum. Proceedings of the Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, Boston, MA, USA.
42. Fischer, G., and Scharff, E. (1998). Learning technologies in support of self-directed learning. J. Interact. Media Educ.10.5334/1998-4 ↗
43. Reigeluth, C.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9780203824283 ↗
44. Study on the Evaluation of Students’ Learning Movtivation Indicators from Using Facebook Communities—Talking the Culture Thinking and Creation of Digital Photography as an Example
45. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design10.1007/BF02905780 ↗
46. Five fundamental requirements for motivation and volition in technology-assisted distributed learning environments
47. Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway10.1016/0304-422X(80)90013-3 ↗
48. (2020, June 13). HP Reveal. Available online: https://dgs.lungteng.com.tw/tf/tool.html?id=2.
49. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, Jossey-Bass.
50. Chambers, A. (1991). The Reading Environment, Thimble Press.
51. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., and Renninger, K. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Psychology Press.
52. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill.
53. Keller, J.M., and Suzuki, K. (1998). Use of ARCS Motivation Model in Courseware Design in Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware, Erlbaum.
54. Taran, C.N. (2005, January 5–8). Motivation techniques in eLearning. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.10.1109/ICALT.2005.206 ↗
55. Amin, I.M., Isa, W.A., Sidek, A.F., Ibrahim, H., and Zulkipli, Z.A. (2013, January 7–9). Investigating motivational dimensions for e-learning: A case study of dental students. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC), Langkawi, Malaysia.10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560118 ↗