A Critical Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Use in Architecture and Urbanism: Scientometric and Bibliometric Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years the use of UAVs (Unmanned aerial vehicles) have proliferated in the civil sector for purposes such as search and rescue, remote sensing or real-time monitoring of road traffic, among others. In the architecture, engineering and construction fields (AEC) UAVs have demonstrated to be an ideal technology due to their optimal performance in terms of time, precision, safety and cost. Given the rapid growth of interest in this technology, this research presents a critical review of the literature on the use of UAVs in architecture and urbanism to define the most widely used techniques and delimit the fields of application based on the experimentation published by the scientific community. A scientific mapping was carried out in two stages using the VOSviewerTM software: a scientometric and a bibliometric analysis. This technique allowed us to analyse a large body of literature and bibliographic data to obtain trends, patterns and directions of this domain of knowledge. Then, a literature review was presented, highlighting the relevant information identified in the previous analysis. The fields of application of UAVs were delimited and the most commonly used payload types and the most appropriate post-processing techniques were specified, depending on the aerial mission objective. The fields of application identified included different techniques related to the generation of 3D models, land mapping, construction site monitoring, building surveying to detect structural damage and energy losses and urban remote sensing. The literature review showed that UAVs provide a useful multi-tasking tool at any stage of an architectural project. These techniques can be applied to buildings or public spaces from the design and construction processes when the project is initiated to the later stages of maintenance and inspection of the building during its life cycle.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Archaeological Research and Protection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Programa de Doctorado de Ciencia y Tecnología Industrial y Ambiental, Centro de Investigación en Tecnología, Energía y Sostenibilidad—CITES, Campus El Carmen, Universidad de Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain
TEP192 Control y Robótica, Centro de Investigación en Tecnología, Energía y Sostenibilidad—CITES, Campus El Carmen, Universidad de Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system10.1016/j.autcon.2014.01.004 ↗
2. 3D reconstruction of disaster scenes for urban search and rescue10.1007/s11042-017-5450-y ↗
3. Monitoring of gas pipelines—A civil UAV application10.1108/00022660510617077 ↗
4. De Exploratory study of using unmanned aerial system imagery for construction site 3D mapping10.1108/CI-05-2017-0049 ↗
5. Sarabia, R., Aquino, A., Ponce, J.M., López, G., and Andújar, J.M. (2020). Automated identification of crop tree crowns from uav multispectral imagery by means of morphological image analysis. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12050748 ↗
6. Last mile delivery by drones: An estimation of viable market potential and access to citizens across European cities10.1186/s12544-019-0368-2 ↗
7. Unmanned aerial vehicle scheduling problem for traffic monitoring10.1016/j.cie.2018.05.039 ↗
8. Designing UAV Surveillance Frameworks for Smart City and Extensive Ocean with Differential Perspectives10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700444 ↗
9. Demonstration and application of diffusive and ballistic wave propagation for drone-to-ground and drone-to-drone wireless communications10.1038/s41598-020-71733-0 ↗
10. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909530 ↗
11. A systematic review of unmanned aerial vehicle application areas and technologies in the AEC domain
12. Visual monitoring of civil infrastructure systems via camera-equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A review of related works10.1186/s40327-015-0029-z ↗
13. Barriers to adoption of RPAs on construction projects: A task–technology fit perspective10.1108/CI-09-2018-0074 ↗
14. Chen, C., Dubin, R., and Schultz, T. (2014). Science Mapping. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, IGI Global. [3rd ed.].10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch410 ↗
15. Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools10.1002/asi.21525 ↗
16. Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces10.1007/BF02457414 ↗
17. Mapping research specialties10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113 ↗
18. Visualizing knowledge domains10.1002/aris.1440370106 ↗
19. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8 ↗
20. Unmanned aerial system applications in construction: A systematic review10.1108/CI-02-2018-0010 ↗
21. Applications of UAVs in Civil Infrastructure10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000464 ↗
22. A review of rotorcraft unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) developments and applications in civil engineering10.12989/sss.2014.13.6.1065 ↗
23. Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A Scientometric analysis10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002 ↗
24. Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature
25. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF ↗
26. Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and scopus10.1002/asi.21062 ↗
27. A bibliometric review of green building research 2000–201610.1080/00038628.2018.1485548 ↗
28. Citation Counting, Citation Ranking, and h-Index of Human-Computer Interaction Researchers: A Comparison of Scopus and Web of Science10.1002/asi.20874 ↗
29. (2020, September 01). Scopus. Available online: https://scopus.com.
30. Rete-netzwerk-red: Analyzing and visualizing scholarly networks using the Network Workbench Tool10.1007/s11192-009-0149-0 ↗
31. Visualizing Bibliometric Networks
32. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 ↗
33. Garrigos-Simon, F.J., Narangajavana-Kaosiri, Y., and Lengua-Lengua, I. (2018). Tourism and sustainability: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. Sustainabilty, 10.10.3390/su10061976 ↗
34. Global Research Patterns on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)10.1007/s10712-018-9475-1 ↗
35. Floating treatment wetlands: A review and bibliometric analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136776 ↗
36. Niñerola, A., Sánchez-Rebull, M.V., and Hernández-Lara, A.B. (2019). Tourism research on sustainability: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainabilty, 11.10.3390/su11051377 ↗
37. Gough, M., Santos, S.F., Javadi, M., Castro, R., and Catalão, J.P.S. (2020). Prosumer flexibility: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review and scientometric analysis. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13112710 ↗
38. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 ↗
39. (2020, November 05). VOSviewer. Available online: https://vosviewer.com.
40. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 ↗
41. UAV-based urban structural damage assessment using object-based image analysis and semantic reasoning10.5194/nhess-15-1087-2015 ↗
42. Identification of damage in buildings based on gaps in 3D point clouds from very high resolution oblique airborne images10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.016 ↗
43. Duarte, D., Nex, F., Kerle, N., and Vosselman, G. (2018). Multi-resolution feature fusion for image classification of building damages with convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101636 ↗
44. Nex, F., Duarte, D., Tonolo, F.G., and Kerle, N. (2019). Structural building damage detection with deep learning: Assessment of a state-of-the-art CNN in operational conditions. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11232765 ↗
45. Kerle, N., Nex, F., Gerke, M., Duarte, D., and Vetrivel, A. (2019). UAV-based structural damage mapping: A review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, 9.10.3390/ijgi9010014 ↗
46. Potential of big visual data and building information modeling for construction performance analytics: An exploratory study10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.004 ↗
47. Automated content-based filtering for enhanced vision-based documentation in construction toward exploiting big visual data from drones10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102831 ↗
48. Geotechnical and safety protective equipment planning using range point cloud data and rule checking in building information modeling10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.002 ↗
49. Heat map generation for predictive safety planning: Preventing struck-by and near miss interactions between workers-on-foot and construction equipment10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.008 ↗
50. UAV-enabled intelligent transportation systems for the smart city: Applications and challenges10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600238CM ↗
51. A Multidimensional Framework for Unmanned Aerial System Applications in Construction Project Management10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000597 ↗
52. View planning for multi-view stereo 3D Reconstruction using an autonomous multicopter10.1007/s10846-011-9576-2 ↗
53. Coverage path planning with unmanned aerial vehicles for 3D terrain reconstruction10.1016/j.eswa.2016.02.007 ↗
54. UAV vs classical aerial photogrammetry for archaeological studies
55. Direct georeferencing of ultrahigh-resolution UAV imagery10.1109/TGRS.2013.2265295 ↗
56. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x ↗
57. Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry: A multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007 ↗
58. Low-cost aerial unit for outdoor inspection of building façades10.1016/j.autcon.2013.08.020 ↗
59. Construction automation: Research areas, industry concerns and suggestions for advancement10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.028 ↗
60. Integrating BIM and LiDAR for Real-Time Construction Quality Control10.1007/s10846-014-0116-8 ↗
61. An integrated UGV-UAV system for construction site data collection10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103068 ↗
62. UAV-based automatic generation of high-resolution panorama at a construction site with a focus on preprocessing for image stitching10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.031 ↗
63. Kim, S., Kim, S., and Lee, D.E. (2020). Sustainable application of hybrid point cloud and BIM method for tracking construction progress. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12104106 ↗
64. Field Test-Based UAS Operational Procedures and Considerations for Construction Safety Management: A Qualitative Exploratory Study10.1007/s40999-020-00512-9 ↗
65. Visualization technology-based construction safety management: A review10.1016/j.autcon.2016.10.004 ↗
66. UAV photogrammetry in the post-earthquake scenario: Case studies in L’Aquila10.1080/19475705.2016.1176605 ↗
67. Choi, J., Yeum, C.M., Dyke, S.J., and Jahanshahi, M.R. (2018). Computer-aided approach for rapid post-event visual evaluation of a building Façade. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18093017 ↗
68. Modeling and deterioration mapping of façades in historical urban context by close-range ultra-lightweight UAVs photogrammetry10.1080/15583058.2018.1440030 ↗
69. Image-based methods for metric surveys of buildings using modern optical sensors and tools: From 2D approach to 3D and vice versa
70. Fast 3D reconstruction method based on UAV photography10.4218/etrij.2017-0298 ↗
71. Autonomous UAVs for Structural Health Monitoring Using Deep Learning and an Ultrasonic Beacon System with Geo-Tagging10.1111/mice.12375 ↗
72. Crowdsourcing earthquake damage assessment using remote sensing imagery
73. Malihi, S., Zoej, M.J.V., and Hahn, M. (2018). Large-scale accurate reconstruction of buildings employing point clouds generated from UAV imagery. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10071148 ↗
74. Yan, Y., Gao, F., Deng, S., and Su, N. (2017). A hierarchical building segmentation in digital surface models for 3D reconstruction. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17020222 ↗
75. Unsupervised Detection of Earthquake-Triggered Roof-Holes from UAV Images Using Joint Color and Shape Features10.1109/LGRS.2015.2429894 ↗
76. Hay, G.J., and Castilla, G. (2008). Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A New Name for a New Discipline, Springer. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography; Chapter: 1.4.
77. Seismic damage information extent about the buildings based on low-altitude remote sensing images of mianzu quake-stricken areas
78. Perez, H., Tah, J.H.M., and Mosavi, A. (2019). Deep Learning for Detecting Building Defects Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Sensors, 19.10.20944/preprints201908.0068.v1 ↗
79. Automated regional seismic damage assessment of buildings using an unmanned aerial vehicle and a convolutional neural network10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102994 ↗
80. Use of active learning for earthquake damage mapping from UAV photogrammetric point clouds10.1080/01431161.2018.1466083 ↗
81. Gong, L., Wang, C., Wu, F., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., and Li, Q. (2016). Earthquake-induced building damage detection with post-event sub-meter VHR terrasar-X staring spotlight imagery. Remote Sens., 8.10.3390/rs8110887 ↗
82. Real-time crack assessment using deep neural networks with wall-climbing unmanned aerial system10.1111/mice.12519 ↗
83. Rapid urban flood damage assessment using high resolution remote sensing data and an object-based approach10.1080/19475705.2020.1760360 ↗
84. Fusion of satellite, aircraft, and UAV data for automatic disaster damage assessment10.1080/01431161.2017.1294780 ↗
85. A Multidisciplinary Study on the Seismic Vulnerability of St. Agostino Church in Amatrice following the 2016 Seismic Sequence10.1080/15583058.2019.1575929 ↗
86. Identifying damage caused by the 2008 wenchuan earthquake from VHR remote sensing data10.1080/17538940902767401 ↗
87. Review of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) applications in the built environment: Towards automated building inspection procedures using drones10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.002 ↗
88. Hoon, Y.J., and Hong, S. (2019). Three-dimensional digital documentation of cultural heritage site based on the convergence of terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8020053 ↗
89. Improving archaeological prospection using localized UAVs assisted photogrammetry: An example from the Roman Gold District of the Eria River Valley (NW Spain)
90. Cultural heritage 3D modelling and visualisation within an augmented reality environment, based on geographic information technologies and mobile platforms10.5821/ace.11.33.4686 ↗
91. Tridimensional reconstruction applied to cultural heritage with the use of camera-equipped UAV and terrestrial laser scanner10.3390/rs61110413 ↗
92. Accuracy assessment of low cost UAV based city modelling for urban planning
93. Crommelinck, S., Bennett, R., Gerke, M., Nex, F., Yang, M.Y., and Vosselman, G. (2016). Review of automatic feature extraction from high-resolution optical sensor data for UAV-based cadastral mapping. Remote Sens., 8.10.3390/rs8080689 ↗
94. Urban 3D segmentation and modelling from street view images and LiDAR point clouds10.1007/s00138-017-0845-3 ↗
95. Automatic classification of urban ground elements from mobile laser scanning data10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.004 ↗
96. Automatic building information model reconstruction in high-density urban areas: Augmenting multi-source data with architectural knowledge10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.009 ↗
97. Melgar, S.G., Bohórquez, M.Á.M., and Márquez, J.M.A. (2018). UhuMEB: Design, construction, and management methodology of minimum energy buildings in subtropical climates. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11102745 ↗
98. Gómez Melgar, S., Martínez Bohórquez, M.Á., and Andújar Márquez, J.M. (2020). uhuMEBr: Energy Refurbishment of Existing Buildings in Subtropical Climates to Become Minimum Energy Buildings. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13051204 ↗
99. Improving the detection of thermal bridges in buildings via on-site infrared thermography: The potentialities of innovative mathematical tools10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.10.017 ↗
100. Evaluation of building materials using infrared thermography10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.049 ↗