Organ-on-a-Chip: Design and Simulation of Various Microfluidic Channel Geometries for the Influence of Fluid Dynamic Parameters
Source abstract
Abstract
Shear stress, pressure, and flow rate are fluid dynamic parameters that can lead to changes in the morphology, proliferation, function, and survival of many cell types and have a determinant impact on tissue function and viability. Microfluidic devices are promising tools to investigate these parameters and fluid behaviour within different microchannel geometries. This study discusses and analyses different designed microfluidic channel geometries regarding the influence of fluid dynamic parameters on their microenvironment at specified fluidic parameters. The results demonstrate that in the circular microchamber, the velocity and shear stress profiles assume a parabolic shape with a maximum velocity occurring in the centre of the chamber and a minimum velocity at the walls. The longitudinal microchannel shows a uniform velocity and shear stress profile throughout the microchannel. Simulation studies for the two geometries with three parallel microchannels showed that in proximity to the micropillars, the velocity and shear stress profiles decreased. Moreover, the pressure is inversely proportional to the width and directly proportional to the flow rate within the microfluidic channels. The simulations showed that the velocity and wall shear stress indicated different values at different flow rates. It was also found that the width and height of the microfluidic channels could affect both velocity and shear stress profiles, contributing to the control of shear stress. The study has demonstrated strategies to predict and control the effects of these forces and the potential as an alternative to conventional cell culture as well as to recapitulate the cell- and organ-specific microenvironment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, London UB8 3PH, UK
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: Revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30318-3 ↗
2. Estimated research and development investment needed to bring a new medicine to market10.1001/jama.2020.1166 ↗
3. Biomaterial-enhanced cell, and drug delivery: Lessons learned in the cardiac field and future perspectives10.1002/adma.201505349 ↗
4. Stem cell therapy in heart diseases- cell types, mechanisms, and improvement strategies10.1159/000492704 ↗
5. Biodegradable polymer scaffold for tissue engineering
6. Cardiac tissue engineering10.1097/01.JCN.0000343562.06614.49 ↗
7. Cardiac tissue engineering10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.300522 ↗
8. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: Using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart10.1038/nm1684 ↗
9. Will heart valve tissue engineering change the world?10.1038/ncpcardio0112 ↗
10. Bicompartmental device for dynamic cell coculture: Design, realization and preliminary results10.1263/jbb.105.536 ↗
11. Microfluidic bioreactors for cell culturing: A review10.2174/1876402911103020137 ↗
12. 30 years of microfluidics10.1016/j.mne.2019.01.003 ↗
13. Go with the flow: Modeling unique biological flows in engineered in vitro platforms10.1039/D1LC00014D ↗
14. Microfluidic organs-on-chip10.1038/nbt.2989 ↗
15. Gut-on-a-chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation10.1039/c3ib40126j ↗
16. Organ/body-on-a-chip based on microfluidic technology for drug discovery10.1016/j.dmpk.2017.11.003 ↗
17. Laminar flows: Subcellular positioning of small molecules10.1038/35082637 ↗
18. Organ-on-a-chip platforms for accelerating the evaluation of nanomedicine
19. Carvalho, V., Rodrigues, R.O., Lima, R.A., and Teixeira, S. (2021). Computational Simulations in Advanced Microfluidic Devices: A Review. Micromachines, 12.10.3390/mi12101149 ↗
20. I-Wire Heart-on-a-Chip I: Three-dimensional cardiac tissue constructs for physiology and pharmacology10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.009 ↗
21. Developmentally inspired human organs on chips10.1242/dev.156125 ↗
22. Heart-on-a-Chip: An investigation of the influence of static and perfusion conditions on cardiac (H9C2) cell proliferation, morphology, and alignment10.1177/2472630317705610 ↗
23. Atmaramani, R., Black, B.J., Lam, K.H., Sheth, V.M., Pancrazio, J.J., Schmidtke, D.W., and Alsmadi, N.Z. (2019). The effect of microfluidic geometry on myoblast migration. Micromachines, 10.10.3390/mi10020143 ↗
24. Stretchable Inertial Microfluidic Device for Tunable Particle Separation10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02294 ↗
25. Microsystem with micropillar array for three-(gel-embedded) and two-dimensional cardiac cell culture10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.186 ↗
26. Effect of channel geometry on cell adhesion in microfluidic devices10.1039/B813516A ↗
27. Advances in numerical approaches for microfluidic cell analysis platforms10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.07.008 ↗
28. A Microfluidic Device for Imaging Samples from Microbial Suspension Cultures10.1016/j.mex.2020.100891 ↗
29. Phenotype transformation of aortic valve interstitial cells due to applied shear stresses within a microfluidic chip10.1007/s10439-017-1871-z ↗
30. Development of the microfluidic device to regulate shear stress gradients10.1007/s13206-018-2407-9 ↗
31. Modelling cancer in microfluidic human organs-on-chips10.1038/s41568-018-0104-6 ↗
32. Jigar, P.H., Kent, N.J., Knox, A.J.S., and Harris, L.F. (2020). Microfluidics in Haemostasis: A Review. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25040833 ↗
33. High-throughput organ-on-chip platform with integrated programmable fluid flow and real-time sensing for complex tissue models in drug development workflows10.1039/D1LC00067E ↗
34. Hemodynamic study in 3D printed stenotic coronary artery models: Experimental validation and transient simulation10.1080/10255842.2020.1842377 ↗
35. Carvalho, V., Rodrigues, N., Ribeiro, R., Costa, P.F., Lima, R.A., and Teixeira, S.F. (2020). 3D printed biomodels for flow visualization in stenotic vessels: An experimental and numerical study. Micromachines, 11.10.3390/mi11060549 ↗
36. Geometrical effects in the hemodynamics of stenotic and non-stenotic left coronary arteries—Numerical and in vitro approaches10.1002/cnm.3207 ↗
37. Mosavati, B., Oleinikov, A.V., and Du, E. (2020). Development of an organ-on-a-chip-device for study of placental pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21228755 ↗
38. Development of a microfluidic device with precise on-chip temperature control by integrated cooling and heating components for single cell-based analysis10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.135 ↗
39. Examining metastatic behavior within 3D bioprinted vasculature for the validation of a 3D computational flow model10.1126/sciadv.abb3308 ↗
40. Acoustofluidics 1: Governing equations in microfluidics10.1039/c1lc20658c ↗
41. Spurk, J., and Aksel, N. (2008). Fluid Mechanics, Springer. [2nd ed.].
42. Hydrodynamics in cell studies10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00317 ↗
43. Schlichting, H., Gersten, K., Krause, E., and Oertel, H. (2017). Boundary-Layer Theory, Springer. [9th ed.].10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5 ↗
44. Assessment of the flow velocity of blood cells in a microfluidic device using joint spectral and time domain optical coherence tomography10.1364/OE.21.024025 ↗
45. Microfluidic-based hydrodynamic trap: Design and implementation10.1039/c0lc00709a ↗
46. The geometry effect on steady electrokinetic flows in curved rectangular microchannels10.1063/1.3427572 ↗
47. Lab-on-a-chip technologies for stem cell analysis10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.03.004 ↗
48. Characterization of in vitro endothelial linings grown within microfluidic channels10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0371 ↗
49. Comparison of abdominal aortic hemodynamic between men and women at rest and during lower limb exercise10.1067/mva.2002.107 ↗
50. Abdominal aortic hemodynamic conditions in healthy subjects aged 50–70 at rest and during lower limb exercise: In vivo quantification using MRI10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00099-6 ↗
51. Volume flow and wall shear stress quantification in the human conjunctival capillaries and post-capillary venules in-vivo
52. Tsao, C., Yeh, L., and Cheng, Y. (2014, January 28–31). Mechanical-stress microfluidic device for stem cell stimulation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Nanoelectronics Conference (INEC), Sapporo, Japan.10.1109/INEC.2014.7460332 ↗
53. The role of the dynamics of focal adhesion kinase in the mechanotaxis of endothelial cells10.1073/pnas.052018099 ↗
54. Simulation of organ-on-a-chip systems. New Technologies and Future Prospects
55. A zero-flow microfluidics for long-term cell culture and detection10.1063/1.4904071 ↗
56. Numerical Analysis of a Trapezoidal Microchannel for Hydrodynamic Detachment of Cells
57. Living on the edge: Transfer and traffic of E. coli in a confined flow10.1039/C5SM00939A ↗
58. Nam, U., Kim, S., Park, J., and Jeon, J.S. (2020). Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Vascular Inflammation Model on Microfluidic Chip. Micromachines, 11.10.3390/mi11080747 ↗
59. Poon, C. (2020). Measuring the density and viscosity of culture media for optimized computational fluid dynamics analysis of in vitro devices. bioRxiv.10.1101/2020.08.25.266221 ↗
60. High interstitial fluid pressure—An obstacle in cancer therapy10.1038/nrc1456 ↗
61. A Microfluidic System to Study the Cytotoxic Effect of Drugs: The Combined Effect of Celecoxib and 5-Fluorouracil on Normal and Cancer Cells10.1007/s00604-013-1009-4 ↗