Development of a Novel Hybrid Intelligence Approach for Landslide Spatial Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
We proposed an innovative hybrid intelligent approach, namely, the multiboost based naïve bayes trees (MBNBT) method for the spatial prediction of landslides in the Mu Cang Chai District of Yen Bai Province, Vietnam. The MBNBT, which is an ensemble of the multiboost (MB) and naïve bayes trees (NBT) base classifier, has rarely been applied for landslide susceptibility mapping around the world. For the modeling, we selected 248 landslide locations in the hilly terrain of the study area. Fifteen landslide conditioning factors were selected for the construction of the database based on the one-R attribute evaluation (ORAE) technique. Model validation was done using statistical metrics, namely, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Performance of the hybrid model was evaluated and compared with popular soft computing benchmark models, namely, multiple perceptron neural network (MLPN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and single NBT. Results indicated that the proposed MBNBT (AUC = 0.824) model outperformed the popular models, namely, the MLPN (AUC = 0.804), SVM (AUC = 0.804), and NBT (AUC = 0.800) models. Analysis of the model results also suggested that the MB meta classifier ensemble model could enhance the prediction power of the NBT model. Therefore, the MBNBT is a suitable method for the assessment of landslide susceptibility in landslide prone areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Fire effects on ecosystems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Vietnam Academy for Water Resources, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
Department of Resource and Environment Management, School of Agriculture and Resources, Vinh University, Vinh 460000, Vietnam
Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran
Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 66177-15175, Iran
Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan 87317-53153, Iran
Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sanandaj 66169-49688, Iran
Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran 14178-53933, Iran
Department of Science & Technology, Bhaskarcharya Institute for Space Applications and Geo-Informatics (BISAG), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar 382007, India
Institute of Geological Sciences, Vietnam Academy of Sciences and Technology, 84 Chua Lang Street, Dong da, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Hydraulic Construction Institute, Vietnam Academy for Water Resources, 3/95 Chua Boc Street, Ha Noi 100000, Viet Nam
NTT Hi-Tech Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
Geoscience Platform Research Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), 124, Gwahak-ro Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34132, Korea
Department of Geophysical Exploration, Korea University of Science and Technology, 217 Gajeong-ro Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Korea
Geographic Information System group, Department of Business and IT, University College of Southeast Norway, N-3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway
References (98)
Show source-provided references
1. Landslide hazard assessment: Summary review and new perspectives10.1007/s100640050066 ↗
2. Combining neural network with fuzzy, certainty factor and likelihood ratio concepts for spatial prediction of landslides10.1007/s11069-011-9847-z ↗
3. A comparative study between popular statistical and machine learning methods for simulating volume of landslides10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.016 ↗
4. Assessing landslide hazards10.1126/science.1143308 ↗
5. The algorithmic complexity of landscapes10.1080/01426397.2011.650628 ↗
6. Mathematical modelling of land use and landscape complexity with ultrametric topology10.1080/1747423X.2011.637136 ↗
7. Landslide risk assessment and management: An overview10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00093-X ↗
8. GIS based spatial data analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1007/s11629-008-0052-9 ↗
9. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Bagging Ensemble Based Alternating Decision Trees, Logistic Regression and J48 Decision Trees Methods: A Comparative Study10.1007/s10706-017-0264-2 ↗
10. Application and comparison of decision tree-based machine learning methods in landside susceptibility assessment at Pauri Garhwal Area, Uttarakhand, India10.1007/s40710-017-0248-5 ↗
11. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.002 ↗
12. Evaluation and comparison of LogitBoost Ensemble, Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Analysis, logistic regression and support vector machines methods for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/10106049.2017.1404141 ↗
13. A comparative study of sequential minimal optimization-based support vector machines, vote feature intervals, and logistic regression in landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS10.1007/s12665-017-6689-3 ↗
14. Pham, B.T., and Prakash, I. (2018). Machine learning methods of kernel logistic regression and classification and regression trees for landslide susceptibility assessment at part of Himalayan area, India. Indian J. Sci. Technol., 11.10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i12/99745 ↗
15. A hybrid machine learning ensemble approach based on a radial basis function neural network and rotation forest for landslide susceptibility modeling: A case study in the Himalayan area, India10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.09.008 ↗
16. GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using logistic regression model10.1080/19475705.2010.532975 ↗
17. A GIS-based logistic regression model in rock-fall susceptibility mapping along a mountainous road: Salavat Abad case study, Kurdistan, Iran10.1007/s11069-012-0321-3 ↗
18. Nguyen, V.V., Pham, B.T., Vu, B.T., Prakash, I., Jha, S., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Ba, D.N., Kumar, R., and Chatterjee, J.M. (2019). Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling. Forests, 10.10.3390/f10020157 ↗
19. Chen, W., Zhao, X., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Khosravi, K., Chai, H., Zhang, S., Zhang, L., Ma, J., and Chen, Y. (2019). Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree. Geocarto Int., 1–25.10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 ↗
20. A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the MultiBoost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1007/s10064-018-1281-y ↗
21. A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.011 ↗
22. Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal10.1016/j.cageo.2012.11.003 ↗
23. Self-compacting concrete strength prediction using surrogate models10.1007/s00521-017-3007-7 ↗
24. Chen, H., Asteris, P.G., Jahed Armaghani, D., Gordan, B., and Pham, B.T. (2019). Assessing Dynamic Conditions of the Retaining Wall: Developing Two Hybrid Intelligent Models. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061042 ↗
25. A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266 ↗
26. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.011 ↗
27. Evaluation of predictive ability of support vector machines and naive Bayes trees methods for spatial prediction of landslides in Uttarakhand state (India) using GIS
28. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey)10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.007 ↗
29. Landslide susceptibility assesssment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: A comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods
30. Thai Pham, B., Bui, D.T., and Prakash, I. (2019). Landslide susceptibility modelling using different advanced decision trees methods. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 1–19.10.1080/10286608.2019.1568418 ↗
31. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: A comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster–Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.005 ↗
32. Landslide susceptibility assessment at a part of Uttarakhand Himalaya, India using GIS–based statistical approach of frequency ratio method
33. A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.005 ↗
34. Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using hybrid integration approach of Least-Squares Support Vector Machines and differential evolution optimization: A case study in Central Vietnam10.1080/17538947.2016.1169561 ↗
35. Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach10.1007/s12665-016-6374-y ↗
36. Shirzadi, A., Soliamani, K., Habibnejhad, M., Kavian, A., Chapi, K., Shahabi, H., Chen, W., Khosravi, K., Thai Pham, B., and Pradhan, B. (2018). Novel GIS based machine learning algorithms for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18113777 ↗
37. Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.114 ↗
38. Tien Bui, D., Khosravi, K., Li, S., Shahabi, H., Panahi, M., Singh, V., Chapi, K., Shirzadi, A., Panahi, S., and Chen, W. (2018). New hybrids of anfis with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling. Water, 10.10.3390/w10091210 ↗
39. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Hoang, N.-D., Pham, B., Bui, Q.-T., Tran, C.-T., Panahi, M., and Bin Ahamd, B. (2018). A novel integrated approach of relevance vector machine optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm for spatial modeling of shallow landslides. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101538 ↗
40. Ahmadlou, M., Karimi, M., Alizadeh, S., Shirzadi, A., Parvinnejhad, D., Shahabi, H., and Panahi, M. (2018). Flood susceptibility assessment using integration of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and BAT algorithms (BA). Geocarto Int., 1–21.10.1080/10106049.2018.1474276 ↗
41. Novel hybrid evolutionary algorithms for spatial prediction of floods10.1038/s41598-018-33755-7 ↗
42. Nohani, E., Moharrami, M., Sharafi, S., Khosravi, K., Pradhan, B., Pham, B.T., Lee, S., and Melesse, A.M. (2019). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Different GIS-Based Bivariate Models. Water, 11.10.3390/w11071402 ↗
43. Pham, B.T., Tien Bui, D., Pham, H.V., Le, H.Q., Prakash, I., and Dholakia, M.B. (2016). Landslide Hazard Assessment Using Random SubSpace Fuzzy Rules Based Classifier Ensemble and Probability Analysis of Rainfall Data: A Case Study at Mu Cang Chai District, Yen Bai Province (Viet Nam). J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 1–11.10.1007/s12524-016-0620-3 ↗
44. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Omidvar, E., Shirzadi, A., Geertsema, M., Clague, J.J., Khosravi, K., Pradhan, B., Pham, B.T., and Chapi, K. (2019). Shallow landslide prediction using a novel hybrid functional machine learning algorithm. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11080931 ↗
45. Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221 ↗
46. Thai Pham, B., Prakash, I., Dou, J., Singh, S.K., Trinh, P.T., Trung Tran, H., Minh Le, T., Tran, V.P., Kim Khoi, D., and Shirzadi, A. (2018). A novel hybrid approach of landslide susceptibility modeling using rotation forest ensemble and different base classifiers. Geocarto Int., 1–38.
47. Dou, J., Yunus, A.P., Tien Bui, D., Sahana, M., Chen, C.-W., Zhu, Z., Wang, W., and Pham, B.T. (2019). Evaluating GIS-Based Multiple Statistical Models and Data Mining for Earthquake and Rainfall-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Using the LiDAR DEM. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11060638 ↗
48. Van, T.T., Anh, D.T., Hieu, H.H., Giap, N.X., Ke, T.D., Nam, T.D., Ngoc, D., Ngoc, D.T.Y., Thai, T.N., and Thang, D.V. (2006). Investigation and Assessment of the Current Status and Potential of Landslides in Some Sections of the Ho Chi Minh Road, National Road 1A and Proposed Remedial Measures to Prevent Landslides from Threat of Safety of People, Property, and Infrastructure, Vietnam Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources.
49. Tien Bui, D. (2012). Modeling of Rainfall-Induced Landslide Hazard for the Hoa Binh Province of Vietnam. [Ph.D Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences].
50. NCEP (2018, August 15). Global Weather Data for SWAT, Available online: http://globalweather.tamu.edu/home.
51. MultiBoost: A multi-purpose boosting package
52. Multiboosting: A technique for combining boosting and wagging10.1023/A:1007659514849 ↗
53. Kelarev, A.V., Stranieri, A., Yearwood, J., and Jelinek, H.F. (2012, January 26–28). Empirical study of decision trees and ensemble classifiers for monitoring of diabetes patients in pervasive healthcare. Proceedings of the 2012 15th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS), Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/NBiS.2012.20 ↗
54. Tama, B.A., and Rhee, K.H. (2015). A combination of PSO-based feature selection and tree-based classifiers ensemble for intrusion detection systems. Advances in Computer Science and Ubiquitous Computing, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-0281-6_71 ↗
55. Kohavi, R. (1996, January 2–4). Scaling Up the Accuracy of Naive-Bayes Classifiers: A Decision-Tree Hybrid. Proceedings of the KDD, Portland, OR, USA.
56. Natarajan, R., and Pednault, E. (2002, January 11–13). Segmented regression estimators for massive data sets. Proceedings of the 2002 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Arlington, VA, USA.10.1137/1.9781611972726.33 ↗
57. Salama, M.A., Soliman, O.S., Maglogiannis, I., Hassanien, A.E., and Fahmy, A.A. (2013). Rough set-based identification of heart valve diseases using heart sounds. Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems-Professor Zdzisław Pawlak in Memoriam, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30341-8_25 ↗
58. Vapnik, V. (1995). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 ↗
59. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
60. An Ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064 ↗
61. Tien Bui, D., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Alizadeh, M., Chen, W., Mohammadi, A., Ahmad, B., Panahi, M., and Hong, H. (2018). Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping by airsar data using support vector machine and index of entropy models in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101527 ↗
62. An enhanced Support Vector Machine classification framework by using Euclidean distance function for text document categorization10.1007/s10489-011-0314-z ↗
63. Asteris, P., Roussis, P., and Douvika, M. (2017). Feed-forward neural network prediction of the mechanical properties of sandcrete materials. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17061344 ↗
64. Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: Case study of Youngin, Korea10.1007/s10346-007-0088-x ↗
65. Krill herd algorithm-based neural network in structural seismic reliability evaluation10.1080/15376494.2018.1430874 ↗
66. Asteris, P.G., and Nikoo, M. (2019). Artificial bee colony-based neural network for the prediction of the fundamental period of infilled frame structures. Neural Comput. Appl., 1–11.10.1007/s00521-018-03965-1 ↗
67. Simulation of blasting-induced air overpressure by means of artificial neural networks
68. An optimized ANN model based on genetic algorithm for predicting ripping production10.1007/s00521-016-2359-8 ↗
69. Modeling of masonry failure surface under biaxial compressive stress using Neural Networks10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.041 ↗
70. Asteris, P.G., Tsaris, A.K., Cavaleri, L., Repapis, C.C., Papalou, A., Di Trapani, F., and Karypidis, D.F. (2016). Prediction of the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures using artificial neural networks. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2016.10.1155/2016/5104907 ↗
71. Anisotropic masonry failure criterion using artificial neural networks10.1007/s00521-016-2181-3 ↗
72. Application of artificial neural network for predicting shaft and tip resistances of concrete piles10.15446/esrj.v19n1.38712 ↗
73. Prediction of self-compacting concrete strength using artificial neural networks10.1080/19648189.2016.1246693 ↗
74. Landslide susceptibility mapping using geological data, a DEM from ASTER images and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.006 ↗
75. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: A comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms10.1007/s12517-012-0610-x ↗
76. Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: A land transformation model10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00015-1 ↗
77. A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely-sensed multi-spectral imagery10.1080/01431169508954607 ↗
78. Machine learning feature selection methods for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1007/s11004-013-9511-0 ↗
79. Quinlan, J.R. (2014). C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning, Elsevier.
80. A novel ensemble classifier of rotation forest and Naïve Bayer for landslide susceptibility assessment at the Luc Yen district, Yen Bai Province (Viet Nam) using GIS10.1080/19475705.2016.1255667 ↗
81. Pham, B.T., Prakash, I., Khosravi, K., Chapi, K., Trinh, P.T., Ngo, T.Q., Hosseini, S.V., and Bui, D.T. (2018). A comparison of Support Vector Machines and Bayesian algorithms for landslide susceptibility modelling. Geocarto Int., 1–23.10.1080/10106049.2018.1489422 ↗
82. Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets10.1023/A:1022631118932 ↗
83. A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Uttarakhand area (India)10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.005 ↗
84. A comparative study of least square support vector machines and multiclass alternating decision trees for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced landslides in a tropical cyclones area10.1007/s10706-016-9990-0 ↗
85. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and naïve Bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China10.1080/19475705.2017.1401560 ↗
86. Landslide susceptibility modeling using Reduced Error Pruning Trees and different ensemble techniques: Hybrid machine learning approaches10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018 ↗
87. Rock fall susceptibility assessment along a mountainous road: An evaluation of bivariate statistic, analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio10.1007/s12665-017-6471-6 ↗
88. Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning Area, China: A comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods10.1007/s11069-018-3536-0 ↗
89. Uncertainties of prediction accuracy in shallow landslide modeling: Sample size and raster resolution10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.017 ↗
90. Frye, C. (2019, January 17). About the Geometrical Interval Classification Method. Available online: http://blogs.esri.com/esri/arcgis.
91. Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: Backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.016 ↗
92. Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy)10.1016/j.catena.2013.08.006 ↗
93. Comparison of differences in resolution and sources of controlling factors for gully erosion susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.027 ↗
94. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: A comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks
95. Marjanovic, M., Bajat, B., and Kovacevic, M. (2009, January 4–6). Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithms. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/INCOS.2009.25 ↗
96. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: A comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 ↗
97. Landslide susceptibility assesssment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: A comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods10.1007/s00704-015-1702-9 ↗
98. Rotation forest fuzzy rule-based classifier ensemble for spatial prediction of landslides using GIS10.1007/s11069-016-2304-2 ↗