Advanced Development of Sensors’ Roles in Maritime-Based Industry and Research: From Field Monitoring to High-Risk Phenomenon Measurement
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of human civilization over the last decade has reached a landmark as Industry 4.0 has been widely introduced. Several aspects of industry and manufacturing activities are changing due to the Internet of Things (IoT), location detection technologies, and advanced human–machine interfaces. To enact industrial affairs under those specifications, a sensor is required to transform physical events into numerical information. The use of sensors in marine applications also appears in research and studies, in which the sensor is used for both monitoring the phenomena of a designated subject and data acquisition. Achievements in quantifying complex phenomena in critical maritime designs are fascinating subjects to discuss regarding their development and current states, which may be reliable references for further research on developing sensors and related measurement analysis tools in marine, shipbuilding, and shipping fields. This comprehensive review covers several discussion topics, including the origins and development of sensor technology, applied sensor engineering in logistic and shipping activities, the hydrodynamic characterization of designed hulls, the monitoring of advanced machinery performance, Arctic-based field observations, the detection of vibration-based damage to offshore structures, corrosion control and monitoring, and the measurement of explosions on critical maritime infrastructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia
Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Ponorogo 63471, Indonesia
Funding
Sebelas Maret University
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, X., Nosheen, S., Haq, N.U., and Gao, X. (2021). Value creation during fourth industrial revolution: Use of intellectual capital by most innovative companies of the world. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 163.10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120479 ↗
2. Neto, R.D.C.S., Maia, J.S., Neiva, S.D.S., Scalia, M.D., and Guerra, J.B.S.O.D.A. (2020). The fourth industrial revolution and the coronavirus: A new era catalyzed by a virus. Res. Glob., 2.10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100024 ↗
3. Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution?10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.042 ↗
4. Ćwiklicki, M., Klich, J., and Chen, J. (2020). The adaptiveness of the healthcare system to the fourth industrial revolution: A preliminary analysis. Futures, 122.10.1016/j.futures.2020.102602 ↗
5. Challenges and Opportunities for Marketing Scholars in Times of the Fourth Industrial Revolution10.1016/j.intmar.2020.06.001 ↗
6. Ebekozien, A., and Aigbavboa, C. (2021). COVID-19 recovery for the Nigerian construction sites: The role of the fourth industrial revolution technologies. Sustain. Cities Soc., 69.10.1016/j.scs.2021.102803 ↗
7. The Main Goals of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Renewable Energy Perspectives
8. The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Occupational Health and Safety, Worker’s Compensation and Labor Conditions10.1016/j.shaw.2019.09.005 ↗
9. Zunino, C., Valenzano, A., Obermaisser, R., and Petersen, S. (2020). Factory Communications at the Dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Comput. Stand. Interface, 71.10.1016/j.csi.2020.103433 ↗
10. Fitzgerald, E., Piór, M., and Tomaszewski, A. (2019). Network lifetime maximization in wireless mesh networks for machine-to-machine communication. Ad Hoc Netw., 95.10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.101987 ↗
11. Machine-to-machine wireless communication technologies for the Internet of Things: Taxonomy, comparison and open issues10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.08.002 ↗
12. Intelligent M2M: Complex event processing for machine-to-machine communication10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.005 ↗
13. Xu, B., and Li, C. (2021). Influencing factors of college students’ entrepreneurial ecosystem based on the internet of things and embedded systems. Microprocess. Microsyst., 81.10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103694 ↗
14. Building the Internet of Things platform for smart maternal healthcare services with wearable devices and cloud computing10.1016/j.future.2021.01.016 ↗
15. Industrial Internet of Things and its Applications in Industry 4.0: State of The Art10.1016/j.comcom.2020.11.016 ↗
16. Spatial takeoff in the first industrial revolution10.1016/j.red.2014.01.002 ↗
17. Assessing the role of steam power in the first industrial revolution: The early work of Nick von Tunzelmann10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.008 ↗
18. In Patenting in England, Scotland and Ireland during the Industrial Revolution, 1700–185210.1016/j.eeh.2014.08.002 ↗
19. Space, sound and sedition on the Royal Naval ship, 1756–181510.1016/j.jhg.2020.07.004 ↗
20. Immigration and the American industrial revolution from 1880 to 192010.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.001 ↗
21. Moving from Industry 2.0 to Industry 4.0: A case study from India on leapfrogging in smart manufacturing
22. The energy embodied in the first and second industrial revolution10.1111/jiec.12994 ↗
23. Britain and the Second Industrial Revolution10.1177/004057365601300104 ↗
24. Marketing in the Second Industrial Revolution: A Case Study of the Ferranti Computer Group, 1949–196310.1080/00076799200000005 ↗
25. The new industrial revolution10.1016/0016-3287(91)90079-H ↗
26. Scientific societies and the third industrial revolution—The future role of the OTC10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30788-X ↗
27. Information technology and the third industrial revolution10.1108/eb045307 ↗
28. Could Key Engine, as a new open-source for RES technology development, start the third industrial revolution?10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.152 ↗
29. The Third industrial revolution: A special challenge to managers10.1016/0090-2616(84)90031-7 ↗
30. How the Third Industrial Revolution Will Create a Green Economy10.1111/npqu.12017 ↗
31. Investigation of Optimum Ply Angle using Finite Element (FE) Approach: References for Technical Application on the Composite Navigational Buoys
32. Tensile analysis and assessment of carbon and alloy steels using FE approach as an idealization of material fractures under collision and grounding10.1515/cls-2020-0016 ↗
33. Crashworthiness assessment of thin-walled double bottom tanker: Influences of seabed to structural damage and damage-energy formulae for grounding damage calculations10.1016/j.joes.2020.03.002 ↗
34. Investigation of Meshing Strategy on Mechanical Behaviour of Hip Stem Implant Design Using FEA10.1515/eng-2020-0087 ↗
35. Effects of the rebounding of a striking ship on structural crashworthiness during ship-ship collision10.1016/j.tws.2017.02.022 ↗
36. Yusvika, M., Prabowo, A.R., Tjahjana, D.D.D.P., and Sohn, J.M. (2020). Cavitation Prediction of Ship Propeller Based on Temperature and Fluid Properties of Water. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8060465 ↗
37. Investigation on the performance of the traditional Indonesian fishing vessel10.1051/matecconf/201815902056 ↗
38. Fire Phenomenon of Natural Gas Leak Accidents on the LNG-Fueled Ship Using Computational Fluid Dynamic
39. Assessment of turbine stages and blade numbers on modified 3D Savonius hydrokinetic turbine performance using CFD analysis10.1108/MMMS-12-2019-0224 ↗
40. Numerical Investigation against Laboratory Experiment: An Overview of Damage and Wind Loads on Structural Design
41. Schwab, K. (2021, March 03). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/.
42. Reliability analysis and Response Based Design of a moored FPSO in West Africa10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.08.002 ↗
43. A survey of shipping finance research: Setting the future research agenda
44. Nwafor, N.A., and Walker, T.R. (2020). Rethinking marine insurance and plastic pollution: Food for thought. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 161.10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104950 ↗
45. Investigation of structural performance subjected to impact loading using finite element approach: Case of ship-container collision10.1515/cls-2020-0002 ↗
46. Finetti, E.S., Bonet, C.A., Lapeñ, O.L., and Areny, R.P. (2019). Cost-effective autonomous sensor for the long-term monitoring of water electrical conductivity of crop fields. Comput. Electron. Agric., 165.10.1016/j.compag.2019.104940 ↗
47. A magnetostrictive biased magnetic field sensor with geometrically controlled full-scale range10.1016/j.sna.2018.08.014 ↗
48. Rose-like CuO nanostructures for highly sensitive glucose chemical sensor application10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.003 ↗
49. Strain Measurements of Composite Laminates with Embedded Fibre Bragg Gratings: Criticism and Opportunities for Research10.3390/s110100384 ↗
50. Use of a Dynamic Enclosure Approach to Test the Accuracy of the NDIR Sensor: Evaluation Based on the CO2 Equilibration Pattern10.3390/s7123459 ↗
51. UNCTAD (2017). Review of Maritime Transport 2017, United Nations Publication.
52. IMO (2010). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), IMO Publications.
53. Shaping Ship Safety: The Face of the Future
54. Relative availability of satellite imagery and ship-based sampling for assessment of stormwater runoff plumes in coastal southern California10.1016/j.ecss.2006.07.016 ↗
55. Detection of ships in inland river using high-resolution optical satellite imagery based on mixture of deformable part models10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.04.013 ↗
56. Vessel detection and classification from spaceborne optical images: A literature survey10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.033 ↗
57. A Multifamily GLRT for Oil Spill Detection10.1109/TGRS.2016.2594867 ↗
58. Ship detection for visual maritime surveillance from non-stationary platforms10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.022 ↗
59. Landslide monitoring with high-resolution SAR data in the Three Gorges region10.1007/s11430-011-4259-1 ↗
60. Real-Time Optronic Beamformer on Receive in Phased Array Radar10.1109/LGRS.2018.2875461 ↗
61. Zou, L., Zhang, H., Wang, C., Wu, F., and Gu, F. (2020). Mw-acgan: Generating multiscale high-resolution SAR images for ship detection. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20226673 ↗
62. Gunnarsson, B. (2021). Recent ship traffic and developing shipping trends on the Northern Sea Route—Policy implications for future arctic shipping. Mar. Policy, 124.10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104369 ↗
63. Pan, Z., Yang, R., and Zhang, Z. (2020). Msr2n: Multi-stage rotational region based network for arbitrary-oriented ship detection in sar images. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20082340 ↗
64. Dai, W., Mao, Y., Yuan, R., Liu, Y., Pu, X., and Li, C. (2020). A novel detector based on convolution neural networks for multiscale sar ship detection in complex background. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20092547 ↗
65. Gui, Y., Li, X., and Xue, L. (2019). A multilayer fusion light-head detector for SAR ship detection. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19051124 ↗
66. Xie, T., Zhang, W., Yang, L., Wang, Q., Huang, J., and Yuan, N. (2018). Inshore ship detection based on level set method and visual saliency for SAR images. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18113877 ↗
67. Fukuda, G., Hatta, D., Guo, X., and Kubo, N. (2021). Performance evaluation of IMU and DVL integration in marine navigation. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041056 ↗
68. Wang, L., Li, Y., Wan, Z., Yang, Z., Wang, T., Guan, K., and Fu, L. (2020). Use of AIS data for performance evaluation of ship traffic with speed control. Ocean Eng., 204.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107259 ↗
69. Feng, M., Shaw, S.-L., Peng, G., and Fang, Z. (2020). Time efficiency assessment of ship movements in maritime ports: A case study of two ports based on AIS data. J. Transp. Geogr., 86.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102741 ↗
70. An Integrated Method for Predicting the Hydrodynamic Resistance of Low-CB Ships10.1016/j.cad.2009.08.001 ↗
71. Heave and Pitch Motions of a Ship in Model Ice: An Experimental Study on Ship Resistance and Ice Breaking Pattern10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.04.007 ↗
72. Hydrodynamic Design of an Underwater Hull Cleaning Robot and Its Evaluation10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0101 ↗
73. Experimental Investigation of a Fast Catamaran in Head Waves10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.012 ↗
74. Experimental Investigation of Frictional Resistance Reduction with Air Layer on the Hull Bottom of a Ship10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0185 ↗
75. A Novel Full Scale Laboratory for Yacht Engineering Research10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.005 ↗
76. Prediction of Extreme Motions and Vertical Bending Moments on a Cruise Ship and Comparison with Experimental Data10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.021 ↗
77. Jiao, J., Ren, H., Adenya, C.A., and Chen, C. (2017). Development of a Shipboard Remote Control and Telemetry Experimental System for Large-Scale Model’s Motions and Loads Measurement in Realistic Sea Waves. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17112485 ↗
78. Ship Performance Monitoring Dedicated to Biofouling Analysis: Development on a Small Size Research Catamaran10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.005 ↗
79. Kim, D., Lee, S., and Lee, J. (2020). Data-Driven Prediction of Vessel Propulsion Power Using Support Vector Regression with Onboard Measurement and Ocean Data. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20061588 ↗
80. Lin, J.F., Zhao, D.G., Guo, C.Y., Su, Y.M., and Zhong, X.H. (2020). Comprehensive Test System for Ship-Model Resistance and Propulsion Performance in Actual Seas. Ocean Eng., 197.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106915 ↗
81. Guo, C.Y., Zhong, X.H., Zhao, D.G., Wang, C., Lin, J.F., and Song, K.W. (2020). Propulsion performance of large-scale ship model in real sea environment. Ocean Eng., 210.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107440 ↗
82. Su, Y.M., Lin, J.F., Zhao, D.G., Guo, C.Y., and Guo, H. (2020). Influence of a pre-swirl stator and rudder bulb system on the propulsion performance of a large-scale ship model. Ocean Eng., 218.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108189 ↗
83. Mei, B., Sun, L., and Shi, G. (2020). Full-Scale Maneuvering Trials Correction and Motion Modelling Based on Actual Sea and Weather Conditions. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20143963 ↗
84. Ha, Y.J., Kim, K.H., Nam, B.W., Hong, S.Y., and Kim, H. (2021). Experimental Study for Characteristics of Slamming Loads on Bow of a Ship-Type FPSO under Breaking and Irregular Wave Conditions. Ocean Eng., 224.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108738 ↗
85. Allianz (2020). Safety and Shipping Review 2020, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty.
86. Employment of Wireless Sensor Networks for Full-Scale Ship Application
87. Characteristics of wireless sensor network for full-scale ship application10.1007/s00773-008-0038-x ↗
88. Penttilä, P., and Ruponen, P. (2010, January 14–16). Use of Level Sensors in Breach Estimation for a Damaged Ship. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships, Espoo, Finland.
89. Advanced Ship Systems Condition Monitoring for Enhanced Inspection, Maintenance and Decision Making in Ship Operations10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.133 ↗
90. Raptodimos, Y., Lazakis, I., Theotokatos, G., Varelas, T., and Drikos, L. (2016, January 26–27). Ship sensors data collection and analysis for condition monitoring of ship structures and machinery systems. Proceedings of the Smart Ship Technology, London, UK.10.3940/rina.sst.2016.13 ↗
91. Noordstrand, A. (2018, January 12–14). Experience with Robotic Underwater Hull Cleaning in Dutch Ports. Proceedings of the 3rd Hull Performance & Insight Conference, Redworth, UK.
92. Drewing, S., and Witkowski, K. (2021). Spectral Analysis of Torsional Vibrations Measured by Optical Sensors, as a Method for Diagnosing Injector Nozzle Coking in Marine Diesel Engines. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21030775 ↗
93. Kozak, M., Bejger, A., and Tomczak, A. (2021). Identification of Gate Turn-Off Thyristor Switching Patterns Using Acoustic Emission Sensors. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21010070 ↗
94. Kyzioł, L., Panasiuk, K., Hajdukiewicz, G., and Dudzik, K. (2021). Acoustic emission and k-s metric entropy as methods for determining mechanical properties of composite materials. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21010145 ↗
95. Estimates of primary production by remote sensing in the Arctic Ocean: Assessment of accuracy with passive and active sensors10.1016/j.dsr.2010.06.011 ↗
96. Multi sensor validation and error characteristics of Arctic satellite sea surface temperature observations10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.013 ↗
97. Tagesson, T., Mastepanov, M., Mölder, M., Tamstorf, M.P., Eklundh, L., Smith, B., Sigsgaard, C., Lund, M., Ekberg, A., and Falik, J.M. (2013). Modelling of growing season methane fluxes in a high-Arctic wet tundra ecosystem 1997–2010 using in situ and high-resolution satellite data. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol., 65.10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.19722 ↗
98. Lund, M., Hansen, B.U., Pedersen, S.H., Stiegler, C., and Tamstorf, M.P. (2014). Characteristics of summer-time energy exchange in a high Arctic tundra heath 2000–2010. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol., 66.10.3402/tellusb.v66.21631 ↗
99. Impact of different eddy covariance sensors, site set-up, and maintenance on the annual balance of CO2 and CH4 in the harsh Arctic environment10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.008 ↗
100. Re-calibration of Arctic sea ice extent datasets using Arctic surface air temperature records10.1080/02626667.2017.1324974 ↗