journal article·2021-02-23Open access

Application of Artificial Intelligence to Determined Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement-Stabilized Soil in Vietnam

Huong Thi Thanh Ngo, Tuan Anh Pham, Huong Lan Thi Vu, Loi Van Giap

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 4

Abstract

Cement stabilized soil is one of the commonly used as ground reinforcement solutions in geotechnical engineering. In this study, the main object was to apply three machine learning (ML) methods namely gradient boosting (GB), artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) to predict unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cement stabilized soil. Soil samples were collected at Hai Duong city, Vietnam. A total of 216 soil–cement samples were mixed in the laboratory and compressed to determine the UCS. This data set is divided into two parts of the training data set (80%) and testing set (20%) to build and test the model, respectively. To verify the performance of ML model, various criteria named correlation coefficient (R), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used. The results show that all three ML models were effective methods to predict the UCS of cement-stabilized soil. Amongst three model used in this study, optimized ANN model provided superior performance compare to two others models with performance indicator R = 0.925, RMSE = 419.82 and MAE = 292.2 for testing part. This study can provide an effective tool to quickly predict the UCS of cement stabilized soil with high accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Transport Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Bergado, D.T. (1996). Soft Ground Improvement: In Lowland and Other Environments, ASCE Press.
2. State of the Art in Deep Mixing Technology: Part I. Basic Concepts and Overview10.1680/gi.1998.020204 ↗
3. Evaluation of Strength Properties of Cement Stabilized Sand Mixed with EPS Beads and Fly Ash
4. Full-Scale Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls under Strip Footing Load10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.12.002 ↗
5. Improvement of Soft Bangkok Clay Using Vertical Geotextile Band Drains Compared with Granular Piles10.1016/0266-1144(90)90054-G ↗
6. Soft Ground Improvement via Vertical Drains and Vacuum Assisted Preloading10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.01.004 ↗
7. Field Investigations on Performance of T-Shaped Deep Mixed Soil Cement Column–Supported Embankments over Soft Ground10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000625 ↗
8. Reinforcement and Arching Effect of Geogrid-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Embankment on Marine Soft Ground10.1080/10641190701359591 ↗
9. Microstructure Characteristics of Cement-Stabilized Sandy Soil Using Nanosilica10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.015 ↗
10. Modeling of Ground Motion Rotational Components for Near-Fault and Far-Fault Earthquake According to Soil Type10.1007/s12517-014-1409-8 ↗
11. Strength Properties of Soft Clay Treated with Mixture of Nano-SiO2 and Recycled Polyester Fiber10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.03.013 ↗
12. Physical and Geotechnical Properties of Cement-Treated Clayey Soil Using Silica Nanoparticles: An Experimental Study10.1140/epjp/i2016-16134-3 ↗
13. Choobbasti, A.J., Vafaei, A., and Kutanaei, S.S. (2015). Mechanical Properties of Sandy Soil Improved with Cement and Nanosilica. Open Eng., 5.10.1515/eng-2015-0011 ↗
14. Assessment of Strength Development in Cement-Admixed High Water Content Clays with Abrams’ Law as a Basis10.1680/geot.2003.53.4.439 ↗
15. Engineering Behavior of Cement Stabilized Clay at High Water Content10.3208/sandf.41.5_33 ↗
16. Compressibility of Cement-Admixed Clays at High Water Content10.1680/geot.2004.54.2.151 ↗
17. Clay–Water/Cement Ratio Identity for Cement Admixed Soft Clays10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(187) ↗
18. Prediction of Maximum Dry Density and Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement Stabilised Soil Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques10.1007/s40891-016-0051-9 ↗
19. Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soft Grounds Using Computational Intelligence Techniques: A Comparative Study10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.03.006 ↗
20. Application of Artificial Intelligence to Maximum Dry Density and Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement Stabilized Soil10.1007/s10706-010-9379-4 ↗
21. Prediction of Soil Unconfined Compressive Strength Using Artificial Neural Network Model
22. An Experimental Study on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soft Soil-Cement Mixtures with or without GGBFS in the Coastal Area of Vietnam
23. Influence of Water Content in the UCS of Soil-Cement Mixtures for Different Cement Dosages10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.008 ↗
24. Effect of Water Content and Density on Strength and Deformation Behavior of Clay Soils10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.028 ↗
25. Study on the Strength Influence of Pile Driving Disturbance on the Surrounding Soil10.1051/e3sconf/201913604078 ↗
26. Haralambos, S.I. (2009, January 10). Compressive Strength of Soil Improved with Cement. Proceedings of the Contemporary Topics in Ground Modification, Problem Soils, and Geo-Support, American Society of Civil Engineers, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1061/41023(337)37 ↗
27. Influences of Specimen Geometry and Loading Rate on Compressive Strength of Unstabilized Compacted Earth Block10.1155/2018/5034256 ↗
28. Güneyli, H., and Rüşen, T. (2015). Effect of Length-to-Diameter Ratio on the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil Specimens. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 75.10.1007/s10064-015-0835-5 ↗
29. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
30. Wei, L., Yuan, Z., Zhong, Y., Yang, L., Hu, X., and Zhang, Y. (2019). An Improved Gradient Boosting Regression Tree Estimation Model for Soil Heavy Metal (Arsenic) Pollution Monitoring Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9091943 ↗
31. Fault Diagnosis in Benchmark Process Control System Using Stochastic Gradient Boosted Decision Trees
32. Assessment of Spatial Hybrid Methods for Predicting Soil Organic Matter Using DEM Derivatives and Soil Parameters10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.010 ↗
33. Fast Gradient Boosting Decision Trees with Bit-Level Data Structures
34. Liu, L., Ji, M., and Buchroithner, M. (2017). Combining Partial Least Squares and the Gradient-Boosting Method for Soil Property Retrieval Using Visible near-Infrared Shortwave Infrared Spectra. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9121299 ↗
35. Artificial Neural Network Applications in Geotechnical Engineering
36. Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Cement Containing Class C Fly Ash by Using Artificial Neural Network and Regression Technique
37. GIS-Based Groundwater Potential Mapping Using Boosted Regression Tree, Classification and Regression Tree, and Random Forest Machine Learning Models in Iran10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6 ↗
38. A Comparative Assessment of Support Vector Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Random Forests for Predicting and Mapping Soil Organic Carbon Stocks across an Afromontane Landscape10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.028 ↗
39. Theory of the Backpropagation Neural Network
40. Dybowski, R., and Gant, V. (2001). Neural networks as statistical methods in survival analysis. Clinical Applications of Artificial Neural Networks, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511543494 ↗
41. Predict Soil Texture Distributions Using an Artificial Neural Network Model10.1016/j.compag.2008.07.008 ↗
42. Peak Shear Strength of Discrete Fiber-Reinforced Soils Computed by Machine Learning and Metaensemble Methods10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000595 ↗
43. Lu, J., Yu, Z., Zhu, Y., Huang, S., Luo, Q., and Zhang, S. (2019). Effect of Lithium-Slag in the Performance of Slag Cement Mortar Based on Least-Squares Support Vector Machine Prediction. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12101652 ↗
44. Hyperparameter Optimization for Machine Learning Models Based on Bayesian Optimizationb
45. Liashchynskyi, P., and Liashchynskyi, P. (2019). Grid Search, Random Search, Genetic Algorithm: A Big Comparison for NAS. arXiv.
46. Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization
47. Pham, T.A., Tran, V.Q., Vu, H.-L.T., and Ly, H.-B. (2020). Design Deep Neural Network Architecture Using a Genetic Algorithm for Estimation of Pile Bearing Capacity. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0243030 ↗
48. Pham, B.T., Qi, C., Ho, L.S., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Al-Ansari, N., Nguyen, M.D., Nguyen, H.D., Ly, H.-B., Le, H.V., and Prakash, I. (2020). A Novel Hybrid Soft Computing Model Using Random Forest and Particle Swarm Optimization for Estimation of Undrained Shear Strength of Soil. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062218 ↗
49. Shekar, B.H., and Dagnew, G. (2019, January 25–28). Grid Search-Based Hyperparameter Tuning and Classification of Microarray Cancer Data. Proceedings of the 2019 Second International Conference on Advanced Computational and Communication Paradigms (ICACCP), Gangtok, India.10.1109/ICACCP.2019.8882943 ↗
50. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
51. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE)?
52. Why Should Ensemble Spread Match the RMSE of the Ensemble Mean?10.1175/JHM-D-14-0008.1 ↗