journal article·2020-06-21Open access

Short-Term Spatio-Temporal Drought Forecasting Using Random Forests Model at New South Wales, Australia

Abhirup Dikshit, Biswajeet Pradhan, Abdullah M. Alamri

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 12

Abstract

Droughts can cause significant damage to agriculture and water resources, leading to severe economic losses and loss of life. One of the most important aspect is to develop effective tools to forecast drought events that could be helpful in mitigation strategies. The understanding of droughts has become more challenging because of the effect of climate change, urbanization and water management; therefore, the present study aims to forecast droughts by determining an appropriate index and analyzing its changes, using climate variables. The work was conducted in three different phases, first being the determination of Standard Precipitation Evaporation Index (SPEI), using global climatic dataset of Climate Research Unit (CRU) from 1901–2018. The indices are calculated at different monthly intervals which could depict short-term or long-term changes, and the index value represents different drought classes, ranging from extremely dry to extremely wet. However, the present study was focused only on forecasting at short-term scales for New South Wales (NSW) region of Australia and was conducted at two different time scales, one month and three months. The second phase involved dividing the data into three sample sizes, training (1901–2010), testing (2011–2015) and validation (2016–2018). Finally, a machine learning approach, Random Forest (RF), was used to train and test the data, using various climatic variables, e.g., rainfall, potential evapotranspiration, cloud cover, vapor pressure and temperature (maximum, minimum and mean). The final phase was to analyze the performance of the model based on statistical metrics and drought classes. Regarding this, the performance of the testing period was conducted by using statistical metrics, Coefficient of Determination (R2) and Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE) method. The performance of the model showed a considerably higher value of R2 for both the time scales. However, statistical metrics analyzes the variation between the predicted and observed index values, and it does not consider the drought classes. Therefore, the variation in predicted and observed SPEI values were analyzed based on different drought classes, which were validated by using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-based Area under the Curve (AUC) approach. The results reveal that the classification of drought classes during the validation period had an AUC of 0.82 for SPEI 1 case and 0.84 for SPEI 3 case. The study depicts that the Random Forest model can perform both regression and classification analysis for drought studies in NSW. The work also suggests that the performance of any model for drought forecasting should not be limited only through statistical metrics, but also by examining the variation in terms of drought characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrology and Drought Analysis · Climate variability and models · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia

Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Choongmu-gwan, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea

Department of Geology & Geophysics, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Funding

University of Technology Sydney · King Saud University

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Maladaptation to drought: A case report from California, USA10.1007/s11625-014-0269-1 ↗
2. Drought modeling–A review10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.049 ↗
3. Integrated drought causality, hazard, and vulnerability assessment for future socioeconomic scenarios: An information theory perspective10.1002/2014JD022670 ↗
4. Hydrological drought explained10.1002/wat2.1085 ↗
5. Hydrological drought across the world: Impact of climate and physical catchment structure10.5194/hess-17-1715-2013 ↗
6. Development of soil moisture drought index to characterize droughts10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001213 ↗
7. Drought in the Anthropocene10.1038/ngeo2646 ↗
8. Mulualem, G.M., and Liou, Y.-A. (2020). Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Forecasting a Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index for the Upper Blue Nile Basin. Water, 12.10.3390/w12030643 ↗
9. Drought assessment and monitoring through blending of multi-sensor indices using machine learning approaches for different climate regions10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.10.011 ↗
10. Application of the artificial neural network model for prediction of monthly standardized precipitation and evapotranspiration index using hydrometeorological parameters and climate indices in eastern Australia10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.03.018 ↗
11. Fung, K., Huang, Y., Koo, C., and Soh, Y. (2019). Drought forecasting: A review of modelling approaches 2007–2017. J. Water Clim. Chang.10.2166/wcc.2019.236 ↗
12. A review of drought concepts10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012 ↗
13. Drought indices and indicators revisited10.1007/s12517-019-4237-z ↗
14. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1 ↗
15. Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) revisited: Parameter fitting, evapotranspiration models, tools, datasets and drought monitoring10.1002/joc.3887 ↗
16. Pathak, A.A., and Dodamani, B.M. (2019). Comparison of Meteorological Drought Indices for Different Climatic Regions of an Indian River Basin. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci.10.1007/s13143-019-00162-5 ↗
17. Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Begueria, S., Lorenzo-Lacruz, J., Camarero, J.J., Lopez-Moreno, J.I., Azorin-Molina, C., Revuelto, J., Moran-Tejeda, E., and Sanchez-Lorenzo, A. (2012). Performance of Drought Indices for Ecological, Agricultural, and Hydrological Applications. Earth Interact., 16.10.1175/2012EI000434.1 ↗
18. Nolan, R.H., Boer, M.M., Collins, L., Resco de Dios, V., Clarke, H., Jenkins, M., Kenny, B., and Bradstock, R.A. (2020). Causes and consequences of eastern Australia’s 2019-20 season of mega-fires. Glob. Chang. Biol.10.1111/gcb.14987 ↗
19. A review of global precipitation data sets: Data sources, estimation, and intercomparisons10.1002/2017RG000574 ↗
20. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3 ↗
21. Evaluation of drought propagation in an ensemble mean of large-scale hydrological models10.5194/hess-16-4057-2012 ↗
22. Drought forecasting based on the remote sensing data using ARIMA models10.1016/j.mcm.2009.10.031 ↗
23. Probabilistic prediction of hydrologic drought using a conditional probability approach based on the meta-Gaussian model10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.048 ↗
24. Bridging the gap between weather and seasonal forecasting: Intraseasonal forecasting for Australia10.1002/qj.769 ↗
25. Dikshit, A., Sarkar, R., Pradhan, B., Segoni, S., and Alamri, A.M. (2020). Rainfall Induced Landslide Studies in Indian Himalayan Region: A Critical Review. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072466 ↗
26. Meteorological drought forecasting for ungauged areas based on machine learning: Using long-range climate forecast and remote sensing data10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.011 ↗
27. Park, H., and Kim, K. (2019). Prediction of severe drought area based on random forest: Using satellite image and topography data. Water, 11.10.3390/w11040705 ↗
28. Random forests: From early developments to recent advancements10.1080/21642583.2014.956265 ↗
29. Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134979 ↗
30. Ji, M., Liu, L., Du, R., and Buchroithner, M.F. (2019). A comparative study of texture and convolutional neural network features for detecting collapsed buildings after earthquakes using pre-and post-event satellite imagery. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11101202 ↗
31. Arabameri, A., Chen, W., Blaschke, T., Tiefenbacher, J.P., Pradhan, B., and Tien Bui, D. (2020). Gully Head-Cut Distribution Modeling Using Machine Learning Methods—A Case Study of NW Iran. Water, 12.10.3390/w12010016 ↗
32. Seasonal drought prediction: Advances, challenges, and future prospects10.1002/2016RG000549 ↗
33. Near real-time vegetation anomaly detection with MODIS NDVI: Timeliness vs. accuracy and effect of anomaly computation options10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.041 ↗
34. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 ↗
35. Adede, C., Oboko, R., Wagacha, P.W., and Atzberger, C. (2019). A Mixed Model Approach to Vegetation Condition Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN): Case of Kenya’s Operational Drought Monitoring. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11091099 ↗
36. Wittwer, G. (2020). Estimating the Regional Economic Impacts of the 2017 to 2019 Drought on NSW and the Rest of Australia, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
37. Steffen, W., Hughes, L., Mulling, G., Bambrick, H., Dean, A., and Rice, M. (2019). Dangerous Summer: Escalating Bushfire, Heat and Drought Risk, Climate Council of Australia.
38. Hennessy, K., Fawcett, R., Kirono, D., Mpelasoka, F., Jones, D., Bathols, J., Whetton, P., Stafford Smith, M., Howden, M., and Mitchell, C. (2008). An Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change on the Nature and Frequency of Exceptional Climatic Events, CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology.
39. Dikshit, A., Pradhan, B., and Alamri, A.M. (2020). Temporal Hydrological Drought Index Forecasting for New South Wales, Australia Using Machine Learning Approaches. Atmosphere, 11.10.3390/atmos11060585 ↗
40. A review of past and projected changes in Australia’s rainfall10.1002/wcc.577 ↗
41. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3. 10 Dataset10.1002/joc.3711 ↗
42. Miao, L., Li, S., Zhang, F., Chen, T., Shan, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2020). Future drought in the drylands of Asia under the 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C warming scenarios. Earth’s Future.10.1029/2019EF001337 ↗
43. The relationship between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and temperature variability in China during the last millennium10.1002/jqs.2658 ↗
44. Regional climate model data used within the SWURVE project? 1: Projected changes in seasonal patterns and estimation of PET10.5194/hess-11-1069-2007 ↗
45. Automatic calculation of rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence in Chukha Dzongkhag, Bhutan10.1007/s10064-018-1415-2 ↗
46. A multiscalar global drought dataset: The SPEIbase: A new gridded product for the analysis of drought variability and impacts10.1175/2010BAMS2988.1 ↗
47. Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping10.1007/s11269-017-1660-3 ↗
48. Machine learning-based integration of remotely-sensed drought factors can improve the estimation of agricultural drought in South-Eastern Australia10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.015 ↗
49. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
50. Classification and regression by randomForest
51. Predictive soil parent material mapping at a regional-scale: A random forest approach10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.09.016 ↗
52. Random forests for classification in ecology10.1890/07-0539.1 ↗
53. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python
54. Parr, T., Turgutlu, K., Csiszar, C., and Howard, J. (2020, May 10). Beware Default Random Forest Importances. Available online: https://explained.ai/rf-importance/index.html.
55. A temperature-based model for global solar irradiance and its application to estimate daily irradiation values10.1002/er.1709 ↗
56. Global change-type drought-induced tree mortality: Vapor pressure deficit is more important than temperature per se in causing decline in tree health10.1002/ece3.664 ↗
57. Novick, K.A., Williams, C.A., Phillips, R., Oishi, A.C., Sulman, B.N., Bohrer, G., and Ficklin, D.L. (2017, January 11–15). Vapor pressure deficit is as important as soil moisture in determining limitations to evapotranspiration during drought. Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, New Orleans, LA, USA.
58. Droughts over amazonia in 2005, 2010, and 2015: A cloud cover perspective10.3389/feart.2018.00227 ↗
59. An introduction to ROC analysis10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 ↗
60. Dikshit, A., Sarkar, R., Pradhan, B., Jena, R., Drukpa, D., and Alamri, A.M. (2020). Temporal Probability Assessment and Its Use in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for Eastern Bhutan. Water, 12.10.3390/w12010267 ↗