journal article·2021-04-12Open access

Constructed Technosols: A Strategy toward a Circular Economy

Debora Fabbri, Romeo Pizzol, Paola Calza, Mery Malandrino, Elisa Gaggero, Elio Padoan, Franco Ajmone-Marsan

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

Soil is a non-renewable natural resource. However, the current rates of soil usage and degradation have led to a loss of soil for agriculture, habitats, biodiversity, and to ecosystems problems. Urban and former industrial areas suffer particularly of these problems, and compensation measures to restore environmental quality include the renaturation of dismissed areas, de-sealing of surfaces, or the building of green infrastructures. In this framework, the development of methodologies for the creation of soils designed to mimic natural soil and suitable for vegetation growth, known as constructed soils or technosols, are here reviewed. The possible design choices and the starting materials have been described, using a circular economy approach, i.e., preferring non-contaminated wastes to non-renewable resources. Technosols appear to be a good solution to the problems of land degradation and urban green if using recycled wastes or by-products, as they can be an alternative to the remediation of contaminated sites and to importing fertile agricultural soil. Nevertheless, waste use requires analysis to ensure the salubrity of the starting materials. Moreover, materials produced on site or nearby minimize the cost and the environmental impact of transport, thus the involvement of local stakeholders in the urban land management must be encouraged.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Green Space and Health · Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of Turin, via P. Giuria 5, 10125 Turin, Italy

Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. FAO (2021, April 11). Soil Is a Non-Renewable Resource. Its Preservation Is Essential for Food Security and Our Sustainable Future. Food Agric. Organ., Available online: http://www.fao.org/resources/infographics/infographics-details/en/c/278954/.
2. United Nations (2019). The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423), United Nations.
3. Land take and the effectiveness of project screening in Environmental Impact Assessment: Findings from an empirical study10.1016/j.eiar.2017.08.008 ↗
4. Re-reuse of regenerated brownfields: Lessons from an Eastern European post-industrial city10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.313 ↗
5. A multi-faceted, environmental forensic characterization of a paradigmatic brownfield polluted by hazardous waste containing Hg, As, PAHs and dioxins10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138546 ↗
6. Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.003 ↗
7. Payá Pérez, A., and Rodríguez Eugenio, N. (2018). Status of Local Soil Contamination in Europe: Revision of the Indicator “Progress in the Management Contaminated Sites in Europe”, Publications Office of the European Union. EUR 29124 EN.
8. Araneo, F., and Bartolucci, E. (2021). Lo Stato Delle Bonifiche Dei Siti Contaminati in Italia:i Dati Regionali, ISPRA Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale. Rapporti 337/21.
9. Humanity’s Transformation Of Earth’s Soil: Pedology’s New Frontier10.1097/ss.0b013e3181586bb7 ↗
10. Soil science as an interdisciplinary synthetic science10.1134/S1064229306130023 ↗
11. UNCCD (2021, April 11). Available online: https://www.unccd.int/.
12. (2021, March 11). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication.
13. Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: Ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions10.1890/090220 ↗
14. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 ↗
15. Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001 ↗
16. Filho, W.L., Barbir, J., Sima, M., Kalbus, A., Nagy, G.J., Paletta, A., Villamizar, A., Martinez, R., Azeiteiro, U.M., and Pereira, M.J. (2020). Reviewing the role of ecosystems services in the sustainability of the urban environment: A multi-country analysis. J. Clean. Prod., 262.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121338 ↗
17. Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.021 ↗
18. Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents’ health: Adding quality to quantity10.1136/jech.2009.104695 ↗
19. Bourguignon, D. (2016). Closing the loop New circular economy package. Eur. Parliam. Res. Serv., 9.
20. (2021, February 28). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions-The European Green Deal. (COM/2019/640 final). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640.
21. (2021, February 28). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. European Commission (COM/2011/0571 final). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0571.
22. (2021, February 28). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. (COM/2020/380 final). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0380.
23. (2021, February 26). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (COM/2012/ 046). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0046.
24. (2021, February 28). Future of the Common Agricultural Policy. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-agricultural-policy/future-cap_en.
25. European Commission (2021, April 11). Overview of CAP Reform 2014–2020. Agricultural Policy Perspectives Brief N°5*. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/agri-policy-perspectives-brief-05_en.pdf.
26. Montanarella, L., and Panagos, P. (2021). The relevance of sustainable soil management within the European Green Deal. Land Use Policy, 100.10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104950 ↗
27. (2021, February 28). Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030. (COM/2020/652 final). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020PC0652.
28. (2021, April 11). Science for Environment Policy (2016) No net land take by 2050? Future Brief 14. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/no_net_land_take_by_2050_FB14_en.pdf.
29. Quarry rehabilitation employing treated residual sludge from dimension stone working plant10.1007/s12665-014-3895-0 ↗
30. Prokop, G., Jobstmann, H., Schönbauer, A., and Environment Agency Austria (2011). Report on Best Practices for Limiting Soil Sealing and Mitigating Its Effects, European Commission. Technical Report 2011-050.
31. Influence of the soil sealing on the geoaccumulation index of heavy metals and various pollution factors10.1007/s11356-016-8209-5 ↗
32. Soil sealing causes substantial losses in C and N storage in urban soils under cool climate10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138369 ↗
33. Blumlein, P., Kircholtes, H.J., Schweiker, M., Wolf, G., Schug, B., Wieshofer, I., Huber, S., Parolin, M., Villa, F., and Zelioli, A. (2012). Soil in the City. Urban Soil Management Strategy, Department of Environmental Protection.
34. Urban Regeneration Policy from the Integrated Urban Development Model in the European Union: An Analytical Approach Based on the Study of Spanish Cities10.1080/03003930.2015.1110520 ↗
35. IUSS Working Group WRB (2015). World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, FAO. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106.
36. Craul, T.A., and Craul, P.J. (2006). Soil Design Protocols for Landscape Architects and Contractors, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
37. Technosols in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources–history and definitions10.1080/00380768.2018.1432973 ↗
38. Role of green space in urban planning: Outlook towards smart cities10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.007 ↗
39. Soil construction: A step for ecological reclamation of derelict lands10.1065/jss2008.03.277 ↗
40. Influence of connectivity & topsoil management practices of a constructed technosol on pedofauna colonization: A field study10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.12.001 ↗
41. Walsh, D., Glass, K., Morris, S., Zhang, H., McRae, I., Anderson, N., Alfieri, A., Egendorf, S.P., Holberton, S., and Owrang, S. (2018). Sediment exchange to mitigate pollutant exposure in urban soil. J. Environ. Manag.10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.013 ↗
42. Aggregation and availability of phosphorus in a Technosol constructed from urban wastes10.1007/s11368-016-1469-3 ↗
43. Using constructed soils for green infrastructure-Challenges and limitations10.5194/soil-6-413-2020 ↗
44. Technosols made with various urban wastes showed contrasted performance for tree development during a 3-year experiment10.1007/s12665-018-7848-x ↗
45. Water retention characteristics of coarse porous materials to construct purpose-designed plant growing media10.1080/00380768.2018.1447293 ↗
46. Grard, B.J.P., Manouchehri, N., Aubry, C., Frascaria-Lacoste, N., and Chenu, C. (2020). Potential of technosols created with urban by-products for rooftop edible production. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17093210 ↗
47. Modelling agronomic properties of Technosols constructed with urban wastes10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.016 ↗
48. A study on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of cocopeat perlite mixture as a growing media in containerized plant production10.17576/jsm-2017-4606-17 ↗
49. Green Roof Growing Substrates: Types, Ingredients, Composition and Properties10.24266/0738-2898-28.4.244 ↗
50. El uso de los sustratos en Europa es cada vez mayor
51. Response of chrysanthemum plant to addition of broiler manure as a substitute for commercial substrate
52. Contribution of bricks to urban soil properties10.1007/s11368-012-0559-0 ↗
53. Use of water-retention additives to improve performance of green roof substrates10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1108.35 ↗
54. Bates, A.J., Sadler, J.P., Greswell, R.B., and Mackay, R. (2015). Effects of recycled aggregate growth substrate on green roof vegetation development: A six year experiment. Landsc. Urban Plan.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.010 ↗
55. Molineux, C.J., Gange, A.C., Connop, S.P., and Newport, D.J. (2015). Using recycled aggregates in green roof substrates for plant diversity. Ecol. Eng.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.036 ↗
56. Laboratory study on the potential use of recycled inert construction waste material in the substrate mix for extensive green roofs10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.015 ↗
57. Green roof substrates: Effect of recycled crushed porcelain and foamed glass on plant growth and water retention10.1016/j.ufug.2016.08.008 ↗
58. Effects of recycled glass and different substrate materials on the leachate quality and plant growth of green roofs10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.013 ↗
59. Utilization of waste Autoclaved Aerated Concrete as lighting material in the structure of a green roof10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.083 ↗
60. Farías, R.D., García, C.M., Palomino, T.C., and Arellano, M.M. (2017). Effects of wastes from the brewing industry in lightweight aggregates manufactured with clay for green roofs. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10050527 ↗
61. (2021, March 27). Construction and Demolition waste: Challenges and Opportunities in a Circular Economy. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/waste/waste-management/construction-and-demolition-waste-challenges.
62. Physical properties of structural soils containing waste materials to achieve urban greening10.1007/s11368-016-1524-0 ↗
63. Constructed soils for mitigating lead (Pb) exposure and promoting urban community gardening: The New York City Clean Soil Bank pilot study10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.012 ↗
64. Co-composting as a Management Strategy for Posidonia oceanica Residues and Dredged Sediments10.1007/s12649-019-00822-7 ↗
65. Zichella, L., Dino, G.A., Bellopede, R., Marini, P., Padoan, E., and Passarella, I. (2020). Environmental impacts, management and potential recovery of residual sludge from the stone industry: The piedmont case. Resour. Policy, 65.10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101562 ↗
66. (2021, March 27). Waste Statistics 2018. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Waste_statistics#Total_waste_generation.
67. (2020). Bio-Waste in Europe—Turning Challenges into Opportunities. EEA Report N° 04/2020, Publications Office of the European Union.
68. (2019). Digestate and Compost as Fertilisers: Risk Assessment and Risk Management Options, EC, Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited.
69. Organic matter dynamics, soil aggregation and microbial biomass and activity in Technosols created with metalliferous mine residues, biochar and marble waste10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.04.017 ↗
70. Gunnlaugsson, B., and Adalsteinsson, S. (1995). Pumice as Environment-Friendly Substrate-A Comparison With Rockwool. Acta Hortic., 131–136.10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.401.15 ↗
71. Improving agricultural production under water scarcity in Fars province, Iran
72. Benefits of treating a sandy soil with a crosslinked-type polyacrylamide10.1071/EA04026 ↗
73. The effect of a hydrophilic polymer on plant water status and survival of transplanted pine seedlings10.21273/HORTTECH.5.2.141 ↗
74. Effects of hydrophilic polymer on the survival of buttonwood seedlings grown under drought stress10.1080/01904160601054973 ↗
75. Root desiccation and drought stress responses of bareroot Quercus rubra seedlings treated with a hydrophilic polymer root dip10.1007/s11104-008-9746-6 ↗
76. Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil10.1097/SS.0b013e3181981d9a ↗
77. Environmental Benefits of Biochar10.2134/jeq2012.0151 ↗
78. Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an ultisol and two aridisols10.1097/SS.0b013e31824e5593 ↗
79. Effect of biochar on physicochemical properties of a sandy soil and maize growth in a greenhouse experiment10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.033 ↗
80. Influence of pecan biochar on physical properties of a Norfolk loamy sand10.1097/SS.0b013e3181cb7f46 ↗
81. The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: A review10.4141/cjss2010-064 ↗
82. Circular economy indicators: What do they measure?10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045 ↗
83. Cascone, S. (2019). Green Roof Design: State of the Art on Technology and Materials. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11113020 ↗
84. Technosols made of wastes to improve physico-chemical characteristics of a copper mine soil10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60074-5 ↗
85. Wilson, D. (2016). Global Waste Management Outlook, United Nations Environment Programme.
86. Wahlström, M., Bergmans, J., Teittinen, T., Smeets, A., and Paduart, A. (2020). Construction and Demolition Waste: Challenges and Opportunities in a Circular Economy, European Environment Agency European Topic Centre on Waste and Materials in a Green Economy. Available online: https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-wmge/products/etc-reports/construction-and-demolition-waste-challenges-and-opportunities-in-a-circular-economy/@@download/file/Clean%20Version_CDW%20and%20CE%20Report%20version%20January%2010%202020_final.pdf.
87. Brandon, D.L., and Price, R.A. (2021, April 11). Summary of Available Guidance and Best Practices for Determining Suitability of Dredged Material for Beneficial Uses. Available online: https://www.vims.edu/research/departments/physical/programs/ssp/_docs/usace-2007--beneficial-use-suitablitiy.pdf.
88. Fertility of Technosols constructed with dam sediments for urban greening and land reclamation10.1007/s11368-018-2077-1 ↗
89. Coating a dredged sand with recycled ferrihydrites to create a functional material for plant substrate10.1007/s11368-017-1772-7 ↗
90. On the feasibility of South African coal waste for production of ‘FabSoil’, a Technosol10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106059 ↗
91. Technosol as an integrated management tool for turning urban and coal mining waste into a resource10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106179 ↗
92. Principal Chemical Properties of Artificial Soil Composed of Fly Ash and Furfural Residue10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60101-X ↗
93. Technosols made from urban and industrial wastes are a good option for the reclamation of abandoned city plots10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114563 ↗
94. Mixtures of crushed rock, forest soils, and sewage sludge used as soils for grassed green areas10.1078/1618-8667-00022 ↗
95. Sustainable management of excavated soil and rock in urban areas-A literature review10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.010 ↗
96. Rehabilitation of mining areas through integrated biotechnological approach: Technosols derived from organic/inorganic wastes and autochthonous plant development10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.172 ↗
97. Composted sewage sludge and steel mill slag as potential amendments for urban soils involved in afforestation programs10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.015 ↗
98. Environmental Protection Agency (2002). European Waste Catalogue and Hazardous Waste List, Environmental Protection Agency.
99. Letter to the editors: Phyto-P-mining—secondary urban green recycles phosphorus from soils constructed of urban wastes10.1007/s11368-014-1023-0 ↗
100. Fate and behaviour of phenanthrene in the natural and artificial soils10.1016/j.envpol.2007.05.034 ↗