Optimal Estimation of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Parameter Based on Coyote Optimization Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, the penetration of fuel cells in distribution systems is significantly increased worldwide. The fuel cell is considered an electrochemical energy conversion component. It has the ability to convert chemical to electrical energies as well as heat. The proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell uses hydrogen and oxygen as fuel. It is a low-temperature type that uses a noble metal catalyst, such as platinum, at reaction sites. The optimal modeling of PEM fuel cells improves the cell performance in different applications of the smart microgrid. Extracting the optimal parameters of the model can be achieved using an efficient optimization technique. In this line, this paper proposes a novel swarm-based algorithm called coyote optimization algorithm (COA) for finding the optimal parameter of PEM fuel cell as well as PEM stack. The sum of square deviation between measured voltages and the optimal estimated voltages obtained from the COA algorithm is minimized. Two practical PEM fuel cells including 250 W stack and Ned Stack PS6 are modeled to validate the capability of the proposed algorithm under different operating conditions. The effectiveness of the proposed COA is demonstrated through the comparison with four optimizers considering the same conditions. The final estimated results and statistical analysis show a significant accuracy of the proposed method. These results emphasize the ability of COA to estimate the parameters of the PEM fuel cell model more precisely.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Microgrid Control and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan 81542, Egypt
Department of Electrical Engineering, Shoubra Faculty of Engineering, Benha University, Cairo 11629, Egypt
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Power ramp rate capabilities of a 5 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell system with discrete ejector control10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.090 ↗
2. Ahmed, K., Farrok, O., Rahman, M.M., Ali, M.S., Haque, M.M., and Azad, A.K. (2020). Proton Exchange Membrane Hydrogen Fuel Cell as the Grid Connected Power Generator. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13246679 ↗
3. Qiu, Y., Wu, P., Miao, T., Liang, J., Jiao, K., Li, T., Lin, J., and Zhang, J. (2020). An Intelligent Approach for Contact Pressure Optimization of PEM Fuel Cell Gas Diffusion Layers. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10124194 ↗
4. Derbeli, M., Barambones, O., and Sbita, L. (2018). A Robust Maximum Power Point Tracking Control Method for a PEM Fuel Cell Power System. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122449 ↗
5. Ansari, S.A., Khalid, M., Kamal, K., Abdul Hussain Ratlamwala, T., Hussain, G., and Alkahtani, M. (2021). Modeling and Simulation of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Alongside a Waste Heat Recovery System Based on the Organic Rankine Cycle in MATLAB/SIMULINK Environment. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031218 ↗
6. Veziroğlu, T.N. (2013). Foreword. PEM Fuel Cells, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-387710-9.06001-X ↗
7. Ihonen, J. (2021, February 25). Value Chain Analysis of Hydrogen in Finland. Available online: http://www.topnest.no/attachments/article/12/WP3_H2FC%20Finland_revised.pdf.
8. Operational experiences of PEMFC pilot plant using low grade hydrogen from sodium chlorate production process10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.056 ↗
9. Model-Based Fault Tolerant Control for the Thermal Management of PEMFC Systems10.1109/TIE.2019.2912772 ↗
10. Abbas, A.S., El-Sehiemy, R.A., Abou El-Ela, A., Ali, E.S., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., and Darwish, M.M.F. (2021). Optimal Harmonic Mitigation in Distribution Systems with Inverter Based Distributed Generation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11020774 ↗
11. Reliable Solar Irradiance Forecasting Approach Based on Choquet Integral and Deep LSTMs10.1109/TII.2020.2996235 ↗
12. Bayoumi, A.S., El-Sehiemy, R.A., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., and Darwish, M.M.F. (2021). Assessment of an Improved Three-Diode against Modified Two-Diode Patterns of MCS Solar Cells Associated with Soft Parameter Estimation Paradigms. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11031055 ↗
13. A Novel Design of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Based Combined Cooling, Heat and Power Residential System in the U.K10.1109/TIA.2020.3034073 ↗
14. Fast Corona Discharge Assessment Using FDM integrated with Full Multigrid Method in HVDC Transmission Lines Considering Wind Impact10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045073 ↗
15. Electrical equivalent circuit modeling and parameter estimation for PEM fuel cell
16. Parameter Optimization for a Pemfc Model With Particle Swarm Optimization
17. Fuel-cell parameter estimation and diagnostics10.1109/TEC.2005.845516 ↗
18. Parameter optimization for a PEMFC model with a hybrid genetic algorithm10.1002/er.1170 ↗
19. A new parameter extraction method for accurate modeling of PEM fuel cells10.1002/er.1525 ↗
20. An Efficient Fuzzy-Logic Based Variable-Step Incremental Conductance MPPT Method for Grid-connected PV Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058052 ↗
21. Mansour, D.-E.A., Abdel-Gawad, N.M.K., El Dein, A.Z., Ahmed, H.M., Darwish, M.M.F., and Lehtonen, M. (2020). Recent Advances in Polymer Nanocomposites Based on Polyethylene and Polyvinylchloride for Power Cables. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14010066 ↗
22. Elsisi, M., Tran, M.-Q., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., and Darwish, M.M.F. (2021). Deep Learning-Based Industry 4.0 and Internet of Things towards Effective Energy Management for Smart Buildings. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041038 ↗
23. Ali, M.N., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., and Darwish, M.M.F. (2021). Promising MPPT Methods Combining Metaheuristic, Fuzzy-Logic and ANN Techniques for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041244 ↗
24. Ghoneim, S.M., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., and Darwish, M.M.F. (2021). Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy of Transformer Faults Using Teaching-Learning Based Optimization. IEEE Access, 9.10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060288 ↗
25. Parameter identification of PEMFC model based on hybrid adaptive differential evolution algorithm10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.081 ↗
26. Electrical characterisation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells stack using grasshopper optimizer10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0232 ↗
27. Multi-verse optimizer for identifying the optimal parameters of PEMFC model10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.014 ↗
28. Hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.058 ↗
29. A backtracking search algorithm combined with Burger’s chaotic map for parameter estimation of PEMFC electrochemical model10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.052 ↗
30. A novel P systems based optimization algorithm for parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell model10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.131 ↗
31. A biogeography-based optimization algorithm with mutation strategies for model parameter estimation of solar and fuel cells10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.026 ↗
32. Parameter estimation of fuel cell polarization curve using BMO algorithm10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.047 ↗
33. Validation of genetic algorithm results in a fuel cell model10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.129 ↗
34. A novel approach for fuel cell parameter estimation using simple Genetic Algorithm
35. An innovative global harmony search algorithm for parameter identification of a PEM fuel cell model10.1109/TIE.2011.2172173 ↗
36. An Improved Neural Network Algorithm to Efficiently Track Various Trajectories of Robot Manipulator Arms10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051807 ↗
37. Elsisi, M., Mahmoud, K., Lehtonen, M., and Darwish, M.M.F. (2021). Reliable Industry 4.0 Based on Machine Learning and IoT for Analyzing, Monitoring, and Securing Smart Meters. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21020487 ↗
38. Parameter identification of PEMFC based on Convolutional neural network optimized by balanced deer hunting optimization algorithm10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.011 ↗
39. Santarelli, M.G., Torchio, M.F., and Cochis, P. (2006). Parameters estimation of a PEM fuel cell polarization curve and analysis of their behavior with temperature. J. Power Sources.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.099 ↗
40. Sun, Z., Cao, D., Ling, Y., Xiang, F., Sun, Z., and Wu, F. (2021). Proton exchange membrane fuel cell model parameter identification based on dynamic differential evolution with collective guidance factor algorithm. Energy.10.1016/j.energy.2020.119056 ↗
41. Development and application of a generalized steady-state electrochemical model for a PEM fuel cell10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00484-X ↗
42. Pierezan, J., and Dos Santos Coelho, L. (2018, January 8–13). Coyote Optimization Algorithm: A New Metaheuristic for Global Optimization Problems. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2018 Proceedings, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1109/CEC.2018.8477769 ↗
43. Effective methodology based on neural network optimizer for extracting model parameters of PEM fuel cells10.1002/er.4809 ↗
44. Rizk-Allah, R.M., and El-Fergany, A.A. (2020). Artificial ecosystem optimizer for parameters identification of proton exchange membrane fuel cells model. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.256 ↗
45. PEM fuel cells model parameter identification based on a new improved fluid search optimization algorithm10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.013 ↗
46. Extracting optimal parameters of PEM fuel cells using Salp Swarm Optimizer10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.051 ↗
47. SCA: A Sine Cosine Algorithm for solving optimization problems10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022 ↗
48. PEM fuel cell model parameters extraction based on moth-flame optimization10.1016/j.ces.2020.116100 ↗