State-of-the-Art Review on Determining Prestress Losses in Prestressed Concrete Girders
Source abstract
Abstract
Prestressing methods were used to realize long-span bridges in the last few decades. For their predictive maintenance, devices and dynamic nondestructive procedures for identifying prestress losses were mainly developed since serviceability and safety of Prestressed Concrete (PC) girders depend on the effective state of prestressing. In fact, substantial long term prestress losses can induce excessive deflections and cracking in large span PC bridge girders. However, old unsolved problematics as well as new challenges exist since a variation in prestress force does not significantly affect the vibration responses of such PC girders. As a result, this makes uncertain the use of natural frequencies as appropriate parameters for prestress loss determinations. Thus, amongst emerging techniques, static identification based on vertical deflections has preliminary proved to be a reliable method with the goal to become a dominant approach in the near future. In fact, measured vertical deflections take accurately and instantaneously into account the changes of structural geometry of PC girders due to prestressing losses on the equilibrium conditions, in turn caused by the combined effects of tendon relaxation, concrete creep and shrinkage, and parameters of real environment as, e.g., temperature and relative humidity. Given the current state of quantitative and principled methodologies, this paper represents a state-of-the-art review of some important research works on determining prestress losses conducted worldwide. The attention is principally focused on a static nondestructive method, and a comparison with dynamic ones is elaborated. Comments and recommendations are made at proper places, while concluding remarks including future studies and field developments are mentioned at the end of the paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bridge Engineering Division, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE), Taipei 10668, Taiwan
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Funding
National Applied Research Laboratories of Taiwan · Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan
References (91)
Show source-provided references
1. Prestress Losses and Camber Growth in Wing-Shaped Structural Members10.15554/pcij60.1-04 ↗
2. Prediction of vertical deflections for a long-span prestressed concrete bridge structure10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.013 ↗
3. Modeling for assessment of long-term behavior of prestressed concrete box-girder bridges10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001210 ↗
4. Multi-site damage localization in a suspension bridge via aftershock monitoring
5. Damage detection and localization on a benchmark cable-stayed bridge10.12989/eas.2015.8.5.1113 ↗
6. Non-destructive monitoring of a prestressed bridge with a data-driven method
7. Structural damage detection using a parked vehicle induced frequency variation10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.082 ↗
8. Damage detection of highway bridges based on long-gauge strain response under stochastic traffic flow10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.03.022 ↗
9. Modal parameter identification of a multiple-span post-tensioned concrete bridge using hybrid vibration testing data10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110953 ↗
10. Variation of prestress forces in a prestressed concrete bridge during the first 30 months10.15554/pcij.09011996.66.72 ↗
11. Bridge prestress losses in dry climate10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1998)3:3(111) ↗
12. Monitoring and analysis of long-term prestress losses in post-tensioned concrete beams10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.057 ↗
13. Investigation of applicability of an embedded EM sensor to measure the tension of a PSC girder10.1155/2019/2469647 ↗
14. Cho, K., Kim, S.T., Cho, J.R., and Park, Y.H. (2017). Estimation of tendon force distribution in prestressed concrete girders using smart strand. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7121319 ↗
15. Long-term monitoring of ground anchor tensile forces by FBG sensors embedded tendon10.12989/sss.2017.19.3.269 ↗
16. ACI (American Concrete Institute) (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI.
17. PCI (2010). Design Handbook, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute. [7th ed.].
18. PCI Commitee on Prestress Losses (1975). Recommendations for estimating prestress losses. PCI J., 20, 43–75.10.15554/pcij20.4-04 ↗
19. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2017). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [8th ed.].
20. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2002). AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highways Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [17th ed.].
21. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2004). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [3rd ed.].
22. PCI (2011). Bridge Design Manual, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute. [3rd ed.].
23. Russell, B.W., and Gross, S.P. (2005). A comparison of methods for experimentally determining prestress losses in pretensioned prestressed concrete girders. Historic Innovations in Prestressed Concrete, American Concrete Institute.
24. Estimating prestress loss in pretensioned, high-strength concrete members10.15554/pcij.09012009.132.159 ↗
25. Effect of allowable compressive stress at release on prestress losses and on the performance of precast, prestressed concrete bridge girders10.15554/pcij.03012006.14.25 ↗
26. Prestress losses evaluation in prestressed concrete prismatic specimens10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.038 ↗
27. Experimental technique for measuring the long-term transfer length in prestressed concrete10.1111/str.12019 ↗
28. Experimental investigation of prestress losses in full-scale bridge girders10.14359/51687909 ↗
29. RILEM draft recommendation: TC-242-MDC multi-decade creep and shrinkage of concrete: Material model and structural analysis. Model B4 for creep, drying shrinkage and autogenous shrinkage of normal and high-strength concretes with multi-decade applicability10.1617/s11527-014-0485-2 ↗
30. New model for concrete creep and shrinkage prediction and its application10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.249.125 ↗
31. The effect of degree of prestressing and age of concrete beams on frequency and damping of their free vibration10.1007/BF02472987 ↗
32. Prestress force effect on vibration frequency of concrete bridges10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(2233) ↗
33. Behavior of prestressed beam strengthened with external tendons10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1033) ↗
34. Identification of prestress force from measured structural responses10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.001 ↗
35. Theoretical analysis of natural frequency of externally prestressed concrete beam based on rigidity correction
36. Hybrid health monitoring of prestressed concrete girder bridges by sequential vibration-impedance approaches10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.021 ↗
37. A sensitivity analysis of the key parameters for the prediction of the pre-stress force on bonded tendons10.5516/NET.2010.42.3.319 ↗
38. Experimental investigation of dynamic behavior of prestressed girders with internal tendons10.1007/s13296-015-6011-8 ↗
39. A theoretical study of force identification using prestressed concrete bridges10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00087-5 ↗
40. Timoshenko, S.P., and Gere, J.M. (1961). Theory of Elastic Stability, McGraw-Hill.
41. Bažant, Z.P., and Cedolin, L. (1991). Stability of Structures, Oxford University Press.
42. Young, W.C., and Budynas, R.G. (2002). Dynamic and Temperature Stresses. Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain, McGraw–Hill.
43. Identification of prestress-loss in PSC beams using modal information10.12989/sem.2004.17.3_4.467 ↗
44. Time domain responses of a prestressed beam and prestress identification10.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.045 ↗
45. Natural frequencies of bonded and unbonded prestressed beams-prestress force effects10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.032 ↗
46. Effect of prestressing on the first flexural natural frequency of beams10.12989/sem.2008.28.5.515 ↗
47. Damage detection in a post tensioned concrete beam—Experimental investigation10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.017 ↗
48. The effect of prestressing force on natural frequencies of concrete beams—A numerical validation of existing experiments by modelling shrinkage crack closure10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.030 ↗
49. The effect of prestress force magnitude and eccentricity on the natural bending frequencies of uncracked prestressed concrete beams10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.047 ↗
50. Experimental study on the fundamental frequency of prestressed concrete bridge beams with parabolic unbonded tendons10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.038 ↗
51. Bonopera, M., Chang, K.C., Lin, T.K., and Tullini, N. (2021). Influence of prestressing on the behavior of uncracked concrete beams with a parabolic bonded tendon. Struct. Eng. Mech., 77, Accepted.
52. Effect of a time dependent concrete modulus of elasticity on prestress losses in bridge girders10.1007/s40069-013-0037-0 ↗
53. Flexural performance correlation with natural bending frequency of post-tensioned concrete beam: Experimental investigation10.1007/s13349-019-00374-3 ↗
54. Full-scale testing and analysis of 20-year-old pretensioned concrete box girders
55. In-situ methods to determine residual prestress forces in concrete bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.059 ↗
56. Destructive testing of two forty-year-old prestressed concrete bridge beams10.15554/pcij.09011996.84.93 ↗
57. Instrument to evaluate remaining prestress in damaged prestressed concrete bridge girders10.15554/pcij.03011998.62.71 ↗
58. Application of a new nondestructive evaluation technique to a 25-year-old prestressed concrete girder10.15554/pcij.05011996.82.95 ↗
59. Vibration based method to detect pre–stress loss in beam type bridges
60. Effective pre–stress identification for a simply supported PRC beam bridge by BP neural network method
61. Pre–stress force identification for eccentrically prestressed concrete beam from beam vibration response
62. Prestress force identification for externally pre–stressed concrete beam based on frequency equation and measured frequencies10.1155/2014/840937 ↗
63. Prestress and excitation force identification in a prestressed concrete box-girder bridge
64. On the evaluation of prestress loss in PRC beams by means of dynamic techniques10.1186/s40069-018-0237-8 ↗
65. Prestress evaluation in continuous PSC bridges by dynamic identification
66. Moving load and prestress identification using wavelet based method10.1115/1.2793134 ↗
67. Assessment of prestress force in bridges using structural dynamic responses under moving vehicles
68. Synergic identification of prestress force and moving load on prestressed concrete beam based on virtual distortion method10.12989/sss.2016.17.6.917 ↗
69. Dynamic identification of beam axial loads using one flexural mode shape10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.061 ↗
70. Identifying multiple axial load patterns using measured vibration data10.1016/j.jsv.2011.02.024 ↗
71. Bending tests to estimate the axial force in tie–rods10.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.06.005 ↗
72. Identification of axial forces in beam members by local vibration measurements10.1016/j.jsv.2013.05.017 ↗
73. Estimate of the axial force in slender beams with unknown boundary conditions using one flexural mode shape10.1016/j.jsv.2013.03.018 ↗
74. Bending tests to estimate the axial force in slender beams with unknown boundary conditions10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.07.011 ↗
75. Vibration-based model updating and identification of multiple axial forces in truss structures10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.499 ↗
76. Non-destructive assessment of the axial stress state in iron and steel truss structures by dynamic measurements10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.447 ↗
77. Axial load detection in compressed steel beams using FBG–DSM sensors
78. Compressive column load identification in steel space frames using second–order deflection–based methods10.1142/S021945541850092X ↗
79. Bending tests for the structural safety assessment of space truss members10.1177/0266351118804123 ↗
80. Feasibility study of prestress force prediction for concrete beams using second–order deflections10.1142/S0219455418501249 ↗
81. Prestress force effect on fundamental frequency and deflection shape of PCI beams
82. Dynamic identification of axial force and boundary restraints in tie rods and cables with uncertainty quantification using Set Inversion Via Interval Analysis10.1016/j.jsv.2018.02.062 ↗
83. Dynamic impact testing on post–tensioned steel rectangular hollow sections; An investigation into the “compression–softening” effect10.1016/j.jsv.2015.06.021 ↗
84. Reliability of the tensile force identification in ancient tie-rods using one flexural mode shape10.1080/15583058.2018.1563227 ↗
85. Identification of axial forces on statically indeterminate pin-jointed trusses by a nondestructive mechanical test10.2174/1874149501307010050 ↗
86. Prestress loss distributions along simply supported pretensioned concrete beams10.56748/ejse.16207 ↗
87. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2016). Annual Book of ASTM standards, Section 4: Construction vol. 04.02, Concrete & Aggregates.
88. Integration of in–situ load experiments and numerical modeling in a long–term bridge monitoring system on a newly–constructed widened section of freeway in Taiwan10.12989/sss.2014.13.6.1015 ↗
89. A bridge safety monitoring system for prestressed composite box–girder bridges with corrugated steel webs based on in–situ loading experiments and a long–term monitoring database10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.006 ↗
90. Development of displacement estimation method of girder bridges using measured strain signal induced by vehicular loads10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.107 ↗
91. Fiber Bragg grating–differential settlement measurement system for bridge displacement monitoring: Case study10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001470 ↗