Automated Diatom Classification (Part A): Handcrafted Feature Approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper deals with automatic taxa identification based on machine learning methods. The aim is therefore to automatically classify diatoms, in terms of pattern recognition terminology. Diatoms are a kind of algae microorganism with high biodiversity at the species level, which are useful for water quality assessment. The most relevant features for diatom description and classification have been selected using an extensive dataset of 80 taxa with a minimum of 100 samples/taxon augmented to 300 samples/taxon. In addition to published morphological, statistical and textural descriptors, a new textural descriptor, Local Binary Patterns (LBP), to characterize the diatom’s valves, and a log Gabor implementation not tested before for this purpose are introduced in this paper. Results show an overall accuracy of 98.11% using bagging decision trees and combinations of descriptors. Finally, some phycological features of diatoms that are still difficult to integrate in computer systems are discussed for future work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diatoms and Algae Research · Identification and Quantification in Food · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
VISILAB-University of Castilla-La Mancha, Av. Camilo José Cela s/n, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
Institute of Optics, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain
The Institute of the Environment, University of Leon, E-24071 León, Spain
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Lek, S., Scardi, M., Verdonschot, P.F.M., Descy, J.-P., and Park, Y.-S. (2005). Using bioindicators to assess rivers in Europe: An overview. Modelling Community Structure Infreshwater Ecosystems, Springer. Chapter 1.10.1007/b138251 ↗
2. Using river microalgae as indicators for freshwater biomonitoring: Review of published research and future directions10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.066 ↗
3. Comparison of biotic indices for water quality diagnosis in the Duero Basin (Spain)
4. Round, F.E., Crawford, R.M., and Mann, D.G. (1990). Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of the Genera, Cambridge University Press.
5. The species concept in diatoms10.2216/i0031-8884-38-6-437.1 ↗
6. Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers III10.1023/A:1008182326039 ↗
7. A model of diatom shape and texture for analysis, synthesis and identification10.1007/s00138-006-0035-1 ↗
8. Smol, J., and Stoermer, E. (2010). The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763175 ↗
9. European Standard, EN 14407: 2004 (2004). Water Quality—Guidance Standard for the Identification, Enumeration and Interpretation of Benthic Diatom Samples from Running Waters, European Commission. Technical Report.
10. Wayne, R. (2014). Light and Video Microscopy, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
11. Electron microscope studies on diatoms
12. Quantitative morphometric methods in diatom research
13. Kloster, M., Kauer, G., and Beszteri, B. (2014). SHERPA: An image segmentation and outline feature extraction tool for diatoms and other objects. BMC Bioinform., 15.10.1186/1471-2105-15-218 ↗
14. Determining the accuracy of coherent optical identification of diatoms10.1111/j.1752-1688.1979.tb01187.x ↗
15. Automatic classification of field-collected dinoflagellates by artificial neural network10.3354/meps139281 ↗
16. Optical-digital system applied to the identification of five phytoplankton species10.1007/s002270050402 ↗
17. Automatic system for phytoplanktonic algae identification10.23818/limn.20.14 ↗
18. Du Buf, H., and Bayer, M. (2002). Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence. Automatic Diatom Identification, World Scientific Publishing Co.10.1142/4907 ↗
19. Legendre shape descriptors and shape group determination of specimens in the Cymbella cistula species complex10.2216/i0031-8884-42-1-90.1 ↗
20. Du Buf, H., Bayer, M., Droop, S., Head, R., Juggins, S., Fischer, S., Bunke, H., Wilkinson, M., Roerdink, J., and Pech-Pacheco, J. (1999, January 27–29). Diatom identification: A double challenge called ADIAC. Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, Venice, Italy.
21. Hierarchical classification of diatom images using ensembles of predictive clustering trees10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.09.001 ↗
22. Kuang, Y. (2015). Deep Neural Network for Deep Sea Plankton Classification, Stanford University. Technical Report.
23. A Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network for Plankton Classification10.1007/978-3-319-54526-4_8 ↗
24. Pedraza, A., Deniz, O., Bueno, G., Cristobal, G., Borrego-Ramos, M., and Blanco, S. (2017). Automated Diatom Classification (Part B): A deep learning approach. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7050460 ↗
25. High-throughput time-stretch imaging flow cytometry for multi-class classification of phytoplankton10.1364/OE.24.028170 ↗
26. Evaluación de la calidad del agua en los ríos de la cuenca del Duero mediante índices diatomológicos
27. Textural features for image classification10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 ↗
28. Texture classification using texture spectrum10.1016/0031-3203(90)90135-8 ↗
29. Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., and Harwood, D. (1994, January 9–13). Performance evaluation of texture measures with classification based on Kullback discrimination of distributions. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition-Conference A: Computer Vision Image Processing (IAPR), Jerusalem, Israel.
30. A comprehensive study of texture analysis based on local binary patterns10.1117/12.923558 ↗
31. An Analysis of Texture Classification: Local Binary Patterns
32. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017623 ↗
33. Texture Image Retrieval Based on Log-Gabor Features
34. Visual Pattern Recognition by Moment Invariants
35. Self Invertible Gabor Wavelets10.1007/s11263-006-0026-8 ↗
36. An introduction to variable and feature selection
37. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G. (2001). Pattern Classification, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
38. Unsupervised feature selection using feature similarity10.1109/34.990133 ↗
39. Floating search methods in feature selection10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9 ↗
40. Alpaydin, E. (2010). Introduction to Machine Learning, The MIT Press. [2nd ed.].
41. Bagging predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗