Residential Demand Response Scheduling with Consideration of Consumer Preferences
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes a new demand response scheduling framework for an array of households, which are grouped into different categories based on socio-economic factors, such as the number of occupants, family decomposition and employment status. Each of the households is equipped with a variety of appliances. The model takes the preferences of participating households into account and aims to minimize the overall production cost and, in parallel, to lower the individual electricity bills. In the existing literature, customers submit binary values for each time period to indicate their operational preferences. However, turning the appliances “on” or “off” does not capture the associated discomfort levels, as each appliance provides a different service and leads to a different level of satisfaction. The proposed model employs integer values to indicate household preferences and models the scheduling problem as a multi-objective mixed integer programming. The main thrust of the framework is that the multi-level preference modeling of appliances increases their “flexibility”; hence, the job scheduling can be done at a lower cost. The model is evaluated by using the real data provided by the Department of Energy & Climate Change, UK. In the computational experiments, we examine the relation between the satisfaction of consumers based on the appliance usage preferences and the electricity costs by exploring the Pareto front of the related objective functions. The results show that the proposed model leads to significant savings in electricity cost, while maintaining a good level of customer satisfaction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Energy Management · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute (QEERI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 5825, Doha 3263, Qatar
College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 5825, Doha 3263, Qatar
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Smart Homes: Past, Present, and Future10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2189204 ↗
2. The socio-economic, dwelling and appliance related factors affecting electricity consumption in domestic buildings10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.084 ↗
3. Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid10.1109/TSG.2010.2089069 ↗
4. A Survey on Demand Response Programs in Smart Grids: Pricing Methods and Optimization Algorithms10.1109/COMST.2014.2341586 ↗
5. Barker, S., Mishra, A., Irwin, D., Shenoy, P., and Albrecht, J. (2012, January 19–23). SmartCap: Flattening peak electricity demand in smart homes. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), Lugano, Switzerland.10.1109/PerCom.2012.6199851 ↗
6. Power grid balancing of energy systems with high renewable energy penetration by demand response10.1016/j.jup.2007.11.006 ↗
7. Taking Demand Response to the Next Level10.1109/MPE.2010.936352 ↗
8. Balijepalli, V., Pradhan, V., Khaparde, S., and Shereef, R. (2011, January 1–3). Review of demand response under smart grid paradigm. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies—India (ISGT India), Kerala, India.
9. Demand response and smart grids—A survey10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.022 ↗
10. Koutsopoulos, I., and Tassiulas, L. (June, January 31). Control and optimization meet the smart power grid: Scheduling of power demands for optimal energy management. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking, New York, NY, USA.
11. Capacity Planning Frameworks for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations With Multiclass Customers10.1109/TSG.2015.2406532 ↗
12. Unsplittable Load Balancing in a Network of Charging Stations Under QoS Guarantees10.1109/TSG.2014.2362994 ↗
13. Falvo, M.C., Sbordone, D., Bayram, I.S., and Devetsikiotis, M. (2014, January 18–20). EV charging stations and modes: International standards. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), Ischia, Italy.10.1109/SPEEDAM.2014.6872107 ↗
14. Scheduling for electricity cost in smart grid10.1007/978-3-319-03780-6_27 ↗
15. Caron, S., and Kesidis, G. (2010, January 4–6). Incentive-Based Energy Consumption Scheduling Algorithms for the Smart Grid. Proceedings of the 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Gaithersburg, MD, USA.10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622073 ↗
16. Control of Flexible Smart Devices in the Smart Grid10.1109/TSG.2012.2204410 ↗
17. Optimal Control Policies for Power Demand Scheduling in the Smart Grid10.1109/JSAC.2012.120704 ↗
18. Dupont, B., Tant, J., and Belmans, R. (2012, January 14–17). Automated residential demand response based on dynamic pricing. Proceedings of the 2012 3rd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Proceedings of the Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/ISGTEurope.2012.6465806 ↗
19. Residential Demand Response Scheduling With Multiclass Appliances in the Smart Grid10.1109/TSG.2015.2445491 ↗
20. Multi-objective optimal energy consumption scheduling in smart grids10.1109/TSG.2012.2214068 ↗
21. Palmer, J., Terry, N., Firth, S., Kane, T., Godoy-Shimizu, D., and Pope, P. (2012). Further Analysis of the Household Electricity Survey Energy Use at Home: Models, Labels and Unusual Appliances, Intertek Testing & Certification Ltd.
22. Bisschop, J. (2006). AIMMS Optimization Modeling, Lulu.
23. Energy Consumption Calculator, RapidTables. Available online: www.rapidtables.com/calc/electric/energy-consumption-calculator.htm.
24. Energy Use Calculator. Available online: http://energyusecalculator.com/.
25. Zimmermann, J.P., Evans, M., Griggs, J., King, N., Harding, L., Roberts, P., and Evans, C. (2012). Household Electricity Survey: A study of domestic electrical product usage, Intertek Report.
26. COMED’S Hourly Pricing Program. Available online: https://hourlypricing.comed.com/.
27. Optimal Household Appliances Scheduling under Day-Ahead Pricing and Load-Shaping Demand Response Strategies10.1109/TII.2015.2438534 ↗
28. An exact ϵ-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem with Profits10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.014 ↗