journal article·2022-01-08Open access

Are Sustainable Aviation Fuels a Viable Option for Decarbonizing Air Transport in Europe? An Environmental and Economic Sustainability Assessment

Alexander Barke, Timo Bley, Christian Thies, Christian Weckenborg, Thomas S. Spengler

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 2

Abstract

The use of drop-in capable alternative fuels in aircraft can support the European aviation sector to achieve its goals for sustainable development. They can be a transitional solution in the short and medium term, as their use does not require any structural changes to the aircraft powertrain. However, the production of alternative fuels is often energy-intensive, and some feedstocks are associated with harmful effects on the environment. In addition, alternative fuels are often more expensive to produce than fossil kerosene, which can make their use unattractive. Therefore, this paper analyzes the environmental and economic impacts of four types of alternative fuels compared to fossil kerosene in a well-to-wake perspective. The fuels investigated are sustainable aviation fuels produced by power-to-liquid and biomass-to-liquid pathways. Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing are used as environmental and economic assessment methods. The results of this well-to-wake analysis reveal that the use of sustainable aviation fuels can reduce the environmental impacts of aircraft operations. However, an electricity mix based on renewable energies is needed to achieve significant reductions. In addition, from an economic perspective, the use of fossil kerosene ranks best among the alternatives. A scenario analysis confirms this result and shows that the production of sustainable aviation fuels using an electricity mix based solely on renewable energy can lead to significant reductions in environmental impact, but economic competitiveness remains problematic.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Environmental Impact and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Automotive Management and Industrial Production, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany

Cluster of Excellence “SE^{2}A—Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Aviation”, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. International Transport Forum (2019). ITF Transport Outlook 2019, OECD Publishing.
2. Airbus, S.A.S. (2019). Cities, Airports & Aircraft, Airbus.
3. Boeing (2019). Commercial Market Outlook: 2019–2038, Boeing.
4. COVID-19 and pathways to low-carbon air transport until 205010.1088/1748-9326/abe90b ↗
5. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), European Environmental Agency (EEA), and EUROCONTROL (2019). European Aviation Environmental Report 2019.
6. Technical and environmental assessment of all-electric 180-passenger commercial aircraft10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.11.002 ↗
7. Recommendations for calculation of the global warming potential of aviation including the radiative forcing index10.1007/s11367-018-1556-3 ↗
8. The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 201810.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834 ↗
9. Status, Daten und Entwicklungen der globalen Energieversorgung
10. Mensen, H. (2013). Handbuch der Luftfahrt, Springer Vieweg. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-662-46045-0 ↗
11. ICAO (2018). Annex 16 CORSIA, ICAO.
12. European Commission (2014). Flightpath 2050: Europe’s Vision for Aviation, European Comission.
13. Kumar, N., Möller, U., Tang, S., and Chiarini, P. (2021, September 15). Flightpath 2050 Goals, Available online: https://www.acare4europe.org/sria/flightpath-2050-goals.
14. Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe (ACARE) (2012). Strategic Research & Innovation Agenda, ACARE.
15. Life cycle sustainability assessment of potential battery systems for electric aircraft10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.171 ↗
16. ICAO (2019). Electric, Hybrid, and Hydrogen Aircraft—State of Play, ICAO.
17. Fend, T., and Roeb, M. (2021, September 15). Solare Thermochemische Wasserspaltung. Available online: https://www.dlr.de/sf/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-9315/22259_read-51105/.
18. Melo, S.P., Barke, A., Cerdas, F., Thies, C., Mennenga, M., Spengler, T.S., and Herrmann, C. (2020). Sustainability Assessment and Engineering of Emerging Aircraft Technologies—Challenges, Methods and Tools. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12145663 ↗
19. Power-to-Liquids as Renewable Fuel Option for Aviation: A Review10.1002/cite.201700129 ↗
20. Life-cycle analysis of bio-based aviation fuels10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.153 ↗
21. Gomez Jimenez, I. (2021, September 15). Feasibility Study on the Use of Sustainable Aviation Fuels. Available online: https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/FeasabilityStudy_BurkinaFaso_Report-Web.pdf.
22. ICAO (2017). Agenda Item 1: Developments in Research and Certification of Aviation Alternative Fuels, ICAO.
23. ICAO (2017). Agenda Item 1: Developments in Research and Certification of Aviation Alternative Fuels STATUS, ICAO.
24. Bley, T. (2021). Analyse und Vergleich Ökologischer und Sozioökonomischer Umweltwirkungen Verschiedener Kraftstoffvarianten für die Verwendung im Luftverkehr. [Master’s Thesis, Technische Universität Braunschweig].
25. Farokhi, S. (2020). Future Propulsion Systems and Energy Sources in Sustainable Aviation, Wiley & Sons. [1st ed.].10.1002/9781119415077 ↗
26. Systematik im Power-to-X-Ansatz—Identifikation, Charakterisierung und Clusterung der Power-to-X-Technologien
27. Roth, A., Sizmann, A., and Jeßberger, C. (2016). Report on Compilation, Mapping and Evaluation of R&D Activities in the Field of Conversion Technologies of Biogenic Feedstock and Biomass-Independent Pathways, Bauhaus Luftfahrt e.V.
28. Life cycle environmental analysis of “drop in” alternative aviation fuels: A review10.1039/C9SE00788A ↗
29. Techno-Economic Assessment of Power-to-Liquids (PtL) Fuels Production and Global Trading Based on Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plants10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.115 ↗
30. The Synthesis of Petroleum at Atmospheric Pressures from Gasification Products of Coal
31. Horschig, T., Penke, C., Habersetzer, A., and Batteiger, V. (2021, September 15). Regional Feedstock Potentials and Preference Regions for HTL Projects. Available online: www.hyflexfuel.eu.
32. Nationale Organisation Wasserstoff-und Brennstoffzellentechnologie (2021). Factsheet: Übersicht und Einordnung Alternativer Kraftstoffe Kraftstoffe im Fokus der NOW, NOW GmbH.
33. Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008 ↗
34. Life cycle assessment of air transportation and the Swiss commercial air transport fleet10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.017 ↗
35. A review on the production processes of renewable jet fuel10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.108 ↗
36. Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components10.3389/fenrg.2020.00110 ↗
37. Aviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.007 ↗
38. Rye, L., and Batten, D. (2011, January 23–28). Alternative aviation fuel feedstock: The microalgae solution. Proceedings of the ICAS 2012, Brisbane, Australia.
39. Alternative jet fuel feasibility10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.018 ↗
40. Techno-economic and environmental analysis of aviation biofuels10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.09.022 ↗
41. Johanning, A., and Scholz, D. (2015, January 7–11). Comparison of the potential environmental impact improvements of future aircraft concepts using life cycle assessment. Proceedings of the 5th CEAS Air & Space Conference, Delft, The Netherlands.
42. Advantages of the use of hydrogen fuel as compared to kerosene10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.004 ↗
43. Life cycle evaluation of hydrogen and other potential fuels for aircrafts
44. State of art of hydrogen usage as a fuel on aviation10.26701/ems.364286 ↗
45. Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment10.3390/su2103309 ↗
46. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023 ↗
47. Techno-Economic Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization10.3389/fenrg.2020.00005 ↗
48. Reddy, K.R., Sadasivam, B.Y., and Adams, J.A. (2014, January 6–8). Social Sustainability Evaluation Matrix (SSEM) to Quantify Social Aspects of Sustainable Remediation. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1061/9780784478745.078 ↗
49. Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future10.1021/es101316v ↗
50. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products10.1065/lca2008.02.376 ↗
51. UNEP/SETAC (2011). Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Making Informed Choices on Products, UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.
52. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007 ↗
53. Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment—A practical approach applied to biorefineries10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.095 ↗
54. Activity analysis based modeling of global supply chains for sustainability assessment
55. The Need for a Preference-Based Multicriteria Prioritization Framework in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment10.1111/jiec.12631 ↗
56. Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 ↗
57. Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., and van Zelm, R. (2013). ReCiPe 2008: A life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level, Ministerie van VROM.
58. Life cycle costing in LCM: Ambitions, opportunities, and limitations10.1007/BF02978913 ↗
59. Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., and Rebitzer, G. (2008). Environmental Life Cycle Costing, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420054736 ↗
60. The computational structure of environmental life cycle costing10.1007/s11367-015-0952-1 ↗
61. Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: Unifying LCA and LCC10.1007/s11367-012-0461-4 ↗
62. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 ↗
63. Raffinerie Heide (2017). Energising the North, Raffinerie Heide GmbH.
64. 3N Centre of Experts for Renewable Resources Lower Saxony (2014). Biogas in Lower Saxony, 3N Centre of Experts.
65. Energy and climate impacts of producing synthetic hydrocarbon fuels from CO210.1021/es500191g ↗
66. Rutkowski, M., Penev, M., Saur, G., and Steward, D. (2021, September 30). Current Central Hydrogen from Natural Gas with CO2 Capture and Sequestration: NREL, Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/assets/docs/current-central-natural-gas-with-co2-sequestration-v3-2018.20210104.xlsm.
67. DeSantis, D., James, B., and Saur, G. (2021, September 30). Hydrogen Production from Central PEM Electrolysis: NREL, Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/assets/docs/current-central-pem-electrolysis-2019-v3-2018.xlsm.
68. James, B., DeSantis, D., Moton, J., and Saur, G. (2021, September 30). Current Central Hydrogen Production from Solid Oxide Electrolysis: NREL, Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/assets/docs/current-central-solid-oxide-electrolysis-v3-2018.xlsm.
69. ECSPP (2021, September 15). An Overview of the Pipeline Networks of Europe. Available online: https://chemicalparks.eu/europe/pipeline-networks.
70. Lufthansa Group (2021, September 15). LH-Factsheet-Sustainability-2020. Available online: https://www.lufthansagroup.com/media/downloads/en/responsibility/LH-Factsheet-Sustainability-2020.pdf.
71. About the emissions of alternative jet fuels10.1007/s13272-016-0230-3 ↗
72. Combustion performance of bio-ethanol at various blend ratios in a gasoline direct injection engine10.1016/j.fuel.2010.12.025 ↗
73. Brightway: An open source framework for Life Cycle Assessment10.21105/joss.00236 ↗
74. Fraunhofer ISE (2021). German Net Electricity Generation in First Half of 2021: Decline in Renewables Due to Weak Winds, Fraunhofer ISE.
75. 100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 ↗
76. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of renewable jet fuel production in integrated Brazilian sugarcane biorefineries10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.079 ↗
77. State of the Art of Hydrogen Production via Pyrolysis of Natural Gas10.1002/cben.202000014 ↗
78. Socio-economic life cycle assessment of future aircraft systems10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.096 ↗