journal article·2018-09-12Open access

Comparison of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) with Laboratory Grade Equipment

Roberto Aliandro Varella, Barouch Giechaskiel, Luís Sousa, Gonçalo Duarte

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 9

Abstract

Real-driving emissions (RDE) testing with portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) during the type approval and in-service conformity of light-duty vehicles was recently introduced in the European Union legislation. In this paper, three PEMS were compared with laboratory analyzers connected to the tailpipe and the dilution tunnel. The tests were conducted with two Euro 6 vehicles (one gasoline and one diesel) performing the World harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) and a pre-recorded RDE cycle on a chassis dynamometer. The results showed that the differences of the PEMS gas analyzers compared to the laboratory references were typically within 2% for CO2 and 5% for NOx. The CO2 and NOx mass emissions were within 10% and 15%, respectively, with only a few exceptions. The exhaust flow rate measurements were within 10% at low speeds (urban conditions), and 5% at higher speeds. These results confirm the legislated permitted tolerances and the 2017 PEMS uncertainty estimates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vehicle emissions and performance · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

European Commission–Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Energy, Transport and Climate, Sustainable Transport Unit, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy

Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research (IN+/IST), University of Lisbon–Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

ADEM/ISEL/IPL, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Rua Conselheiro Emídio Navarro 1, 1959-007 Lisbon, Portugal

Funding

National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq – Brazil)

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. European Commission (2017). EU Transport in Figures, Publications Office of the European Union.
2. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2016). Transitions towards a More Sustainable Mobility System, Publications Office of the European Union. ISSN 1977-8449.
3. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2017). Air Quality in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union. Report No. 13/2017.
4. European Commission (2017). Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 of 1 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EC) No. 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1230/2012 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No. 692/2008. Off. J. Eur. Union, L175, 1–643.
5. How much difference in type-approval CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe can be expected from changing to the new test procedure (NEDC vs. WLTP)?
6. Giechaskiel, B., Vlachos, T., Riccobono, F., Forni, F., Colombo, R., Montigny, F., Le-Lijour, P., Carriero, M., Bonnel, P., and Weiss, M. (2016). Implementation of portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) for the real-driving emissions (RDE) regulation in Europe. J. Vis. Exp., 118.10.3791/54753-v ↗
7. Baldino, C., Tiegte, U., Muncrief, R., Bernard, Y., and Mock, P. (2017). Road Tested: Comparative Overview of Real-World Versus Type-Approval NOx and CO2 Emissions from Diesel Cars in Europe, International Council on Clean Transportation Europe (ICCT). White Paper.
8. Merkisz, J., Pielecha, J., Bielaczyc, P., and Woodburn, J. (2016). Analysis of emission factors in RDE tests as well as in NEDC and WLTC chassis dynamometer tests. SAE Tech. Pap.10.4271/2016-01-0980 ↗
9. Framework for the assessment of PEMS (Portable Emissions Measuremet Systems) uncertainty10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.012 ↗
10. On-road and chassis dynamometer evaluations of emissions from two Euro 6 diesel vehicles10.4271/2014-01-2826 ↗
11. Characteristics of on-road NOx emissions from Euro 6 light-duty diesel vehicles using a portable emissions measurement system10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.101 ↗
12. Thompson, G., Carder, D., Besch, M., Thiruvengadam, A., and Kappanna, H. (2014). In-Use Emissions Testing of Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles in the United States, West Virginia University. Report.
13. Experiences and results with different PEMS
14. Vehicle modal emissions measurement—Techniques and issues10.1243/0954407041581057 ↗
15. Verner, J., and Sejkorova, M. (2018). Comparison of CVS and PEMS measuring devices used for stating CO2 exhaust emissions of light-duty vehicles during WLTP testing procedure. Eng. Rural Dev., 2054–2059.10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N284 ↗
16. Evaluation of NOx emissions of a retrofitted Euro 5 passenger car for the Horizon prize “Engine retrofit”10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.006 ↗