Blockchain-Based Distributed Patient-Centric Image Management System
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, many researchers have focused on developing a feasible solution for storing and exchanging medical images in the field of health care. Current practices are deployed on cloud-based centralized data centers, which increase maintenance costs, require massive storage space, and raise privacy concerns about sharing information over a network. Therefore, it is important to design a framework to enable sharing and storing of big medical data efficiently within a trustless environment. In the present paper, we propose a novel proof-of-concept design for a distributed patient-centric image management (PCIM) system that is aimed to ensure safety and control of patient private data without using a centralized infrastructure. In this system, we employed an emerging Ethereum blockchain and a distributed file system technology called Inter-Planetary File System (IPFS). Then, we implemented an Ethereum smart contract called the patient-centric access control protocol to enable a distributed and trustworthy access control policy. IPFS provides the means for decentralized storage of medical images with global accessibility. We describe how the PCIM system architecture facilitates the distributed and secured patient-centric data access across multiple entities such as hospitals, patients, and image requestors. Finally, we deployed a smart contract prototype on an Ethereum testnet blockchain and evaluated the proposed framework within the Windows environment. The evaluation results demonstrated that the proposed scheme is efficient and feasible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Cloud Data Security Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. A Review of PHR, EMR and EHR Integration: A More Personalized Healthcare and Public Health Policy10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.08.002 ↗
2. (2020, December 16). Report Linker “Deep Learning Market: Focus on Medical Image Processing”, 2020–2030. Available online: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05987918/Deep-Learning-Market-Focus-on-Medical-Image-Processing.
3. Seh, A.H., Zarour, M., Alenezi, M., Sarkar, A.K., Agrawal, A., and Khan, A.R. (2020). Healthcare Data Breaches: Insights and Implications. Healthcare, 8.10.3390/healthcare8020133 ↗
4. Mettler, M. (2016, January 14–16). Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: The Revolution Starts Here. Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), Munich, Germany.10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749510 ↗
5. Nakamoto, S. (2020, November 22). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available online: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
6. Wood, G. (2020, November 02). Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger. Available online: https://gavwood.com/paper.pdf.
7. Zhang, M., and Ji, Y. (2018). Blockchain for Healthcare Records: A Data Perspective. Peer J Prepr., 2–6.10.7287/peerj.preprints.26942v1 ↗
8. (2020, November 22). Bitinfocharts. Available online: https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/.
9. The Potential for Blockchain to Transform Electronic Health Records
10. Benet, J. (2020, November 22). IPFS—Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System(DRAFT 3). Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3561.
11. Blockchain-based decentralized storage networks: A survey10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102656 ↗
12. Cloud Based Medical Image Exchange-Security Challenges10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.399 ↗
13. Experience with Importation of Electronic Images into the Medical Record from Physical Media10.1007/s10278-011-9364-3 ↗
14. Introduction to the DICOM standard10.1007/s003300101100 ↗
15. Sampaio, R.A., and Jackowski, M.P. (2013, January 5–8). Assessment of Steganographic Methods in Medical Imaging. Proceedings of the XXVI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI ‘13), Arequipa, Peru. Available online: https://www.ucsp.edu.pe/sibgrapi2013/eproceedings/wuw/115732_1.pdf.
16. The RSNA Image Sharing Network10.1007/s10278-014-9714-z ↗
17. Prince, J., and Links, J. (2006). Medical Imaging Signals and System, Pearson Prentice Hall.
18. Entangled stakeholder roles and perceptions in health information systems: A longitudinal study of the UK NHS N3 Network
19. Cybersecurity Challenges for PACS and Medical Imaging10.1007/s10278-020-00393-3 ↗
20. Health Information Exchange: Persistent Challenges and New Strategies10.1136/jamia.2010.003673 ↗
21. Beyond Bitcoin: Potential Applications of Blockchain Technology in Dermatology10.1111/bjd.16922 ↗
22. System-level Quality Imporvement MedBlock: Efficient and Secure Medical Data Sharing Via Blockchain
23. MeDShare: Trust-Less Medical Data Sharing among Cloud Service Providers via Blockchain10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2730843 ↗
24. Shen, B., Guo, J., and Yang, Y. (2019). MedChain: Efficient Healthcare Data Sharing via Blockchain. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061207 ↗
25. A Framework for Secure and Decentralized Sharing of Medical Imaging Data via Blockchain Consensus
26. Buterin, V. (2020, November 02). Ethereum White Paper. Available online: https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper.
27. (2020, December 16). GIT, Getting Started—About Version Control, Chapter 1. Available online: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control.
28. SPP: An Anti-Phishing Single Password Protocol10.1016/j.comnet.2007.03.007 ↗
29. Callas, J., Donnerhacke, L., Finney, H., Shaw, D., and Thayer, R. (2020, December 27). OpenPGP Message Format. RFC 2440 (Proposed Standard). Technol. Rep., Available online: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2440.txt.
30. Evaluation of DICOM viewer software for workflow integration in clinical trials
31. Lee, W. (2019). Getting Started with Smart Contract and using the MetaMask Chrome Extension. Beginning Ethereum Smart Contracts Programming, Apress.10.1007/978-1-4842-5086-0 ↗
32. (2020, November 22). Github-Go-IPFS. Available online: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs.
33. (2020, November 22). Infonet GIST. Available online: https://github.com/infonetGIST/PCAC-SC.
34. (2020, November 22). Etherscan. Available online: https://rinkeby.etherscan.io/.
35. (2020, December 16). PostDICOM API Documentation. Available online: https://www.postdicom.com/.
36. Benet, J., and Greco, N. (2018). Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network, Protocol Labs. Available online: https://filecoin.io/filecoin.pdf.
37. Survey on Encryption Approaches for Secure Face Biometrics10.1088/1757-899X/396/1/012028 ↗
38. Liu, X., Lee, W., Bui, Q., Lin, C., and Wu, H. (2018). Biometrics-Based RSA Cryptosystem for Securing Real-Time Communication. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10103588 ↗
39. Authentication and Data Hiding using a Hybrid ROI10.1007/s10278-009-9253-1 ↗
40. Multiple Image Watermarking Applied to Health Information Management10.1109/TITB.2006.875655 ↗
41. Sensitive Patient Data Hiding using a ROI Reversible Steganography Scheme for DICOM Images10.1007/s10916-016-0514-5 ↗
42. Edemekong, P.F., and Haydel, M.J. (2018). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), StatPearls Publishing.