journal article·2019-01-16Open access

Energy Consumption and Financial Development in NAFTA Countries, 1971–2015

Mario Gómez, José Carlos Rodríguez

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 2

Abstract

To satisfy human needs and desires, it is necessary to produce goods and services that require the use of some production factors, such as labor, capital, and energy, among others. Nowadays, energy is a key production factor for economic activity in all countries. The main objective of this paper is to analyze the relationship between energy, economic growth, urbanization, and financial development in the country-members of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) during the period of 1971–2015. Panel data Econometric methods are applied in this research, namely cross-section dependence (Pesaran test), unit root (Cross-sectional Augmented Dickey Fuller and Cross-sectional Im, Pesaran, and Shin tests), cointegration (Kao and Fisher–Johansen tests), and heterogeneous causality (Hurlin and Dumitrescu test). The results achieved in this research demonstrate that the variables of this model are characterized by a cross-section dependence, and they are integrated in order one. An equilibrium or long-term relationship between them exists. By means of the Fully Modified OLS and Dynamic OLS estimators it this demonstrated that there is a positive relationship between GDP and EC, while there is a negative relationship between FD, CPI, URB, and TO and EC. The economic policy recommendations drawn from this investigation are that financial development promotion, urbanization, and trade openness may contribute to reducing energy consumption in these countries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Energy and Environment Impacts · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Economic and Business Research Institute, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Avda. Francisco J. Múgica S/N, Edificio ININEE, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia C.P. 58030, Michoacán, Mexico

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Causal relationship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: A panel data analysis of Asian countries10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.009 ↗
2. (2018, July 05). World Bank. Available online: http://databank.bancomundial.org/data.
3. The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.048 ↗
4. Financial development and energy consumption in Central and Eastern European frontier economies10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.034 ↗
5. Dynamic relationship between financial development, energy consumption, trade and greenhouse gas: Comparison of upper middle income countries form Asia, Europe, Africa and America10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.129 ↗
6. Is the long-run between economic growth, electricity consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and financial development in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries robust?10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.005 ↗
7. Claessens, S., and Feijen, E. (2006). Financial Sector Development and the Millennium Development Goals, Work Bank Working Paper. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/7145/386880financia101official0use0only1.pdf?sequence=1.
8. Does higher economic and financial development lead to enviromental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025 ↗
9. Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.021 ↗
10. Linking financial development, economic growth and energy consumption in Pakistan10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.015 ↗
11. The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.007 ↗
12. Chen, S., and Chen, B. (2015). Urban energy consumption: Different insights from energy flow analysis and ecological network analysis. Appl. Energy, 99–107.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.055 ↗
13. Revisiting the role of financial development for energy-growth-trade nexus BRICS economies10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.055 ↗
14. Effects of financial developments and income on energy consumption10.1016/j.iref.2014.08.011 ↗
15. The nexus between financial development and energy consumption in the EU: A dynamic panel data analysis10.1016/j.eneco.2013.04.001 ↗
16. Financial development and energy demand in the United States: New evidence from combined cointegartion and asymmetric causality tests10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.121 ↗
17. Financial development and energy consumption: Evidence from a heterogeneous panel of Asian countries10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.120 ↗
18. Does financial development intensify energy consumption in Saudi Arabia?10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.081 ↗
19. The dynamics between energy consumption patterns, financial sector development and economic growth in Financial Action Task Force (FATF) countries10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.094 ↗
20. Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.050 ↗
21. Effects of financial development, economic growth and trade on electricity consumption: Evidence from post-Fukushima Japan10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.023 ↗
22. Ouyang, Y., and Li, P. (2018). On the nexus of financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption in China: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach. Energy Econ., 71–252.10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.015 ↗
23. Estimating the impact of the financial development on energy consumption: Evidence from the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.067 ↗
24. Baltagi, B.H. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley and Sons. [1st ed.].
25. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7 ↗
26. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 ↗
27. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631 ↗
28. Unit Root Tests for Panel Data10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6 ↗
29. Decoupling CO2 emission and economic growth in China: Is there consistency in estimation results in analyzing environmental Kuznets curve?10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.117 ↗
30. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence10.1002/jae.951 ↗
31. Linear regression limit theory for non-stationary panel data10.1111/1468-0262.00070 ↗
32. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels
33. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15007-8 ↗
34. Some recent development in a concept of causality10.1016/0304-4076(88)90045-0 ↗
35. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 ↗
36. Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, CESifo Working Paper Series.10.2139/ssrn.572504 ↗
37. Spurious Regression and Residual Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2 ↗
38. The compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis10.1080/00420980050162184 ↗