A Tool for the Rapid Seismic Assessment of Historic Masonry Structures Based on Limit Analysis Optimisation and Rocking Dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a user-friendly, CAD-interfaced methodology for the rapid seismic assessment of historic masonry structures. The proposed multi-level procedure consists of a two-step analysis that combines upper bound limit analysis with non-linear dynamic (rocking) analysis to solve for seismic collapse in a computationally-efficient manner. In the first step, the failure mechanisms are defined by means of parameterization of the failure surfaces. Hence, the upper bound limit theorem of the limit analysis, coupled with a heuristic solver, is subsequently adopted to search for the load multiplier’s minimum value and the macro-block geometry. In the second step, the kinematic constants defining the rocking equation of motion are automatically computed for the refined macro-block model, which can be solved for representative time-histories. The proposed methodology has been entirely integrated in the user-friendly visual programming environment offered by Rhinoceros3D + Grasshopper, allowing it to be used by students, researchers and practicing structural engineers. Unlike time-consuming advanced methods of analysis, the proposed method allows users to perform a seismic assessment of masonry buildings in a rapid and computationally-efficient manner. Such an approach is particularly useful for territorial scale vulnerability analysis (e.g., for risk assessment and mitigation historic city centres) or as post-seismic event response (when the safety and stability of a large number of buildings need to be assessed with limited resources). The capabilities of the tool are demonstrated by comparing its predictions with those arising from the literature as well as from code-based assessment methods for three case studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ISISE, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
Funding
European Research Council
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Estimating economic losses from earthquakes using an empirical approach10.1193/1.4000104 ↗
2. Stepinac, M., Kisicek, T., Renić, T., Hafner, I., and Bedon, C. (2020). Methods for the assessment of critical properties in existing masonry structures under seismic loads-the ARES project. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland), 10.10.3390/app10051576 ↗
3. Seismic Structural Assessment of the Christchurch Catholic Basilica, New Zealand10.1016/j.istruc.2018.06.004 ↗
4. Survey and seismic vulnerability assessment of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Tumba (Italy)10.1016/j.culher.2017.01.010 ↗
5. Cascardi, A., Micelli, F., Aiello, M.A., and Funari, M. (2020). Structural analysis of a masonry church with variable cross-section dome. Brick and Block Masonry-From Historical to Sustainable Masonry, Proceedings of the 17th International Brick/Block Masonry Conference (17thIB2MaC 2020), Kraków, Poland, 5–8 July 2020, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003098508-28 ↗
6. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures10.1080/15583050601176868 ↗
7. Computations on historic masonry structures10.1002/pse.120 ↗
8. Methods and challenges for the seismic assessment of historic masonry structures
9. The stone skeleton10.1016/0020-7683(66)90018-7 ↗
10. D’Altri, A.M., Sarhosis, V., Milani, G., Rots, J., Cattari, S., Lagomarsino, S., Sacco, E., de Miranda, S., Tralli, A., and Castellazzi, G. (2019). A review of numerical models for masonry structures. Numerical Modeling of Masonry and Historical Structures: From Theory to Application, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-08-102439-3.00001-4 ↗
11. A fast and general upper-bound limit analysis approach for out-of-plane loaded masonry walls10.1007/s11012-017-0637-x ↗
12. A macro-block model for in-plane loaded masonry walls with non-associative Coulomb friction10.1007/s11012-013-9728-5 ↗
13. 3D macro and micro-block models for limit analysis of out-of-plane loaded masonry walls with non-associative Coulomb friction10.1007/s11012-014-9943-8 ↗
14. Visual programming for structural assessment of out-of-plane mechanisms in historic masonry structures10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101425 ↗
15. (2017, December 20). Circolare n. 7 del 21 Gennaio 2019. Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’«Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”» di cui al DM 17 gennaio 2018. CS LL. PP., Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2019/02/11/19A00855/sg.
16. Aggiornamento Delle Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (2017, December 20). Gazzetta Ufficiale Serie Generale. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2018/02/20/18A00716/sg.
17. Out-of-plane seismic behaviour of rocking masonry walls10.1002/eqe.1168 ↗
18. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes10.1785/BSSA0530020403 ↗
19. Seismic response of stone masonry spires: Analytical modeling10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.010 ↗
20. The relative dynamic resilience of masonry collapse mechanisms10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.021 ↗
21. Displacement-based seismic analysis for out-of-plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls10.1002/eqe.126 ↗
22. Failure of masonry arches under impulse base motion10.1002/eqe.719 ↗
23. On the dynamic response of rigid body assemblies10.1002/eqe.4290140604 ↗
24. Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free-standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam10.1002/eqe.2222 ↗
25. Dynamically equivalent rocking structures10.1002/eqe.2410 ↗
26. A CAD-interfaced dynamics-based tool for analysis of masonry collapse mechanisms10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.053 ↗
27. Material and seismic assessment of the great house at casa grande ruins national monument, Arizona10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000371 ↗
28. A digital tool based on Genetic Algorithms and Limit Analysis for the seismic assessment of historic masonry buildings10.1016/j.prostr.2020.10.124 ↗
29. Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions10.1137/S1052623496303470 ↗
30. McNeel, R. (2017, December 20). Grasshopper. Algorithmic Modeling for Rhino. Available online: https://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
31. In-plane frictional resistances in dry block masonry walls and rocking-sliding failure modes revisited and experimentally validated10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.013 ↗
32. Corner failure in masonry buildings: An updated macro-modeling approach with frictional resistances10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.03.003 ↗
33. Globalized Nelder–Mead method for engineering optimization10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.072 ↗
34. Array programming with NumPy10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
35. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
36. (2020, October 09). Digital Structures. GH Python Remote. Available online: https://github.com/pilcru/ghpythonremote.
37. Gregson, S. (2017, December 20). Nelder-Mead Optimisation (EOC). Available online: https://www.eocengineers.com/en/news/digital-design-group-tackles-classic-engineering-problem.
38. Orduña, A. (2003). Seismic Assessment of Ancient Masonry Structures by Rigid Blocks Limit Analysis. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minho].
39. Limit analysis of 3D masonry block structures with non-associative frictional joints using cone programming10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.07.010 ↗
40. Casapulla, C., and D’Ayala, D. (2006). In-plane collapse behaviour of masonry walls with frictional resistances and openings. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. Possibilities of Numerical and Experimental Techniques, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, New Delhi, India, 6–8 November 2006, Macmillan India Ltd.
41. Collapse mechanism analysis of historic masonry structures subjected to lateral loads: A comparison between continuous and discrete models10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.04.005 ↗
42. European Committee for Standardization (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization.
43. (2020, December 09). SIMQKE_GR. Available online: http://gelfi.unibs.it/software/simqke/simqke_gr.htm.
44. Gasparini, D.A., and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1976). SIMQKE: A Program for Artificial Motion Generation. User’s Manual and Documentation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
45. PEER (2014). PEER Ground Motion Database, University of California.