Integration of Cost and Work Breakdown Structures in the Management of Construction Projects
Source abstract
Abstract
Scope management allows project managers to react when a project underperforms regarding schedule, budget, and/or quality at the execution stage. Scope management can also minimize project changes and budget omissions, as well as improve the accuracy of project cost estimates and risk responses. For scope management to be effective, though, it needs to rely on a robust work breakdown structure (WBS). A robust WBS hierarchically and faithfully reflects all project tasks and work packages so that projects are easier to manage. If done properly, the WBS also allows meeting the project objectives while delivering the project on time, on budget, and with the required quality. This paper analyzes whether the integration of a cost breakdown structure (CBS) can lead to the generation of more robust WBSs in construction projects. Over the last years, some international organizations have standardized and harmonized different cost classification systems (e.g., ISO 12006-2, ISO 81346-12, OmniClass, CoClass, UniClass). These cost databases have also been introduced into building information modeling (BIM) frameworks. We hypothesize that in BIM environments, if these CBSs are used to generate the project WBS, several advantages are gained such as sharper project definition. This enhanced project definition reduces project contradictions at both planning and execution stages, anticipates potential schedule and budget deviations, improves resource allocation, and overall it allows a better response to potential project risks. The hypothesis that the use of CBSs can generate more robust WBSs is tested by the response analysis of a questionnaire survey distributed among construction practitioners and project managers. By means of structural equation modeling (SEM), the correlation (agreement) and perception differences between two 250-respondent subsamples (technical project staff vs. project management staff) are also discussed. Results of this research support the use of CBSs by construction professionals as a basis to generate WBSs for enhanced project management (PM).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Construction Project Management and Performance · BIM and Construction Integration · Value Engineering and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. PwC (2014). When Will You Think Differently about Programme Delivery, PwC.
2. Project Management Institute (2016). The High Cost of Low Performance. How Will You Improve Business Results, Project Management Institute.
3. Looking again at current practice in project management10.1108/17538371111164010 ↗
4. Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.006 ↗
5. KPMG International (2015). Climbing the Curve, KPMG International.
6. Measuring Project Management Performance: Case of Construction Industry10.1080/10429247.2017.1380579 ↗
7. Integrating stakeholders during community FM’s early project phases10.1108/02632770610666152 ↗
8. International Project Management Association (2015). Individual Competence Baseline for Project, Programme & Portfolio Management, IPMA. [4th ed.].
9. Project Management Institute (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMBOK Guide, PMI. [6th ed.].
10. Wang, Y. (2002). Applying the PDRI in Project Risk Management, The University of Texas at Austin.
11. Does BIM offer a better approach to guarantee a reliable, accurate, and precise Cost Estimate?
12. Camilleri, E. (2011). Project Success: Critical Factors and Behaviours, Gower Publishing. [1st ed.].
13. A Work Breakdown Structure that Integrates Different Views in Aircraft Modification Projects10.1177/1063293X03011001005 ↗
14. Integrated cost and schedule control in the Korean construction industry based on a modified work-packaging model10.1139/L07-094 ↗
15. Influence of scope management in construction industry projects
16. Ibrahim, Y.M., Kaka, A.P., Trucco, E., Kagioglou, M., and Ghassan, A. (2007, January 26–27). Semi-automatic development of the work breakdown structure (WBS) for construction projects. Proceedings of the 4th International Salford Centre for Research and Innovation (SCRI) Research Symposium, Salford, UK.
17. Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Cerezo-Narváez, A., Otero-Mateo, M., Pastor-Fernández, A., Zhang, J., and Vanhoucke, M. (2020). Forecasting the Project Duration Average and Standard Deviation from Deterministic Schedule Information. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020654 ↗
18. Prioritising Project Scope Definition Elements in Public Building Projects
19. Investigating the effect of initial scope establishment on the performance of a project through system dynamics modelling10.1108/eb021198 ↗
20. Gómez-Senent Martínez, E. (1997). El Proyecto. Diseño en Ingeniería, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia UPV.
21. Wang, Y.-R., and Gibson, G.E. (2008, January 26–29). A study of preproject planning and project success using ANN and regression models. Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Vilnius, Lithuania.10.3846/isarc.20080626.688 ↗
22. Thaweejinda, J., and Methakullawat, N. (2012). Guideline for Clearly Definition Scope, Chulalongkorn University.
23. Analysis and Cost Estimating
24. Seidel Calazans, A.T., and Dias Kosloski, R.A. (2012, January 27–31). O gerenciamento da alteração de escopo na contratação externa de serviços de desenvolvimento/manutenção de software. Proceedings of the 13th Argentine Symposium on Software Engineering (ASSE), La Plata, Argentina.
25. Project Scope Management
26. Project: The just necessary structure to reach your goals10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.002 ↗
27. Sikdar, S., and Das, O. (2009, January 26–27). Goal based project scope determination approach. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/TIC-STH.2009.5444463 ↗
28. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., and Shrum, S. (2012). CMMI for Development: A Guide to Process Integration and Product Improvement, Editorial Centro De Estudios Ramón Areces. [1st ed.].
29. Use of a WBS Matrix to Improve Interface Management in Projects10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:1(67) ↗
30. Project Management Institute (2019). Practice Standard for Work Breakdown Structures, Project Management Institute. [3rd ed.].
31. International Organization for Standardization (2012). ISO 21500:2012. Guidance on Project Management, International Organization for Standardization.
32. López Paredes, A., Pajares Gutierrez, J., and Iglesias Sanzo, M. (2013). Certificación IPMA-4LC. Manual de Preparación, Business Project Management Solutions & Technologies.
33. Kerzner, H. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, John Wiley & Sons. [11th ed.].
34. Buchtik, L. (2013). Secrets to Mastering the WBS in Real World Projects, Project Management Institute. [2nd ed.].
35. Hendrickson, C., and Au, T. (1989). Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders, Prentice Hall. [1st ed.].
36. Engineering Advancement Association of Japan (2017). A Guidebook of Project & Program Management for Enterprise Innovation, Project Management Association of Japan. [3rd ed.].
37. AXELOS (2017). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, AXELOS.
38. The American Institute of Architects (2007). Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide, The American Institute of Architects.
39. Saidi, K.S., Lytle, A.M., and Stone, W.C. (2003, January 21–24). Report of the NIST Workshop on Data Exchange Standards at the Construction Job Site. Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.22260/ISARC2003/0095 ↗
40. Automating progress measurement of construction projects10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.004 ↗
41. Variation Orders in Construction Projects
42. Improving the estimation of probability of bidder participation in procurement auctions10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.001 ↗
43. González Fernández de Valderrama, F. (2010). Mediciones y Presupuestos, Reverte. [2nd ed.].
44. Lock, D. (2004). Project Management in Construction, Routledge. [1st ed.].
45. Framework for a generic work breakdown structure for building projects10.1108/14714170910995930 ↗
46. An overall guidance and proposition of a WBS template for construction planning of the template (jacket) platforms
47. A case study of time/cost analysis for aged-housing renovation using a pre-made BIM database structure10.1007/s12205-013-0617-1 ↗
48. Flexible Work Breakdown Structure for Integrated Cost and Schedule Control10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:5(616) ↗
49. Effective Sizing and Content Definition of Work Packages10.1177/875697289802900403 ↗
50. Taylor, M.D. (2009). How to Develop Work Breakdown Structures, Systems Management Services.
51. Heerkens, G.R. (2002). Gestión de Proyectos, McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
52. Identifying the Criteria Used for Establishing Work Package Size for Project WBS
53. Pavan, A., Daniotti, B., Re Cecconi, F., Maltese, S., Spagnolo, S.L., Caffi, V., Chiozzi, M., and Pasini, D. (2014). INNOVance: Italian BIM Database for Construction Process Management. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE.10.1061/9780784413616.080 ↗
54. Engineering Information Classification System10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(454) ↗
55. Development of risk-based standardized WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) for quality planning of high rise building architectural works10.1051/matecconf/201815901019 ↗
56. Development of risk-based standardized work breakdown structure for quality planning of airport construction project10.1088/1742-6596/1360/1/012005 ↗
57. Lister, G. (2015). Mastering Project, Program, and Portfolio Management. Models for Structuring and Executing the Project Hierarchy, Pearson Education Limited.
58. Criticality and propagation analysis of impacts between project deliverables10.1007/s00163-017-0254-7 ↗
59. Büchmann-Slorup, R. (2012). Criticality in Location-Based Management of Construction, Technical University of Denmark.
60. A Study on Selection of Roof Waterproofing Method by analyzing Life Cycle Costing10.5345/JKIC.2008.8.5.127 ↗
61. Development of a generic framework for collecting whole life cost data for the building industry10.1108/13552510210430017 ↗
62. Le, Y., Ren, J., Ning, Y., He, Q., and Li, Y. (2009, January 26–28). Life Cycle Cost Integrative Management in Construction Engineering. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, Nanjing, China.10.1109/ICISE.2009.713 ↗
63. Schade, J. (2007, January 14–15). Life Cycle Cost Calculation Models for Buildings. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organisation: Development Processes in Construction Mangement, Luleå, Sweden.
64. Bahaudin, A.Y., Elias, E.M., Dahalan, H., and Jamaluddin, R. (2012, January 4–6). Construction Cost Control: A Review of Practices in Malaysia. Proceedings of the The 3rd International Conference on Technology and Operation Management (ICTOM), Bandung, Indonesia.
65. Cost Calculation of Building Structures and Building Works in Polish Conditions10.5539/emr.v1n2p72 ↗
66. Delays and cost increases in the construction of private residential projects in Kuwait10.1080/0144619042000326710 ↗
67. Cost overrun in construction projects in developing countries, gas-oil industry of Iran as a case study10.3846/13923730.2014.992467 ↗
68. Explaining cost overruns in infrastructure projects: A new framework with applications to Sweden10.1080/01446193.2015.1064983 ↗
69. Characteristics of cost overruns for Dutch transport infrastructure projects and the importance of the decision to build and project phases10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.04.001 ↗
70. Cost overruns in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects: Explanations and their theoretical embeddedness
71. Harrison, F., and Lock, D. (2017). Advanced Project Management, Gower Publishing.10.4324/9781315263328 ↗
72. A feature ontology to support construction cost estimating10.1017/S0890060403172034 ↗
73. BIM and ontology-based approach for building cost estimation10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.020 ↗
74. Semi-automatic and specification-compliant cost estimation for tendering of building projects based on IFC data of design model10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.020 ↗
75. Measure Costs Right: Make the Right Decision
76. Cost modeling in logistics using time-driven ABC10.1108/09600030810866977 ↗
77. Time-Driven Activity- Based Costing
78. (2019, December 30). International Federation of Consulting Engineers Which FIDIC Contract Should I Use?. Available online: http://fidic.org/bookshop/about-bookshop/which-fidic-contract-should-i-use.
79. Marsh, P. (2016). Contracting for Engineering and Construction Projects, Routledge. [5th ed.].10.4324/9781315259369 ↗
80. Hughes, W., Champion, R., and Murdoch, J. (2015). Construction Contracts. Law and Management, Routledge. [5th ed.].10.4324/9781315695211 ↗
81. Mathematical relationships between scoring parameters in capped tendering10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.008 ↗
82. Modeling bidding competitiveness and position performance in multi-attribute construction auctions
83. Estimating future bidding performance of competitor bidders in capped tenders10.3846/13923730.2014.914096 ↗
84. (2019, December 30). Council for Development and Housing of the Regional Government of Andalusia; University of Seville; School of Building Engineering of Seville; Official Association of Quantity Surveyors and Technical Architects of Seville Andalusian Construction Cost Base (BCCA). Available online: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/fomentoinfraestructurasyordenaciondelterritorio/areas/vivienda-rehabilitacion/planes-instrumentos/paginas/vivienda-bcca.html.
85. (2019, December 30). Construction Technology Institute of Catalonia (ITEC) BEDEC DataBase. Available online: https://metabase.itec.cat/vide/es/bedec.
86. (2019, December 30). Council of Development Housing Territorial Planning and Tourism of the Regional Government of Extremadura Construction Pricing Base of the Regional Government of Extremadura. Available online: http://basepreciosconstruccion.gobex.es/.
87. (2019, December 30). Directorate General of Housing and Rehabilitation of the Community of Madrid Construction Database of the Community of Madrid. Available online: http://www.madrid.org/bdccm/index.html.
88. (2019, December 30). CYPE Arquimedes. Available online: http://arquimedes.cype.es/.
89. (2019, December 30). PREOC Premeti. Available online: http://www.preoc.es/#!129000001.
90. (2019, December 30). PROSOFT Menfis. Available online: https://prosoft.es/productos/menfis.
91. Magalhães, P.M., and Sousa, H. (2014, January 17–19). Information consistency on construction—Case study of correlation between classification systems for construction types. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling (ECPPM), Vienna, Austria.
92. International Organization for Standardization (1994). ISO TR 14177:1994. Classification of Information in the Construction Industry, International Organization for Standardization. [1st ed.].
93. Adaptability of information classification systems for civil works10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(419) ↗
94. The European Council for Construction Economists (2014). Code of Measurement for Cost Planning, CEEC.
95. Deutsches Institut für Normung (2008). DIN 276-1. Building Costs. Part 1: Building Construction, DIN.
96. Swedish Building Centre (2005). BSAB 96. Systems and Applications, Swedish Building Centre. [1st ed.].
97. (2019, December 30). National Building Specification (NBS) UniClass 2015. Available online: https://www.thenbs.com/our-tools/uniclass-2015.
98. Construction 2000 Classification Committee (2000). TALO 2000. Construction Classification, Building Information Foundation.
99. Centre for Productivity in Construction (Cuneco) (2010). Development plan for the Danish Building Classification System (DBK) 2010–2012, Centre for Productivity in Construction (Cuneco). [3rd ed.].
100. International Construction Measurement Standards Coalition (2019). ICMS: Global Consistency in Presenting Construction and Other Life Cycle Costs, International Construction Measurement Standards Coalition.