Enhancing Food Integrity through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, we examined the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) as new fronts in addressing some of the pertinent challenges posed by food integrity to human and animal health. In recent times, AI and ML, along with other Industry 4.0 technologies such as big data, blockchain, virtual reality, and the internet of things (IoT), have found profound applications within nearly all dimensions of the food industry with a key focus on enhancing food safety and quality and improving the resilience of the food supply chain. This paper provides an accessible scrutiny of these technologies (in particular, AI and ML) in relation to food integrity and gives a summary of their current advancements and applications within the field. Key areas of emphasis include the application of AI and ML in quality control and inspection, food fraud detection, process control, risk assessments, prediction, and management, and supply chain traceability, amongst other critical issues addressed. Based on the literature reviewed herein, the utilization of AI and ML in the food industry has unequivocally led to improved standards of food integrity and consequently enhanced public health and consumer trust, as well as boosting the resilience of the food supply chain. While these applications demonstrate significant promise, the paper also acknowledges some of the challenges associated with the domain-specific implementation of AI in the field of food integrity. The paper further examines the prospects and orientations, underscoring the significance of overcoming the obstacles in order to fully harness the capabilities of AI and ML in safeguarding the integrity of the food system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability · Food Supply Chain Traceability · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein Campus, P.O. Box 17011, Gauteng 2028, South Africa
Funding
South African National Research Foundation (NRF) · the Maize Trust
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Cao, Z., Yemets, M., Muneem, S., Shannon, K., Gowher, F., Malloy, J., Kafka, E., Mitchell, C., King, J., and Urban, S. (2023). Food Fraud: Insights from Investigating a near-Fatal Poisoning with Global Implications. medRxiv, 2023–2029.10.1101/2023.09.27.23296221 ↗
2. Kemsawasd, V., Jayasena, V., and Karnpanit, W. (2023). Incidents and Potential Adverse Health Effects of Serious Food Fraud Cases Originated in Asia. Foods, 12.10.3390/foods12193522 ↗
3. Analysis of the Economically Motivated Food Adulteration in China Based on 6477 Events from 2000 to 202010.15586/qas.v15i2.1144 ↗
4. The 11 Sins of Seafood: Assessing a Decade of Food Fraud Reports in the Global Supply Chain10.1111/1541-4337.12998 ↗
5. Chicanery in the Food Supply Chain! Food Fraud, Mitigation, and Research Needs in Low-Income Countries10.1016/j.tifs.2023.03.027 ↗
6. WHO (2022, October 21). Estimating the Burden of Foodborne Diseases. Available online: https://www.who.int/activities/estimating-the-burden-of-foodborne-diseases#:~:text=Eachyearworldwide%2Cunsafefood,numberislikelyanunderestimation.
7. Etiological Agents Implicated in Foodborne Illness World Wide10.5851/kosfa.2020.e75 ↗
8. WHO (2015). WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases, World Health Organization.
9. WHO (2017). The Burden of Foodborne Diseases in the WHO European Region, World Health Organization.
10. European Commission (2022). Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1370 of 5 August 2022 Amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as Regards Maximum Levels of Ochratoxin A in Certain Foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union, L 206, 11–14.
11. (2024, February 12). Phytocontrol New Limits for Ochratoxin A. Available online: https://www.phytocontrol.com/en/regulatory-watch/new-limits-for-ochratoxin-a/.
12. (2024, February 12). SGS EU Updates Maximum Levels for Ochratoxin A in Certain Foodstuffs. Available online: https://www.digicomply.com/blog/eu-updates-maximum-levels-for-ochratoxin-a-in-certain-foodstuffs.
13. Sharpless, N.E. (2019). Statement from Acting FDA Commissioner Ned Sharpless, MD, and Deputy Commissioner Frank Yiannas on Steps to Usher the US into a New Era of Smarter Food Safety.
14. Emerging Applications of Machine Learning in Food Safety10.1146/annurev-food-071720-024112 ↗
15. Systematic Delineation of Media Polarity on COVID-19 Vaccines in Africa: Computational Linguistic Modeling Study10.2196/22916 ↗
16. Vinci, G., Ruggieri, R., Ruggeri, M., and Prencipe, S.A. (2023). Rice Production Chain: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment—A Review. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13020340 ↗
17. Neural Network Modeling of Greenhouse Tomato Yield, Growth and Water Use from Automated Crop Monitoring Data10.1016/j.compag.2011.07.013 ↗
18. Artificial Intelligence in Eye Care? Naturally!
19. Cioffi, R., Travaglioni, M., Piscitelli, G., Petrillo, A., and De Felice, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Smart Production: Progress, Trends, and Directions. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12020492 ↗
20. Artificial Intelligence as a Future in Cancer Surgery10.35713/aic.v3.i1.11 ↗
21. Cannataro, M., Guzzi, P.H., Agapito, G., Zucco, C., and Milano, M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Bioinformatics, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-822952-1.00012-7 ↗
22. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Definitions, Applications, and Future Directions10.1007/s12178-020-09600-8 ↗
23. Galanos, V. (2023). Expectations and Expertise in Artificial Intelligence: Specialist Views and Historical Perspectives on Conceptualisation, Promise, and Funding. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh].
24. Le, Q.V. (2013, January 26–31). Building High-Level Features Using Large Scale Unsupervised Learning. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6639343 ↗
25. Delipetrev, B., Tsinaraki, C., and Kostic, U. (2024, January 06). Historical Evolution of Artificial Intelligence. JRC Publications Repository. Available online: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC120469.
26. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention Is All You Need. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
27. Flowers, J.C. (2019, January 25–27). Strong and Weak AI: Deweyan Considerations. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Towards Conscious AI Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
28. Why General Artificial Intelligence Will Not Be Realized10.1057/s41599-020-0494-4 ↗
29. Artificial Stupidity
30. Scenarios from Artificial Narrow Intelligence to Artificial General Intelligence—Reviewing the Results of the International Work/Technology 2050 Study10.1177/19467567221101637 ↗
31. Approaches of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Smart Cities: Critical Review10.1088/1757-899X/1022/1/012019 ↗
32. Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Smart Cities10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.069 ↗
33. Saravanan, R., and Sujatha, P. (2018, January 14–15). A State of Art Techniques on Machine Learning Algorithms: A Perspective of Supervised Learning Approaches in Data Classification. Proceedings of the 2018 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), Madurai, India.10.1109/ICCONS.2018.8663155 ↗
34. Supervised Learning-a Systematic Literature Review
35. Supervised machine learning approaches: A survey10.21917/ijsc.2015.0133 ↗
36. Shetty, S.H., Shetty, S., Singh, C., and Rao, A. (2022). Fundamentals and Methods of Machine and Deep Learning: Algorithms, Tools and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781119821908.ch1 ↗
37. Verma, R., Nagar, V., and Mahapatra, S. (2021). Data Analytics in Bioinformatics, Wiley.
38. Sindhu Meena, K., and Suriya, S. (2019, January 3–5). A Survey on Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Smart Grid and Smart City Applications: AISGSC, Coimbatore, India.10.1007/978-3-030-24051-6_58 ↗
39. Unsupervised Machine Learning for Networking: Techniques, Applications and Research Challenges10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916648 ↗
40. Rajoub, B. (2020). Biomedical Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Elsevier.
41. Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Based Review on Diabetes Care
42. Balamurali, M. (2021). Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences, Springer.
43. An Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms: Comprehensive Review10.12785/ijcds/130172 ↗
44. Dong, H., Dong, H., Ding, Z., and Zhang, S. (2020). Chang Deep Reinforcement Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-4095-0 ↗
45. Reinforcement Learning
46. Martín-Guerrero, J.D., and Lamata, L. (2021). Reinforcement Learning and Physics. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11188589 ↗
47. Dong, H., Ding, Z., and Zhang, S. (2020). Deep Reinforcement Learning: Fundamentals, Research and Applications, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.10.1007/978-981-15-4095-0 ↗
48. Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Healthcare Applications: A Survey10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101964 ↗
49. (2023, December 21). AgShift Hydra—Power the Transformation of Food through AI. Available online: https://www.agshift.com/.
50. Zaynub (2023, November 29). How Can AI Technology Be Used in Food Safety Implementation?. Available online: https://medium.com/@jenny_sBlogs/how-can-ai-technology-be-used-in-food-safety-implementation-efec411e29f0.
51. Colored Rice Quality Inspection System Using Machine Vision10.1016/j.jcs.2019.05.010 ↗
52. Date Grading Using Rule-Based Fuzzy Inference System
53. A Computer Vision System for Defect Discrimination and Grading in Tomatoes Using Machine Learning and Image Processing
54. Recent Developments in Hyperspectral Imaging for Assessment of Food Quality and Safety10.3390/s140407248 ↗
55. Non-Destructive Prediction and Visualization of Chemical Composition in Lamb Meat Using NIR Hyperspectral Imaging and Multivariate Regression10.1016/j.ifset.2012.06.003 ↗
56. Early Detection of Mechanical Damage in Mango Using NIR Hyperspectral Images and Machine Learning10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.03.009 ↗
57. Development of Simple Algorithms for the Detection of Fecal Contaminants on Apples from Visible/near Infrared Hyperspectral Reflectance Imaging10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.11.018 ↗
58. Hyperspectral System for Early Detection of Rottenness Caused by Penicillium Digitatum in Mandarins10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.04.009 ↗
59. Lee, J., Nazki, H., Baek, J., Hong, Y., and Lee, M. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Approach for Tomato Detection and Mass Estimation in Precision Agriculture. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12219138 ↗
60. FDA (2023, December 21). Tracking and Tracing of Food, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/new-era-smarter-food-safety/tracking-and-tracing-food.
61. Food Traceability 4.0 as Part of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Key Enabling Technologies10.1080/10408398.2022.2110033 ↗
62. Research on Intelligent Supervision and Application System of Food Traceability Based on Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence
63. (2023, December 10). Archana Sristy Blockchain in the Food Supply Chain—What Does the Future Look Like?. Available online: https://tech.walmart.com/content/walmart-global-tech/en_us/news/articles/blockchain-in-the-food-supply-chain.html.
64. (2023, December 10). Roger Aitken IBM & Walmart Launching Blockchain Food Safety Alliance in China with Fortune 500’s JD.Com. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2017/12/14/ibm-walmart-launching-blockchain-food-safety-alliance-in-china-with-fortune-500s-jd-com/?sh=22a372277d9c.
65. Shahbazi, Z., and Byun, Y.-C. (2020). A Procedure for Tracing Supply Chains for Perishable Food Based on Blockchain, Machine Learning and Fuzzy Logic. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10010041 ↗
66. Geographical Origin Traceability and Identification of Refined Sugar Using UPLC-QTof-MS Analysis10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128701 ↗
67. Analysis and Comparison of Lipids in Saanen Goat Milk from Different Geographic Regions in China Based on UHPLC-QTOF-MS Lipidomics10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111441 ↗
68. Investigation of Oyster Crassostrea Gigas Lipid Profile from Three Sea Areas of China Based on Non-Targeted Lipidomics for Their Geographic Region Traceability10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132748 ↗
69. An Efficient Bayes Classifiers Algorithm for Traceability of Food Supply Chain Management Using Internet of Things10.35940/ijeat.A1379.109119 ↗
70. An Improved Traceability System for Food Quality Assurance and Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Classification and Neural Network10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.013 ↗
71. Violino, S., Ortenzi, L., Antonucci, F., Pallottino, F., Benincasa, C., Figorilli, S., and Costa, C. (2020). An Artificial Intelligence Approach for Italian EVOO Origin Traceability through an Open Source IoT Spectrometer. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9060834 ↗
72. Frąckiewicz, M. (2023, November 29). The Role of Predictive Analytics in Food Safety Risk Assessment. Available online: https://ts2.space/en/the-role-of-predictive-analytics-in-food-safety-risk-assessment/#gsc.tab=0.
73. Wu, L.-Y., and Weng, S.-S. (2021). Ensemble Learning Models for Food Safety Risk Prediction. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132112291 ↗
74. Food Safety Risk Intelligence Early Warning Based on Support Vector Machine10.3233/JIFS-179774 ↗
75. Automated Food Safety Early Warning System in the Dairy Supply Chain Using Machine Learning10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108872 ↗
76. A Topic Model Approach to Identify and Track Emerging Risks from Beeswax Adulteration in the Media10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107435 ↗
77. A Holistic Approach to Food Safety Risks: Food Fraud as an Example10.1016/j.foodres.2016.08.028 ↗
78. Application of Bayesian Networks in the Development of Herbs and Spices Sampling Monitoring System10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.019 ↗
79. Zhang, R., Zhou, L., Zuo, M., Zhang, Q., Bi, M., Jin, Q., and Xu, Z. (2018, January 21–28). Prediction of Dairy Product Quality Risk Based on Extreme Learning Machine. Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Business Analytics (ICDSBA), Changsha, China.10.1109/ICDSBA.2018.00090 ↗
80. A Comparison of Neural and Non-Neural Machine Learning Models for Food Safety Risk Prediction with European Union RASFF Data10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108697 ↗
81. Improving Efficiency of RFID-Based Traceability System for Perishable Food by Utilizing IoT Sensors and Machine Learning Model10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107016 ↗
82. An Internet-of-Things Solution for Food Safety and Quality Control: A Pilot Project in China
83. Khan, P.W., Byun, Y.-C., and Park, N. (2020). IoT-Blockchain Enabled Optimized Provenance System for Food Industry 4.0 Using Advanced Deep Learning. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102990 ↗
84. Early Warning Modeling and Analysis Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process Integrated Extreme Learning Machine (AHP-ELM): Application to Food Safety10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.02.045 ↗
85. Tian, F. (2017, January 16–18). A Supply Chain Traceability System for Food Safety Based on HACCP, Blockchain & Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Dalian, China.
86. Machine-Learned Epidemiology: Real-Time Detection of Foodborne Illness at Scale10.1038/s41746-018-0045-1 ↗
87. Tutul, M.J.I., Alam, M., and Wadud, M.A.H. (2023, January 16–17). Smart Food Monitoring System Based on Iot and Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Next-Generation Computing, IoT and Machine Learning (NCIM), Gazipur, Bangladesh.10.1109/NCIM59001.2023.10212608 ↗
88. Machine Learning Prediction of Foodborne Disease Pathogens: Algorithm Development and Validation Study10.2196/24924 ↗
89. Raman Spectroscopy Combined with Machine Learning for Rapid Detection of Food-Borne Pathogens at the Single-Cell Level10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122195 ↗
90. Pesesky, M.W., Hussain, T., Wallace, M., Patel, S., Andleeb, S., Burnham, C.-A.D., and Dantas, G. (2016). Evaluation of Machine Learning and Rules-Based Approaches for Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Gram-Negative Bacilli from Whole Genome Sequence Data. Front. Microbiol., 7.10.3389/fmicb.2016.01887 ↗
91. Teyhouee, A., McPhee-Knowles, S., Waldner, C., and Osgood, N. (2017, January 5–8). Prospective Detection of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks Using Machine Learning Approaches. Proceedings of the Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling: 10th International Conference, SBP-BRiMS 2017, Washington, DC, USA. Proceedings 10.10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_36 ↗
92. Classification of Listeria Monocytogenes Persistence in Retail Delicatessen Environments Using Expert Elicitation and Machine Learning10.1111/risa.12218 ↗
93. Wheeler, N.E., Gardner, P.P., and Barquist, L. (2018). Machine Learning Identifies Signatures of Host Adaptation in the Bacterial Pathogen Salmonella Enterica. PLoS Genet., 14.10.1371/journal.pgen.1007333 ↗
94. AI-Enabled Biosensing for Rapid Pathogen Detection: From Liquid Food to Agricultural Water10.1016/j.watres.2023.120258 ↗
95. A Pan-Genome-Based Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Antimicrobial Resistance Activities of the Escherichia Coli Strains10.1093/bioinformatics/bty276 ↗
96. Non-Destructive Classification and Prediction of Aflatoxin-B1 Concentration in Maize Kernels Using Vis–NIR (400–1000 Nm) Hyperspectral Imaging10.1007/s13197-020-04552-w ↗
97. Ye, W., Yan, T., Zhang, C., Duan, L., Chen, W., Song, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., and Gao, P. (2022). Detection of Pesticide Residue Level in Grape Using Hyperspectral Imaging with Machine Learning. Foods, 11.10.3390/foods11111609 ↗
98. Optimization of Pesticides Spray on Crops in Agriculture Using Machine Learning
99. Predicting Pesticide Dissipation Half-Life Intervals in Plants with Machine Learning Models10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129177 ↗
100. Bhatia, S., and Albarrak, A.S. (2023). A Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chain Management Using QR Code and XAI-Faster RCNN Architecture. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15032579 ↗