Development of Adaptive Formative Assessment System Using Computerized Adaptive Testing and Dynamic Bayesian Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Online formative assessments in e-learning systems are increasingly of interest in the field of education. While substantial research into the model and item design aspects of formative assessment has been conducted, few software systems embodied with a psychometric model have been proposed to allow us to adaptively implement formative assessments. This study aimed to develop an adaptive formative assessment system, called computerized formative adaptive testing (CAFT) by using artificial intelligence methods based on computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and Bayesian networks as learning analytics. CAFT can adaptively administer personalized formative assessment to a learner by dynamically selecting appropriate items and tests aligned with the learner’s ability. Forty items in an item bank were evaluated by 410 learners, moreover, 1000 learners were recruited for a simulation study and 120 learners were enrolled to evaluate the efficiency, validity, and reliability of CAFT in an application study. The results showed that, through CAFT, learners can adaptively take item s and tests in order to receive personalized diagnostic feedback about their learning progression. Consequently, this study highlights that a learning management system which integrates CAT as an artificially intelligent component is an efficient educational evaluation tool for a remote personalized learning service.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Educational Technology and Assessment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Adolescent Coaching Counseling, Hanyang Cyber University, Seoul 04763, Korea
Department of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Towards Next Generation Teaching, Learning, and Context-Aware Applications for Higher Education: A Review on Blockchain, IoT, Fog and Edge Computing Enabled Smart Campuses and Universities10.3390/app9214479 ↗
2. Computational Characterization of Activities and Learners in a Learning System10.3390/app10072208 ↗
3. SIETTE: A web-based tool for adaptive testing
4. McCallum, S., and Milner, M.M. (2020). The effectiveness of formative assessment: Student views and staff reflections. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 1–16.10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761 ↗
5. Formative assessment: A critical review10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678 ↗
6. Assessment and classroom learning10.1080/0969595980050102 ↗
7. Meta–analytic methodology and inferences about the efficacy of formative assessment10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00251.x ↗
8. Choi, Y., Rupp, A., Gushta, M., and Sweet, S. (2020). Modeling Learning Trajectories with Epistemic Network Analysis: An Investigation of a Novel Analytic Method for Learning Progressions in Epistemic Games, National Council on Measurement in Education.
9. Student reflections on formative e–assessment: Expectations and perceptions10.1080/17439880802324178 ↗
10. National Tests and Diagnostic Feedback: What Say Teachers in Trinidad and Tobago?10.1080/00220671.2013.788993 ↗
11. Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001 ↗
12. Schez-Sobrino, S., Gmez-Portes, C., Vallejo, D., Glez-Morcillo, C., and Miguel, A.R. (2020). An Intelligent Tutoring System to Facilitate the Learning of Programming through the Usage of Dynamic Graphic Visualizations. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041518 ↗
13. Technology Enhanced Assessment (TEA) in COVID 19 Pandemic10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2795 ↗
14. West, P., Rutstein, D.W., Mislevy, R.J., Liu, J., Choi, Y., Levy, R., and Behrens, J.T. (2010, August 19). A Bayesian Network Approach to Modeling Learning Progressions and Task Performance. CRESST Report No 776. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512650.pdf.
15. The Influence of Human Resource Management Strategy on Learning Achievement in Online Learning Environment: The Moderated Mediating Effect of Metacognition by Extraneous Cognitive Load
16. Online formative assessments: Exploring their educational value
17. Windows software for simulating computerized adaptive test administration10.1177/0146621611414407 ↗
18. Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests10.1207/s15324818ame0204_6 ↗
19. An efficiency balanced information criterion for item selection in computerized adaptive testing10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00173.x ↗
20. Embertson, S.E., and Reise, S.P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists, Psychology Press. [1st ed.].
21. Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing10.2307/1165378 ↗
22. Maximum likelihood score estimation method with fences for short-length tests and computerized adaptive tests10.1177/0146621616631317 ↗
23. Global information approach to computerized adaptive testing10.1177/014662169602000303 ↗
24. A-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing10.1177/01466219922031338 ↗
25. Choi, Y., and Mislevy, R. (2012). Dynamic Bayesian Inference Network and hidden Markov Model for Modeling Learning Progression over Multiple Time Points. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland at College Park].
26. Revy, J. (1998). Two-Phase Updating of Student Models Based on Dynamic Belief Networks. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 4th International Conference ITS’98, Springer.10.1007/3-540-68716-5_33 ↗
27. Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., and Lesgold, A. (1996). Belief Net Backbone for Student Modeling Intelligent Tutoring System: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer.10.1007/3-540-61327-7 ↗
28. Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x ↗
29. Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models10.1177/0146621603027004004 ↗
30. Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores
31. Incorporating randomness in the fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs10.1348/000711007X230937 ↗
32. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm10.1007/BF02293801 ↗
33. A Bayesian approach to tailored testing
34. Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing
35. Modeling diagnostic assessments with Bayesian networks10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00043.x ↗
36. Almond, R.G., Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., Williamson, D.M., and Yan, D. (2015). Bayesian Networks in Educational Assessment, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-2125-6 ↗
37. Choi, Y., and Cho, Y.I. (2020). Learning Analytics Using Social Network Analysis and Bayesian Network Analysis in Sustainable Computer-Based Formative Assessment System. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12197950 ↗
38. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Academic Press.10.4324/9780203771587 ↗
39. Nguyen-Thin, L. (2016). A Classification of Adaptive Feedback in Educational Systems for Programming. Systems, 4.10.3390/systems4020022 ↗
40. William, V.C., Milton, R.C., and Xavier, P.P. (2020). Improvement of an Online Education Model with the Integration of Machine Learning and Data Analysis in an LMS. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155371 ↗
41. Shaojie, Q., Kan, L., Bo, W., and Yongchao, W. (2019). Predicting Student Achievement Based on Temporal Learning Behavior in MOOCs. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245539 ↗
42. A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems10.1177/014662169301700205 ↗
43. A comparison of item-selection methods for adaptive tests with content constraints10.1111/j.1745-3984.2005.00015.x ↗
44. Nichols, P.D., Chipman, S.F., and Brennan, R.L. (1995). Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F., and Rogat, A. (2009). Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63 ↗