A Global Review of PWR Nuclear Power Plants
Source abstract
Abstract
Nuclear energy is presented as a real option in the face of the current problem of climate change and the need to reduce CO2 emissions. The nuclear reactor design with the greatest global impact throughout history and which has the most ambitious development plans is the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR). Thus, a global review of such a reactor design is presented in this paper, utilizing the analysis of (i) technical aspects of the different variants of the PWR design implemented over the past eight years, (ii) the level of implementation of PWR nuclear power plants in the world, and (iii) a life extension scenario and future trends in PWR design based on current research and development (R&D) activity. To develop the second analysis, a statistical study of the implementation of the different PWR variants has been carried out. Such a statistical analysis is based on the operating factor, which represents the relative frequency of reactors operating around the world. The results reflect the hegemony of the western variants in the 300 reactors currently operating, highlighting the North American and French versions. Furthermore, a simulation of a possible scenario of increasing the useful life of operational PWRs up to 60 years has been proposed, seeing that in 2050 the generation capacity of nuclear PWRs power plants will decrease by 50%, and the number of operating reactors by 70%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear and radioactivity studies · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Catholic University of Ávila, C/Canteros, s/n, 05005 Avila, Spain
Department of N. S. and Marine Engineering, Universidade da Coruña, Paseo de Ronda, 51, 15011 A Coruña, Spain
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. Meiswinkel, R., Meyer, J., and Schnell, J. (2013). Design and Construction of Nuclear Power Plants, Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn.10.1002/9783433602775 ↗
2. Merk, B., Litskevich, D., Whittle, K.R., Bankhead, M., Taylor, R.J., and Mathers, D. (2017). On a long term strategy for the success of nuclear power. Energies, 10.10.20944/preprints201704.0050.v1 ↗
3. Technological transfer from research nuclear reactors to new generation nuclear power reactors
4. Breeze, P. (2014). Power Technologies Generation, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
5. Evolutionary developments of advanced PWR nuclear materials fuel and cladding materials10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.04.013 ↗
6. International Atomic Energy Agency (2020, January 11). Power Reactor Information System (PRIS). Available online: https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/home.aspx.
7. Analysis of the costs of spent nuclear fuel management in Spain: The Mariño model10.1016/j.energy.2019.115853 ↗
8. The effect of economic growth, oil prices, and the benefits of reactor standardization: Duration of nuclear power plant construction revisited10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.032 ↗
9. Glasstone, S., and Sesonske, A. (1994). Nuclear Reactor Engineering: Reactor Systems Engineering, Springer-Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4615-7525-2 ↗
10. The future of the nuclear industry reconsidered: Risks, uncertainties, and continued promise10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.008 ↗
11. Evolution of nuclear fission reactors: Third generation and beyond10.1016/j.enconman.2009.12.043 ↗
12. Fernández-Arias, P. (2017). Análisis de los factores que influyeron en la evolución y desarrollo del reactor nuclear PWR. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Salamanca].
13. History of the PWR and its worldwide development10.1016/0301-4215(84)90026-0 ↗
14. Global developments in advanced reactor technologies and international cooperation10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.734 ↗
15. Design evolutions of PWRs: Shippingport to generation III+10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.08.008 ↗
16. Kennard, M.W., and Harbottle, J.E. (2002). LWR Control Assembly Designs. A Historical Perspective. Control Assembly Materials for Water Reactors: Experience, Performance and Perspectives, IAEA Tecdoc.
17. Bahman, Z., and McDaniel, P. (2015). Thermodynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Systems, Springer Science+Business Media.
18. Duquesne Light and Shippingport: Nuclear power is born in western Pennsylvania
19. Basalla, G. (1988). The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107049864 ↗
20. The turnkey era in nuclear power10.2307/3145862 ↗
21. Historic American Engineering Record (1968). Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Plant (Connecticut Yankee Nuclear Power Plant), Historic American Engineering Record.
22. Adaptation of a pressurized water reactor of American design to the requirements of the German standards program and licensing procedure10.1016/0029-5493(91)90014-9 ↗
23. A realistic anticipated transient without SCRAM. Evaluation of the Zorita nuclear power plant10.13182/NT93-A34835 ↗
24. Control simulation and study of load rejection transient for AP100010.1016/j.pnucene.2015.05.008 ↗
25. Transient analysis of AP1000 NPP under the similar Fukushima accident conditions10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.026 ↗
26. Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive plant10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.03.049 ↗
27. The erection and commissioning Mülheim-Kärlich nuclear power plant10.1016/0029-5493(87)90081-1 ↗
28. PWR steam generators10.1016/0301-9322(95)00016-Q ↗
29. International Atomic Energy Agency (2020, January 23). Country Nuclear Power Profiles, France. Available online: https://cnpp.iaea.org/countryprofiles/France/France.htm.
30. The cost of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.003 ↗
31. Grubler, A. (2009). An Assessment of the Costs of the French Nuclear PWR Program 1970–2000, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
32. Jaquemain, D. (2015). Design and operation of a Pressurised Water Reactor Nuclear. Power Reactor Core Melt Accidents: Current State of Knowledge, EDP Sciences.
33. Wealer, B., Bauer, S., Landry, N., Seiß, H., and Von Hirschhausen, C. (2012). Nuclear Power Reactors Worldwide—Technology Developments, Diffusion Patterns, and Country-by-Country Analysis of Implementation (1951–2017), Deutsches Institut for Wirtschaftsftsforschung.
34. Systems organization for the European pressurized water reactor (EPR)10.1016/S0029-5493(98)00258-1 ↗
35. Objectives in developing the European pressurized water reactor (EPR)10.1016/0029-5493(95)01158-7 ↗
36. Nuclear power in the Soviet Union
37. Comparative technology and public policy: The development of the nuclear power reactor in six nations10.1007/BF00136001 ↗
38. VVER-Type reactors of Russian design
39. Libmann, J. (1996). Elements of Nuclear Safety, Les Editions de Physique.
40. Dwiddar, M.S., Badawi, A.A., Abou-Gabal, H.H., and El-Osery, I.A. (2014, January 12–14). From VVER-1000 to VVER-1200: Investigation of the Effect of the Changes in Core. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Physics and Technology of Reactors and Applications, Tetuan, Morocco.
41. Peachy, C. (2020, January 23). Chinese Reactor Design Evolution. Nuclear Engineering International. Available online: http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurechinese-reactor-design-evolution-4272370/.
42. Generation III pressurized water reactors and China’s nuclear power10.1631/jzus.A1600035 ↗
43. Xu, Y., Kang, J., and Yuan, J. (2018). The prospective of nuclear power in China. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10062086 ↗
44. The general design and technology innovations of CAP140010.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.018 ↗
45. CAP1400 IVR related design features and assessment10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.03.002 ↗
46. Is it the end of the line for Light Water Reactor technology or can China and Russia save the day?10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.062 ↗
47. Kadak, A.C. (2017). A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies, Center on Global Energy Policy.
48. International Atomic Energy Agency (2015). Advanced Large Water Cooled Reactors, Advanced Reactor Information System (ARIS).
49. Small nuclear heat and power co-generation stations and water desalination complexes on the basis of marine reactor plants10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00108-8 ↗
50. Floating nuclear power plants: Potential implications for radioactive pollution of the northern marine environment10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.11.025 ↗
51. Hass, R., Mez, L., and Ajanovic, A. (2019). The technological development of different generations and reactor concepts. The Technological and Economic Future of Nuclear Power, Springer.
52. HPR1000: Advanced pressurized water reactor with active and passive safety10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.017 ↗
53. Janardhanan, N., Pant, G., and Grover, R.B. (2017). The Expectant Global Nuclear Energy Renaissance: Movers, Shakers and Spoilers. Resurgence of Nuclear Power: Challenges and Opportunities for Asia, Springer.
54. Geographical political economy of nuclear power plant closures10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.017 ↗
55. Nuclear power plant aging and life extension: Safety aspects
56. Safeguard assessment for life extension in nuclear power plants (NPPs) using a production function10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.01.022 ↗
57. Ageing management and life extension of concrete in nuclear power plants10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.053 ↗
58. Role and importance of NDE in nuclear power plant life extension10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.036 ↗
59. Structural assessment of radiation damage in light water power reactor concrete biological shield walls10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.04.027 ↗
60. Progress in studying the fretting wear/corrosion of nuclear steam generator tubes10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107556 ↗
61. Overview of steam generator tube degradation an integrity issues10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00167-3 ↗
62. Particle deposition and fouling in PWR steam generators10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00336-2 ↗
63. Nuclear power for sustainable development: Current status and future prospects10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.052 ↗
64. Belgian nuclear power life extension and fuss about nuclear rents10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.054 ↗
65. EPR development—An evolutionary design process
66. The AP1000 plant and the China commissioning success
67. Life Extension of Nuclear Power Plants: World Situation and the USA Case
68. Kerasmi, A., and Moroni, J.M. (2012, January 14–18). Consquences of the Fukushima accident for the life extension program of French nuclear power plants. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Nuclear Power Plant Life Management (IAEA), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
69. Cenerino, G., Dubreuil, M., Raimond, E., and Pichereau, F. (2012, January 14–18). Radiological objectives and severe accident mitigation strategy for the generation II PWRs in France in the framework of PLE. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Nuclear Power Plant Life Management (IAEA), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
70. Kern, F. (2016). Second life or half-life? The contested future of nuclear power and its potential role in a sustainable energy transition. Energy Transitions, Palgrave Macmillan.
71. US nuclear power. The vanishing low-carbon wedge10.1073/pnas.1804655115 ↗
72. International Atomic Energy Agency (2019). Nuclear Power Reactors in the World, International Atomic Energy Agency.
73. Garamszeghy, M. (2013). Nuclear Fuel Waste Projections in Canada—2013 Update, Nuclear Waste Management Organization.
74. Application of accelerators in nuclear waste management
75. Yanagihara, S. (November, January 21). A study on decision-making methodology for decommissioning/life extension of nuclear power plant. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Power and Energy Systems, Tokyo, Japan.
76. Technical and social problems of nuclear waste10.1002/wene.289 ↗
77. The future of nuclear decommissioning—A worldwide market potenical10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.014 ↗
78. International Atomic Energy Agency (2017). Opportunities for Cogeneration with Nuclear Energy, International Atomic Energy Agency.
79. Insight on electrical and thermal powers mix with a Gen2 PWR: Rankine cycle performances under low to high temperature grade cogeneration10.1016/j.energy.2020.117518 ↗
80. Makhijani, A. (2013). Light Water Design of Small Modular Reactors: Facts and Analysis, Institute for Energy and Environmental Research.
81. Small modular reactors and the future of nuclear power in the United States
82. A dynamic model of a passively cooled small modular reactor for controller design purposes10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.04.026 ↗
83. Technology readiness assessment of Small Modular Reactor (SMR) designs10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.07.005 ↗