Ultrafiltration/Granulated Active Carbon-Biofilter: Efficient Removal of a Broad Range of Micropollutants
Source abstract
Abstract
Pharmaceutical residues, and other organic micropollutants that pass naturally through the human body into sewage, are in many cases unaffected by treatment processes at conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Accumulated in the environment, however, they can significantly affect aquatic ecosystems. The present study provides an evaluation of a treatment system for the removal of pharmaceutical residues and other micropollutants. The system is based on a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR), including ultrafiltration (UF), followed by a biofilter using granulated active carbon (GAC) as filter material. It was found that all investigated micropollutants, such as pharmaceutical residues, phenolic compounds, bacteria and microplastic particles, present in wastewater, could be removed by the treatment system to below detection limits or very low concentrations. This shows that the combination of filtration, adsorption and biodegradation provides a broad and efficient removal of micropollutants and effects. The tested treatment configuration appears to be one of the most sustainable solutions that meets today’s and future municipal sewage treatment requirements. The treatment system delivers higher resource utilization and security than other advanced treatment systems including solely GAC-filters without biology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis · Water Treatment and Disinfection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Box 210 60, 100 31 Stockholm, Sweden
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Dilute Concentrations of a Psychiatric Drug Alter Behavior of Fish from Natural Populations10.1126/science.1226850 ↗
2. Emerging pollutants in wastewater: A review of the literature10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.08.002 ↗
3. Fick, J., Lindberg, R.H., Kaj, L., and Brorström-Lundén, E. (2011). Results from the Swedish National Screening Programme 2010, Subreport 3, Pharmaceuticals, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. B2014.
4. EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.024 ↗
5. Kim, S.D., Cho, J., Kim, I.S., Vanderford, B.J., and Snyder, S.A. (2007). Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking, and waste waters. Water Res., 41.10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.034 ↗
6. Environmental side effects of pharmaceutical cocktails: What we know and what we should know10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.069 ↗
7. Rempharmawater (2018, August 22). Ecotoxicological Assessments and Removal Technologies for Pharmaceuticals in Wastewaters. Project Reference: EVK1-CT-2000-00048. Available online: http://www.unina.it.
8. POSEIDON (2018, August 22). Assessment of Technologies for the Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Sewage and Drinking Water Facilities to Improve the Indirect Potable Water Reuse. Project Reference: EVK1-CT-2000-00047. Available online: http://www.eu-poseidon.com.
9. RiSKWa (2013). Risk Management of Emerging Compounds and Pathogens in the Water Cycle, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). Available online: http://www.bmbf.riskwa.de.
10. Abegglen, C., and Siegrist, H. (2012). Mikroverunreinigungen aus Kommunalem Abwasser. Verfahren zur Weitergehenden Elimination auf Kläranlagen (Micropollutants from Municipal Wastewater. Method for Further Elimination on Sewage Treatment Plants), Bundesamt für Umwelt. Umwelt-Wissen Nr. 1214: 210.
11. Arge Spurenstoffe NRW (2013). Teilprojekt 6. Elimination von Arzneimitteln und Organischen Spurenstoffen: Entwicklung von Konzeptionen und Innovativen, Kostengünstigen Reinigungsverfahren (Elimination of Pharmaceuticals and Organic Trace Substances: Development of Concepts and Innovative, Cost-Effective Cleaning Methods)–Abschlussbericht zur Phase 2, Arge Spurenstoffe NRW.
12. Baresel, C., Ek, M., Harding, M., and Bergström, R. (2014). Treatment of Biologically Treated Wastewater with Ozone or Activated Carbon, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. B2203.
13. Baresel, C., Dahlgren, L., Nikolic, A., de Kerchove, A., Almemark, M., Ek, M., Harding, M., Ottosson, E., Karlsson, J., and Yang, J. (2015). Reuse of Treated Wastewater for Nonpotable Use (ReUse)–Final Report, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. B2219.
14. Removal of pharmaceutical residues using ozonation as intermediate process step at Linköping WWTP, Sweden10.2166/wst.2016.045 ↗
15. Baresel, C., Ek, M., Ejhed, H., Allard, A.S., Magnér, J., Dahlgren, L., Westling, K., Wahlberg, C., Fortkamp, U., and Søhr, S. (2017). Handbook for the Treatment of Micropollutants at Sewage Treatment Plant–Planning and Installing Treatment Techniques for Pharmaceutical residues and Other Micropollutants, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. Final Report SystemLäk Project; B2288.
16. Activated carbon for the removal of pharmaceutical residues from treated wastewater10.2166/wst.2014.172 ↗
17. Wahlberg, C., Björlenius, B., and Paxéus, N. (2010). Läkemedelsrester i Stockholms Vattenmiljö–Förekomst, Förebyggande Åtgärder och Rening av Avloppsvatten (Pharmaceutical Residues in Stockholm’s Aquatic Environment–Prevention, Prevention and Treatment of Sewage), Stockholm Vatten AB.
18. Direct comparison of ozonation and adsorption onto powdered activated carbon for micropollutant removal in advanced wastewater treatment10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.025 ↗
19. Ozonung von gereinigtem Abwasser zur Elimination von organischen Spurenstoffen. Grosstechnischer Pilotversuch Regensdorf (Schweiz) (Ozonation of purified wastewater to eliminate organic trace substances. Large-scale pilot test Regensdorf (Switzerland))
20. Review of Ozone for Water Reuse Applications: Toxicity, Regulations, and Trace Organic Contaminant Oxidation10.1080/01919512.2011.578038 ↗
21. Magdeburg, A., Stalter, D., and Oehlmann, J. (2012). Whole effluent toxicity assessment at a wastewater treatment plant upgraded with a full-scale post-ozonation using aquatic key species. Chemosphere, 88.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.017 ↗
22. Evaluating the efficiency of advanced wastewater treatment: Target analysis of organic contaminants and (geno-)toxicity assessment tell a different story10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.041 ↗
23. Guidance on the interpretation and design of ozonation plants for micropollutants elimination
24. Biofiltration of wastewater treatment plant effluent: Effective removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products and reduction of toxicity10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.013 ↗
25. Toxication or detoxication? In vivo toxicity assessment of ozonation as advanced wastewater treatment with the rainbow trout10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.025 ↗
26. Comparative toxicity assessment of ozone and activated carbon treated sewage effluents using an in vivo test battery10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.023 ↗
27. Ozonation and activated carbon treatment of sewage effluents: Removal of endocrine activity and cytotoxicity10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.008 ↗
28. Formation of oxidation byproducts from ozonation of wastewater10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.020 ↗
29. Projekt zur Teilstrombehandlung mit Pulveraktivkohle im Klärwerk Mannheim (Project for sidestream treatment with powdered activated carbon in the sewage treatment plant Mannheim)
30. Removal of micropollutants in municipal wastewater treatment plants by powderactivated carbon10.2166/wst.2012.353 ↗
31. Einsatz reaktivierter Aktivkohle von Wasserwerken zur Spurenstoffelimination in kommunalen Kläranlagen am Beispiel Düsseldorf (Use of reactivated activated carbon from water works for the elimination of trace substances in municipal sewage treatment plants using the example of Düsseldorf)
32. Improved removal of estrogenic and pharmaceutical compounds in sewage effluent by full scale granular activated carbon: Impact on receiving river water10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.005 ↗
33. Elimination of Micropollutants during Post-Treatment of Hospital Wastewater with Powdered Activated Carbon, Ozone, and UV10.1021/es400708w ↗
34. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065 ↗
35. Kosten der Pulveraktivkohleanwendung zur Spurenstoffelimination am Beispiel ausgeführter und in Bau befindlicher Anlagen (Cost of powdered activated carbon application for the elimination of trace substances using the example of selected plants under construction.)
36. Baresel, C., Ek, M., Harding, M., Magnér, J., Allard, A.S., and Karlsson, J. (2017). Complementary Tests for a Resource Efficient Advanced Sewage Treatment, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. Subreport SystemLäk Project; B2287.
37. Energy efficiency in membrane bioreactors10.2166/wst.2013.163 ↗
38. The environmental footprint of a membrane bioreactor treatment process through Life Cycle Analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.032 ↗
39. Ten years of industrial and municipal membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems–Lessons from the field10.2166/wst.2014.201 ↗
40. Recent Advances in Membrane Bioreactors: Configuration Development, Pollutant Elimination, and Sludge Reduction10.1089/ees.2010.0420 ↗
41. Aktual, A. (2006). Membrantechnik für die Abwasserreinigung (Membrane Technology for Wastewater Treatment). Siedlungswasser- und Siedlungsabfallwirtschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen, FiW-Verl.
42. Baresel, C., Westling, K., Samuelsson, O., Andersson, S., Royen, H., Andersson, S., and Dahlén, N. (2017). Membrane Bioreactor Processes to Meet Todays and Future Municipal Sewage Treatment Requirements?. Int. J. Water Wastewater Treat., 3.10.16966/2381-5299.140 ↗
43. Influencing parameters for the operation of an MBR with respect to the removal of persistent organic pollutants10.5004/dwt.2009.654 ↗
44. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.043 ↗
45. Comparison of removal of pharmaceuticals in MBR and activated sludge systems10.1016/j.desal.2009.06.073 ↗
46. Ek, M., Bergström, R., Magnér, J., Harding, M., and Baresel, C. (2013). Aktivt kol för Avlägsnande av Läkemedelsrester ur Behandlat Avloppsvatten (Activated Carbon for Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues from Treated Wastewater), IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. B2089.
47. Ek, M., Bergström, R., and Baresel, C. (2013). Avskiljning av Läkemedelsrester Med Granulerat Aktivt kol–Försök vid Himmerfjärdsverket (Removal of Pharmaceutical Residues with Granulated Activated Carbon), IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. U4492.
48. Magnusson, K., Jörundsdóttir, H., Norén, F., Lloyd, H., and Talvitie, J. (2016). Microlitter in Sewage Treatment Systems: A Nordic Perspective on Waste Water Treatment Plants as Pathways for Microscopic Anthropogenic Particles to Marine Systems.10.6027/TN2016-510 ↗
49. Removal characteristics of pharmaceuticals and personal care products: Comparison between membrane bioreactor and various biological treatment processes10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.135 ↗
50. Bio-regeneration of activated carbon: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.015 ↗
51. Advanced biological activated carbon filter for removing pharmaceutically active compounds from treated wastewater10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.214 ↗
52. Baresel, C., Cousins, A.P., Hörsing, M., Ek, M., Ejhed, H., Allard, A.S., Magnér, J., Westling, K., Wahlberg, C., and Fortkamp, U. (2015). Pharmaceutical Residues and Other Emerging Substances in the Effluent of Sewage Treatment Plants–Review on Concentrations, Quantification, Behaviour, and Removal Options, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. B2226.