Classification of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises Based on the Level of Industry 4.0 Implementation
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to Industry 4.0 technologies, small- and medium-sized enterprises have a great opportunity to increase their competitiveness. However, the question remains as to whether they are truly able to implement such modern technologies faster and carry out digital transformation. The main aim of the paper is to classify small- and medium-sized enterprises into various groups, according to the level of implementation of Industry 4.0, using the Index of Industry 4.0. Based on the results of the cluster analysis, the small and medium enterprises are categorized into four different groups, according to the level of implementation of Industry 4.0. There are top Industry 4.0 technological enterprises, I4 start enterprises, noobs enterprises, and I4 advances enterprises. So far, the largest group consists of the small- and medium-sized enterprises that are just starting out with the introduction of Industry 4.0 technologies, such as IT infrastructure, digitalization (data, cloud, data analysis, and information systems), and sensors. On the other hand, the top I4 technological enterprises group is the least numerous. The analysis carried out comparing the small- and medium-sized enterprises with the large enterprises shows that the SMEs still have a lower level of Industry 4.0 implementation. This confirms the assumption that the large enterprises have greater opportunities to use new technologies and transform them into smart factories. However, this situation may change in the future if new technologies become more accessible, and SMEs are worth investing in Industry 4.0 in terms of the return on investment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Economic and Technological Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Studentska 13, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
Funding
University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 ↗
2. Efficiency of production factors in the EU
3. Strategic management and measurement of competitiveness of regions on example of countries EU
4. The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.014 ↗
5. Ingaldi, M., and Ulewicz, R. (2020). Problems with the implementation of industry 4.0 in enterprises from the SME sector. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12010217 ↗
6. Turkes, M.C., Oncioiu, I., Aslam, H.D., Marin-Pantelescu, A., Topor, D.I., and Capusneanu, S. (2019). Drivers and barriers in using industry 4.0: A perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7030153 ↗
7. Ahmi, A., Elbardan, H., and Raja Mohd Ali, R.H. (2019, January 22–25). Bibliometric analysis of published literature on industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC), Auckland, New Zealand.10.23919/ELINFOCOM.2019.8706445 ↗
8. Robot skills for manufacturing: From concept to industrial deployment10.1016/j.rcim.2015.04.002 ↗
9. Maly, I., Sedlacek, D., and Leitao, P. (2016, January 19–21). Augmented reality experiments with industrial robot in industry 4.0 environment. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Poitiers, France.10.1109/INDIN.2016.7819154 ↗
10. Zambon, I., Cecchini, M., Egidi, G., Saporito, M.G., and Colantoni, A. (2019). Revolution 4.0: Industry vs. agriculture in a future development for SMEs. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7010036 ↗
11. Lin, B., Wu, W., and Song, M. (2019). Industry 4.0: Driving factors and impacts on firm’s performance: An empirical study on China’s manufacturing industry. Ann. Oper. Res.10.1007/s10479-019-03433-6 ↗
12. Industry 4.0 based process data analytics platform: A waste-to-energy plant case study10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105508 ↗
13. Madsen, D.Ø. (2019). The emergence and rise of industry 4.0 viewed through the Lens of management fashion theory. Adm. Sci., 9.10.3390/admsci9030071 ↗
14. Industry 4.0: A supply chain innovation perspective10.1080/00207543.2019.1641642 ↗
15. Industry 4.0: Emerging themes and future research avenues using a text mining approach10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.018 ↗
16. Application of Industry 4.0 to enhance sustainable manufacturing10.1002/ep.13360 ↗
17. Energy efficient multi-objective scheduling of tasks with interval type-2 fuzzy timing constraints in an Industry 4.0 ecosystem10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103257 ↗
18. A Maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 ↗
19. Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110 ↗
20. Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: A maturity-based analysis10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00122-4 ↗
21. Kaltenbach, F., Marber, P., Gosemann, C., Bolts, T., and Kuhn, A. (2018, January 17–20). Smart services maturity level in Germany. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, Germany.10.1109/ICE.2018.8436329 ↗
22. A survey study on Industry 4.0 for New Zealand manufacturing10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.007 ↗
23. Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140 ↗
24. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 ↗
25. Internet of Things (IoT): A literature review10.4236/jcc.2015.35021 ↗
26. Dwevedi, R., Krishna, V., and Kumar, A. (2018). Environment and big data: Role in smart cities of India. Resources, 7.10.3390/resources7040064 ↗
27. Sagiroglu, S., and Sinanc, D. (2013, January 20–24). Big data: A review. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/CTS.2013.6567202 ↗
28. Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook10.1016/j.compind.2016.02.004 ↗
29. Critical analysis of big data challenges and analytical methods10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001 ↗
30. Abubakr, M., Abbas, A.T., Tomaz, I., Soliman, M.S., Luqman, M., and Hegab, H. (2020). Sustainable and smart manufacturing: An integrated approach. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062280 ↗
31. Key issues for the successful adoption of cloud computing10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.016 ↗
32. Maskuriy, R., Selamat, A., Ali, K.N., Maresova, P., and Krejcar, O. (2019). Industry 4.0 for the construction industry-how ready is the industry?. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9142819 ↗
33. Bambach, M., Sviridov, A., Weisheit, A., and Schleifenbaum, J.H. (2017). Case studies on local reinforcement of sheet metal components by laser additive manufacturing. Metals, 7.10.3390/met7040113 ↗
34. Bandyopadhyay, A., and Susmita Bose, S. (2019). Additive Manufacturing, 2nd ed, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429466236 ↗
35. Gibson, I., Rosen, D., and Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 ↗
36. Robot assisted additive manufacturing: A review10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.005 ↗
37. Venkatraman, S., and Fahd, K. (2016). Challenges and success factors of ERP systems in Australian SMEs. Systems, 4.10.3390/systems4020020 ↗
38. Scanning the Industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems
39. Industry 4.0 concept: Background and overview10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072 ↗
40. Elfekey, H., Bastawrous, H.A., and Okamoto, S. (2016). A Touch sensing technique using the effects of extremely low frequency fields on the human body. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16122049 ↗
41. Stojanova, H., Lietavcova, B., and Vrdoljak Raguž, I. (2019). The Dependence of unemployment of the senior workforce upon explanatory variables in the European Union in the context of Industry 4.0. Soc. Sci., 8.10.3390/socsci8010029 ↗
42. Koilo, V. (2019). Evidence of the environmental kuznets curve: Unleashing the opportunity of Industry 4.0 in emerging economies. J. Risk Financ. Manag., 12.10.3390/jrfm12030122 ↗
43. Tsai, W.-H. (2018). Green Production planning and control for the textile industry by using mathematical programming and Industry 4.0 techniques. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11082072 ↗
44. Ageyeva, T., Horváth, S., and Kovács, J.G. (2019). In-mold sensors for injection molding: On the way to Industry 4.0. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19163551 ↗
45. Project management and innovation in the manufacturing industry in Czech Republic10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.206 ↗
46. Maresova, P., Soukal, I., Svobodova, L., Hedvicakova, M., Javanmardi, E., Selamat, A., and Krejcar, O. (2018). Consequences of Industry 4.0 in business and economics. Economies, 6.10.3390/economies6030046 ↗
47. Sevinc, A., Gur, S., and Eren, T. (2018). Analysis of the difficulties of SMEs in industry 4.0 applications by analytical hierarchy process and analytical network process. Processes, 6.10.3390/pr6120264 ↗
48. SMEs and industry 4.0-introducing a KPI based procedure model to identify focus areas in manufacturing industry10.30958/ajbe.2-2-1 ↗
49. Huang, C.J., Chicoma, E.D.T., and Huang, Y.H. (2019). Evaluating the factors that are affecting the implementation of industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing MSMEs, the case of Peru. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7030161 ↗
50. Imran, M., Salisu, I., Aslam, H.D., Iqbal, J., and Hameed, I. (2019). Resource and information access for SME sustainability in the era of IR 4.0: The mediating and moderating roles of innovation capability and management commitment. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7040211 ↗
51. Cerezo-Narviez, A., Garcia-Jurado, D., Gonzalez-Cruz, M.C., Pastor-Fernandez, A., Otero-Mateo, M., and Ballesteros-Perez, P. (2019). Standardizing innovation management: An opportunity for SMEs in the aerospace industry. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7050282 ↗
52. Hamidi, S.R., Aziz, A.A., Shuhidan, S.M., and Mokhsin, M. (2018). SMEs Maturity Model Assessment of IR4.0 Digital Transformation, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_75 ↗
53. Pirola, F., Cimini, C., and Pinto, R. (2019). Digital readiness assessment of Italian SMEs: A case-study research. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag.10.1108/JMTM-09-2018-0305 ↗
54. Three stage maturity model in SME’s towards industry 4.0
55. Butala, P., Govekar, E., and Vrabic, R. (2019). Deriving Essential Components of Lean and Industry 4.0 Assessment Model for Manufacturing SMEs., Elsevier Bv.
56. Chonsawat, N., and Sopadang, A. (2019). The Development of the Maturity Model to Evaluate the Smart SMEs 4.0 Readiness, IEOM Society.
57. A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005 ↗
58. Vrchota, J., and Pech, M. (2019). Readiness of enterprises in Czech Republic to implement industry 4.0: Index of industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245405 ↗
59. (2020, February 20). Available online: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/23169600/ht_odvetvi.pdf/cb4dc782-a3e0-43a4-8d96-99b8d1f14cca.
60. European Commission (2003). Recommendation of 6 May 2003 Concerning the Definition of Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (Text with EEA Relevance) (Notified under Document Number C (2003) 1422), The Publications Office of the European Union.
61. Little, T. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods, Vol.2: Statistical Analysis, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199934898.001.0001 ↗
62. King, R.S. (2015). Cluster Analysis and Data Mining: An Introduction, Mercury Learning and Information.10.1515/9781938549397 ↗
63. Rezankova, H. (2007). Shluková Analýza Dat (Cluster Data Analysis), Professional Publishing.
64. Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9 ↗
65. K-Means clustering in R libraries {cluster} and {factoextra} for Grouping Oceanographic Data
66. Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., and Hornik, K. (2020, February 20). Cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cluster/.
67. Adler, D., and Murdoch, D. (2020, February 01). Rgl: 3D Visualization Using OpenGL. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318392813_Rgl_3D_Visualization_Using_OpenGL.
68. Ligges, U., and Mächler, M. (2003). Scatterplot3d—An R package for visualizing multivariate data. J. Stat. Softw., 8.10.18637/jss.v008.i11 ↗
69. Babtiste, A. (2020, February 20). GridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for “Grid” Graphics. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gridExtra.
70. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., and Müller, K. (2020, February 20). Dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
71. Tan, P.N., Steinbach, M., Karpatne, A., and Kumar, V. (2019). Introduction to Data Mining, Pearson. [2nd ed.].
72. Hennig, C., Meila, M., Murtagh, F., and Rocci, R. (2016). Handbook of Cluster Analysis, CRC Press.10.1201/b19706 ↗
73. Cluster validity methods: Part I10.1145/565117.565124 ↗
74. Cluster validity methods: Part II10.1145/601858.601862 ↗
75. Potential cluster regions for manufacturing small and medium enterprises in khulna city of bangladesh: A spatial examination
76. Rodríguez, A.J.G., Barón, N.J., and Martínez, J.M.G. (2020). Validity of dynamic capabilities in the operation based on new sustainability narratives on nature tourism SMEs and clusters. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12031004 ↗
77. Open innovation in regional innovation systems: Assessment of critical success factors for implementation in SMEs10.1007/s13132-019-00619-y ↗
78. Establishing open innovation culture in cluster initiatives: The role of trust and information asymmetry10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.022 ↗
79. Bahena-Álvarez, I.L., Cordón-Pozo, E., and Delgado-Cruz, A. (2019). Social entrepreneurship in the conduct of responsible innovation: Analysis cluster in Mexican SMEs. Sustainability, 11.10.20944/preprints201905.0348.v1 ↗
80. Conceptualising digital transformation in SMEs: An ecosystemic perspective10.1108/JSBED-05-2019-0144 ↗
81. Strategic orientations, knowledge management (KM) and business performance: An exploratory study in SMEs using clustering analysis10.1108/K-05-2018-0277 ↗
82. Determinants of SMEs’ performance: Evidence from European countries
83. The analysis of the factors influencing the international trade of the slovak republic
84. Woods, J., Galbraith, B., and Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2019). Network centrality and open innovation: A social network analysis of an SME manufacturing cluster. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 1–14.
85. Improvements for determining the number of clusters in k-means for innovation databases in SMEs10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.172 ↗
86. Building a taxonomy of eco-innovation types in firms. A quantitative perspective10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.021 ↗
87. Innovative activities of SMEs in Russia: Constraints and growth factors
88. Roadmap industry 4.0—Implementation guideline for enterprises
89. Fox, S. (2019). Moveable production systems for sustainable development and trade: Limitations, opportunities and barriers. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11195154 ↗
90. Brozzi, R., D’Amico, R.D., Pasetti Monizza, G., Marcher, C., Riedl, M., and Matt, D. (2018). Design of Self-Assessment Tools to Measure Industry 4.0 Readiness. A Methodological Approach for Craftsmanship SMEs, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_52 ↗
91. (2019, December 15). Statista Worldwide Semiannual Small and Medium Business Spending Guide. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/760799/worldwide-small-medium-business-it-spending/.
92. (2020, January 02). IDC Worldwide Semiannual Small and Medium Business Spending Guide. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/800684/worldwide-small-medium-business-it-spending-growth/.
93. (2019, December 12). Statista In-depth: Industry 4.0. Available online: https://www.statista.com/study/66974/in-depth-industry-40/.
94. (2019, December 19). Computer Economics Robotic Process Automation Adoption Trends and Customer Experience. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1017027/worldwide-robotic-process-automation-adoption-investment-rates-organization-size/.
95. Human-system interaction design requirements to improve machinery and systems safety10.1007/978-3-030-20497-6_1 ↗
96. Chumnumporn, K., Jeenanunta, C., Komolavanij, S., Saenluang, N., Onsri, K., Fairat, K., and Itthidechakhachon, K. (2020). The Impact of IT knowledge capability and big data and analytics on firm’s industry 4.0 capability. Proceedings, 39.10.3390/proceedings2019039022 ↗
97. Erasmus, J., Grefen, P., Vanderfeesten, I., and Traganos, K. (2018). Smart hybrid manufacturing control using cloud computing and the internet-of-things. Machines, 6.10.3390/machines6040062 ↗
98. Choy, M., and Park, G. (2016). Sustaining innovative success: A case study on consumer-centric innovation in the ICT industry. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8100986 ↗
99. Lara, E., Aguilar, L., Sanchez, M.A., and García, J.A. (2020). Lightweight authentication protocol for M2M communications of resource-constrained devices in industrial internet of things. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20020501 ↗
100. Pallas, G., Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M., Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R., and Vijver, M.G. (2018). Green and clean: Reviewing the justification of claims for nanomaterials from a sustainability point of view. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10030689 ↗