Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation, Spatial Spillover and Agricultural Green Development—Taking 30 Provinces in China as the Research Object
Source abstract
Abstract
In the face of increasingly severe resource and environmental constraints, accelerating the transformation of agricultural green development through agricultural science and technology innovation is an effective measure to reduce agricultural pollution and improve agricultural production efficiency. From the perspective of multidimensional proximity, this paper expounds the mechanism of agricultural science and technology innovation on agricultural green development through spatial spillover from two perspectives: factor spillover path and product spillover path. Based on panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2019, using the gray correlation analysis method, the level of agricultural green development in China was measured, and its spatial–temporal evolution trend was analyzed. The spatial economic matrix was selected as the spatial weight matrix, and the spatial econometric model was used to analyze the spatial spillover effect of agricultural science and technology innovation on agricultural green development. The results showed the following: (1) Agricultural green development had distinct spatial characteristics. The development level of green agriculture in eastern and northwestern China showed a trend of fluctuation decline, while that in southwest China showed a trend of fluctuation increase. The overall spatial distribution of green agriculture was high in the east and low in the west. (2) The spatial distribution of agricultural science, technological innovation and the agricultural green development level showed a significant positive global spatial autocorrelation, and the local spatial pattern characteristics of a number of provinces showed high-value agglomeration (HH), low-value agglomeration (LL), low-value collapse (LH) and high-value bulge (HL) as the auxiliary local spatial distribution. (3) Under the economic matrix, the improvement of the agricultural science and technology innovation level not only had a significant promoting effect on agricultural green development within each province but also promoted agricultural green development in neighboring provinces through positive spillover effects. This study provides insights that can help make up for the lack of regional agricultural science and technology investment, formulate scientific regional agricultural science and technology innovation policies and promote agricultural green development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Economic and Environmental Valuation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
School of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
Funding
Heilongjiang philosophy and social sciences research planning project "Research on Farmers' willingness to pay and government compensation mechanism for straw deep ploughing and returning to the field in Heilongjiang Province Based on black land protectio
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. A solution for the sunset industry: Adoption of Green Fertiliser Technology amongst Malaysian paddy farmers10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.033 ↗
2. Fertiliser adoption and sustainable rural livelihood improvement in Nigeria Chock10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104193 ↗
3. Emergy evaluation of agricultural sustainability of Northwest China before and after the grain-for-green policy10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.060 ↗
4. Crop advisers as conservation intermediaries: Perceptions and policy implications for relying on nontraditional partners to increase U.S. farmers’ adoption of soil and water conservation practices10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.054 ↗
5. Measurement and spatial convergence analysis of China’s agricultural green development index10.1007/s11356-020-11953-z ↗
6. Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.012 ↗
7. Agriculture green development: A model for China and the world10.15302/J-FASE-2019300 ↗
8. Exploring the drivers of green agricultural development (GAD) in China: A spatial association network structure approaches10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105827 ↗
9. Yan, L., Deng, Y., and Qu, Z. (2016). Construction of Theoretical Framework for Innovations in Green Agriculture and Practical Exploration. Ecological Economics and Harmonious Society, Springer.
10. Toward cleaner production: What drives farmers to adopt eco-friendly agricultural production?10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.272 ↗
11. Green agriculture: Foundations for biodiverse, resilient and productive agricultural systems10.1080/14735903.2011.610206 ↗
12. Investigating interior driving factorsand cross-industrial linkages of carbon emission efficiency in China’s construction industry: Based on Super-SBM DEA and GVAR model10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118322 ↗
13. An evaluation of China’s agricultural green production: 1978–201710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118483 ↗
14. Evolution trend and internal mechanism of regional total factor productivity in Chinese agriculture
15. Analysis on the dynamic and influencing factors of agricultural total factor productivity in China
16. Subsidies for agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from a randomized experiment with improved grain storage bags in Uganda10.1093/ajae/aay108 ↗
17. Time Preferences and green agricultural technology adoption: Field evidence from rice farmers in China10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105627 ↗
18. Effects of awareness and policy on green behavior spreading in multiplex networks10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.067 ↗
19. Impact of farmer self-identity and attitudes on participation in agri-environment schemes10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104660 ↗
20. Measuring green total factor productivity of China’s agricultural sector: A three-stage SBM-DEA model with non-point source pollution and CO2 emissions10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128543 ↗
21. Measurement for China’s agricultural green TFP
22. China’s agricultural green total factor productivity based on carbon emission: An analysis of evolution trend and influencing factors10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123692 ↗
23. Innovation, international R&D spillovers and the sectoral heterogeneity of knowledge flows10.1007/s10290-013-0167-0 ↗