Show source-provided references
2. Lawless, H.T., and Heymann, H. (2010). Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. Food Science Text Series, Springer. [2nd ed.].
10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5 ↗3. ISO 8586 (2012). Sensory Analysis—General Guidelines for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Selected Assessors and Expert Sensory Assessors, ISO.
5. Sensory Analysis of Cosmetic Powders: Personal Care Ingredients and Emulsions
10.1111/ics.12352 ↗6. Rogers, L. (2017). Sensory Panel Management: A Practical Handbook for Recruitment, Training and Performance, Woodhead Publishing.
7. ISO 5492 (2008). Sensory Analysis—Vocabulary, ISO.
8. Meilgaard, M.C., Carr, B.T., and Civille, G.V. (2006). Sensory Evaluation Techniques, CRC Press. [4th ed.].
10.1201/b16452 ↗9. Raithatha, C., and Rogers, L. (2018). Panel Quality Management: Performance, Monitoring and Proficiency. Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation, John Wiley & Sons.
10.1002/9781118991657.ch4 ↗11. ISO 11036 (2020). Sensory Analysis—Methodology—Texture Profile, ISO.
12. Sweet Taste in Apple: The Role of Sorbitol, Individual Sugars, Organic Acids and Volatile Compounds
10.1038/srep44950 ↗13. Næs, T., Brockhoff, P.B., and Tomic, O. (2010). Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. [1st ed.].
10.1002/9780470669181 ↗14. Fichet, B., Piccolo, D., Verde, R., and Vichi, M. (2011). Monitoring Panel Performance Within and between Sensory Experiments by Multi-Way Analysis. Classification and Multivariate Analysis for Complex Data Structures, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-642-13312-1 ↗15. Meiselman, H.L. (2019). 24—Contextual Product Testing for Small to Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Context, Woodhead Publishing.
17. Sensory optimisation in new food product development: A case study of polish apple juice
18. Cavicchi, A., and Santini, C. (2018). Chapter 4—Sensory and Consumer Approaches for Targeted Product Development in the Agro-Food Sector. Case Studies in the Traditional Food Sector, Woodhead Publishing.
23. A Comparative Study of the Main International Extra Virgin Olive Oil Competitions: Their Impact on Producers and Consumers
10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.014 ↗25. How Do Consumer Hedonic Ratings for Extra Virgin Olive Oil Relate to Quality Ratings by Experts and Descriptive Analysis Ratings?
10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.004 ↗26. An Investigation of the Pivot© Profile Sensory Analysis Method Using Wine Experts: Comparison with Descriptive Analysis and Results from Two Expert Panels
10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103858 ↗29. Current Status and Perspectives of the Official Sensory Control Methods in Protected Designation of Origin Food Products and Wines
10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.01.010 ↗30. ISO 20613 (2019). Sensory Analysis—General Guidance for the Application of Sensory Analysis in Quality Control, ISO.
31. Partial Projective Mapping and Ultra-Flash Profile with and without Red Light: A Case Study with White Wine
10.1111/joss.12528 ↗37. Sipos, L., Végh, R., Bodor, Z., Zaukuu, J.-L.Z., Hitka, G., Bázár, G., and Kovacs, Z. (2020). Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR. Sensors, 20.
10.3390/s20236768 ↗38. Chun, S., Chambers, E., and Han, I. (2020). Development of a Sensory Flavor Lexicon for Mushrooms and Subsequent Characterization of Fresh and Dried Mushrooms. Foods, 9.
10.3390/foods9080980 ↗40. Comparison of Results from Cupping and Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Colombian Brewed Coffee
10.1111/joss.12104 ↗41. Sensory Profiling, the Blurred Line between Sensory and Consumer Science. A Review of Novel Methods for Product Characterization
10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.037 ↗43. ISO 16820 (2019). Sensory Analysis—Methodology—Sequential Analysis, ISO.
44. ISO 11132 (2012). Sensory Analysis—Methodology—Guidelines for Monitoring the Performance of a Quantitative Sensory Panel, ISO.
45. ISO 13299 (2016). Sensory Analysis—Methodology—General Guidance For Establishing A Sensory Profile, ISO.
46. Kilcast, D. (2010). Sensory Analysis for Food and Beverage Quality Control: A Practical Guide, Elsevier.
10.1533/9781845699512 ↗50. Assessing the Performance of a Sensory Panel–Panellist Monitoring and Tracking
10.1002/cem.918 ↗53. ISO 29842 (2011). Sensory Analysis—Methodology—Balanced Incomplete Block Designs, ISO.
54. Multiplicative Decomposition of the Scaling Effect in the Mixed Assessor Model into a Descriptor-Specific and an Overall Coefficients
10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.10.005 ↗64. López-López, A., Sánchez-Gómez, A.H., Montaño, A., Cortés-Delgado, A., and Garrido-Fernández, A. (2019). Panel and Panelist Performance in the Sensory Evaluation of Black Ripe Olives from Spanish Manzanilla and Hojiblanca Cultivars. Foods, 8.
10.3390/foods8110562 ↗68. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): A Framework for Monitoring and Assessing Performance of Trained Sensory Panels and Panelists
10.1111/j.1745-459X.2012.00399.x ↗71. Comparison of Novel Sensory Panel Performance Evaluation Techniques with E-Nose Analysis Integration
10.1002/cem.1391 ↗73. CLV3W: A Clustering around Latent Variables Approach to Detect Panel Disagreement in Three-Way Conventional Sensory Profiling Data
10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.013 ↗75. Olive Oil Sensory Evaluation: An Alternative to the Robust Coefficient of Variation (CVr %) for Measuring Panel Group Performance in Official Tasting Sessions
10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.044 ↗79. Defining and Validating Assessor Compromises about Product Distances and Attribute Correlations
84. Elgaard, L., Mielby, L.A., Hopfer, H., and Byrne, D.V. (2019). A Comparison of Two Sensory Panels Trained with Different Feedback Calibration Range Specifications via Sensory Description of Five Beers. Foods, 8.
10.3390/foods8110534 ↗87. ISO EA-4/09 (2017). Accreditation for Sensory Testing Laboratories, ISO.
88. ISO/IEC 17043 (2010). Conformity Assessment—General Requirements for Proficiency Testing, ISO.
89. ISO/IEC 17025 (2017). Testing and Calibration Laboratories, ISO.
90. Kilcast, D. (2010). 3-Proficiency Testing of Sensory Panels. Sensory Analysis for Food and Beverage Quality Control, Woodhead Publishing.
10.1533/9781845699512 ↗95. Inter-Laboratory Assessment by Trained Panelists from France and the United Kingdom of Beef Cooked at Two Different End-Point Temperatures
10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.07.026 ↗96. Barbieri, S., Brkić Bubola, K., Bendini, A., Bučar-Miklavčič, M., Lacoste, F., Tibet, U., Winkelmann, O., García-González, D.L., and Gallina Toschi, T. (2020). Alignment and Proficiency of Virgin Olive Oil Sensory Panels: The OLEUM Approach. Foods, 9.
10.3390/foods9030355 ↗97. Meullenet, J.-F., Xiong, R., and Findlay, C.J. (2008). Multivariate and Probabilistic Analyses of Sensory Science Problems, John Wiley & Sons.
10.1002/9780470277539 ↗