Interactions in Augmented and Mixed Reality: An Overview
Source abstract
Abstract
“Interaction” represents a critical term in the augmented and mixed reality ecosystem. Today, in mixed reality environments and applications, interaction occupies the joint space between any combination of humans, physical environment, and computers. Although interaction methods and techniques have been extensively examined in recent decades in the field of human-computer interaction, they still should be reidentified in the context of immersive realities. The latest technological advancements in sensors, processing power and technologies, including the internet of things and the 5G GSM network, led to innovative and advanced input methods and enforced computer environmental perception. For example, ubiquitous sensors under a high-speed GSM network may enhance mobile users’ interactions with physical or virtual objects. As technological advancements emerge, researchers create umbrella terms to define their work, such as multimodal, tangible, and collaborative interactions. However, although they serve their purpose, various naming trends overlap in terminology, diverge in definitions, and lack modality and conceptual framework classifications. This paper presents a modality-based interaction-oriented diagram for researchers to position their work and defines taxonomy ground rules to expand and adjust this diagram when novel interaction approaches emerge.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Augmented Reality Applications · Interactive and Immersive Displays · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Informatics, School of Information Sciences, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
Department of Surveying & Geoinformatics Engineering, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patra, Greece
Funding
General Secretariat for Research and Technology
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Olsson, T. (2013). Concepts and Subjective Measures for Evaluating User Experience of Mobile Augmented Reality Services. Human Factors in Augmented Reality Environments, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-4205-9_9 ↗
2. User experience model for augmented reality applications in urban heritage tourism10.1080/1743873X.2016.1251931 ↗
3. The organizational context of user-centered software designs10.2307/249021 ↗
4. Norman, D.A., and Draper, S.W. (1986). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/b15703 ↗
5. Etherington (2021, July 28). Google Launches ‘Live View’ AR Walking Directions for Google Maps. Available online: tinyurl.com/y48mt75e.
6. Cordeiro, D., Correia, N., and Jesus, R. (2015, January 10–12). ARZombie: A Mobile Augmented Reality Game with Multimodal Interaction. Proceedings of 2015 7th International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN), Torino, Italy.10.4108/icst.intetain.2015.259743 ↗
7. State of the art on monocular 3D face reconstruction, tracking, and applications10.1111/cgf.13382 ↗
8. Ladwig, P., and Geiger, C. (2018). A Literature Review on Collaboration in Mixed Reality. International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-95678-7_65 ↗
9. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays
10. Coutrix, C., and Nigay, L. (2006, January 23–26). Mixed Reality: A Model of Mixed Interaction. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Venezia, Italy.10.1145/1133265.1133274 ↗
11. Evangelidis, K., Papadopoulos, T., and Sylaiou, S. (2021). Mixed Reality: A Reconsideration Based on Mixed Objects and Geospatial Modalities. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052417 ↗
12. Historical Oslo on a handheld device–a mobile augmented reality application10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.180 ↗
13. Augmented places: An impact of embodied historical experience on attitudes towards places10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.014 ↗
14. Phithak, T., and Kamollimsakul, S. (February, January 31). Korat Historical Explorer: The Augmented Reality Mobile Application to Promote Historical Tourism in Korat. Proceedings of the 2020 the 3rd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business, Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/3383845.3383888 ↗
15. Nguyen, V.T., Jung, K., Yoo, S., Kim, S., Park, S., and Currie, M. (2019, January 9–11). Civil War Battlefield Experience: Historical Event Simulation Using Augmented Reality Technology. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/AIVR46125.2019.00068 ↗
16. Cavallo, M., Rhodes, G.A., and Forbes, A.G. (2016, January 19–23). Riverwalk: Incorporating Historical Photographs in Public Outdoor Augmented Reality Experiences. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct), Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0068 ↗
17. Angelini, C., Williams, A.S., Kress, M., Vieira, E.R., D’Souza, N., Rishe, N.D., and Ortega, F.R. (2020). City planning with augmented reality. arXiv.
18. Home sweet virtual home: The use of virtual and augmented reality technologies in high involvement purchase decisions
19. Fu, M., and Liu, R. (2018, January 2–4). The Application of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Dealing with Project Schedule Risks. Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1061/9780784481264.042 ↗
20. Amaguaña, F., Collaguazo, B., Tituaña, J., and Aguilar, W.G. (2018). Simulation System Based on Augmented Reality for Optimization of Training Tactics on Military Operations. International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-95270-3_33 ↗
21. Livingston, M.A., Rosenblum, L.J., Brown, D.G., Schmidt, G.S., Julier, S.J., Baillot, Y., and Maassel, P. (2011). Military Applications of Augmented Reality. Handbook of Augmented Reality, Springer. [2011th ed.].10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_31 ↗
22. Illusion & Delusion: Living in reality when inventing imaginary worlds
23. Ramos, F., Granell, C., and Ripolles, O. (2013). An Architecture for the Intelligent Creation of Imaginary Worlds for Running. Intelligent Computer Graphics 2012, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-31745-3_11 ↗
24. Imaging planets from imaginary worlds10.1119/1.5055339 ↗
25. Bunt, H. (1995). Issues in multimodal human-computer communication. International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication, Springer.
26. Multimodal human discourse: Gesture and speech10.1145/568513.568514 ↗
27. Ling, J., Peng, Z., Yin, L., and Yuan, X. (2020). How Efficiency and Naturalness Change in Multimodal Interaction in Mobile Navigation Apps. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_26 ↗
28. Camba, J., Contero, M., and Salvador-Herranz, G. (2014). Desktop vs. Mobile: A Comparative Study of Augmented Reality Systems for Engineering Visualizations in Education. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, IEEE.10.1109/FIE.2014.7044138 ↗
29. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage10.1145/3145534 ↗
30. Human-computer interaction: Overview on state of the art
31. A review of multimodal interaction technique in augmented reality environment10.18517/ijaseit.8.4-2.6824 ↗
32. Human computer interaction: An intellectual approach
33. Accessible Internet-of-Things and Internet-of-Content Services for All in the Home or on the Move10.3991/ijim.v6i4.2190 ↗
34. Tektonidis, D., Karagiannidis, C., Kouroupetroglou, C., and Koumpis, A. (2014). Intuitive User Interfaces to Help Boost Adoption of Internet-of-Things and Internet-of-Content Services for All. Inter-Cooperative Collective Intelligence: Techniques and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-35016-0_4 ↗
35. HCI-Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Technologies in the Universe
36. Raymond, O.U., Ogbonna, A.C., and Shade, K. (2021, September 10). Human Computer Interaction: Overview and Challenges. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263254929_Human_Computer_InteractionOverview_and_Challenges.
37. Gestural Interface Interaction: A Methodical Review
38. Nautiyal, L., Malik, P., and Ram, M. (2018). Computer Interfaces in Diagnostic Process of Industrial Engineering. Diagnostic Techniques in Industrial Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-65497-3_5 ↗
39. Human Ability Improvement with Wireless Sensors in Human Computer Interaction
40. Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition, Basic Books.
41. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
42. Perceptual modalities: Modes of presentation or modes of interaction?
43. Stokes, D., Matthen, M., and Biggs, S. (2015). Perception and Its Modalities, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199832798.001.0001 ↗
44. Pamparău, C., and Vatavu, R.D. (2020, January 22–25). A Research Agenda Is Needed for Designing for the User Experience of Augmented and Mixed Reality: A Position Paper. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Essen, Germany.10.1145/3428361.3432088 ↗
45. Ghazwani, Y., and Smith, S. (2020, January 14–16). Interaction in augmented reality: Challenges to enhance user experience. Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulations, Sydney, Australia.10.1145/3385378.3385384 ↗
46. Irshad, S., and Rambli, D.R.B.A. (2014, January 2–5). User Experience of Mobile Augmented Reality: A Review of Studies. Proceedings of the 2014 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), Shah Alam, Malaysia.10.1109/IUSER.2014.7002689 ↗
47. Côté, S., Trudel, P., Desbiens, M., Giguère, M., and Snyder, R. (2013, January 30–31). Live Mobile Panoramic High Accuracy Augmented Reality for Engineering and Construction. Proceedings of the Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (CONVR), London, UK.
48. Azimi, E., Qian, L., Navab, N., and Kazanzides, P. (2017). Alignment of the virtual scene to the tracking space of a mixed reality head-mounted display. arXiv.
49. Peng, J. (2021, September 10). Changing Spatial Boundaries. Available online: http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/changing-spatial-boundaries.html.
50. Indoor and outdoor positioning in mobile environments a review and some investigations on wlan positioning
51. Bug taxonomies: Use them to generate better tests
52. Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., and Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction, Morgan Kaufmann.
53. Bachmann, D., Weichert, F., and Rinkenauer, G. (2018). Review of three-dimensional human-computer interaction with focus on the leap motion controller. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18072194 ↗
54. Franco, J., and Cabral, D. (2019, January 26–29). Augmented object selection through smart glasses. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Pisa, Italy.10.1145/3365610.3368416 ↗
55. Mossel, A., Venditti, B., and Kaufmann, H. (2013, January 4–6). 3DTouch and HOMER-S: Intuitive manipulation techniques for one-handed handheld augmented reality. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual, Laval, France.10.1145/2466816.2466829 ↗
56. Augmented reality navigation systems10.1007/s10209-005-0017-5 ↗
57. Guidelines for multimodal user interface design10.1145/962081.962106 ↗
58. Rokhsaritalemi, S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., and Choi, S.M. (2020). A review on mixed reality: Current trends, challenges and prospects. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020636 ↗
59. Measuring the potential of augmented reality in civil engineering10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.005 ↗
60. Virtual and augmented reality in public archaeology teaching10.1017/aap.2017.20 ↗
61. Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6 ↗
62. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 ↗
63. Chen, L., Francis, K., and Tang, W. (2017, January 9–13). Semantic Augmented Reality Environment with Material-Aware Physical Interactions. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct), Nantes, France.10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2017.49 ↗
64. Chen, L., Tang, W., John, N., Wan, T.R., and Zhang, J.J. (2018). Context-aware mixed reality: A framework for ubiquitous interaction. arXiv.
65. Sonic interactions in virtual reality: State of the art, current challenges, and future directions10.1109/MCG.2018.193142628 ↗
66. Extracting boundary conditions for sound propagation calculations using augmented reality10.1007/s00502-021-00884-3 ↗
67. Han, C., Luo, Y., and Mesgarani, N. (2020, January 4–8). Real-Time Binaural Speech Separation with Preserved Spatial Cues. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053215 ↗
68. Comparison of optical and video see-through, head-mounted displays. In Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies
69. Nieters, J. (2021, September 10). Defining an Interaction Model: The Cornerstone of Application Design. Available online: https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2012/01/defining-an-interaction-model-the-cornerstone-of-application-design.php.
70. Sostel (2021, July 28). Eye-Gaze and Dwell. Available online: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/design/gaze-and-dwell-eyes.
71. Ballantyne, M., Jha, A., Jacobsen, A., Hawker, J.S., and El-Glaly, Y.N. (2018, January 25–28). Study of Accessibility Guidelines of Mobile Applications. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Cairo, Egypt.10.1145/3282894.3282921 ↗
72. Piumsomboon, T., Lee, G., Lindeman, R.W., and Billinghurst, M. (2017, January 18–19). Exploring Natural Eye-Gaze-Based Interaction for Immersive Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/3DUI.2017.7893315 ↗
73. Jacob, R.J. (1990, January 1–5). What You Look at Is What You Get: Eye Movement-Based Interaction Techniques. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/97243.97246 ↗
74. Pomplun, M., and Sunkara, S. (2003, January 22–27). Pupil Dilation as an Indicator of Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction. Proceedings of the International Conference on HCI, Crete, Greece.
75. Samara, A., Galway, L., Bond, R., and Wang, H. (2017). Human-Computer Interaction Task Classification via Visual-Based Input Modalities. International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-67585-5_62 ↗
76. Bazarevsky, V., Kartynnik, Y., Vakunov, A., Raveendran, K., and Grundmann, M. (2019). Blazeface: Sub-millisecond neural face detection on mobile gpus. arXiv.
77. Kantonen, T., Woodward, C., and Katz, N. (2010, January 20–24). Mixed Reality in Virtual World Teleconferencing. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR), Waltham, MA, USA.10.1109/VR.2010.5444792 ↗
78. Shreyas, K.K., Rajendran, R., Wan, Q., Panetta, K., and Agaian, S.S. (2019, January 4–18). TERNet: A Deep Learning Approach for Thermal Face Emotion Recognition. Proceedings of the SPIE 10993, Mobile Multimedia/Image Processing, Security, and Applications, Baltimore, MD, USA.
79. Busso, C., Deng, Z., Yildirim, S., Bulut, M., Lee, C.M., Kazemzadeh, A., and Narayanan, S. (2004, January 14–15). Analysis of Emotion Recognition Using Facial Expressions, Speech and Multimodal Information. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, State College, PA, USA.10.1145/1027933.1027968 ↗
80. Face recognition and privacy in the age of augmented reality
81. Mehta, D., Siddiqui, M.F.H., and Javaid, A.Y. (2018). Facial emotion recognition: A survey and real-world user experiences in mixed reality. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18020416 ↗
82. Lei, G., Li, X.H., Zhou, J.L., and Gong, X.G. (2009, January 17–19). Geometric Feature Based Facial Expression Recognition Using Multiclass Support Vector Machines. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, Nanchang, China.10.1109/GRC.2009.5255106 ↗
83. Christou, N., and Kanojiya, N. (2019). Human Facial Expression Recognition with Convolution Neural Networks. Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_49 ↗
84. Body centred interaction in immersive virtual environments
85. Kinect-for-windows with augmented reality in an interactive roleplay system for children with an autism spectrum disorder10.1080/10494820.2019.1710851 ↗
86. Hsiao, K.F., and Rashvand, H.F. (2011, January 28–30). Body Language and Augmented Reality Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 2011 Fifth FTRA International Conference on multimedia and ubiquitous engineering, Crete, Greece.10.1109/MUE.2011.51 ↗
87. Umeda, T., Correa, P., Marques, F., and Marichal, X. (2014, January 4–6). A Real-Time Body Analysis for Mixed Reality Application. Proceedings of the Korea-Japan Joint Workshop on Frontiers of Computer Vision, FCV-2004, Fukuoka, Japan.
88. Yousefi, S., Kidane, M., Delgado, Y., Chana, J., and Reski, N. (2016, January 4–8). 3D Gesture-Based Interaction for Immersive Experience in Mobile VR. Proceedings of the 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Cancun, Mexico.10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899949 ↗
89. Weichel, C., Lau, M., Kim, D., Villar, N., and Gellersen, H.W. (May, January 26). MixFab: A Mixed-Reality Environment for Personal Fabrication. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada.
90. Computer-assisted culture learning in an online augmented reality environment based on free-hand gesture interaction10.1109/TLT.2014.2307297 ↗
91. Porter, S.R., Marner, M.R., Smith, R.T., Zucco, J.E., and Thomas, B.H. (2010, January 13–16). Validating Spatial Augmented Reality for Interactive Rapid Prototyping. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Seoul, Korea.10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643599 ↗
92. A Review of Mixed Reality Telepresence10.1088/1757-899X/864/1/012081 ↗
93. Moares, R., Jadhav, V., Bagul, R., Jacbo, R., and Rajguru, S. (2019, January 29–30). Inter AR: Interior Decor App Using Augmented Reality Technology. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Cyber Security & Privacy in Communication Networks (ICCS), Kurukshetra, Haryana, India.10.2139/ssrn.3513248 ↗
94. SlidAR: A 3D positioning method for SLAM-based handheld augmented reality10.1016/j.cag.2015.10.013 ↗
95. Augmented Reality Uses in Interior Design
96. Labrie, A., and Cheng, J. (2020, January 20–23). Adapting Usability Heuristics to the Context of Mobile Augmented Reality. Proceedings of the Adjunct Publication of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Virtual Event, USA.10.1145/3379350.3416167 ↗
97. Augmented assembly technologies based on 3D bare-hand interaction10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.001 ↗
98. Real-time landscape model interaction using a tangible geospatial modeling environment10.1109/MCG.2006.87 ↗
99. Softar: Visually manipulating haptic softness perception in spatial augmented reality10.1109/TVCG.2015.2459792 ↗
100. A context-aware method for authentically simulating outdoors shadows for mobile augmented reality10.1109/TVCG.2017.2676777 ↗