Building Damage Detection from Post-Event Aerial Imagery Using Single Shot Multibox Detector
Source abstract
Abstract
Using aerial cameras, satellite remote sensing or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) equipped with cameras can facilitate search and rescue tasks after disasters. The traditional manual interpretation of huge aerial images is inefficient and could be replaced by machine learning-based methods combined with image processing techniques. Given the development of machine learning, researchers find that convolutional neural networks can effectively extract features from images. Some target detection methods based on deep learning, such as the single-shot multibox detector (SSD) algorithm, can achieve better results than traditional methods. However, the impressive performance of machine learning-based methods results from the numerous labeled samples. Given the complexity of post-disaster scenarios, obtaining many samples in the aftermath of disasters is difficult. To address this issue, a damaged building assessment method using SSD with pretraining and data augmentation is proposed in the current study and highlights the following aspects. (1) Objects can be detected and classified into undamaged buildings, damaged buildings, and ruins. (2) A convolution auto-encoder (CAE) that consists of VGG16 is constructed and trained using unlabeled post-disaster images. As a transfer learning strategy, the weights of the SSD model are initialized using the weights of the CAE counterpart. (3) Data augmentation strategies, such as image mirroring, rotation, Gaussian blur, and Gaussian noise processing, are utilized to augment the training data set. As a case study, aerial images of Hurricane Sandy in 2012 were maximized to validate the proposed method’s effectiveness. Experiments show that the pretraining strategy can improve of 10% in terms of overall accuracy compared with the SSD trained from scratch. These experiments also demonstrate that using data augmentation strategies can improve mAP and mF1 by 72% and 20%, respectively. Finally, the experiment is further verified by another dataset of Hurricane Irma, and it is concluded that the paper method is feasible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Science and Technology, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China
Funding
Beijing Natural Science Foundation · National Key R&D Program of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing for rangeland assessment, monitoring, and management
2. Synthetic Aperture Radar Ship Detection Using Haar-Like Features10.1109/LGRS.2016.2631638 ↗
3. Xu, T.B., Cheng, G.L., Yang, J., and Liu, C.L. (2016, January 16–18). Fast Aircraft Detection Using End-to-End Fully Convolutional Network. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICDSP.2016.7868532 ↗
4. Chern, M.Y., and Hou, P.C. (2003, January 14–19). The lane recognition and vehicle detection at night for a camera-assisted car on highway. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422), Taipei, Taiwan.
5. Dalal, N., and Triggs, B. (2005, January 20–26). Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), San Diego, CA, USA.
6. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗
7. Viola, P., and Jones, M. (2001, January 8–14). Rapid Object Detection using a Boosted Cascade of Simple Features. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001, Kauai, HI, USA.
8. Ho, W.T., Hao, W.L., and Yong, H.T. (2009, January 1–3). Two-Stage License Plate Detection Using Gentle Adaboost and SIFT-SVM. Proceedings of the 2009 First Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Dong Hoi, Vietnam.10.1109/ACIIDS.2009.25 ↗
9. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J. (2014, January 23–28). Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
10. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
11. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.Y., and Berg, A.C. (2016, January 11–14). SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. Proceedings of the the 14th European Conference on Computer Vision, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
12. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (arXiv, 2014). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, arXiv.
13. Building damage assessment using airborne lidar10.1117/1.JRS.11.046024 ↗
14. Earthquake Damage Assessment of Buildings Using VHR Optical and SAR Imagery10.1109/TGRS.2009.2038274 ↗
15. Object-based classification of earthquake damage from high-resolution optical imagery using machine learning10.1117/1.JRS.10.036025 ↗
16. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
17. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012). ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc.
18. Lowe, D.G. (1999, January 20–27). Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkyra, Greece.10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410 ↗
19. Fusion of satellite, aircraft, and UAV data for automatic disaster damage assessment10.1080/01431161.2017.1294780 ↗
20. Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 ↗
21. Donahue, J., Jia, Y., Vinyals, O., Hoffman, J., Zhang, N., Tzeng, E., and Darrell, T. (2018, September 07). DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognition. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.1531.pdf.
22. Howard, A.G. (arXiv, 2013). Some Improvements on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Based Image Classification, arXiv.
23. Automated residential building detection from airborne LiDAR data with deep neural networks10.1016/j.aei.2018.04.002 ↗
24. Cao, Q.D., and Choe, Y. (arXiv, 2018). Detecting Damaged Buildings on Post-Hurricane Satellite Imagery Based on Customized Convolutional Neural Networks, arXiv.
25. Inoue, H. (arXiv, 2018). Data Augmentation by Pairing Samples for Images Classification, arXiv.
26. Why Does Unsupervised Pre-training Help Deep Learning?
27. Geng, M., Wang, Y., Xiang, T., and Tian, Y. (arXiv, 2016). Deep Transfer Learning for Person Re-identification, arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.146 ↗
28. Sheppard, K. (Huffington Post, 2017). Report Warns That Superstorm Sandy Was Not ‘The Big One’, Huffington Post.
29. Semi-supervised classification of hurricane damage from post-event aerial imagery using deep learning10.1117/1.JRS.12.045008 ↗
30. (2018, September 07). Hurricane Irma data, Available online: https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/storms/irma/index.html#6/26.697/-78.794.
31. (2018, September 07). Pytorch. Available online: https://pytorch.org/.