journal article·2020-05-29Open access

Evaluating the Performance of Individual and Novel Ensemble of Machine Learning and Statistical Models for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment at Rudraprayag District of Garhwal Himalaya

Sunil Saha, Anik Saha, Tusar Kanti Hembram, Biswajeet Pradhan, Abdullah M. Alamri

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 11

Abstract

Landslides are known as the world’s most dangerous threat in mountainous regions and pose a critical obstacle for both economic and infrastructural progress. It is, therefore, quite relevant to discuss the pattern of spatial incidence of this phenomenon. The current research manifests a set of individual and ensemble of machine learning and probabilistic approaches like an artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and their ensembles such as ANN-RF, ANN-SVM, SVM-RF, SVM-LR, LR-RF, LR-ANN, ANN-LR-RF, ANN-RF-SVM, ANN-SVM-LR, RF-SVM-LR, and ANN-RF-SVM-LR for mapping landslide susceptibility in Rudraprayag district of Garhwal Himalaya, India. A landslide inventory map along with sixteen landslide conditioning factors (LCFs) was used. Randomly partitioned sets of 70%:30% were used to ascertain the goodness of fit and predictive ability of the models. The contribution of LCFs was analyzed using the RF model. The altitude and drainage density were found to be the responsible factors in causing the landslide in the study area according to the RF model. The robustness of models was assessed through three threshold dependent measures, i.e., receiver operating characteristic (ROC), precision and accuracy, and two threshold independent measures, i.e., mean-absolute-error (MAE) and root-mean-square-error (RMSE). Finally, using the compound factor (CF) method, the models were prioritized based on the results of the validation methods to choose best model. Results show that ANN-RF-LR indicated a realistic finding, concentrating only on 17.74% of the study area as highly susceptible to landslide. The ANN-RF-LR ensemble demonstrated the highest goodness of fit and predictive capacity with respective values of 87.83% (area under the success rate curve) and 93.98% (area under prediction rate curve), and the highest robustness correspondingly. These attempts will play a significant role in ensemble modeling, in building reliable and comprehensive models. The proposed ANN-RF-LR ensemble model may be used in the other geographic areas having similar geo-environmental conditions. It may also be used in other types of geo-hazard modeling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Cryospheric studies and observations · Flood Risk Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal 732103, India

The Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), School of Information, Systems & Modelling, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia

Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Choongmu-gwan, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea

Department of Geology & Geophysics, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Funding

University of Technology Sydney · King Saud University

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. IAEG Commission on Landslides (1990). Suggested nomenclature for landslides. Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol., 41, 3–16.10.1007/BF02590202 ↗
2. Global landslide and avalanche hotspots10.1007/s10346-006-0036-1 ↗
3. Geertsema, M., Highland, L., and Vaugeouis, L. (2009). Environmental impact of landslides. Landslides–Disaster Risk Reduction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_31 ↗
4. How accurate are the performances of gridded precipitation data products over Northeast China?10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.006 ↗
5. The application of GIS-based bivariate statistical methods for landslide hazards assessment in the upper Tons river valley, Western Himalaya, India
6. Analysis of seismicity-induced landslides due to the 8 October 2005 earthquake in Kashmir Himalaya
7. Generating field-based inventory of earthquake-induced landslides in the Himalayas—An aftermath of the 18 September 2011 Sikkim earthquake
8. Earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment of chamoli district, uttarakhand using relative frequency ratio method10.1007/s40098-018-0334-2 ↗
9. Landslide susceptibility zonation in the Rio Mendoza Valley, Argentina10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.019 ↗
10. Wadhawan, S.K. (2019). Landslide susceptibility mapping, vulnerability and risk assessment for development of early warning systems in India. Landslides: Theory, Practice and Modelling, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-77377-3_8 ↗
11. Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.011 ↗
12. Landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in Fayfa area, Saudi Arabia10.1007/s12665-014-3661-3 ↗
13. A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/10106049.2016.1140824 ↗
14. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023 ↗
15. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032 ↗
16. Landslide susceptibility mapping of the Sera River basin using logistic regression model10.1007/s11069-016-2591-7 ↗
17. Applying information theory and GIS-based quantitative methods to produce landslide susceptibility maps in Nancheng County, China10.1007/s10346-016-0769-4 ↗
18. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.007 ↗
19. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Lianhua County (China): A comparison between a random forest data mining technique and bivariate and multivariate statistical models10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.012 ↗
20. Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach10.1007/s12665-016-6374-y ↗
21. Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi Perfection, Greece10.1007/s10346-015-0565-6 ↗
22. An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan10.1007/s11069-015-1799-2 ↗
23. Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data10.1109/TGRS.1990.572944 ↗
24. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034 ↗
25. Hembram, T.K., Paul, G.C., and Saha, S. (2020). Modelling of gully erosion risk using new ensemble of conditional probability and index of entropy in Jainti River basin of Chotanagpur Plateau Fringe Area, India. Appl. Geomat., 1–24.10.1007/s12518-020-00301-y ↗
26. Performance assessment of individual and ensemble data-mining techniques for gully erosion modeling10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.198 ↗
27. Mapping groundwater contamination risk of multiple aquifers using multi-model ensemble of machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.185 ↗
28. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6 ↗
29. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113 ↗
30. Kadavi, P.R., Lee, C.W., and Lee, S. (2018). Application of ensemble-based machine learning models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10081252 ↗
31. Landslide susceptibility mapping using an ensemble statistical index (Wi) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model at Alborz Mountains (Iran)10.1007/s12665-015-5233-6 ↗
32. (2019, October 21). The Pioneer. Available online: https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/landslide-at-rudraprayag-kills-8.html.
33. Indian Meteorological Department (2019, November 24). Available online: https://mausam.imd.gov.in/.
34. (2019, December 20). US Geological Survey Earthexplorer, Available online: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
35. (2019, December 22). Bhuvan, Available online: http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/.
36. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical analysis in Devrek (Zonguldak-Turkey)10.1007/s12665-011-1196-4 ↗
37. Landslide hazard and risk zonation—Why is it still so difficult?10.1007/s10064-005-0023-0 ↗
38. Kononenko, I. (1994). Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF. European Conference on Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/3-540-57868-4_57 ↗
39. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression, frequency ratio, decision tree, weights of evidence and artificial neural network10.1007/s12303-015-0026-1 ↗
40. Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007 ↗
41. A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the MultiBoost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1007/s10064-018-1281-y ↗
42. Li, Z., Zhu, Q., and Gold, C. (2005). Digital Terrain Modeling: Principles and Methodology, CRC Press.10.1201/9780203357132 ↗
43. A simplified method of determining the average slope of land surfaces10.2475/ajs.s5-20.117.184 ↗
44. Burrough, P.A., and McDonell, R.A. (1998). Principles of Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press.
45. Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications10.1002/hyp.3360050103 ↗
46. A Kriging-based approach for locating a sampling site—In the assessment of airquality10.1007/s00477-005-0234-8 ↗
47. Physical basis of the length slope factor in the universal soil loss equation10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000050042x ↗
48. A novel approach to canonical divergences within information geometry10.3390/e17127866 ↗
49. Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping: A case study from darjeeling district, Eastern Himalayas, India10.1007/s12524-018-0916-6 ↗
50. Calculating the vegetation index faster10.1016/0034-4257(90)90085-Z ↗
51. Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7 ↗
52. Prasad, K., Gopi, S., and Rao, R. (1992). Demarcation of Priority Macro-Watersheds in Mahbubnagar District, AP Using Remote Sensing Techniques, Tata McGraw-Hill.
53. Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: A case study from the Nepal Himalaya10.1007/s12665-009-0426-5 ↗
54. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
55. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.436 ↗
56. Comparison of logistic regression and random forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy)10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001 ↗
57. Machine learning feature selection methods for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1007/s11004-013-9511-0 ↗
58. Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.006 ↗
59. A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00013-3 ↗
60. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.011 ↗
61. Evaluation of different machine learning models for predicting and mapping the susceptibility of gully erosion10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.006 ↗
62. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naïve Bayes Models10.1155/2012/974638 ↗
63. Landslide susceptibility mapping using knowledge driven statistical models in Darjeeling District, West Bengal, India10.1186/s40677-019-0126-8 ↗
64. Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis10.1080/00031305.2000.10474502 ↗
65. A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: A case study at İzmir, Turkey10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7 ↗
66. Ensemble-based classifiers10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7 ↗
67. Ensemble-based landslide susceptibility maps in Jinbu area, Korea10.1007/s12665-011-1477-y ↗
68. Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale10.1016/j.rse.2014.05.013 ↗
69. Application of weights-of-evidence (WoE) and evidential belief function (EBF) models for the delineation of soil erosion vulnerable zones: A study on Pathro river basin, Jharkhand, India10.1007/s40808-017-0362-4 ↗
70. Deforestation probable area predicted by logistic regression in Pathro river basin: A tributary of Ajay River10.1007/s41324-017-0151-1 ↗
71. Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.004 ↗
72. Comparative Analysis between Morphometry and Geo-Environmental Factor Based Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using Weight of Evidence Model: A Study on Jainti River Basin, Eastern India10.1007/s40710-019-00388-5 ↗
73. Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analysis10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.05.011 ↗
74. Morphometry and land cover based multicriteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the western Himalayan watershed10.1007/s10661-014-4012-2 ↗
75. Prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil erosion based on morphometric attributes using fuzzy AHP and compound factor in Jainti River basin, Jharkhand, Eastern India10.1007/s10668-018-0247-3 ↗
76. Investigation of automatic feature weighting methods (Fisher, Chi-square and Relief-F) for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/10106049.2016.1170892 ↗
77. Land subsidence susceptibility mapping in south korea using machine learning algorithms10.3390/s18082464 ↗
78. Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing
79. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment by means of GIS-based logistic regression: A case of Sicily (Italy)10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.021 ↗
80. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: Application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, southern Italy)10.1007/s11069-015-1915-3 ↗
81. A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: Multivariate versus bivariate10.1007/s00254-003-0917-8 ↗
82. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using numerical risk factor bivariate model and its ensemble with linear multivariate regression and boosted regression tree algorithms10.1007/s11629-018-5168-y ↗
83. Glade, T., and Crozier, M.J. (2005). Landslide hazard and risk: Concluding comment and perspectives. Landslide Hazard Risk, Wiley.10.1002/9780470012659 ↗