Show source-provided references
1. IAEG Commission on Landslides (1990). Suggested nomenclature for landslides. Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol., 41, 3–16.
10.1007/BF02590202 ↗3. Geertsema, M., Highland, L., and Vaugeouis, L. (2009). Environmental impact of landslides. Landslides–Disaster Risk Reduction, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_31 ↗5. The application of GIS-based bivariate statistical methods for landslide hazards assessment in the upper Tons river valley, Western Himalaya, India
6. Analysis of seismicity-induced landslides due to the 8 October 2005 earthquake in Kashmir Himalaya
7. Generating field-based inventory of earthquake-induced landslides in the Himalayas—An aftermath of the 18 September 2011 Sikkim earthquake
8. Earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment of chamoli district, uttarakhand using relative frequency ratio method
10.1007/s40098-018-0334-2 ↗10. Wadhawan, S.K. (2019). Landslide susceptibility mapping, vulnerability and risk assessment for development of early warning systems in India. Landslides: Theory, Practice and Modelling, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-77377-3_8 ↗11. Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS
10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.011 ↗12. Landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in Fayfa area, Saudi Arabia
10.1007/s12665-014-3661-3 ↗13. A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping
10.1080/10106049.2016.1140824 ↗14. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS
10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023 ↗15. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility
10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032 ↗17. Applying information theory and GIS-based quantitative methods to produce landslide susceptibility maps in Nancheng County, China
10.1007/s10346-016-0769-4 ↗19. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Lianhua County (China): A comparison between a random forest data mining technique and bivariate and multivariate statistical models
10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.012 ↗21. Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi Perfection, Greece
10.1007/s10346-015-0565-6 ↗22. An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan
10.1007/s11069-015-1799-2 ↗23. Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data
10.1109/TGRS.1990.572944 ↗24. Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034 ↗25. Hembram, T.K., Paul, G.C., and Saha, S. (2020). Modelling of gully erosion risk using new ensemble of conditional probability and index of entropy in Jainti River basin of Chotanagpur Plateau Fringe Area, India. Appl. Geomat., 1–24.
10.1007/s12518-020-00301-y ↗28. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran
10.1007/s10661-015-5049-6 ↗29. Ensemble machine-learning-based geospatial approach for flood risk assessment using multi-sensor remote-sensing data and GIS
10.1080/19475705.2017.1294113 ↗30. Kadavi, P.R., Lee, C.W., and Lee, S. (2018). Application of ensemble-based machine learning models to landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sens., 10.
10.3390/rs10081252 ↗31. Landslide susceptibility mapping using an ensemble statistical index (Wi) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model at Alborz Mountains (Iran)
10.1007/s12665-015-5233-6 ↗32. (2019, October 21). The Pioneer. Available online: https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/state-editions/landslide-at-rudraprayag-kills-8.html.
33. Indian Meteorological Department (2019, November 24). Available online: https://mausam.imd.gov.in/.
34. (2019, December 20). US Geological Survey Earthexplorer, Available online: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
35. (2019, December 22). Bhuvan, Available online: http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/.
36. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using bivariate statistical analysis in Devrek (Zonguldak-Turkey)
10.1007/s12665-011-1196-4 ↗38. Kononenko, I. (1994). Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF. European Conference on Machine Learning, Springer.
10.1007/3-540-57868-4_57 ↗39. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression, frequency ratio, decision tree, weights of evidence and artificial neural network
10.1007/s12303-015-0026-1 ↗40. Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS
10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007 ↗41. A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the MultiBoost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling
10.1007/s10064-018-1281-y ↗42. Li, Z., Zhu, Q., and Gold, C. (2005). Digital Terrain Modeling: Principles and Methodology, CRC Press.
10.1201/9780203357132 ↗44. Burrough, P.A., and McDonell, R.A. (1998). Principles of Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press.
45. Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications
10.1002/hyp.3360050103 ↗49. Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping: A case study from darjeeling district, Eastern Himalayas, India
10.1007/s12524-018-0916-6 ↗52. Prasad, K., Gopi, S., and Rao, R. (1992). Demarcation of Priority Macro-Watersheds in Mahbubnagar District, AP Using Remote Sensing Techniques, Tata McGraw-Hill.
53. Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: A case study from the Nepal Himalaya
10.1007/s12665-009-0426-5 ↗55. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.436 ↗56. Comparison of logistic regression and random forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy)
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001 ↗58. Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia
10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.06.006 ↗62. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naïve Bayes Models
10.1155/2012/974638 ↗63. Landslide susceptibility mapping using knowledge driven statistical models in Darjeeling District, West Bengal, India
10.1186/s40677-019-0126-8 ↗65. A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: A case study at İzmir, Turkey
10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7 ↗68. Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale
10.1016/j.rse.2014.05.013 ↗69. Application of weights-of-evidence (WoE) and evidential belief function (EBF) models for the delineation of soil erosion vulnerable zones: A study on Pathro river basin, Jharkhand, India
10.1007/s40808-017-0362-4 ↗70. Deforestation probable area predicted by logistic regression in Pathro river basin: A tributary of Ajay River
10.1007/s41324-017-0151-1 ↗72. Comparative Analysis between Morphometry and Geo-Environmental Factor Based Soil Erosion Risk Assessment Using Weight of Evidence Model: A Study on Jainti River Basin, Eastern India
10.1007/s40710-019-00388-5 ↗73. Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analysis
10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.05.011 ↗74. Morphometry and land cover based multicriteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the western Himalayan watershed
10.1007/s10661-014-4012-2 ↗75. Prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil erosion based on morphometric attributes using fuzzy AHP and compound factor in Jainti River basin, Jharkhand, Eastern India
10.1007/s10668-018-0247-3 ↗76. Investigation of automatic feature weighting methods (Fisher, Chi-square and Relief-F) for landslide susceptibility mapping
10.1080/10106049.2016.1170892 ↗77. Land subsidence susceptibility mapping in south korea using machine learning algorithms
10.3390/s18082464 ↗78. Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing
80. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: Application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, southern Italy)
10.1007/s11069-015-1915-3 ↗81. A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: Multivariate versus bivariate
10.1007/s00254-003-0917-8 ↗82. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using numerical risk factor bivariate model and its ensemble with linear multivariate regression and boosted regression tree algorithms
10.1007/s11629-018-5168-y ↗83. Glade, T., and Crozier, M.J. (2005). Landslide hazard and risk: Concluding comment and perspectives. Landslide Hazard Risk, Wiley.
10.1002/9780470012659 ↗