Survey of Finite Element Method-Based Real-Time Simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
The finite element method (FEM) has deservedly gained the reputation of the most powerful, highly efficient, and versatile numerical method in the field of structural analysis. Though typical application of FE programs implies the so-called “off-line” computations, the rapid pace of hardware development over the past couple of decades was the major impetus for numerous researchers to consider the possibility of real-time simulation based on FE models. Limitations of available hardware components in various phases of developments demanded remarkable innovativeness in the quest for suitable solutions to the challenge. Different approaches have been proposed depending on the demands of the specific field of application. Though it is still a relatively young field of work in global terms, an immense amount of work has already been done calling for a representative survey. This paper aims to provide such a survey, which of course cannot be exhaustive.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Real-time simulation and control systems · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Structural Analysis, Technical University of Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Scholz, P. (2005). Softwareentwicklung Eingebetteter Systeme, Physica-Verlag—Springer.10.1007/3-540-27522-3 ↗
2. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, Reprinted from Electronics, volume 38, number 8, April 19, 1965, pp.114 ff10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785860 ↗
3. Real-time nonlinear finite element computations on GPU—Application to neurosurgical simulation10.1016/j.cma.2010.06.037 ↗
4. vCUDA: GPU-Accelerated High-Performance Computing in Virtual Machines10.1109/TC.2011.112 ↗
5. An approach to efficient FEM simulations on graphics processing units using CUDA
6. Solutions of problems of elasticity by the framework method10.1115/1.4009129 ↗
7. Topping, B.H.V., Adam, J.M., Pallarés, F.J., Bru, R., and Romero, M.L. (2010, January 2). Finite element formulations for fast computation of large and moderately large deformations. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Valencia, Spain.
8. Simulation of surface mesh deformation in orthodontics by mass-spring model10.37936/ecti-eec.201192.172508 ↗
9. Basic study on real-time simulation using mass spring system for robotic surgery10.1007/978-3-540-79982-5_34 ↗
10. Nedel, L.P., and Thalmann, D. (1998, January 26). Real time muscle deformations using mass-spring systems. Proceedings of the Computer Graphics International, Hannover, Germany.
11. Cranofacial surgery simulation10.1007/BFb0046996 ↗
12. A multi-tissue mass-spring model for computer assisted breast surgery10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.03.008 ↗
13. Vascular elasticity determined mass–spring model for virtual reality simulators10.1504/IJMA.2015.068446 ↗
14. A GPU accelerated spring mass system for surgical simulation
15. O’Connor, C., and Stevens, K. (2019, May 20). Modeling Cloth Using Mass Spring Systems. Available online: http://www.math.hmc.edu/~depillis/MATH164/MATH164_StudentProjects_2003/COCONNOR/ClothSimulation/final_report.pdf.
16. Zhang, Y., Prakash, E.C., and Sung, E. (2001). Real-time physically-based facial expression animation using mass-spring system. Proceedings of the Computer Graphics International 2001, Hong Kong, China, July 2001, IEEE.10.1109/CGI.2001.934696 ↗
17. Mesh Topology Identification for Mass-Spring Models10.1007/978-3-540-39899-8_7 ↗
18. Simultaneous topology and stiffness identification for mass-spring models based on fem reference deformations
19. Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Thalmann, D., and Arnaldi, B. (2000). Controlling anisotropy in mass-spring systems. Computer Animation and Simulation 2000, Eurographics, Interlaken, Switzerland, August 2000, Springer.10.1007/978-3-7091-6344-3 ↗
20. Zehn, M.W. (2005). MBS and FEM: A Marriage-of-Convenience or a Love Story?. BENCHmark Int. Mag. Eng. Des. Anal., 12–15.
21. Interaction of vehicles and flexible tracks by co-simulation of multibody vehicle systems and finite element track models
22. Coupled simulation of multibody and finite element systems: An efficient and robust semi-implicit coupling approach10.1007/s00419-011-0586-0 ↗
23. Experimental and numerical investigation of blankholder’s vibration in a forming tool: A coupled MBS-FEM approach10.1007/s11740-015-0640-9 ↗
24. Bathe, K.J. (1996). Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall.
25. Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses10.2514/3.4741 ↗
26. Dietz, S., Wallrapp, O., and Wiedemann, S. (2003, January 1–4). Nodal vs. modal representation in flexible multibody system dynamics. Proceedings of the Multybody Dynamics 2003, IDMEC/IST, Lisbon, Portugal.
27. Schertassek, R., and Wallrapp, O. (1999). Dynamik Flexible Mehrkörpersysteme, Vieweg Verlagsgesellschaft.10.1007/978-3-322-93975-3 ↗
28. Marinković, D., and Zehn, M. (2010, January 20–22). Geometric stiffness matrix in modal space for multibody analysis of flexible bodies with moderate deformations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2010, Proceedings-CD, Leuven, Belgium.
29. Consideration of stress stiffening and material reorientation in modal space based finite element solutions10.1134/S1029959918040082 ↗
30. Modal warping: Real-time simulation of large rotational deformation and manipulation10.1109/TVCG.2005.13 ↗
31. Topping, B.H.V. (2012). Modal-space based solutions including geometric nonlinearities for flexible multi-body systems. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September 2012, Civil-Comp Press.
32. Zingoni, A. (2016). Real-time simulation of deformable structures by means of conventional hardware tools: Formalisms and applications. Insights and Innovations in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation—Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, SEMC 2016, September 2016, Taylor Francis Ltd.
33. Good vibrations: Model dynamics for graphics and animation10.1145/74334.74355 ↗
34. Hauser, K.K., Shen, C., and O’Brien, J.F. (2003, January 11–13). Interactive deformation using modal analysis with constraints. Proceedings of the Graphics Interface 2003, Halifax, NS, Canada.
35. Stochastic dynamics: Simulating the effects of turbulence on flexible structures10.1111/1467-8659.00152 ↗
36. DyRT: Dynamic response textures for real time deformation simulation with graphics hardware10.1145/566654.566621 ↗
37. Real-time deformation of structure using finite element and neural networks in virtual reality applications10.1016/j.finel.2006.03.008 ↗
38. Model reduction technique for mechanical behaviour modelling: Efficiency criteria and validity domain assessment10.1243/09544062JMES683 ↗
39. A real time neural network based finite element analysis of shell structure
40. A finite element method (FEM)—Fuzzy logic (Soft Computing)—Virtual reality model approach in a coalface longwall mining simulation10.1016/j.autcon.2007.07.001 ↗
41. Metaxas, D., Axel, L., Fichtinger, G., and Székely, G. (2008). Real-time nonlinear fem with neural network for simulating soft organ model deformation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2008, New York, NY, USA, September 2008, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8 ↗
42. A fast parametric deformation mechanism for virtual reality applications10.1016/j.cie.2008.08.008 ↗
43. FEM-based neural-network approach to nonlinear modeling with application to longitudinal vehicle dynamics control10.1109/72.774241 ↗
44. Runge, G., Wiese, M., and Raatz, A. (2017). FEM-based training of artificial neural networks for modular soft robots. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Macau, China, December 2017, IEEE.10.1109/ROBIO.2017.8324448 ↗
45. Real-time finite element structural analysis in augmented reality10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.04.014 ↗
46. Interactive ‘touch and see’ FEM simulation using Augmented Reality
47. Real-time displacement monitoring of a composite stiffened panel subjected to mechanical and thermal loads10.1007/s11012-015-0146-8 ↗
48. Real-time volumetric deformable models for surgery simulation using finite elements and condensation10.1111/1467-8659.1530057 ↗
49. A hybrid elastic model for real-time cutting, deformations, and force feedback for surgery training and simulation10.1007/PL00007215 ↗
50. Improving realism of a surgery simulator: Linear anisotropic elasticity, complex interactions and force extrapolation10.1002/vis.257 ↗
51. Toward realistic soft tissue modeling in medical simulation10.1109/5.662876 ↗
52. Virtual Reality-Based Simulation of Endoscopic Surgery10.1162/105474600566817 ↗
53. Real-time deformable models for surgery simulation: A survey10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.11.002 ↗
54. Modelling of soft tissue deformation for laparoscopic surgery simulation10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00002-5 ↗
55. A virtual-reality training system for knee arthroscopic surgery10.1109/TITB.2004.826720 ↗
56. A model reduction approach for real-time part deformation with nonlinear mechanical behavior10.1007/s12008-007-0028-y ↗
57. Comparison of explicit integration algorithms for real-time hybrid simulation10.1007/s10518-015-9816-0 ↗
58. Total Lagrangian explicit dynamics finite element algorithm for computing soft tissue deformation
59. Physically based deformable models in computer graphics10.1111/j.1467-8659.2006.01000.x ↗
60. Zingoni, A. (2013). Co-rotational FEM for fast geometrically nonlinear static and dynamic algorithms. Research and Applications in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation—Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, SEMC 2013, CRC Press.10.1201/b15963-87 ↗
61. Optimized linear FEM for modeling deformable objects10.1002/cav.142 ↗
62. Erlben, K., Sporring, J., Henriksen, K., and Dohlmann, H. (2005). Physics-Based Animation, Charles River Media.
63. A unified formulation of small-strain corotational finite elements: I. Theory10.1016/j.cma.2004.07.035 ↗
64. An efficient co-rotational FEM formulation using a projector matrix
65. Capell, S., Green, S., Curless, B., Duchamp, T., and Popovic, Z. (2002, January 23–26). Interactive skeleton-driven dynamic deformations. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1145/566570.566622 ↗
66. Müller, M., Dorsey, J., McMillan, L., Jagnow, R., and Cutler, B. (2002). Stable real-time deformations. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, San Antonio, TX, USA, July 2002, ACM.10.1145/545261.545269 ↗
67. Etzmuss, O., Keckeisen, M., and Strasser, W. (2003). A fast finite element solution for cloth modelling. Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Canmore, AB, Canada, October 2003, IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/PCCGA.2003.1238266 ↗
68. Müller, M., and Gross, M. (2004). Interactive virtual materials. Proceedings of the Graphics Interface 2004, GI ’04, London, ON, Canada, May 2004, Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society.
69. Finite element formulations for effective computations of geometrically nonlinear deformations10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.04.005 ↗
70. Towards real-time simulation of deformable structures by means of co-rotational finite element formulation10.1007/s11012-018-0868-5 ↗
71. Corotational finite element formulation for virtual-reality based surgery simulators10.1134/S1029959918010034 ↗
72. Zehn, M.W., and Marinkovic, D. (2019, January 2–4). Chances of real-time simulation in FE analyses with conventional hardware. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, SEMC 2019, Cape Town, South Africa. accepted for publishing.