A Deep Learning Method for Bearing Fault Diagnosis through Stacked Residual Dilated Convolutions
Source abstract
Abstract
Real-time monitoring and fault diagnosis of bearings are of great significance to improve production safety, prevent major accidents, and reduce production costs. However, there are three primary concerns in the current research, namely real-time performance, effectiveness, and generalization performance. In this paper, a deep learning method based on stacked residual dilated convolutional neural network (SRDCNN) is proposed for real-time bearing fault diagnosis, which is subtly combined by the dilated convolution, the input gate structure of long short-term memory network (LSTM) and the residual network. In the SRDCNN model, the dilated convolution is used to exponentially increase the receptive field of convolution kernel and extract features from the sample with more points, alleviating the influence of randomness. The input gate structure of LSTM could effectively remove noise and control the entry of information contained in the input sample. Meanwhile, the residual network is introduced to overcome the problem of vanishing gradients caused by the deeper structure of the neural network, hence improving the overall classification accuracy. The experimental results indicate that compared with three excellent models, the proposed SRDCNN model has higher denoising ability and better workload adaptability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Rolling element bearing diagnostics—A tutorial10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.017 ↗
2. Duan, J., Shi, T., Zhou, H., Xuan, J., and Zhang, Y. (2018). Multiband Envelope Spectra Extraction for Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Element Bearings. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18051466 ↗
3. A Deep Learning Based Approach for Bearing Fault Diagnosis10.1109/TIA.2017.2661250 ↗
4. Neural-network-based motor rolling bearing fault diagnosis10.1109/41.873214 ↗
5. An on-line condition monitoring system for induction motors via instantaneous power analysis10.1007/s12206-015-0321-9 ↗
6. Noise resistant time frequency analysis and application in fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.06.008 ↗
7. A convolutional neural network based on a capsule network with strong generalization for bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.050 ↗
8. Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis based on the combination of genetic algorithms and fast kurtogram10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.02.003 ↗
9. Time–frequency analysis based on ensemble local mean decomposition and fast kurtogram for rotating machinery fault diagnosis10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.042 ↗
10. A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
11. Collobert, R., and Weston, J. (2008, January 5–9). A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, Helsinki, Finland.10.1145/1390156.1390177 ↗
12. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597 ↗
13. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. (2012, January 3–6). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
14. Fault diagnosis of rotary machinery components using a stacked denoising autoencoder-based health state identification10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.07.028 ↗
15. Zhang, W., Peng, G., Li, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., and Wang, X. (2017). A New Deep Learning Model for Fault Diagnosis with Good Anti-Noise and Domain Adaptation Ability on Raw Vibration Signals. Sensors, 17.10.20944/preprints201701.0132.v1 ↗
16. A convolutional neural network based feature learning and fault diagnosis method for the condition monitoring of gearbox10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.017 ↗
17. A deep convolutional neural network with new training methods for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy environment and different working load10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.022 ↗
18. Zhuang, Z., and Qin, W. (2018, January 27–29). Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing using one-dimensional multi-scale deep convolutional neural network based health state classification. Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Zhuhai, China.
19. Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing using hierarchical convolutional network based health state classification10.1016/j.aei.2017.02.005 ↗
20. A New Convolutional Neural Network-Based Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Method10.1109/TIE.2017.2774777 ↗
21. Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., and Vinyals, O. (2016). Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization. arXiv.
22. Krueger, D., Ballas, N., Jastrzebski, S., Arpit, D., and Courville, A. (2017, January 24–26). Deep Nets Don’t Learn via Memorization. Proceedings of the International Conference of Learning Representations (ICLR), Toulon, France.
23. A hybrid feature selection scheme for unsupervised learning and its application in bearing fault diagnosis10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.181 ↗
24. Probabilistic Risk-Based Performance Evaluation of Seismically Base-Isolated Steel Structures Subjected to Far-Field Earthquakes10.3390/buildings8090128 ↗
25. Seismic Fragility Assessment of Asymmetric Structures Supported on TCFP Bearings Subjected to Near-field Earthquakes10.1016/j.istruc.2017.11.004 ↗
26. An enhanced convolutional neural network with enlarged receptive fields for fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.012 ↗
27. An Improved Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method using One-Dimensional CNN and LSTM
28. Yu, F., and Koltun, V. (2015). Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutions. arXiv.
29. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., and Darrell, T. (2015, January 7–12). Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965 ↗
30. Oord, A.V.D., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv.
31. Kalchbrenner, N., Espeholt, L., Simonyan, K., Oord, A.V.D., Graves, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). Neural machine translation in linear time. arXiv.
32. Borovykh, A., Bohte, S., and Oosterlee, C.W. (2017). Conditional time series forecasting with convolutional neural networks. arXiv.
33. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
34. Glorot, X., and Bengio, Y. (2010, January 13–15). Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Sardinia, Italy.
35. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
36. Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.021 ↗
37. Visualizing data using t-SNE