Costs and Benefits of Autonomous Shipping—A Literature Review
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of autonomous ship technology is currently in focus worldwide and the literature on this topic is growing. However, an in-depth cost and benefit estimation of such endeavours is in its infancy. With this systematic literature review, we present the state-of-the-art system regarding costs and benefits of the operation of prospective autonomous merchant ships with an objective for identifying contemporary research activities concerning an estimation of operating, voyage, and capital costs in prospective, autonomous shipping and vessel platooning. Additionally, the paper outlines research gaps and the need for more detailed business models for operating autonomous ships. Results reveal that valid financial models of autonomous shipping are lacking and there is significant uncertainty affecting the cost estimates, rendering only a reliable evaluation of specific case studies. The findings of this paper may be found relevant not only by academia, but also organisations considering to undertake a challenge of implementing Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships in their operations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Navigation and Safety · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Maritime Ports and Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Group on Maritime Transportation Risk and Safety, Gdynia Maritime University, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland
Waterborne Transport Innovation Foundation, 83-050 Łapino, Poland
Funding
Gdynia Maritime University
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. (International Maritime Organisation MSC (MSC 99/WP.9) (2018). Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS), International Maritime Organisation.
2. Fan, C., Wróbel, K., Montewka, J., Gil, M., Wan, C., and Zhang, D. (2020). A Framework to Identify Factors Influencing Navigational Risk for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships. Ocean Eng.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107188 ↗
3. Chae, C.J., Kim, M., and Kim, H. (2020). A Study on Identification of Development Status of MASS Technologies and Directions of Improvement. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10134564 ↗
4. Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS): Implementation and Legal Issues10.1108/MABR-01-2019-0006 ↗
5. Autonomous Ships and Legal Authorities of the Ship Master10.1016/j.cstp.2019.12.001 ↗
6. Kooij, C., Colling, A.P., and Benson, C.L. (2018, January 2–4). When Will Autonomous Ships Arrive? A Technological Forecasting Perspective. Proceedings of the International Naval Engineering Conference and Exhibition (INEC), Glasgow, UK.10.24868/issn.2515-818X.2018.016 ↗
7. Rodseth, J.O., and Nordahl, H. (2017). Definitions for Autonomous Merchant Ships, Norwegian Forum for Unmanned Ships, Version 1.0. Nor. Forum Unmanned Ships, 21, Available online: http://nfas.autonomous-ship.org/resources/autonom-defs.pdf.
8. A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Shipboard Decision Sup-port Systems for Accident Prevention10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104717 ↗
9. Rødseth, Ø.J. (2017, January 21–24). From Concept to Reality: Unmanned Merchant Ship Research in Norway. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE OES International Symposium on Underwater Technology, Busan, Korea.10.1109/UT.2017.7890328 ↗
10. Munim, H.Z., Dushenko, M., Jimenez, V.J., Shakil, M.H., and Imset, M. (2020). Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in the Maritime In-dustry: A Bibliometric Review and Future Research Directions. Marit. Policy Manag.10.1080/03088839.2020.1788731 ↗
11. Assessing Ship Risk Model Applicability to Marine Autonomous Surface Ships10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.040 ↗
12. A Framework to Model the STPA Hierarchical Control Structure of an Autonomous Ship10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104939 ↗
13. Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab10.22215/timreview/1203 ↗
14. Etges, A.P., Souza, J.S., and Kliemann Neto, F.J. (2017). Risk Management for Companies Focused on Innovation Processes. Production.10.1590/0103-6513.220916 ↗
15. Predicting Corporate Failure for Listed Shipping Companies10.1057/s41278-018-0101-4 ↗
16. A Navigating Navigator Onboard or a Monitoring Operator Ashore? Towards Safe, Effective, and Sustainable Maritime Transportation: Findings from Five Recent EU Projects10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.060 ↗
17. DNV GL (2018). Position Paper-Remote-Controlled and Autonomous Ships, DNV GL.
18. (2020, May 15). Autonomous Ship Project, Key Facts about YARA Birkeland-Kongsberg Maritime. Available online: https://www.kongsberg.com/maritime/support/themes/autonomous-ship-project-key-facts-about-yara-birkeland/.
19. (2020, November 22). Yara Birkeland Press Kit | Yara International. Available online: https://www.yara.com/news-and-media/press-kits/yara-birkeland-press-kit/.
20. Rolls-Royce (2016). Autonomous Ships: The next Step, AAWA Position Pap. Roll. Royce Plc.
21. Kretschmann, L., Burmeister, H.C., and Jahn, C. (2017). Analyzing the Economic Benefit of Unmanned Autonomous Ships: An Explora-tory Cost-Comparison between an Autonomous and a Conventional Bulk Carrier. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag.10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.06.002 ↗
22. Bhalodi, A. Transportation Management Research Paper.
23. An Economic Analysis of Introducing Autonomous Ships in a Short-Sea Liner Shipping Network. Int. Trans
24. Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships from a Risk Governance Perspective: Interpretation and Implications10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104758 ↗
25. An Economic Approach to Maritime Risk Management and Safety Regulation10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100078 ↗
26. Risk Analysis of Marine Cargoes and Major Port Disruptions10.1057/s41278-018-0110-3 ↗
27. Long-Term Dynamics of Shipping and Icebreaker Capacity along the Northern Sea Route10.1057/s41278-016-0049-1 ↗
28. Towards a Method for Detecting Large Roll Motions Suitable for Oceango-ing Ships10.1016/j.apor.2018.07.005 ↗
29. Towards Realistic Estimation of Ship Excessive Motions in Heavy Weath-er. A Case Study of a Containership in the Pacific Ocean10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.025 ↗
30. Wróbel, K., Gil, M., and Chae, C.J. (2021). On the Influence of Human Factors on Safety of Remotely-Controlled Merchant Vessels. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11031145 ↗
31. Lyu, H., and Yin, Y. (2018). Fast Path Planning for Autonomous Ships in Restricted Waters. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122592 ↗
32. Felski, A., and Zwolak, K. (2020). The Ocean-Going Autonomous Ship-Challenges and Threats. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8010041 ↗
33. A Big Data Analytics Method for Evaluation of Ship-Ship Collision Risk Reflecting Real Operational Conditions. Reliab10.1016/j.ress.2021.107674 ↗
34. Burmeister, H.C., Bruhn, W.C., jan Rødseth, Ø., and Porathe, T. (2020, November 24). Can Unmanned Ships Improve Navigational Safety? Transp. Res. Arena. Available online: http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/198207/local_198207.pdf.
35. Banda, O.A.V., and Kannos, S. (2020, November 24). Hazard Analysis Process for Autonomous Vessels. Available online: https://www.aboamare.fi/_media_25402_/R&D%20kuvat/%C3%83%E2%80%9ElyVESI/Tulokset%20201805/Hazard-Analysis-Process-for-Autonomous-Vessels.pdf.
36. Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty (2020, November 24). Safety and Shipping Review 2019. Available online: http://www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/Reports/Shipping-Review-2015.pdf.
37. A Systemic Hazard Analysis and Man-agement Process for the Concept Design Phase of an Autonomous Vessel. Reliab10.1016/j.ress.2019.106584 ↗
38. Automated ICT Systems in Inland Waterways by Developing a Multiflow River Information Services System10.34218/IJARET.10.2.2019.038 ↗
39. Gu, Y., Goez, J.C., Guajardo, M., and Wallace, S.W. (2020). Autonomous Vessels: State of the Art and Potential Opportunities in Logistics. Int. Trans. Oper. Res.10.2139/ssrn.3448420 ↗
40. Msakni, K.M., Akbar, A., Aasen, A.K.A., Fagerholt, K., Meisel, F., and Lindstad, E. (2020). Can Autonomous Ships Help Short-Sea Ship-ping Become More Cost-Efficient?. Oper. Res. Proc.10.1007/978-3-030-48439-2_47 ↗
41. Colling, A.P., and Hekkenberg, R.G. (2019, January 25–27). A Multi-Scenario Simulation Transport Model to Assess the Economics of Semi-Autonomous Platooning Concepts. Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT 2019), Tullamore, Ireland.
42. Economic Feasibility of an Autonomous Container Ship
43. Rodseth, O.J., Kvamstad, B., Porathe, T., and Burmeister, H.C. (2013, January 10–14). Communication Architecture for an Unmanned Merchant Ship. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2013 MTS/IEEE Bergen: The Challenges of the Northern Dimension, Bergen, Norway.10.1109/OCEANS-Bergen.2013.6608075 ↗
44. Kretschmann, L., Rødseth, Ø.J., Fuller, B.S., Noble, H., Horahan, J., and McDowell, H. (2015). D9.3: Quantitative Assessment. Marit. Unmanned Navig. Intell. Netw., 12–20.
45. ABS (2020, May 15). Ship Energy Efficiency Measures -Status and Guidance. Available online: https://www.eagle.org/eagleExternalPortalWEB/ShowProperty/BEA/Repository/References/Capability/Brochures/ShipEnergyEfficiency.
46. Parametric Design and Multi-Objective Optimisation of Container-ships10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.062 ↗
47. (2020, November 22). A Commercial Reality Check for Autonomous Shipping in 2018 | Seatrade Maritime. Available online: https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/asia/commercial-reality-check-autonomous-shipping-2018.
48. (2020, November 24). Autonomous Ships-Redefining the Industry? General Insurance-Marine. Available online: https://www.asiainsurancereview.com/Magazine/ReadMagazineArticle?aid=38465.
49. Levander, O. (2016). Ship Intelligence—A New Era. Smart Ship Technol., 25–32.10.3940/rina.sst.2016.12 ↗
50. Towards the Assessment of Potential Impact of Unmanned Vessels on Maritime Trans-portation Safety10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.029 ↗
51. Autonomous Merchant Vessels: Examination of Factors That Impact the Effective Implementation of Unmanned Ships. Aust10.1080/18366503.2016.1229244 ↗
52. Höyhtyä, M., and Martio, J. (2020). Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial Connectivity for Autonomous Ships: Survey and Future Research Directions. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12152507 ↗
53. Smart Ships–Autonomous or Remote Controlled?
54. Ottesen, A.E. (2015). Situation Awareness in Remote Operation of Autonomous Ships Shore Control Center Guidelines, Department of Product Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
55. Liner Shipping Network Design10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.057 ↗
56. Meersman, H., Moschouli, E., Sys, C., van de Voorde, E., Vanelslander, T., van Hassel, E., Friedhoff, B., Hoyer, K., Tenzer, M., and Hekkenberg, R. (2020). Identifying Cost Performance Indicators for a Logistics Model for Vessel Trains. Maritime Supply Chains, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-818421-9.00004-5 ↗
57. Autonomous Ships: A Review, Innovative Applications and Future Maritime Business Models10.1080/16258312.2019.1631714 ↗
58. Colling, A., and Hekkenberg, R. (2019). Autonomous Ships–Changing Perceptions and Expectations.
59. Net Present Value Approach: Method for Economic Assessment of Innovation Projects10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.230 ↗
60. Dual-Use Short Sea Shipping Trimaran Trailership HSTT-18010.5957/mt1.2005.42.3.132 ↗
61. Watson, D.G.M. (1997). Practical Ship Design. Elsevier Ocean Engineering Book Series, Elsevier Science Ltd.
62. Decarbonization of Maritime Transport: To Be or Not to Be?10.1057/s41278-018-0098-8 ↗
63. CO2/SO2 Emission Reduction in CO2 Shipping Infrastructure10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.011 ↗
64. Allal, A., Mansouri, K., Youssfi, M., and Qbadou, M. (2018). Toward a Review of Innovative Solutions in the Ship Design and Perfor-mance Management for Energy-Saving and Environmental Protection. Mediterr. Eletrotechnical Conf.10.1109/MELCON.2018.8379078 ↗
65. Tam, K., and Jones, K. (2018, January 2). Cyber-Risk Assessment for Autonomous Ships. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services, Cyber Security 2018, Abu Dhabi, UAE.10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2018.8560690 ↗
66. Autonomous Shipping and Its Impact on Regulations, Technologies, and Industries
67. Furuichi, M., and Shibasaki, R. (2015, January 23–27). Cascade Strategy of Container Terminals to Maximize Their Quantitative and Qualitative Capacity. Proceedings of the IAME 2015 Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
68. Embedding Teaching-Student-Research Nexus in 2018: A Case Study in Big Data Analysis in Nautical Services10.21125/edulearn.2018.1062 ↗