A Systematic Review on Design Thinking Integrated Learning in K-12 Education
Source abstract
Abstract
Design thinking is regarded as an essential way to cultivate 21st century competency and there has been a concomitant rise of needs and interest in introducing K-12 students to design thinking. This study aimed to review high-qualified empirical studies on design thinking integrated learning (DTIL) in K-12 education and explore its future research perspectives. After a systematic search in online database via a keyword search and snowballing approach, 43 SSCI journal papers with 44 studies were included in this review. The results indicate that: (1) There has been a growing popularity of integrating design thinking into K-12 education over the past decade, and most empirical studies target middle school students with small group size and a short period; (2) Studies tend to pay more attention to STEM related curriculum domains by incorporating non-unified design thinking models or processes, and the core concepts of design thinking in K-12 education have been frequently valued and pursued including prototype, ideate, define, test, explore, empathize, evaluate, and optimize; (3) The mostly evaluated learning performances are design thinking, followed by emotional/social aspect, subject learning performance and skill. For evaluation, qualitative assessments are used more frequently with instruments like survey/questionnaire, portfolio, interview, observation, protocol analysis, etc. (4) interventions with non-experimental study, formal classroom setting, collaborative learning, and traditional tools or materials have been mainly applied to the open-ended and challenging activities in real situated DTIL. Overall, the 43 papers suggest that design thinking shows great educational potential in K-12 education, however, the empirical evidence that supports the effectiveness of DTIL is still rather limited. Research gaps and future directions derived from reviewed papers are also discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Design Education and Practice · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Problem and Project Based Learning
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Technology in Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
Funding
Ministry of Education in China Project of Humanities and Social Sciences “The Collaborative Innovation Mechanism for Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Education based on C-STEAM” · Major Project of Social Science in South China Normal University · Major basic research and applied research projects of Guangdong Education Department
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I
2. Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda10.1111/jpim.12466 ↗
3. Simon, H.A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press.
4. Expertise in design: An overview10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002 ↗
5. Toward a design theory of problem solving10.1007/BF02300500 ↗
6. The core of ‘design thinking’and its application10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006 ↗
7. Design thinking
8. Kelley, T., and Kelley, D. (2013). Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All, Crown Business.
9. Martin, R., and Martin, R.L. (2009). The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Press.
10. Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., and Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. Design Thinking for Innovation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3 ↗
11. Rusmann, A., and Ejsing-Duun, S. (2021). When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K-12 level. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.10.1007/s10798-021-09692-4 ↗
12. Children’s Emotions in Design-Based Learning: A Systematic Review10.1007/s10956-020-09830-y ↗
13. A design-led conceptual framework for developing school integrated STEM programs: The Australian context10.1007/s10798-020-09619-5 ↗
14. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (2022, June 09). Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: The Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education. Available online: https://www.iteea.org/STEL.aspx.
15. Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures10.1111/caim.12023 ↗
16. What is design thinking and why is it important?10.3102/0034654312457429 ↗
17. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University (2022, June 09). Design Thinking Bootleg. Available online: https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg.
18. IDEO (2022, June 09). Design Thinking for Educators Toolkit (2nd ed.). Available online: https://designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/.
19. Design Council (2022, June 09). The Double Diamond: A Universally Accepted Depiction of the Design Process. Available online: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond-universally-accepted-depiction-design-process/.
20. Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology
21. Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem10.1007/s10798-018-9482-z ↗
22. Learning to notice science concepts in engineering activities and transfer situations
23. Does design thinking training increase creativity? Results from a field experiment with middle-school students10.1080/14479338.2021.1897468 ↗
24. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review10.1111/1467-8551.00375 ↗
25. Wohlin, C. (2014, January 13). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering, London, UK.10.1145/2601248.2601268 ↗
26. Structural Relationships among High School Students’ Scientific Knowledge, Critical Thinking, Engineering Design Process, and Design Product10.1007/s10763-019-10007-2 ↗
27. An Analysis of the Nature of Young Students’ STEM Learning in 3D Technology-Enhanced Makerspaces10.1080/10409289.2020.1781325 ↗
28. Assessing Young Students’ Design Thinking Disposition and Its Relationship With Computer Programming Self-Efficacy10.1177/0735633120967326 ↗
29. The Effect of STEM Activities Prepared According to the Design Thinking Model on Preschool Children’s Creativity and Problem-Solving Skills10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100864 ↗
30. Understanding design-based learning context and the associated emotional experience10.1007/s10798-020-09630-w ↗
31. Effects of a virtual reality teaching application on engineering design creativity of boys and girls10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100705 ↗
32. ‘Females Don’t Need to be Reluctant’: Employing Design Thinking to Harness Creative Confidence and Interest in STEAM10.1111/jade.12307 ↗
33. Becoming a Design Thinker: Assessing the Learning Process of Students in a Secondary Level Design Thinking Course10.1111/jade.12139 ↗
34. Productive Thinking and Science Learning in Design Teams10.1007/s10763-020-10057-x ↗
35. Impact of a prototyping intervention on middle school students’ iterative practices and reactions to failure10.1002/jee.20294 ↗
36. Nichols, K., Musofer, R., Fynes-Clinton, L., and Blundell, R. (2021). Design thinking and inquiry behaviours are co-constituted in a community of inquiry middle years’ science classroom context: Empirical evidence for design thinking and pragmatist inquiry interconnections. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.10.1007/s10798-021-09711-4 ↗
37. Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1 ↗
38. Destination, Imagination and the Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01632.x ↗
39. The Influence of Toy Design Activities on Middle School Students’ Understanding of the Engineering Design Processes10.1007/s10956-017-9693-1 ↗
40. Understanding design literacy in middle-school education: Assessing students’ stances towards inquiry10.1007/s10798-018-9459-y ↗
41. High school student modeling in the engineering design process10.1007/s10798-013-9260-x ↗
42. Engineering Design Thinking: High School Students’ Performance and Knowledge10.1002/jee.20105 ↗
43. Why do students present different design objectives in engineering design projects?10.1007/s10798-017-9420-5 ↗
44. Identifying design process patterns: A sequential analysis study of design thinking10.1007/s10798-018-9448-1 ↗
45. Examining Middle School Students’ Engineering Design Processes in a Design Workshop10.1007/s11165-019-09893-x ↗
46. Using Linkography to investigate students’ thinking and information use during a STEM task10.1007/s10798-018-9489-5 ↗
47. Sketching by design: Teaching sketching to young learners10.1007/s10798-016-9354-3 ↗
48. From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646 ↗
49. Gennari, R., Melonio, A., and Rizvi, M. (2021). From children’s ideas to prototypes for the internet of things: A case study of cross-generational end-user design. Behav. Inf. Technol.10.1080/0144929X.2021.1979654 ↗
50. Using design thinking to cultivate the next generation of female STEAM thinkers10.1186/s40594-021-00271-6 ↗
51. Ladachart, L., Cholsin, J., Kwanpet, S., Teerapanpong, R., Dessi, A., Phuangsuwan, L., and Phothong, W. Ninth-grade students’ perceptions on the design-thinking mindset in the context of reverse engineering. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., 2021.10.1007/s10798-021-09701-6 ↗
52. Development of novel-engineering-based maker education instructional model10.1007/s10639-021-10841-4 ↗
53. Improving creative ability of base of pyramid (BOP) students in India10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100652 ↗
54. Productive thinking in middle school science students’ design conversations in a design-based engineering challenge10.1007/s10798-019-09498-5 ↗
55. Derler, H., Berner, S., Grach, D., Posch, A., and Seebacher, U. (2019). Project-Based Learning in a Transinstitutional Research Setting: Case Study on the Development of Sustainable Food Products. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12010233 ↗
56. Youth appropriation of social media for collaborative and facilitated design-based learning10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.017 ↗
57. 3D Printing in the Wild: Adopting Digital Fabrication in Elementary School Education10.1111/jade.12310 ↗
58. Collaborative Design Thinking (CoDeT): A co-design approach for high child-to-adult ratios10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.013 ↗
59. Concurrent think-aloud protocols to assess elementary design students10.1007/s10798-014-9291-y ↗
60. A digital game-based assessment of middle-school and college students’ choices to seek critical feedback and to revise10.1111/bjet.12796 ↗
61. Designing human-centered robots: The role of constructive failure10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.001 ↗
62. Reflective Decision-Making in Elementary Students’ Engineering Design10.1002/jee.20173 ↗
63. Trochim, W.M.K., and Donnelly, J.P. (2022, June 09). Research Methods Knowledge Base (3rd ed.). Available online: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/.
64. The genesis of design: Learning about design, learning through design to learning design in play10.1007/s10798-021-09670-w ↗
65. The relation between academic achievement and the spontaneous use of design-thinking strategies10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103806 ↗
66. The development of an entrepreneurial mindset in primary education10.1111/ejed.12293 ↗
67. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking10.2307/1511637 ↗
68. Educating and Measuring Choice: A Test of the Transfer of Design Thinking in Problem Solving and Learning10.1080/10508406.2019.1570933 ↗
69. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). Good Business: Leadership, Flow, and the Making of Meaning, Viking.
70. The importance of design thinking for technological literacy: A phenomenological perspective10.1007/s10798-012-9207-7 ↗
71. International Technology Education Association (2022, June 09). Standards for Technological Literacy. Content for the Study of Technology (3rd ed.)., Available online: https://www.iteea.org/42511.aspx.
72. Benefits of collaborative learning10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091 ↗
73. Wu, Q., Lu, J., Yu, M., Lin, Z., and Zhan, Z. (2022, January 14–17). Teaching Design Thinking in a C-STEAM Project: A Case Study of developing the Wooden Arch Bridges’ Intelligent Monitoring system. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (IC4E), Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/3514262.3514313 ↗
74. De Bono, E. (1999). New Thinking for the New Millennium, Viking Adult.
75. Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (2022, June 09). The Australian Curriculum: Technology. Available online: https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/umbraco/Surface/Download/Pdf?subject=Digital%20Technologies&type=F10.
76. Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (2022, June 09). ACARA STEM Connections Project Report. Available online: https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/media/3220/stem-connections-report.pdf.
77. Learning Through Action: On the Use of Logistics4.0 Lab as Learning Developer
78. The design and application of IRobotQ3D for simulating robotics experiments in K-12 education10.1002/cae.22471 ↗
79. A methodological framework to integrate motion capture system and virtual reality for assembly system 4.0 workplace design10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105561 ↗
80. Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment10.1111/caim.12153 ↗
81. Human Dignity and Human Rights: Thoughts on the Principles of Human-Centered Design10.1162/074793601750357178 ↗
82. Cultural Competence: Part I of the 5Cs Framework forTwenty-first Century Key Competences