journal article·2021-04-21Open access

Digital Twin Providing New Opportunities for Value Co-Creation through Supporting Decision-Making

Shaun West, Oliver Stoll, Jürg Meierhofer, Simon Züst

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 9

Abstract

The application of digital twins provides value creation within the fields of operations and service management; existing research around decision-making and value co-creation is limited at this point. Prior studies have provided insights into the benefits of digital twins that combined both data and simulation approaches; however, there remains a managerial gap. The purpose of this paper is to explore this research gap using input from a multiple case study research design from both manufacturing environments and non-manufacturing environments. The authors use ten cases to explore how digital twins support value co-creation through decision-making. The authors were all involved in the development of the ten cases. Individual biases were removed by using the literature to provide the assessment dimensions and allowing a convergence of the results. Drawing on the lessons from the ten cases, this study empirically identified eight managerial issues that need to be considered when developing digital twins to support multi-stakeholder decision-making that leads to value co-creation. The application of digital twins in value co-creation and decision-making is a topic that has developed from practice and is an area where a research gap exists between theory and practice. A cross-case analysis was developed based on the literature and the ten cases (eight industrial and two pilot-scale cases) providing the empirical findings. The findings describe how firms can design, develop, and commercialize digital-twin-enabled value propositions and will initiate future research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Service and Product Innovation · Digital Transformation in Industry · Sustainable Supply Chain Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Group for Digital Innovation, Department of Engineering and Architecture, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSLU), 6002 Luzern, Switzerland

School of Engineering, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland

Funding

Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Peters, C., Maglio, P., Badinelli, R., Harmon, R.R., Maull, R., Spohrer, J.C., Tuunanen, T., Vargo, S.L., Welser, J.J., and Demirkan, H. (2016). Emerging digital frontiers for service innovation. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 1.10.17705/1CAIS.03908 ↗
2. The role of digital technologies for the service transformation of industrial companies10.1080/00207543.2017.1324224 ↗
3. Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0113 ↗
4. Issues in ecosystem valuation: Improving information for decision making10.1016/0921-8009(95)00021-Z ↗
5. Integrating the Digital Twin of the manufacturing system into a decision support system for improving the order management process10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.192 ↗
6. Decision-Support System-based Service Delivery in the Product-Service System Context: Literature Review and Gap Analysis10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.140 ↗
7. Analytics with digital-twinning: A decision support system for maintaining a resilient port10.1016/j.dss.2021.113496 ↗
8. On the requirements of digital twin-driven autonomous maintenance10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.08.003 ↗
9. A digital twin to train deep reinforcement learning agent for smart manufacturing plants: Environment, interfaces and intelligence10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.012 ↗
10. Decision analysis and expert systems
11. Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids
12. Lusch, R.F., and Vargo, S.L. (2014). It’s all actor-to-actor (A2A). Service-Dominant Logic, Cambridge University Press.10.4324/9781315699035 ↗
13. Co-production in service-dominant logic: Antecedents and consequences
14. Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027 ↗
15. Kowalkowski, C., and Ulaga, W. (2017). Service Strategy in Action: A Practical Guide for Growing Your B2B Service and Solution Business, Service Strategy Press.
16. Value co-creation process of integrated product-services: Effect of role ambiguities and relational coping strategies10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.013 ↗
17. Autio, E., and Thomas, L.D.W. (2018). Ecosystem value co-creation. Acad. Manag. Proc., 2018.10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15913abstract ↗
18. Service network value co-creation: Defining the roles of the generic actor10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.002 ↗
19. Service Systems10.1177/1094670514537709 ↗
20. Meierhofer, J., Kugler, P., and Etschmann, R. (2019, January 13–15). Challenges and approaches with data-driven services for SMEs: Insights from a field study. Proceedings of the Spring Servitization Conference: Delivering Services Growth in the Digital Era, Linköping, Sweden.
21. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 ↗
22. Servitising manufacturers: The impact of service complexity and contractual and relational capabilities10.1080/09537287.2015.1033489 ↗
23. Servitization: Revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0312 ↗
24. A customization-oriented framework for design of sustainable product/service system10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.111 ↗
25. Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services10.1016/0263-2373(88)90033-3 ↗
26. The servitization of manufacturing10.1108/17410380910960984 ↗
27. State-of-the-art in product-service systems10.1243/09544054JEM858 ↗
28. From products to services and back again: Towards a new service procurement logic10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.006 ↗
29. Meta-model of servitization: The integrative profiling approach10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.014 ↗
30. Fischer, T., Gebauer, H., and Fleisch, E. (2012). Service Business Development: Strategies for Value Creation in Manufacturing Firms, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139136730 ↗
31. Behavioral implications of the transition process from products to services10.1108/08858620510583669 ↗
32. Managing the transition from products to services10.1108/09564230310474138 ↗
33. Go downstream: The new profit imperative in manufacturing
34. Manufacturing firms and integrated solutions: Characteristics and implications10.1108/14601060410549900 ↗
35. Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.061 ↗
36. Competitive advantage implication of different Product Service System business models: Consequences of ‘not-replicable’ capabilities10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119121 ↗
37. The value architecture of servitization: Expanding the research scope10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.010 ↗
38. From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.004 ↗
39. Inversions of service-dominant logic10.1177/1470593114534339 ↗
40. From products to services: Why it’s not so simple
41. The relevance of service in European manufacturing industries10.1108/09564231011092908 ↗
42. Overcoming the Service Paradox in Manufacturing Companies10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.006 ↗
43. Servitization of the manufacturing firm10.1108/IJOPM-02-2012-0086 ↗
44. Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet10.1002/bse.414 ↗
45. Learning to discover value: Value-based pricing and selling capabilities for services and solutions10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.026 ↗
46. Value propositions in a digitally transformed world10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.10.004 ↗
47. “Industrie 4.0” and Smart Manufacturing—A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004 ↗
48. Midlife upgrade of capital equipment: A servitization-enabled, value-adding alternative to traditional equipment replacement strategies10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.09.001 ↗
49. Review on upgradability—A product lifetime extension strategy in the context of Product Service Systems10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.329 ↗
50. Product lifecycle management—From its history to its new role10.1504/IJPLM.2010.036489 ↗
51. Design and Development of Product Service Systems (PSS)—Impact on Product Lifecycle Perspective10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.021 ↗
52. Soares, C. (2008). Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Gas Turbines, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-075067969-5.50017-X ↗
53. Product lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.022 ↗
54. Srinivasan, M.M. (2016). Lean Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. The Routledge Companion to Lean Management, Routledge.
55. Spreen, W. (2019). Aerospace maintenance, repair, and overhaul. The Aerospace Business, Routledge.10.4324/9780429299452 ↗
56. Several Aspects of Information Flows in PLM10.1007/978-3-642-35758-9_2 ↗
57. Big Data in product lifecycle management10.1007/s00170-015-7151-x ↗
58. Interactions between Service and Product Lifecycle Management10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.018 ↗
59. How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition
60. La Longa, F., Camassi, R., and Crescimbene, M. (2012). Educational strategies to reduce risk: A choice of social responsibility. Ann. Geophys., 55.10.4401/ag-5525 ↗
61. The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy10.1177/0165551506070706 ↗
62. Understanding data, information, knowledge and their inter-relationships
63. Marakas, G.M. (1999). Decision Support Systems in the 21st Century, Prentice Hall.
64. Decide: A decision-making model for more effective decision making by health care managers10.1097/01.HCM.0000285046.27290.90 ↗
65. The role of time frames in design decision-making10.1016/0142-694X(87)90039-1 ↗
66. Zeng, J., Jackson, S., Lin, I.-J., Gustafson, M., Hoarau, E., and Mitchell, R. (2013, January 1–8). Operations simulation of on-demand digital print. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference Anthology, Chongqing, China.10.1109/ANTHOLOGY.2013.6784976 ↗
67. Nadhan, D., Mayani, M.G., and Rommetveit, R. (2018, January 22–24). Drilling with Digital Twins. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference, APDT, Singapore.10.2118/191388-MS ↗
68. A service design approach to healthcare innovation: From decision-making to sense-making and institutional change10.1007/s13162-019-00138-8 ↗
69. Effective product-service systems: A value-based framework10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.013 ↗
70. University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07 ↗
71. Servitization and operations management: A service dominant-logic approach10.1108/IJOPM-02-2011-0053 ↗
72. Service-Dominant Logic and Performance-Based Contracting: A Systems Thinking Perspective10.1287/serv.2017.0185 ↗
73. An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.009 ↗
74. Maglio, P., Kieliszewski, C., Spohrer, J., Lyons, K., Patrício, L., and Sawatani, Y. (2019). A Multilayer Framework for Service System Analysis. Handbook of Service Science, Springer. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy.10.1007/978-3-319-98512-1 ↗
75. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 ↗
76. Architecture vs. ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.04.003 ↗
77. The service system is the basic abstraction of service science10.1007/s10257-008-0105-1 ↗
78. Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M., Lawrence, A., and Schneider, J. (2017). This is Service Design Doing: Using Research and Customer Journey Maps to Create Successful Services, O’Reilly UK Ltd.
79. Exploring technology-driven service innovation in manufacturing firms through the lens of Service Dominant logic10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.350 ↗
80. Network orchestration for value platform development10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.002 ↗
81. An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: Deploying a service-dominant logic10.1007/s11747-007-0066-9 ↗
82. Technology-enabled value co-creation: An empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.011 ↗
83. Vargo, S.L., and Lusch, R.F. (2019). On the Impact of Autonomous Technologies on Human-centered Service Systems. The SAGE Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic, SAGE.10.4135/9781526470355 ↗
84. Urbach, N., and Röglinger, M. (2019). Digital Transformation of ABB through Platforms: The Emergence of Hybrid Architecture in Process Automation. Digitalization Cases. Management for Professionals, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-95273-4 ↗
85. Developing and managing digital service ecosystems: A service science viewpoint10.1108/JSIT-02-2014-0015 ↗
86. IT Service Platforms: Their Value Creation Model and the Impact of their Level of Openness on their Adoption10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.233 ↗
87. Tissue preconditioning may explain concentric lesions in Baló’s type of multiple sclerosis10.1093/brain/awh457 ↗
88. Exploring the role of Digital Twin for Asset Lifecycle Management10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.415 ↗
89. Chandra, C., and Grabis, J. (2016). Simulation Modeling and Hybrid Approaches. Supply Chain Configuration, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-3557-4 ↗
90. A survey of simulation modeling techniques in production planning and control (PPC)10.1080/09537287.2015.1128010 ↗
91. Hybrid simulation modelling as a supporting tool for sustainable product service systems: A critical analysis10.1080/00207543.2017.1330569 ↗
92. Rondini, A., Tornese, F., Gnoni, M.G., Pezzotta, G., and Pinto, R. (September, January 30). Business process simulation for the design of sustainable Product Service Systems (PSS). Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Novi Sad, Serbia.
93. An introductory guide for hybrid simulation modelers on the primary simulation methods in industrial engineering identified through a systematic review of the literature10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.046 ↗
94. Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.025 ↗
95. Eldabi, T., Balaban, M., Brailsford, S., Mustafee, N., Nance, R.E., Onggo, B.S., and Sargent, R.G. (2016, January 11–14). Hybrid Simulation: Historical lessons, present challenges and futures. Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/WSC.2016.7822192 ↗
96. Hybrid simulation models–when, why, how?10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.039 ↗
97. Evaluation of discrete event simulation software to design and assess service delivery processes
98. Pakkala, D., and Spohrer, J. (2019, January 8–11). Digital Service: Technological Agency in Service Systems. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA.10.24251/HICSS.2019.229 ↗
99. Lawrence, T.B., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B. (2009). Institutional Work—Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies or Organizations, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511596605 ↗
100. The role of shared intentions in the emergence of service ecosystems10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.030 ↗