A Systematic Mapping of the Advancing Use of Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Maintenance in the Manufacturing Sector
Source abstract
Abstract
The increasing availability of data, gathered by sensors and intelligent machines, is changing the way decisions are made in the manufacturing sector. In particular, based on predictive approach and facilitated by the nowadays growing capabilities of hardware, cloud-based solutions, and new learning approaches, maintenance can be scheduled—over cell engagement and resource monitoring—when required, for minimizing (or managing) unexpected equipment failures, improving uptime through less aggressive maintenance schedules, shortening unplanned downtime, reducing excess (direct and indirect) cost, reducing long-term damage to machines and processes, and improve safety plans. With access to increased levels of data (and over learning mechanisms), companies have the capability to conduct statistical tests using machine learning algorithms, in order to uncover root causes of problems previously unknown. This study analyses the maturity level and contributions of machine learning methods for predictive maintenance. An upward trend in publications for predictive maintenance using machine learning techniques was identified with the USA and China leading. A mapping study—steady set until early 2019 data—was employed as a formal and well-structured method to synthesize material and to report on pervasive areas of research. Type of equipment, sensors, and data are mapped to properly assist new researchers in positioning new research activities in the domain of smart maintenance. Hence, in this paper, we focus on data-driven methods for predictive maintenance (PdM) with a comprehensive survey on applications and methods until, for the sake of commenting on stable proposal, 2019 (early included). An equal repartition between evaluation and validation studies was identified, this being a symptom of an immature but growing research area. In addition, the type of contribution is mainly in the form of models and methodologies. Vibrational signal was marked as the most used data set for diagnosis in manufacturing machinery monitoring; furthermore, supervised learning is reported as the most used predictive approach (ensemble learning is growing fast). Neural networks, followed by random forests and support vector machines, were identified as the most applied methods encompassing 40% of publications, of which 67% related to deep neural network with long short-term memory predominance. Notwithstanding, there is no robust approach (no one reported optimal performance over different case tests) that works best for every problem. We finally conclude the research in this area is moving fast to gather a separate focused analysis over the last two years (whenever stable implementations will appear).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quality and Safety in Healthcare · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy
School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
School of Engineering, University College Cork, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland
Funding
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Deep Learning vs. Wise Learning: A Critical and Challenging Overview
2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
3. Towards data mining based decision support in manufacturing maintenance10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.076 ↗
4. Industrial Artificial Intelligence for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.09.002 ↗
5. A survey of the advancing use and development of machine learning in smart manufacturing10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.02.004 ↗
6. On the use of machine learning methods to predict component reliability from data-driven industrial case studies10.1007/s00170-017-1039-x ↗
7. Franciosi, C., Di Pasquale, V., Iannone, R., and Miranda, S. (2020). Multi-stakeholder perspectives on indicators for sustainable maintenance performance in production contexts: An exploratory study. J. Qual. Maint. Eng.10.1108/JQME-03-2019-0033 ↗
8. Duran, O., and Duran, P.A. (2019). Prioritization of physical assets for maintenance and production sustainability. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11164296 ↗
9. Maintenance for sustainability in the industry 4.0 context: A scoping literature review10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.459 ↗
10. Abramowicz, W., and Paschke, A. (2018). Predictive Quality: Towards a New Understanding of Quality Assurance Using Machine Learning Tools. Business Information Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5 ↗
11. Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003 ↗
12. A new intelligent fault identification method based on transfer locality preserving projection for actual diagnosis scenario of rotating machinery10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106344 ↗
13. A hybrid machine learning approach for predictive maintenance in smart factories of the future
14. Scalability in manufacturing systems design and operation: State-of-the-art and future developments roadmap10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.002 ↗
15. A classification scheme for smart manufacturing systems’ performance metrics10.1520/SSMS20160012 ↗
16. Machine learning for predictive maintenance: A multiple classifier approach10.1109/TII.2014.2349359 ↗
17. Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 ↗
18. A big data driven sustainable manufacturing framework for condition-based maintenance prediction10.1016/j.jocs.2017.06.006 ↗
19. Merkt, O. (2019, January 1–4). On the use of predictive models for improving the quality of industrial maintenance: An analytical literature review of maintenance strategies. Proceedings of the 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Leipzig, Germany.10.15439/2019F101 ↗
20. A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance
21. Sezer, E., Romero, D., Guedea, F., MacChi, M., and Emmanouilidis, C. (2018, January 17–20). An industry 4.0-enabled low cost predictive maintenance approach for SMEs: A use case applied to a cnc turning centre. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, Germany.10.1109/ICE.2018.8436307 ↗
22. Using machine learning algorithms on data residing in SAP ERP application to predict equipment failures10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12952 ↗
23. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
24. Paolanti, M., Romeo, L., Felicetti, A., Mancini, A., Frontoni, E., and Loncarski, J. (2018, January 2–4). Machine Learning approach for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA), Oulu, Finland.10.1109/MESA.2018.8449150 ↗
25. An E_ective Predictive Maintenance Framework for Conveyor Motors Using Dual Time-Series Imaging and Convolutional Neural Network in an Industry 4.0 Environment10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006788 ↗
26. A predictive model for the maintenance of industrial machinery in the context of industry 4.010.1016/j.engappai.2019.103289 ↗
27. Data-Driven Methods for Predictive Maintenance of Industrial Equipment: A Survey10.1109/JSYST.2019.2905565 ↗
28. Industrial IoT devices and cyber-physical production systems: Review and use case10.1007/978-3-319-91334-6_40 ↗
29. Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889 ↗
30. Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance inIndustry 4.0: Current status and challenges10.1016/j.compind.2020.103298 ↗
31. Olesen, F., and Shaker, H.R. (2020). Predictive Maintenance for Pump Systems and Thermal Power Plants: State-of-the-Art Review, Trends and Challenges. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20082425 ↗
32. (2021, March 02). Factory Integration. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems: 2020. IEEE 2020. Available online: https://irds.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/2020/2020IRDS_BC.pdf.
33. Woschank, M., Rauch, E., and Zsifkovits, H. (2020). A Review of Further Directions for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Smart Logistics. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12093760 ↗
34. Adaptive virtual metrology method based on Just-in-time reference and particle filter for semiconductor manufacturing10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108338 ↗
35. Deep learning-based cross-sensor domain adaptation for fault diagnosis of electro-mechanical actuators10.1007/s40435-020-00669-0 ↗
36. Integration of digital twin and deep learning in cyber-physical systems: Towards smart manufacturing10.1049/iet-cim.2020.0009 ↗
37. Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 ↗
38. Prognosability Regularization for Prognostics and Health
39. Amihai, I., Pareschi, D., and Gitzel, R. (2018, January 18–20). Modeling machine health using gated recurrent units with entity embeddings and k-means clustering. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Porto, Portugal.10.1109/INDIN.2018.8472065 ↗
40. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 ↗
41. Big data in manufacturing: A systematic mapping study
42. Feature extraction for document text using Latent Dirichlet allocation10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012047 ↗
43. Structural Monitoring with Distributed-Regional and Event-based NN-Decision Tree Learning Using Mobile Multi-Agent Systems and Common Java Script Platforms10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.063 ↗
44. Lærum, K.H. (2021, March 02). A study of Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance Computer Science. Available online: https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2568871/19478_FULLTEXT.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1.
45. Transformer Fault Condition Prognosis Using Vibration Signals over Cloud Environment10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2809436 ↗
46. Kolokas, N., Vafeiadis, T., Ioannidis, D., and Tzovaras, D. (2018, January 3–5). Forecasting faults of industrial equipment using machine learning classifiers. Proceedings of the 2018 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), Thessaloniki, Greece.10.1109/INISTA.2018.8466309 ↗
47. Predictive Maintenance for Supermarket Refrigeration Systems Using only Case Temperature Data
48. Satta, R., Cavallari, S., Pomponi, E., Grasselli, D., Picheo, D., and Annis, C. (2017). A dissimilarity-based approach to predictive maintenance with application to HVAC systems. arXiv.
49. Anomaly Detection Approaches for Semiconductor Manufacturing10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.353 ↗
50. A hybrid prognostics tech- nique for rolling element bearings using adaptive predictive models10.1109/TIE.2017.2733487 ↗
51. Techane, A.W., Wang, Y.-F., and Weldegiorgis, B.H. (2018, January 24). Rotating Machinery Prognostics and Application of Machine Learning Algorithms: Use of Deep Learning with Similarity Index Measure for Health Status Prediction. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.36001/phmconf.2018.v10i1.253 ↗
52. Canizo, M., Onieva, E., Conde, A., Charramendieta, S., and Trujillo, S. (2017, January 19–21). Real-time predictive maintenance for wind turbines using Big Data frameworks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM), Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICPHM.2017.7998308 ↗
53. Martín-Díaz, I., Duque-Perez, O., Romero-Troncoso, R., and Morinigo-Sotelo, D. (2015, January 1–4). Supervised Diagnosis of Induction Motor Faults: A Proposed Methodology for an Improved Performance Evaluation. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED), Guarda, Portugal.10.1109/DEMPED.2015.7303715 ↗
54. Durbhaka, G.K., and Selvaraj, B. (2016, January 1–24). Predictive maintenance for wind turbine diagnostics using vibration signal analysis based on collaborative recommendation approach. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Jaipur, India.10.1109/ICACCI.2016.7732316 ↗
55. Aydin, O., and Guldamlasioglu, S. (2017, January 8–10). Using LSTM networks to predict engine condition on large scale data processing framework. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICEEE), Ankara, Turkey.10.1109/ICEEE2.2017.7935834 ↗
56. Chen, Y.E (2018). A System Approach to Implementation of Predictive Maintenance with Machine Learning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
57. Deep Learning for Improved System Remaining Life Prediction10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.262 ↗
58. Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.070 ↗
59. Amruthnath, N., and Gupta, T. (2018, January 26–28). A Research Study on Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Fault Detection in Predictive Maintenance. Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Singapore.10.1109/IEA.2018.8387124 ↗
60. Machine Learning Approaches for Failure Type Detection and Predictive Maintenance
61. Machine learning in manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, and applications
62. Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review
63. A Review on Machine Learning Algorithms, Tasks and Applications Laptop security system View project Handwritten Gurmukhi Character Recognition System
64. Introduction to Machine Learning
65. Vasilić, P., Vujnović, V., Popović, N., Marjanović, A., and Marjanović, Ž (2018, January 19–24). Adaboost algorithm in the frame of predictive maintenance tasks. Proceedings of the 2018 23rd International Scientific-Professional Conference on Information Technology (IT), Zabljak, Montenegro.10.1109/SPIT.2018.8350846 ↗
66. Mathew, V., Toby, T., Singh, V., Rao, B.M., and Kumar, M.G. (2017, January 20–21). Prediction of Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) of turbofan engine using machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems (ICCS), Thiruvananthapuram, India.10.1109/ICCS1.2017.8326010 ↗
67. Adaptive SVM-based real-time quality assessment for primer-sealer dispensing process of sunroof assembly line10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.020 ↗
68. Amruthnath, N., and Gupta, T. (2018, January 23–25). Fault Class Prediction in Unsupervised Learning using Model-Based Clustering Approach. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT), DeKalb, IL, USA.10.1109/INFOCT.2018.8356831 ↗
69. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Bearings Using Fuzzy Multimodal Extreme Learning Regression
70. Machine Learning-based CPS for Clustering High throughput Machining Cycle Conditions10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.091 ↗
71. Reinforcement learning based predictive maintenance for a machine with multiple deteriorating yield levels
72. A data-driven two-stage maintenance framework for degradation prediction in semiconductor manufacturing industries10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.008 ↗
73. Cheng, F.L., and Qu, Q. (2015, January 20–24). A case-based data-driven prediction framework for machine fault prognostics. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ECCE.2015.7310219 ↗
74. A Machine Learning Decision-Support System Improves the Internet of Things’ Smart Meter Operations10.1109/JIOT.2017.2722358 ↗
75. Li, J. (2014, January 23–26). Hard drive failure prediction using classification and regression trees. Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/DSN.2014.44 ↗
76. Feed Forward Backpropagation Neural Network Model to Predict Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Ion Implant Tool
77. Chang, C.-W., Lee, H.-W., and Liu, C.-H. (2018). A Review of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Used for Smart Machine Tools. Inventions, 3.10.3390/inventions3030041 ↗
78. Reinforcement Learning for Predictive Maintenance of Industrial Plants
79. Hundman, K., Constantinou, V., Laporte, C., Colwell, I., and Soderstrom, T. (2018, January 19–23). Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, London, UK.10.1145/3219819.3219845 ↗
80. Bearing remaining useful life prediction based on deep autoencoder and deep neural networks10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.008 ↗
81. Jiang, P., Maghrebi, M., Crosky, A., and Saydam, S. (2017). Unsupervised Deep Learning for Data-Driven Reliability and Risk Analysis of Engineered Systems. Handbook of Neural Computation, Elsevier Inc.. [1st ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-811318-9.00023-5 ↗
82. Predictive Maintenance Applications for Machine Learning
83. Kroll, B., Schaffranek, D., Schriegel, S., and Niggemann, O. (2014, January 16–19). System modeling based on machine learning for anomaly detection and predictive maintenance in industrial plants. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005202 ↗
84. Lechevalier, D., Narayanan, A., and Rachuri, S. (2014, January 27–30). Towards a domain-specific framework for predictive analytics in manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/BigData.2014.7004332 ↗
85. Sayed, M.S., Lohse, N., Søndberg-Jeppesen, N., and Madsen, A.L. (2015, January 22–24). SelSus: Towards a reference architecture for diagnostics and predictive maintenance using smart manufacturing devices. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Cambridge, UK.10.1109/INDIN.2015.7281990 ↗
86. Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., and Kumara, S. (2016, January 5–8). Cloud-based machine learning for predictive analytics: Tool wear prediction in milling. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/BigData.2016.7840831 ↗
87. Machinery condition prediction based on wavelet and support vector machine10.1007/s10845-015-1045-5 ↗
88. A Data Driven Model for Predicting Tool Health Condition in High Speed Milling of Titanium Plates Using Real-Time SCADA10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.191 ↗
89. Schopka, U. (2013, January 14–16). Practical aspects of virtual metrology and predictive maintenance model development and optimization. Proceedings of the ASMC 2013 SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA.10.1109/ASMC.2013.6552793 ↗
90. Guo, Y., Wu, Z., and Ji, Y. (2017, January 10–11). A Hybrid Deep Representation Learning Model for Time Series Classification and Prediction. Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Big Data Computing and Communications (BIGCOM), Chengdu, China.10.1109/BIGCOM.2017.13 ↗
91. Lindström, J. (2021, March 02). Predictive Maintenance for a Wood Chipper Using Supervised Machine Learning. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa68/1b38ee1e9caae921f8a4589e560a9e2d447e.pdf?_ga=2.57831786.1777101615.1615205525-1148404372.1615205525.
92. A Supervised Learning and Control Method to Improve Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms10.1109/TSMC.2016.2560128 ↗
93. Prediction of pipe performance with ensemble machine learning based approaches10.3233/JIFS-169556 ↗
94. Langcake, S. (2021, March 02). Conditions in the Manufacturing Sector–June Quarter 2016, Available online: https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2016/jun/pdf/bu-0616-4.pdf.
95. Towards a data science toolbox for industrial analytics applications10.1016/j.compind.2017.09.003 ↗
96. Susto, G.A., McLoone, S., Pagano, D., Schirru, A., Pampuri, S., and Beghi, A. (2013, January 10–13). Prediction of integral type failures in semiconductor manufacturing through classification methods. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 18th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), Cagliari, Italy.10.1109/ETFA.2013.6648127 ↗
97. An adaptive machine learning decision system for flexible predictive maintenance
98. Forecasting obsolescence risk and product lifecycle with machine learning10.1109/TCPMT.2016.2589206 ↗
99. Long short-term memory for machine remaining life prediction10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.05.011 ↗
100. Automated diagnostics for manufacturing machinery based on well-regularized deep neural networks10.1016/j.vlsi.2017.03.012 ↗