Pilot Study for Investigating the Cyclic Behavior of Slit Damper Systems with Recentering Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Bending Bars Used for Seismic Restrainers
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the steel slit dampers commonly utilized for aseismic design approach can dissipate considerable energy created by the yielding of base materials, large residual deformation may happen in the entire frame structure. After strong external excitation, repair costs will be incurred in restoring a structure to its original condition and to replace broken components. For this reason, alternative recentering devices characterized by smart structures, which mitigate the damage for such steel energy dissipation slit dampers, are developed in this study. These devices, feasibly functioning as seismic restrainers, can be improved by implementing superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) bending bars in a parallel motion with the steel energy-dissipating damper. The bending bars fabricated with superelastic SMAs provide self-centering forces upon unloading, and accordingly contribute to reducing permanent deformation in the integrated slit damper system. The steel slit dampers combined with the superelastic SMA bending bars are evaluated with respect to inelastic behavior as simulated by refined finite element (FE) analyses. The FE slit damper models subjected to cyclic loads are calibrated to existing test results in an effort to predict behavior accurately. The responses of the proposed slit damper systems are compared to those of the conventionally used slit damper systems. From the analysis results, it is concluded that innovative steel slit dampers combined with superelastic SMA bending bars generate remarkable performance improvements in terms of post-yield strength, energy dissipation, and recentering capability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University, 12-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-772, Korea
Incheon Disaster Prevention Research Center, Incheon National University, 12-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-772, Korea
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis and evaluations for composite-moment frames with SMA PR-CFT connections10.1007/s11071-010-9903-3 ↗
2. Design, analysis, and application of innovative composite PR connections between steel beams and CFT columns10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/025019 ↗
3. Seismic demands on steel braced-frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X ↗
4. Seismic analysis and evaluation of several recentering braced frame structures10.1177/0954406213490600 ↗
5. Response of Seismically Isolated Steel Frame Buildings with Sustainable Lead-Rubber Bearing (LRB) Isolator Devices Subjected to Near-Fault (NF) Ground Motions10.3390/su7010111 ↗
6. Seismic design, nonlinear analysis, and performance evaluation of recentering buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs)10.1007/s13296-014-1201-3 ↗
7. Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy dissipation10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.028 ↗
8. Hysteretic model for steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel building10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.010 ↗
9. McCormick, J., Aburano, H., Ikenaga, M., and Nakashima, M. (, January October). Permissible Residual Deformation Levels for Building Structures Considering both Safety and Human Elements. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
10. Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape-memory alloys10.1002/1096-9845(200007)29:7<945::AID-EQE958>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
11. Mechanical behavior of shape memory alloys for seismic applications. 2: Austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00050-9 ↗
12. Seismic assessment of concentrically braced steel frames with shape memory alloy braces10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(862) ↗
13. A new concept of isolation bearings for highway steel bridges using shape memory alloys10.1139/l05-049 ↗
14. Feasibility assessment of an innovative isolation bearing system with shape memory alloys10.1080/13632460902813216 ↗
15. Seismic performance assessment of highway bridges equipped with superelastic shape memory alloy-based laminated rubber isolation bearing10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.022 ↗
16. Dezfuli, F.H., and Alam, M.S. (2013). Shape memory alloy wire-based smart natural rubber bearing. Smart Mater. Struct., 22.10.1088/0964-1726/22/4/045013 ↗
17. Performance-based assessment and design of FRP-based high damping rubber bearing incorporated with shape memory alloy wires10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.008 ↗
18. Steel beam-column connections using shape memory alloys10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:5(732) ↗
19. Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.010 ↗
20. Hu, J.W. (2008). Seismic Performance Evaluations and Analyses for Composite Moment Frames with Smart SMA PR-CFT Connections. [Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology].
21. Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.005 ↗
22. Duerig, T., Melton, K., Stokel, D., and Wayman, C. (1990). Engineering aspects of shape memory alloys, Butterworth-Heinemann.10.1016/B978-0-7506-1009-4.50015-9 ↗
23. Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38) ↗
24. Moradi, S., and Alam, M.S. (2014). Feasibility study of utilizing superelastic shape memory alloy plates in steel beam–column connections for improved seismic performance. J. Intelligent Mater. Syst. Struct.10.1177/1045389X14529032 ↗
25. Seismic analysis of concentrically braced frame systems with self-centering friction damping braces10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(121) ↗
26. Performance-based optimal design of self-centering friction damping brace systems between recentering capability and energy dissipation10.1007/s12206-014-0721-2 ↗
27. (2013). ABAQUS, Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Inc.. ABAQUS 6.12 User’s Manuals.
28. A one-dimensional model for superelastic shape-memory alloys with different properties between martensite and austenite10.1016/S0020-7462(96)00130-8 ↗
29. Numerical simulation for the behavior of superelastic shape memory alloys10.1007/s12206-012-1268-8 ↗
30. Steady forced vibrations as influenced by damping