GIS-Based Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Models Using Certainty Factors and Functional Trees-Based Ensemble Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to use ensembles techniques of functional tree-based bagging, rotation forest, and dagging (functional trees (FT), bagging-functional trees (BFT), rotation forest-functional trees (RFFT), dagging-functional trees (DFT)) for landslide susceptibility modeling in Zichang County, China. Firstly, 263 landslides were identified, and the landslide inventory map was established, and the landslide locations were randomly divided into 70% (training data) and 30% (validation data). Then, 14 landslide conditioning factors were selected. Furthermore, the correlation analysis between conditioning factors and landslides was applied using the certainty factor method. Hereafter, four models were applied for landslide susceptibility modeling and zoning. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and statistical parameters were used to evaluate and compare the overall performance of the four models. The results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the four models was larger than 0.74. Among them, the BFT model is better than the other three models. In addition, this study also illustrated that the integrated model is not necessarily more effective than a single model. The ensemble data mining technology used in this study can be used as an effective tool for future land planning and monitoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Fire effects on ecosystems · Tree Root and Stability Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Geology & Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi’an 710021, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Bagging based support vector machines for spatial prediction of landslides10.1007/s12665-018-7268-y ↗
2. Prioritization of landslide conditioning factors and its spatial modeling in shangnan county, China using gis-based data mining algorithms10.1007/s10064-017-1004-9 ↗
3. Guo, C., Qin, Y., Ma, D., Xia, Y., Chen, Y., Si, Q., and Lu, L. (2019). Ionic composition, geological signature and environmental impacts of coalbed methane produced water in China. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff., 1–15.10.1080/15567036.2019.1636161 ↗
4. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk
5. Gis-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid integration approaches of fractal dimension with index of entropy and support vector machine10.1007/s11629-018-5337-z ↗
6. Landslide spatial modeling: Introducing new ensembles of ann, maxent, and svm machine learning techniques10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.06.020 ↗
7. Gis-based regional landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study in Southern California10.1002/esp.1562 ↗
8. Application of a semiquantitative and gis-based statistical model to landslide susceptibility zonation in kayangan catchment, Java, Indonesia10.1007/s11069-017-2772-z ↗
9. Gis-based landslide hazard zonation in the bhagirathi (ganga) valley, himalayas10.1080/01431160010014260 ↗
10. An approach for gis-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation—with a case study in the Himalayas10.1007/s10346-004-0039-8 ↗
11. Landslide susceptibility mapping at golestan province, iran: A comparison between frequency ratio, dempster–shafer, and weights-of-evidence models10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.005 ↗
12. Uncertainty in landslide occurrence prediction using dempster–shafer theory10.1007/s40808-016-0240-5 ↗
13. Mezaal, M., Pradhan, B., and Rizeei, H. (2018). Improving landslide detection from airborne laser scanning data using optimized dempster–shafer. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10071029 ↗
14. Landslide susceptibility assessment using the bivariate statistical analysis and the index of entropy in the sibiciu basin (Romania)10.1007/s12665-010-0724-y ↗
15. Gis-based frequency ratio and index of entropy models for landslide susceptibility assessment in the caspian forest, northern iran10.1007/s13762-013-0464-0 ↗
16. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in gis and their comparison at mugling–narayanghat road section in nepal himalaya10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6 ↗
17. Gis-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the zhongxian segment in the three gorges area, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.09.025 ↗
18. A gis-based comparative study of dempster-shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/10106049.2016.1140824 ↗
19. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility by combining evidential belief function, logistic regression and logistic model tree10.1080/10106049.2019.1588393 ↗
20. Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at the chongren area (China) using frequency ratio, certainty factor, and index of entropy
21. Gis-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (ahp) and certainty factor (cf) models for the baozhong region of baoji city, China10.1007/s12665-015-4795-7 ↗
22. Landslide susceptibility analysis using probabilistic certainty factor approach: A case study on tevankarai stream watershed, India10.1007/s12040-012-0230-6 ↗
23. A gis-based comparative study of frequency ratio, statistical index and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping10.1007/s12517-015-2150-7 ↗
24. Landslide susceptibility assessment at the wuning area, China: A comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods10.1007/s11069-018-3536-0 ↗
25. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (ahp)10.1007/s11069-015-2075-1 ↗
26. Gou, C., Rui, L., and Feng, C. (2013, January 20–22). Gis-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process in Wenchuan. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geoinformatics, Kaifeng, China.10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626068 ↗
27. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea10.1007/s12665-012-1842-5 ↗
28. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.007 ↗
29. A hybrid fuzzy weight of evidence method in landslide susceptibility analysis on the wuyuan area, China10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.04.002 ↗
30. Comparison and evaluation of landslide susceptibility maps obtained from weight of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models10.1007/s11069-018-3299-7 ↗
31. Gis-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1007/s00254-007-0818-3 ↗
32. Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in central nepal himalaya10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z ↗
33. Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and index of entropy models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping for the baozhong region of baoji, China10.1007/s12517-014-1554-0 ↗
34. Multivariate adaptive regression spline (mars) for prediction of elastic modulus of jointed rock mass10.1007/s10706-012-9584-4 ↗
35. Comparison of landslide susceptibility maps using random forest and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in combination with catchment map units10.1007/s12303-018-0038-8 ↗
36. Estimating hysteretic energy demand in steel moment resisting frames using multivariate adaptive regression spline and least square support vector machine10.1016/j.asej.2014.12.006 ↗
37. Application of weights-of-evidence (woe) and evidential belief function (ebf) models for the delineation of soil erosion vulnerable zones: A study on pathro river basin, jharkhand, India10.1007/s40808-017-0362-4 ↗
38. Gis-based landslide susceptibility analysis using frequency ratio and evidential belief function models10.1007/s12665-016-5732-0 ↗
39. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.003 ↗
40. A hybrid artificial intelligence approach using gis-based neural-fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization for forest fire susceptibility modeling at a tropical area10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.002 ↗
41. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using data mining-based kernel logistic regression, naive bayes and rbfnetwork models for the long county area (China)10.1007/s10064-018-1256-z ↗
42. Landslide susceptibility assesssment in the uttarakhand area (India) using gis: A comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods10.1007/s00704-015-1702-9 ↗
43. Comparison of a logistic regression and naïve bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: The influence of models complexity and training dataset size10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.004 ↗
44. Method for prediction of landslide movements based on random forests10.1007/s10346-016-0761-z ↗
45. Multi-resolution landslide susceptibility analysis using a dem and random forest10.4236/ijg.2016.75056 ↗
46. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032 ↗
47. Strategies investigation in using artificial neural network for landslide susceptibility mapping: Application to a sicilian catchment10.2166/hydro.2013.191 ↗
48. Application of artificial neural network in landslide susceptibility assessment
49. Landslide susceptibility analysis using gis and artificial neural network10.1002/esp.593 ↗
50. Chen, W., Hong, H., Panahi, M., Shahabi, H., Wang, Y., Shirzadi, A., Pirasteh, S., Alesheikh, A.A., Khosravi, K., and Panahi, S. (2019). Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using gis-based data mining techniques of anfis with whale optimization algorithm (woa) and grey wolf optimizer (gwo). Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183755 ↗
51. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines10.1016/j.catena.2015.05.019 ↗
52. Landslide susceptibility modelling using gis-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124 ↗
53. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps produced using support vector machine with different kernel functions and entropy data mining models in China
54. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using gis10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023 ↗
55. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: Application to the 2009 storm event in messina (Sicily, Southern Italy)10.1007/s11069-015-1915-3 ↗
56. Tien Bui, D., Pradhan, B., Lofman, O., and Revhaug, I. (2012). Landslide susceptibility assessment in vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and naive bayes models. Math. Probl. Eng., 974638.10.1155/2012/974638 ↗
57. A new gis-based data mining technique using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) and k-fold cross-validation approach for land subsidence susceptibility mapping10.1007/s11069-018-3449-y ↗
58. Novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach of bivariate statistical-methods-based kernel logistic regression classifier for landslide susceptibility modeling10.1007/s10064-018-1401-8 ↗
59. Landslide susceptibility mapping using an ensemble statistical index (wi) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) model at alborz mountains (iran)10.1007/s12665-015-5233-6 ↗
60. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) modeling for landslide susceptibility assessment in a mediterranean hilly area10.1007/s10064-017-1125-1 ↗
61. Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00142-X ↗
62. A novel hybrid evidential belief function-based fuzzy logic model in spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the Lang son city area (Vietnam)10.1080/19475705.2013.843206 ↗
63. Landslide susceptibility modeling applying machine learning methods: A case study from longju in the three gorges reservoir area, China10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.019 ↗
64. Chen, W., Shahabi, H., Zhang, S., Khosravi, K., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., Pham, B., Zhang, T., Zhang, L., and Chai, H. (2018). Landslide susceptibility modeling based on gis and novel bagging-based kernel logistic regression. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122540 ↗
65. Evaluation of environmental parameters in logistic regression models for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/17538947.2011.586443 ↗
66. A model of inexact reasoning in medicine10.1016/0025-5564(75)90047-4 ↗
67. Probabilistic interpretations for MYCIN’s certainty factors
68. Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using gis in the Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan, China10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.06.009 ↗
69. Dou, J., Tien Bui, D., Yunus, A.P., Jia, K., Song, X., Revhaug, I., Xia, H., and Zhu, Z. (2015). Optimization of causative factors for landslide susceptibility evaluation using remote sensing and GIS data in parts of Niigata, Japan. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0133262 ↗
70. Gis-based landslide susceptibility mapping using a certainty factor model and its validation in the chuetsu area, central Japan10.1007/978-3-319-05050-8_65 ↗
71. Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7 ↗
72. Functional trees10.1023/B:MACH.0000027782.67192.13 ↗
73. Landslide susceptibility mapping using gis-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7 ↗
74. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., and Hall, M.A. (2011). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.. [3rd ed.].
75. Gis-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with adaboost, bagging, and multiboost ensemble frameworks
76. Pham, B.T., and Prakash, I. (2017, January 5–6). A novel hybrid intelligent approach of random subspace ensemble and reduced error pruning trees for landslide susceptibility modeling: A case study at Mu Cang Chai District, Yen Bai Province, Vietnam. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geo-Spatial Technologies & Earth Resources, Hanoi, Vietnam.10.1007/978-3-319-68240-2_16 ↗
77. Doetsch, P., Buck, C., Golik, P., Hoppe, N., Kramp, M., Laudenberg, J., Steingrube, P., Forster, J., and Mauser, A. (2009, January 28). Logistic model trees with AUC split criterion for the KDD cup 2009 small challenge. Proceedings of the International Conference on KDD-Cup 2009 Competition, New York, NY, USA.
78. Logistic model trees10.1007/s10994-005-0466-3 ↗
79. Novel hybrid integration approach of bagging-based fisher’s linear discriminant function for groundwater potential analysis10.1007/s11053-019-09465-w ↗
80. Bagging predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
81. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants10.1023/A:1007515423169 ↗
82. Rotation forest: A new classifier ensemble method10.1109/TPAMI.2006.211 ↗
83. Svm feature selection based rotation forest ensemble classifiers to improve computer-aided diagnosis of Parkinson disease10.1007/s10916-011-9678-1 ↗
84. Landslide susceptibility mapping using j48 decision tree with adaboost, bagging and rotation forest ensembles in the Guangchang area (China)10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.005 ↗
85. Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: Hybrid machine learning approaches10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.018 ↗
86. Kai, M.T., and Witten, I.H. (1997, January 8–12). Stacking bagged and dagged models. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, TN, USA.
87. Predicting and analyzing early wake-up associated gene expressions by integrating gwas and eqtl studies10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.10.036 ↗
88. A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on the rotation forest ensemble and naïve bayes tree classifiers for a landslide susceptibility assessment in Langao County, China10.1080/19475705.2017.1401560 ↗
89. Gis-based landslide susceptibility modelling: A comparative assessment of kernel logistic regression, naïve-bayes tree, and alternating decision tree models. Geomatics10.1080/19475705.2017.1289250 ↗
90. An introduction to variable and feature selection
91. Flood susceptibility modelling using novel hybrid approach of reduced-error pruning trees with bagging and random subspace ensembles10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.089 ↗
92. Landslide spatial modelling using novel bivariate statistical based naïve bayes, rbf classifier, and rbf network machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.329 ↗
93. Landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in Fayfa area, Saudi Arabia10.1007/s12665-014-3661-3 ↗
94. Performance evaluation of gis-based new ensemble data mining techniques of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (anfis) with genetic algorithm (ga), differential evolution (de), and particle swarm optimization (pso) for landslide spatial modelling10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.034 ↗
95. Groundwater spring potential mapping using population-based evolutionary algorithms and data mining methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.312 ↗
96. A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: A case study at İzmir, Turkey10.1007/s10346-011-0283-7 ↗
97. Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using anfis ensembled with teaching-learning-based and biogeography-based optimization10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.013 ↗
98. Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134979 ↗
99. Landslide susceptibility assessment using three bivariate models considering the new topo-hydrological factor: Hand10.1080/10106049.2017.1334832 ↗
100. Performance assessment of individual and ensemble data-mining techniques for gully erosion modeling10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.198 ↗