Non-Destructive Testing Applications for Steel Bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing population and increasing demand for surface transportation have highlighted the importance of maintaining safe and reliable civil infrastructures for daily use. Among all civil infrastructures, bridges are one of the most important elements in the transportation system. As such, to prevent any failures caused by aging and environmental impacts, bridges require periodic inspections. This becomes even more critical due to climate change and its effect on bridges, especially in the coastal regions. Most of the inspections conducted incorporate the visual type of evaluation due to its simplicity. However, with the current developments in new technologies, there is a need for more advanced techniques of structural health monitoring (SHM) methods to be incorporated in the maintenance programs for more accurate and efficient surveys. In this paper, non-destructive testing (NDT) methods applicable to steel bridges are reviewed, with a focus on methods applicable to local damage detection. Moreover, the methodology, advantages and disadvantages, and up-to-date research on NDT methods are presented. Furthermore, the application of novel NDT techniques using innovative sensors, drones, and robots for the rapid and efficient assessment of damages on small and large scales is emphasized. This study is deemed necessary as it compiles in one place the available information regarding NDT methods for in-service steel bridges. Access to such information is critical for researchers who intend to work on new or improved NDT techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. (2021, May 23). Structurally Deficient Bridges|Bridge Infrastructure|ASCE’s 2021 Infrastructure Report Card. Available online: https://infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/bridges/.
2. (2021, May 23). Highways and Bridges—NACE. Available online: https://www.nace.org/resources/industries-nace-serves/highways-bridges.
3. (2021, May 23). FHWA—FAPG 23 CFR 650C, National Bridge Inspection Standards, Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/fapg/cfr0650c.htm.
4. Rus, G. (2021, May 23). Nondestructive Evaluation Laboratory 2010. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Available online: https://highways.dot.gov/research/laboratories/nondestructive-evaluation-laboratory/nondestructive-evaluation-laboratory-overview.
5. Review of available systems and materials for splicing prestressed-precast concrete piles10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.029 ↗
6. Mehrabi, A.B., and Khedmatgozar Dolati, S.S. (2020). Alternative Materials and Configurations for Prestressed-Precast Concrete Pile Splice Connection, Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC). ABC-UTC Rep.
7. (2021, May 23). Corrosion of Steel—Reliant Institute of Technology. Available online: http://www.relianttechnologyinstitute.com/blog/tekla/corrosion-of-steel/.
8. Delamination failure of steel single angle sections10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.04.009 ↗
9. Fatigue-prone details in steel bridges10.3390/buildings2040456 ↗
10. Hopwood, T., Gof, C., Fairchild, J., and Palle, S. (2016). Nondestructive Evaluation of Steel Bridges: Methods and Applications, Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky.
11. Reliability of visual bridge inspection
12. Benchmark for Evaluating Performance in Visual Inspection of Fatigue Cracking in Steel Bridges10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001507 ↗
13. (2021, September 28). Dye Penetrant Testing (PT)—Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Web Manual. Federal Highway of Administration Research and Technology, Available online: https://cms7.fhwa.dot.gov/research/projects/nondestructive-evaluation-nde-web-manual.
14. Achille Peiris, B.S. (2017). Capillary Action—Chemistry LibreTexts, LibreTexts.
15. Advances and researches on non destructive testing: A review10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.620 ↗
16. (2021, May 28). FMB Oxford Non Destructive Testing—Dye Penetrant Inspection. Ionisation Chambers. Available online: http://www.wermac.org/others/ndt_dyepenetrant.html.
17. Worman, J. (2021, May 29). Liquid Penetrant Examination. Available online: http://www.nationalboard.org/index.aspx?pageID=164&ID=374.
18. Willcox, M., and Downes, G. (2003). A Brief Description of NDT Techniques, Toronto NDT Equip. Ltd.
19. (2021, September 28). Magnetic Particle Inspection, Inspection Services. Available online: http://ccindt.com/magnetic-particle-inspection.php.
20. (2021, May 30). Globetrace Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI). Available online: http://www.globetrace.co.uk/?page_id=96.
21. Research on the nondestructive examination of narrow gap MAG welding of API 5L X65M thermomechanical treated steel10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.384 ↗
22. (2021, May 29). Eddy Current Testing|Institut Dr; Foerster GmbH und Co., KG. Available online: http://www.foerstergroup.com/en/usa/technology/eddy-current-testing/.
23. Pulsed Eddy Current Non-destructive Testing and Evaluation: A Review10.1007/s10033-017-0122-4 ↗
24. Non-destructive techniques based on eddy current testing10.3390/s110302525 ↗
25. Lamtenzan, D., Washer, G., and Lozev, M. (2000). Detection and Sizing of Cracks in Structural Steel Using the Eddy Current Method, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. FHWA-RD-00.
26. Hellier, C.J. (2013). Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation, McGraw-Hill Education.
27. Detection of delamination in concrete bridge decks by joint amplitude and phase analysis of ultrasonic array measurements10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000513 ↗
28. Health monitoring of closure joints in accelerated bridge construction: A review of non-destructive testing application10.3151/jact.17.381 ↗
29. Ultrasonic testing of properties of 50 year old concrete
30. Contact and noncontact ultrasonic nondestructive test in reinforced concrete beam10.1155/2018/5783175 ↗
31. Mehrabi, A., and Farhangdoust, S. (2019). NDT Methods Applicable to Health Monitoring of ABC Closure Joints, Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC).10.32548/RS.2018.017 ↗
32. Olympus Technical Communications Service (2004). Introduction to Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Applications, Olymous. [4th ed.].
33. Advanced Ultrasonic Testing Technologies with Applications to Evaluation of Steel Bridge Welding—An Overview10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.727-728.785 ↗
34. (2021, May 29). Phased Array Services—Acuren. Available online: https://www.acuren.com/inspection/advanced-nde-ndt/phased-array/.
35. Enhancement of ultrasonic images for sizing of defects by time-of-flight diffraction10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.003 ↗
36. (2021, May 29). Time-of-Flight Diffraction (TOFD) vs Phased Array Methods: What’s the Difference?|Zetec. Available online: https://www.zetec.com/blog/time-of-flight-diffraction-tofd-vs-phased-array-methods-whats-the-difference/.
37. Shear-wave time of flight diffraction (S-TOFD) technique10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.01.003 ↗
38. (2021, May 29). TOFD—AUT Solutions. Available online: https://autsolutions.net/ndt-resources/tofd/.
39. Laprise, F., Berlanger, J., and Maes, G. (2012, January 16–20). Sectorial Scan PAUT Combined with TOFD, a Robust Weld Inspection Technique in Lieu of RT. Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Durban, South Africa.
40. Hay, D.R., Cavaco, J.A., and Mustafa, V. (2009). Monitoring the civil infrastructure with acoustic emission: Bridge case studies. J. Acoust. Emiss., 27.
41. Kosnik, D.E., and Marron, D.R. (November, January 29). Acoustic Emission Evaluation of Retrofits on the I-80 Bryte Bend Bridge, Sacramento, California. Proceedings of the AEWG-50/ICAE-6. Acoustic Emission Working Group, CO, USA, and Acoustic Emission Group, Encino, CA, USA, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
42. Tabatabai, H. (2005). Inspection and Maintenance of Bridge Stay Cable Systems: A Synthesis of Highway Practice, Transportation Research Board.
43. Qu, Z., Jiang, P., and Zhang, W. (2020). Development and application of infrared thermography non-destructive testing techniques. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20143851 ↗
44. In-service evaluation of cable-stayed bridges, overview of available methods and findings10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:6(716) ↗
45. Measuring stress intensity factors during fatigue crack growth using thermoelasticity10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00782.x ↗
46. Application of infrared thermography to structural integrity evaluation of steel bridges10.1080/09500340.2010.511289 ↗
47. Izumi, Y., Sakagami, T., and Kubo, S. (2009, January 12–17). Stress Intensity Factor Measurements for Fatigue Cracks in Steel Bridges Based on Thermoelastic Stress Analysis. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Fracture 2009 (ICF-12), Ottawa, ON, Canada.
48. Defect detection by pulse compression in frequency modulated thermal wave imaging10.3166/qirt.2.41-54 ↗
49. Advances in pulsed phase thermography10.1016/S1350-4495(02)00138-X ↗
50. Prediction of depth model for cracks in steel using infrared thermography10.1016/j.infrared.2015.06.013 ↗
51. Wimsatt, A.J., Scullion, T., Fernando, E.G., Hurlebaus, S., Lytton, R.L., Zollinger, D.G., and Walker, R.S. (2009). A Plan for Developing High-Speed, Nondestructive Testing Procedures for Both Design Evaluation and Construction Inspection, TRB.
52. (2021, May 28). Gamma Radiography (RT). Available online: https://www.shawcor.com/integrity-management-solutions/ndt-and-inspection-services/onshore-inspection-services/gamma-radiography-(rt).
53. Sukesh, O.P. (2021, May 28). Radiographic Testing (RT)-NDT. Available online: https://www.slideshare.net/SukeshOP/ndt-module-5.
54. Recent Trends in Industrial and Other Engineering Applications of Non Destructive Testing: A ReviewNo Title
55. Focus: Applications of high energy X-ray inspection of post-tensioned concrete structures and cable stay bridges
56. Wilkinson, S., and Duke, S.M. (2014). Comparative Testing of Radiographic Testing, Ultrasonic Testing and Phased Array Advanced Ultrasonic Testing Non Destructive Testing Techniques in Accordance with the AWS D1.5 Bridge Welding Code.
57. Non-destructive testing methods in the US for bridge inspection and maintenance10.1007/s12205-014-0633-9 ↗
58. Elbeheri, A., and Zayed, T. (2016, January 25–28). Non-destructive Evaluation Techniques for Steel Bridges Inspection. Proceedings of the TAC 2016: Efficient Transportation-Managing the Demand-2016 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
59. Guldur, B., Yan, Y., and Hajjar, J.F. (2015, January 23–25). Condition assessment of bridges using terrestrial laser scanners. Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2015, Portland, OR, USA.10.1061/9780784479117.031 ↗
60. Hurlebaus, S., Hueste, M.B.D., Karthik, M.M., and Terzioglu, T. (2016). Condition Assessment of Bridge Post-tensioning and Stay Cable Systems Using NDE Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Texas A&M Transportation Institute.10.17226/24779 ↗
61. Theory and application of magnetic flux leakage pipeline detection10.3390/s151229845 ↗
62. Bergamini, A. (2001). Nondestructive Testing of Stay Cables, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.10.2749/222137801796350743 ↗
63. Magnetostrictive sensors for the characterization of corrosion in rebars and prestressing strands10.1117/12.259151 ↗
64. Kalogeropoulos, A. (2012). Non-Destructive Determination of Chloride and Water Content in Concrete Using Ground Penetrating Radar, EPFL.
65. Application of various NDT methods for the evaluation of building steel structures for reuse10.3390/ma7107130 ↗
66. American Society for Testing and Materials (1999). ASTM C876-99 Standard, Test Method for Half-Cell Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete, American Society for Testing and Materials.
67. Ahmed, S. (2021, May 28). Corrosion Potential Mapping. Available online: https://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/CE/sud/Teaching/CE%20401-112/03%20-%20Half-Cell%20Potential.pdf.
68. Corrosion monitoring of steel in concrete by galvanostatic pulse technique10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.03.005 ↗
69. Half-cell potential measurements—Potential mapping on reinforced concrete structures10.1007/BF02481526 ↗
70. Performance of cable-stayed bridges: Evaluation methods, observations, and a rehabilitation case10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000715 ↗
71. Unified finite difference formulation for free vibration of cables10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1313) ↗
72. A laser-based noncontact vibration technique for health monitoring of structural cables: Background, success, and new developments
73. Deflection measurement on vibrating stay cables by non-contact microwave interferometer10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.11.007 ↗
74. Vibration-based structural health monitoring of stay cables by microwave remote sensing10.12989/sss.2015.16.2.263 ↗
75. Field observation of Tagus river suspension bridge10.1061/JSDEAG.0002240 ↗
76. Measurements of static and dynamic displacement from visual monitoring of the Humber Bridge10.1016/0141-0296(93)90054-8 ↗
77. Dynamic measurements of the second severn crossing10.1680/itran.1997.29978 ↗
78. Development and application of a vision-based displacement measurement system for structural health monitoring of civil structures10.12989/sss.2007.3.3.373 ↗
79. Vision-based multipoint displacement measurement for structural health monitoring10.1002/stc.1819 ↗
80. Choi, I., Kim, J., and Kim, D. (2016). A target-less vision-based displacement sensor based on image convex hull optimization for measuring the dynamic response of building structures. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16122085 ↗
81. A non-contact vision-based system for multipoint displacement monitoring in a cable-stayed footbridge10.1002/stc.2155 ↗
82. Liao, W.Y., Chen, W.H., Ni, Y., and Xia, Y. (July, January 29). Development of a vision-based real-time displacement measurement system for Guangzhou New TV Tower. Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2010, Naples, Italy.
83. Non-contact measurement of the dynamic displacement of railway bridges using an advanced video-based system10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.051 ↗
84. A vision-based approach for the direct measurement of displacements in vibrating systems10.1088/0964-1726/12/5/016 ↗
85. Caetano, E., Silva, S., and Bateira, J. (2007). Application of a vision system to the monitoring of cable structures. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Cable Dynamics, Citeseer.
86. A review of machine vision-based structural health monitoring: Methodologies and applications10.1155/2016/7103039 ↗
87. Detection of rust defects on steel bridge coatings via digital image recognition10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.008 ↗
88. Lee, S., and Chang, L.M. (2005). Digital image processing methods for assessing bridge painting rust defects and their limitations. Proceedings of the 2005 ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineer.10.1061/40794(179)80 ↗
89. Automated recognition of surface defects using digital color image processing10.1016/j.autcon.2005.08.001 ↗
90. Intelligent steel bridge coating assessment using neuro-fuzzy recognition approach10.1111/1467-8667.00278 ↗
91. On the evaluation of texture and color features for nondestructive corrosion detection10.1155/2010/817473 ↗
92. Automated steel bridge coating rust defect recognition method based on color and texture feature10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.003 ↗
93. Riccitelli, F. (2020). Performance of Existing Abc Projects: Inspection Case Studies, Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC).
94. Taeby, M., and Mehrabi, A.B. (2019). Decision Support Framework for Inspection and Maintenance: A Focus on Bridges using Post-Tensioning Tendons. Curr. Trends Civil. Struct. Eng., 3.10.33552/CTCSE.2019.03.000574 ↗
95. Robot-assisted bridge inspection10.1007/s10846-010-9514-8 ↗
96. Liu, Q., and Liu, Y. (2013, January 12–14). An approach for auto bridge inspection based on climbing robot. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2013, Shenzhen, China.10.1109/ROBIO.2013.6739861 ↗
97. Aerial manipulator for structure inspection by contact from the underside
98. Pham, N.H., and La, H.M. (2016, January 27–30). Design and implementation of an autonomous robot for steel bridge inspection. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton, IL, USA.10.1109/ALLERTON.2016.7852280 ↗
99. Ratsamee, P., Kriengkomol, P., Arai, T., Kamiyama, K., Mae, Y., Kiyokawa, K., Mashita, T., Uranishi, Y., and Takemura, H. (2016, January 23–27). A hybrid flying and walking robot for steel bridge inspection. Proceedings of the SSRR 2016—International Symposium on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics, Lausanne, Switzerland.10.1109/SSRR.2016.7784278 ↗
100. Bridge deck delamination identification from unmanned aerial vehicle infrared imagery10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.024 ↗