Datasets for Cognitive Load Inference Using Wearable Sensors and Psychological Traits
Source abstract
Abstract
This study introduces two datasets for multimodal research on cognitive load inference and personality traits. Different to other datasets in Affective Computing, which disregard participants’ personality traits or focus only on emotions, stress, or cognitive load from one specific task, the participants in our experiments performed seven different tasks in total. In the first dataset, 23 participants played a varying difficulty (easy, medium, and hard) game on a smartphone. In the second dataset, 23 participants performed six psychological tasks on a PC, again with varying difficulty. In both experiments, the participants filled personality trait questionnaires and marked their perceived cognitive load using NASA-TLX after each task. Additionally, the participants’ physiological response was recorded using a wrist device measuring heart rate, beat-to-beat intervals, galvanic skin response, skin temperature, and three-axis acceleration. The datasets allow multimodal study of physiological responses of individuals in relation to their personality and cognitive load. Various analyses of relationships between personality traits, subjective cognitive load (i.e., NASA-TLX), and objective cognitive load (i.e., task difficulty) are presented. Additionally, baseline machine learning models for recognizing task difficulty are presented, including a multitask learning (MTL) neural network that outperforms single-task neural network by simultaneously learning from the two datasets. The datasets are publicly available to advance the field of cognitive load inference using commercially available devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Personal Information Management and User Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jožef Stefan Postgraduate School, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
Funding
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS · Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
References (90)
Show source-provided references
1. Peter, C., and Beale, R. (2008). Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction: From Theory to Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-540-85099-1 ↗
2. Kolenik, T., Gjoreski, M., and Gams, M. (2019, January 26–28). Designing an intelligent cognitive assistant for behavior change in mental health. Proceedings of the 22nd International Multiconference Information Society—IS 2019 Slovenian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seville, Spain.
3. Borst, J.P., Taatgen, N.A., and van Rijn, H. (2015, January 18–23). What Makes Interruptions Disruptive? A Process-Model Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2015, Seoul, Korea.10.1145/2702123.2702156 ↗
4. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. (2004, January 24–29). A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2004, Vienna, Austria.10.1145/985692.985715 ↗
5. Iqbal, S.T., and Horvitz, E. (2010, January 19–23). Notifications and Awareness: A Field Study of Alert Usage and Preferences. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China.10.1145/1718918.1718926 ↗
6. Mark, G., Voida, S., and Cardello, A. (2012, January 5–10). “A Pace Not Dictated by Electrons”: An Empirical Study of Work Without Email. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012, Austin, TX, USA.10.1145/2207676.2207754 ↗
7. The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification10.1037/xhp0000100 ↗
8. Goyal, N., and Fussell, S.R. (2017, January 11–15). Intelligent Interruption Management Using Electro Dermal Activity Based Physiological Sensor for Collaborative Sensemaking. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Maui, HI, USA.10.1145/3130917 ↗
9. Mark, G., Gudith, D., and Klocke, U. (2008, January 5–10). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy.10.1145/1357054.1357072 ↗
10. Kushlev, K., Proulx, J., and Dunn, E.W. (2016, January 7–12). “Silence Your Phones” Smartphone Notifications Increase Inattention and Hyperactivity Symptoms. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA.10.1145/2858036.2858359 ↗
11. Monitoring stress with a wrist device using context10.1016/j.jbi.2017.08.006 ↗
12. An investigation of myocardial aerobic capacity as a measure of both physical and cognitive workloads10.1016/j.ergon.2005.06.002 ↗
13. Analysis of the sensitivity of heart rate variability and subjective workload measures in a driving simulator: The case of highway work zones10.1016/j.ergon.2018.02.015 ↗
14. Respiratory changes in response to cognitive load: A systematic review10.1155/2016/8146809 ↗
15. Haak, M., Bos, S., Panic, S., and Rothkrantz, L. (2008, January 3–4). Detecting stress using eye blinks and brain activity from EEG signals. Proceedings of the 1st Driver Car Interaction and Interface (DCII 2008), Prague, Czech.
16. ElKomy, M., Abdelrahman, Y., Funk, M., Dingler, T., Schmidt, A., and Abdennadher, S. (2017, January 6–11). ABBAS: An adaptive bio-sensors based assistive system. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA.
17. Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E., and Chen, F. (May, January 28). Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load. Proceedings of the CHI’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA.
18. Wang, Z., Yan, J., and Aghajan, H. (2012, January 22–26). A framework of personal assistant for computer users by analyzing video stream. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction, Santa Monica, CA, USA.10.1145/2401836.2401850 ↗
19. Knez, T. (2019). Analyzing Effect of Computer Game Difficulty on Biological Signals. [Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Ljubljana]. First Cycle University Study Programme Computer and Information Science.
20. Novak, M.F. (2019). Developing Software Tools for In Situ Cognitive Load Estimation. [Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Ljubljana]. First Cycle University Study Programme Computer and Information Science.
21. Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.411 ↗
22. Correlation Among Behavior, Personality, and Electroencephalography Revealed by a Simulated Driving Experiment10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01524 ↗
23. Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks10.1007/BF02213420 ↗
24. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8 ↗
25. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 ↗
26. A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.223 ↗
27. Physical, mental, emotional, and subjective workload components in train drivers10.1080/00140139408964897 ↗
28. Influence of drive and timing mechanisms on breathing pattern and ventilation during mental task performance10.1016/S0301-0511(98)00026-X ↗
29. Haapalainen, E., Kim, S., Forlizzi, J.F., and Dey, A.K. (2010, January 26–29). Psycho-physiological Measures for Assessing Cognitive Load. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.1145/1864349.1864395 ↗
30. Assessment of pilot performance and mental workload in rotary wing aircraft10.1080/00140139308967983 ↗
31. Air-to-ground training missions: A psychophysiological workload analysis10.1080/00140139308967979 ↗
32. Rajan, R., Selker, T., and Lane, I. (2016, January 17–20). Task Load Estimation and Mediation Using Psycho-physiological Measures. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Marina del Ray, CA, USA.10.1145/2856767.2856769 ↗
33. John, W.F., Ruth, B.E., and Leighton, A. (1969). Manual for Kit of Reference Tests for Cognitive Factors, PriceEducational Testing Service.
34. Züger, M., and Fritz, T. (2015, January 18–23). Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Korea.10.1145/2702123.2702593 ↗
35. Matkovič, T., and Pejović, V. (2018, January 8–12). Wi-mind: Wireless mental effort inference. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers, Singapore.10.1145/3267305.3274114 ↗
36. Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA device10.1109/TITB.2009.2036164 ↗
37. Novak, G.J.K., Stojmenova, K., and Sodnik, J. (2017). Assessment of Cognitive Load through Biometric Monitoring, Society for Information Systems and Computer Networks.
38. Schaule, F., Johanssen, J.O., Bruegge, B., and Loftness, V. (2018, January 8–12). Employing Consumer Wearables to Detect Office Workers’ Cognitive Load for Interruption Management. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Singapore.10.1145/3191764 ↗
39. ASCERTAIN: Emotion and personality recognition using commercial sensors10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2625250 ↗
40. Correa, J.A.M., Abadi, M.K., Sebe, N., and Patras, I. (2018). Amigos: A dataset for affect, personality and mood research on individuals and groups. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput.
41. Deap: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.15 ↗
42. The MAHNOB Mimicry Database: A database of naturalistic human interactions10.1016/j.patrec.2015.03.005 ↗
43. DECAF: MEG-based multimodal database for decoding affective physiological responses10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2392932 ↗
44. Schneegass, S., Pfleging, B., Broy, N., Heinrich, F., and Schmidt, A. (2013, January 28–30). A data set of real world driving to assess driver workload. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1145/2516540.2516561 ↗
45. Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors10.1109/TITS.2005.848368 ↗
46. Dissecting driver behaviors under cognitive, emotional, sensorimotor, and mixed stressors10.1038/srep25651 ↗
47. Machine Learning and End-to-end Deep Learning for Monitoring Driver Distractions from Physiological and Visual Signals10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986810 ↗
48. Schmidt, P., Reiss, A., Duerichen, R., Marberger, C., and Van Laerhoven, K. (2018, January 16–20). Introducing wesad, a multimodal dataset for wearable stress and affect detection. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Boulder, CO, USA.10.1145/3242969.3242985 ↗
49. Birjandtalab, J., Cogan, D., Pouyan, M.B., and Nourani, M. (2016, January 26–28). A non-EEG biosignals dataset for assessment and visualization of neurological status. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (SiPS), Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/SiPS.2016.27 ↗
50. The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’—A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting10.1159/000119004 ↗
51. Personality and physiological reactions to acute psychological stress10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.018 ↗
52. Personality traits modulate emotional and physiological responses to stress10.1097/FBP.0000000000000064 ↗
53. An evaluation of sex differences in psychological and physiological responses to experimentally-induced pain: A path analytic description10.1016/j.pain.2004.08.017 ↗
54. Psychopathic Traits and Physiological Responses to Aversive Stimuli in Children Aged 9–11 Years10.1007/s10802-011-9606-3 ↗
55. Elevated blood pressure and personality: A meta-analytic review10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.293 ↗
56. Moderation of physiological stress responses by personality traits and daily hassles: Less flexibility of immune system responses10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00096-6 ↗
57. Cai, R., Guo, A., Ma, J., Huang, R., Yu, R., and Yang, C. (2018, January 12–15). Correlation Analyses Between Personality Traits and Personal Behaviors Under Specific Emotion States Using Physiological Data from Wearable Devices. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 16th International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 4th International Conference on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech), Athens, Greece.10.1109/DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTec.2018.00023 ↗
58. Cai, R., Guo, A., Ma, J., and Huang, R. (2018, January 25–29). Correlational Analyses among Personality Traits, Emotional Responses andBehavioral States Using Physiological Data from Wearable Sensors. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, Rome, Italy.
59. Sano, A., Phillips, A.J., Yu, A.Z., McHill, A.W., Taylor, S., Jaques, N., Czeisler, C.A., Klerman, E.B., and Picard, R.W. (2015, January 9–12). Recognizing academic performance, sleep quality, stress level, and mental health using personality traits, wearable sensors and mobile phones. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), Cambridge, MA, USA.10.1109/BSN.2015.7299420 ↗
60. A task is a task is a task: Putting complex span, n-back, and other working memory indicators in psychometric context10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01475 ↗
61. A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356 ↗
62. Psychometric Properties of the Hexaco-10010.1177/1073191116659134 ↗
63. Gravetter, F.J., and Wallnau, L.B. (2013). Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Cengage Learning. [8th ed.].
64. A healthy heart is not a metronome: An integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040 ↗
65. Poincaré plot indexes of heart rate variability: Relationships with other nonlinear variables10.1016/j.autneu.2013.05.004 ↗
66. Wang, R., and Tang, K. (2009, January 6). Feature selection for maximizing the area under the ROC curve. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, Miami, FL, USA.10.1109/ICDMW.2009.25 ↗
67. Arndt, C. (2001). Information Measures: Information and Its Description in Science and Engineering, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-56669-1_14 ↗
68. Estimating mutual information10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138 ↗
69. Ho, T.K. (1995, January 14–16). Random decision forests. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, QC, Canada.
70. Improved use of continuous attributes in C4. 510.1613/jair.279 ↗
71. Russell, S.J., and Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Pearson Education Limited.
72. Instance-based learning algorithms10.1007/BF00153759 ↗
73. Lin, C.J., Weng, R.C., and Keerthi, S.S. (2007, January 13–15). Trust region newton methods for large-scale logistic regression. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, Cincinnati, OH, USA.10.1145/1273496.1273567 ↗
74. Bagging predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
75. Rosenblatt, F. (1961). Principles of Neurodynamics. Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory. Technical Report.10.21236/AD0256582 ↗
76. Multitask learning10.1023/A:1007379606734 ↗
77. Nair, V., and Hinton, G.E. (2010, January 21–24). Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), Haifa, Israel.
78. Rissler, R., Nadj, M., Li, M.X., Knierim, M.T., and Maedche, A. (2018, January 21–26). Got flow? Using machine learning on physiological data to classify flow. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1145/3170427.3188480 ↗
79. Maier, M., Marouane, C., and Elsner, D. (2019, January 13–17). Deepflow: Detecting optimal user experience from physiological data using deep neural networks. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.24963/ijcai.2019/196 ↗
80. Gjoreski, M., Luštrek, M., and Pejović, V. (2018, January 8–12). My Watch Says I’m Busy: Inferring Cognitive Load with Low-Cost Wearables. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers, Singapore.10.1145/3267305.3274113 ↗
81. A review of psychophysiological measures to assess cognitive states in real-world driving10.3389/fnhum.2019.00057 ↗
82. Cognitive Workload Analysis of Fighter Aircraft Pilots in Flight Simulator Environment10.14429/dsj.70.14539 ↗
83. Johannessen, E., Szulewski, A., Radulovic, N., White, M., Braund, H., Howes, D., Rodenburg, D., and Davies, C. (2020). Psychophysiologic measures of cognitive load in physician team leaders during trauma resuscitation. Comput. Hum. Behav., in press.10.1016/j.chb.2020.106393 ↗
84. Fritz, T., Begel, A., Müller, S.C., Yigit-Elliott, S., and Züger, M. (June, January 31). Using psycho-physiological measures to assess task difficulty in software development. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, Hyderabad, India.
85. Jimenez-Molina, A., Retamal, C., and Lira, H. (2018). Using psychophysiological sensors to assess mental workload during web browsing. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18020458 ↗
86. Atomic Head Movement Analysis for Wearable Four-Dimensional Task Load Recognition10.1109/JBHI.2019.2893945 ↗
87. Dearing, D., Novstrup, A., and Goan, T. (2018). Assessing workload in human-machine teams from psychophysiological data with sparse ground truth. International Symposium on Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-14273-5_2 ↗
88. Using physiological signals to measure operator’s mental workload in shipping—An engine room simulator study10.1080/20464177.2016.1275496 ↗
89. Zhao, S., Ding, G., Han, J., and Gao, Y. (2018, January 13–19). Personality-Aware Personalized Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signals. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18), Stockholm, Sweden.10.24963/ijcai.2018/230 ↗
90. Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlow–Crowne Social Desirability Scale10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I ↗