journal article·2018-03-09Open access

Examination of Indoor Mobile Mapping Systems in a Diversified Internal/External Test Field

Grazia Tucci, Domenico Visintini, Valentina Bonora, Erica Parisi

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 3

Abstract

Nowadays, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithms support several commercial sensors which have recently been introduced to the market, and, like the more common mobile mapping systems (MMSs), are designed to acquire three-dimensional and high-resolution point clouds. The new systems are said to work both in external and internal environments, and completely avoid the use of targets and control points. The possibility of increasing productivity in three-dimensional digitization projects is fascinating, but data quality needs to be carefully evaluated to define appropriate fields of application. The paper presents the analytical measurement principle of these indoor mobile mapping systems (IMMSs) and the results of some tests performed on three commercial systems. A common test field was defined in order to acquire comparable data. By taking the already available terrestrial laser scan survey as the ground truth, the datasets under examination were compared with the reference and some assessments are presented which consider both quantitative and qualitative aspects. Geometric deformation in the final models was computed using the so-called Multiscale Model to Model Cloud Comparison (M3C2) algorithm. Cross sections and cloud to mesh (C2M) distances were also employed for a more detailed analysis. The real usability assessment is based on the features of recognizability, double surface evidence, and visualization effectiveness. For these evaluations, comparative images and tables are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

GECO Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, via Pier Antonio Micheli 8, I-50121 Florence, Italy

Polytechnic Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Udine, via delle Scienze 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy

Funding

Italian Research Project of National Interest “GAMHer – Geomatics Data Acquisition and Management for Landscape and Built Heritage in a European Perspective” - PRIN2015 · Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICEA) of the University of Florence

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Photogrammetry and laser scanning for archaeological site 3D modeling—Some critical issues
2. Multi-sensor platform for indoor mobile mapping: System calibration and using a total station for indoor applications10.3390/rs5115805 ↗
3. Indoor localization algorithms for an ambulatory Human operated 3D mobile mapping system10.3390/rs5126611 ↗
4. Efficiently capturing large, complex cultural heritage sites with a handheld mobile 3D laser mapping system10.1016/j.culher.2013.11.009 ↗
5. Evaluation of a backpack-mounted 3D mobile scanning system10.3390/rs71013753 ↗
6. A man-portable, IMU-free mobile mapping system10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-W5-17-2015 ↗
7. Schmitz, L., Schroth, G., and Reinshagen, F. (GIM International, 2015). Mapping Indoor Spaces with an Advanced Trolley Equipped with Laser Scanners, Cameras and Advanced Software, GIM International.
8. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (1995, January 24–26). 1995 Mobile Mapping Symposium. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on “Mobile Mapping Technology”, Columbus, OH, USA.
9. Woodman, O.J. (2007). An Introduction to Inertial Navigation, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. Technical Report 696.
10. Mobile laser scanning for indoor modelling10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W2-289-2013 ↗
11. Nocerino, E., Menna, F., Remondino, F., Toschi, L., and Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P. (2017, January 25–29). Investigation of indoor and outdoor performance of two portable mobile mapping systems. Proceedings of the SPIE Vol. 10332 Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIV, Munich, Germany.10.1117/12.2270761 ↗
12. Lehtola, V.V., Kaartinen, H., Nüchter, A., Kaijaluoto, R., Kukko, A., Litkey, P., Honkavaara, E., Rosnell, T., Vaaja, M.T., and Virtanen, J.-P. (2017). Comparison of the Selected State-Of-The-Art 3D Indoor Scanning and Point Cloud Generation Methods. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9080796 ↗
13. Comparison of low cost photogrammetric survey with TLS and Leica Pegasus backpack 3D models
14. Kinematic multi-sensor systems for close range digital imaging
15. Airborne laser scanning: Basic relations and formulas10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00015-5 ↗
16. External orientation of a mobile sensor system for cartographic updating by dynamic vision of digital map points
17. 6D SLAM-3D Mapping Outdoor Environments10.1002/rob.20209 ↗
18. (2017, November 15). Kaarta Stencil. Available online: http://www.kaarta.com/stencil/.
19. Zhang, J., and Singh, S. (2015, January 13–15). LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in real-time. Proceedings of the 2014 Robotics: Science and Systems Conference (RSS), Berkeley, CA, USA.10.15607/RSS.2014.X.007 ↗
20. (2017, November 15). Kaarta Stencil Technical Sheet. Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57f7e2b215d5dbb87f65e7b2/t/58cc4aa646c3c4081398dc8a/1489783463807/Stencil+spec+sheet+3.17+web.pdf.
21. Kaarta (2017, November 15). Measurement Accuracy of Lidar-based SLAM Systems. Available online: http://www.microgeo.it/public/userfiles/LaserScanner/Stencil%20Accuracy%20Tech%20Report-001.pdf.
22. Zhang, J., and Singh, S. (2015, January 26–30). Visual-lidar Odometry and Mapping: Low-drift, Robust, and Fast. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139486 ↗
23. (2017, November 15). Leica Pegasus Backpack. Available online: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/mobile-sensor-platforms/capture-platforms/leica-pegasus-backpack.
24. (2017, November 15). Leica Pegasus Backpack Technical Sheet. Available online: http://leica-geosystems.com/-/media/files/leicageosystems/products/datasheets/leica_pegasusbackpack_ds.ashx?la=en.
25. (2017, November 15). GeoSlam Zeb-Revo. Available online: https://geoslam.com/hardware/zeb-revo/.
26. (2017, November 15). GeoSlam Zeb-Revo Technical Sheet. Available online: https://geoslam.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/GeoSLAM-ZEB-REVO-Solution-v7.pdf.
27. Zebedee: Design of a Spring-Mounted 3-D Range Sensor with Application to Mobile Mapping10.1109/TRO.2012.2200990 ↗
28. Digital workflow for the acquisition and elaboration of 3D data in a monumental complex: The Fortress of Saint John the Baptist in Florence
29. (2017, November 15). CloudCompare (Version 2.9), GPL Software. Available online: http://www.cloudcompare.org/.
30. Girardeau-Montaut, D., Roux, M., Marc, R., and Thibault, G. (2005, January 12–14). Change detection on points cloud data acquired with a ground laser scanner. Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop Laser Scanning 2005, ISPRS Archives, Enschede, The Netherlands.
31. Change. Detection in Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data via Point Cloud Correspondence
32. Feature-Based Quality Evaluation of 3D Point Clouds—Study of the Performance of 3D Registration Algorithms10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W2-59-2013 ↗
33. Development of kinematic 3D laser scanning system for indoor mapping and as-built BIM using constrained SLAM10.3390/s151026430 ↗
34. Computational and methodological aspects of terrestrial surface analysis based on point clouds10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.011 ↗
35. Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z)10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009 ↗
36. (2017, November 15). CloudCompare Wiki. Available online: http://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page.
37. Investigating laser scanner accuracy