A Comprehensive Review of Conventional, Machine Leaning, and Deep Learning Models for Groundwater Level (GWL) Forecasting
Source abstract
Abstract
Groundwater level (GWL) refers to the depth of the water table or the level of water below the Earth’s surface in underground formations. It is an important factor in managing and sustaining the groundwater resources that are used for drinking water, irrigation, and other purposes. Groundwater level prediction is a critical aspect of water resource management and requires accurate and efficient modelling techniques. This study reviews the most commonly used conventional numerical, machine learning, and deep learning models for predicting GWL. Significant advancements have been made in terms of prediction efficiency over the last two decades. However, while researchers have primarily focused on predicting monthly, weekly, daily, and hourly GWL, water managers and strategists require multi-year GWL simulations to take effective steps towards ensuring the sustainable supply of groundwater. In this paper, we consider a collection of state-of-the-art theories to develop and design a novel methodology and improve modelling efficiency in this field of evaluation. We examined 109 research articles published from 2008 to 2022 that investigated different modelling techniques. Finally, we concluded that machine learning and deep learning approaches are efficient for modelling GWL. Moreover, we provide possible future research directions and recommendations to enhance the accuracy of GWL prediction models and improve relevant understanding.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Flood Risk Assessment and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Environmental & IT Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
Department of Computer Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
SafeTechResearch, Inc., Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
Department of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
Funding
Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) · Chungnam National University
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Groundwater modelling using an analytic element method and finite difference method: An insight into lower ganga river basin10.1007/s12040-019-1225-3 ↗
2. Artificial neural networks vis-à-vis MODFLOW in the simulation of groundwater: A review10.1007/s40808-022-01365-y ↗
3. Loh, H.W., Ooi, C.P., Seoni, S., Barua, P.D., Molinari, F., and Acharya, U.R. (2022). Application of explainable artificial intelligence for healthcare: A systematic review of the last decade (2011–2022). Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 107161.10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107161 ↗
4. On the use of neural networks to evaluate groundwater levels in fractured media10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.005 ↗
5. Comparison of FFNN and ANFIS models for estimating groundwater level10.1007/s12665-010-0617-0 ↗
6. Developing a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based model for predicting water table depth in agricultural areas10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.065 ↗
7. Carbonate scale reduction in reverse osmosis membrane by CO2 in wastewater reclamation10.12989/mwt.2017.8.2.125 ↗
8. Shahid, M.K., and Choi, Y. (2021). Sustainable Membrane-Based Wastewater Reclamation Employing CO2 to Impede an Ionic Precipitation and Consequent Scale Progression onto the Membrane Surfaces. Membranes, 11.10.3390/membranes11090688 ↗
9. Current advances in treatment technologies for removal of emerging contaminants from water—A critical review10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213993 ↗
10. Khan, J., and Kim, K. (2022). A Performance Evaluation of the Alpha-Beta (α-β) Filter Algorithm with Different Learning Models: DBN, DELM, and SVM. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199429 ↗
11. Khan, J., Lee, E., and Kim, K. (2022). A higher prediction accuracy–based alpha–beta filter algorithm using the feedforward artificial neural network. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol.10.1049/cit2.12148 ↗
12. Prediction of groundwater quality using efficient machine learning technique10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130265 ↗
13. Hussein, E.A., Thron, C., Ghaziasgar, M., Bagula, A., and Vaccari, M. (2020). Groundwater prediction using machine-learning tools. Algorithms, 13.10.3390/a13110300 ↗
14. Large scale prediction of groundwater nitrate concentrations from spatial data using machine learning10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.045 ↗
15. Modeling groundwater and surface water interaction: An overview of current status and future challenges10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157355 ↗
16. Fitts, C.R. (2002). Groundwater Science, Elsevier.
17. Younger, P.L. (2009). Groundwater in the Environment: An Introduction, John Wiley & Sons.
18. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science10.1007/s10040-001-0170-8 ↗
19. What are decision trees?10.1038/nbt0908-1011 ↗
20. Decision trees: A recent overview10.1007/s10462-011-9272-4 ↗
21. Decision trees: An overview and their use in medicine10.1023/A:1016409317640 ↗
22. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
23. Palimkar, P., Shaw, R.N., and Ghosh, A. (2022). Advanced Computing and Intelligent Technologies: Proceedings of ICACIT 2021, Springer.
24. Analysis of a random forests model
25. Louppe, G. (2014). Understanding random forests: From theory to practice. arXiv.
26. Support vector machines10.1109/5254.708428 ↗
27. Powers, D.M. (2020). Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv.
28. Precision–recall curve (PRC) classification trees10.1007/s12065-021-00565-2 ↗
29. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
30. Past, Present and Perspective Methodology for Groundwater Modeling-Based Machine Learning Approaches10.1007/s11831-022-09715-w ↗
31. Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014 ↗
32. Prediction of GWL with the help of GRACE TWS for unevenly spaced time series data in India: Analysis of comparative performances of SVR, ANN and LRM10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.005 ↗
33. Taylor, C.J., and Alley, W.M. (2001). Ground-Water-Level Monitoring and the Importance of Long-Term Water-Level Data.10.3133/cir1217 ↗
34. An integrated wavelet-support vector machine for groundwater level prediction in Visakhapatnam, India10.1016/j.neucom.2014.05.026 ↗
35. A high-accuracy map of global terrain elevations10.1002/2017GL072874 ↗
36. Simulating future groundwater recharge in coastal and inland catchments10.1007/s11269-021-02907-2 ↗
37. (2023, February 01). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id14116.
38. Standardised soil profile data to support global mapping and modelling (WoSIS snapshot 2019)10.5194/essd-12-299-2020 ↗
39. The NCEP climate forecast system version 210.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1 ↗
40. Inferring the interconnections between surface water bodies, tile-drains and an unconfined aquifer–aquitard system: A case study10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.046 ↗
41. Pan-European groundwater to atmosphere terrestrial systems climatology from a physically consistent simulation10.1038/s41597-019-0328-7 ↗
42. Compiling and mapping global permeability of the unconsolidated and consolidated Earth: GLobal HYdrogeology MaPS 2.0 (GLHYMPS 2.0)10.1002/2017GL075860 ↗
43. DAAC, L.P. (2023, February 10). The Application for Extracting and Exploring Analysis Ready Samples (AρρEEARS), Available online: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/tools/appeears/.
44. PCR-GLOBWB 2: A 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018 ↗
45. The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2. 2d: Model description and evaluation10.5194/gmd-14-1037-2021 ↗
46. Groundwater share quantification through flood hydrographs simulation using two temporal rainfall distributions10.5004/dwt.2018.22346 ↗
47. An Efficient Methodology for Water Supply Pipeline Risk Index Prediction for Avoiding Accidental Losses
48. Comprehensive review of groundwater scarcity, stress and sustainability index-based assessment10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100782 ↗
49. Shukla, P., and Singh, R.M. (2018). Groundwater, Springer.
50. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research10.1016/S0731-7085(99)00272-1 ↗
51. An improved alpha beta filter using a deep extreme learning machine10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073876 ↗
52. Lee, E., Khan, J., Son, W.-J., and Kim, K. (2023). An Efficient Feature Augmentation and LSTM-Based Method to Predict Maritime Traffic Conditions. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042556 ↗
53. Groundwater quality forecasting modelling using artificial intelligence: A review10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100643 ↗
54. Forecasting groundwater level in Shiraz plain using artificial neural networks10.1007/s13369-012-0291-5 ↗
55. Rainfall-runoff modeling using conceptual, data driven, and wavelet based computing approach10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.016 ↗
56. An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling10.1080/02626669809492102 ↗
57. Modelling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks10.1002/hyp.6686 ↗
58. Multilayer feed forward models in groundwater level forecasting using meteorological data in public management10.1007/s11269-018-2126-y ↗
59. ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system10.1109/21.256541 ↗
60. Groundwater depth predictions by GSM, RBF, and ANFIS models: A comparative assessment10.1007/s12517-017-2954-8 ↗
61. Groundwater level prediction using ANFIS algorithm
62. A comparative study of artificial neural networks, support vector machines and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for forecasting groundwater levels near Lake Okeechobee, Florida10.1007/s11269-015-1167-8 ↗
63. Simulation of groundwater level through artificial intelligence system10.1007/s12665-014-3997-8 ↗
64. Prediction the groundwater level of bastam plain (Iran) by artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)10.1007/s11269-014-0810-0 ↗
65. Clustering spatial–temporal precipitation data using wavelet transform and self-organizing map neural network10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.11.005 ↗
66. Using non-decimated wavelet decomposition to analyse time variations of North Atlantic Oscillation, eddy kinetic energy, and Ukrainian precipitation10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.029 ↗
67. A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods10.1007/s11269-012-0239-2 ↗
68. A review of the artificial intelligence methods in groundwater level modeling10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.037 ↗
69. Genetic programming based monthly groundwater level forecast models with uncertainty quantifcation10.1007/s40808-016-0083-0 ↗
70. Bayesian neural networks for uncertainty analysis of hydrologic modeling: A comparison of two schemes10.1007/s11269-012-0021-5 ↗
71. Predicting groundwater level fuctuations with meteorological efect implications-A comparative study among soft computing techniques10.1016/j.cageo.2013.01.007 ↗
72. Using long short-term memory models to fill data gaps in hydrological monitoring networks10.5194/hess-26-1727-2022 ↗
73. Bowes, B.D., Sadler, J.M., Morsy, M.M., Behl, M., and Goodall, J.L. (2019). Forecasting groundwater table in a flood prone coastal city with long short-term memory and recurrent neural networks. Water, 11.10.1002/essoar.10500507.1 ↗
74. Shin, M.J., Moon, S.H., Kang, K.G., Moon, D.C., and Koh, H.J. (2020). Analysis of groundwater level variations caused by the changes in groundwater withdrawals using long short-term memory network. Hydrology, 7.10.3390/hydrology7030064 ↗
75. Modelling groundwater level fluctuation in an Indian coastal aquifer
76. Groundwater level simulation and forecasting using interior search algorithm-least square support vector regression (ISA-LSSVR)10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100447 ↗
77. Comparison study of artificial intelligence method for short term groundwater level prediction in the northeast Gachsaran unconfined aquifer10.2166/ws.2020.015 ↗
78. Seifi, A., Ehteram, M., Singh, V.P., and Mosavi, A. (2020). Modeling and uncertainty analysis of groundwater level using six evolutionary optimization algorithms hybridized with ANFIS, SVM, and ANN. Sustainability, 12.10.2139/ssrn.3636873 ↗
79. Modeling of groundwater level using artificial intelligence techniques: A case study of Reyhanli region in Turkey10.15666/aeer/1702_26512663 ↗
80. Comparison of groundwater level models based on artificial neural networks and ANFIS10.1155/2015/742138 ↗
81. Monthly groundwater level prediction using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models: A case study on Kerman plain, Iran10.2166/hydro.2010.034 ↗
82. Predicting groundwater level changes using GRACE data10.1002/wrcr.20421 ↗
83. Prediction of water table depth in western region, Orissa using BPNN and RBFN neural networks10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.003 ↗
84. CNN-BiLSTM hybrid neural networks with attention mechanism for well log prediction10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108838 ↗
85. Developing a novel framework for forecasting groundwater level fluctuations using Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) deep neural network10.1016/j.compag.2021.106568 ↗
86. Forecast of short-term daily reference evapotranspiration under limited meteorological variables using a hybrid bi-directional long short-term memory model (Bi-LSTM)10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106386 ↗
87. Modelling groundwater level fluctuations in urban areas using artificial neural network10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100484 ↗
88. Groundwater level modeling with hybrid artificial intelligence techniques10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125659 ↗
89. Kombo, O.H., Kumaran, S., Sheikh, Y.H., Bovim, A., and Jayavel, K. (2020). Long-term groundwater level prediction model based on hybrid KNN-RF technique. Hydrology, 7.10.3390/hydrology7030059 ↗
90. Relating groundwater levels with meteorological parameters using ANN technique10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108163 ↗
91. Usage of statistical modeling techniques in surface and groundwater level prediction10.2166/aqua.2020.143 ↗
92. Cao, Y., Yin, K., Zhou, C., and Ahmed, B. (2020). Establishment of landslide groundwater level prediction model based on GA-SVM and influencing factor analysis. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20030845 ↗
93. Groundwater level prediction in Apulia region (Southern Italy) using NARX neural network10.1016/j.envres.2020.110062 ↗
94. Ensemble modelling framework for groundwater level prediction in urban areas of India10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135539 ↗
95. A new artificial intelligence strategy for predicting the groundwater level over the Rafsanjan aquifer in Iran10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125468 ↗
96. Self-optimizer data-mining method for aquifer level prediction10.2166/ws.2019.204 ↗
97. A comparative study among machine learning and numerical models for simulating groundwater dynamics in the Heihe River Basin, northwestern China10.1038/s41598-020-60698-9 ↗
98. Groundwater Level Mapping Tool: An open source web application for assessing groundwater sustainability10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104782 ↗
99. Climatic data analysis for groundwater level simulation in drought prone Barind Tract, Bangladesh: Modelling approach using artificial neural network10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100361 ↗
100. A novel deseasonalized time series model with an improved seasonal estimate for groundwater level predictions10.2166/h2oj.2019.022 ↗