A Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for Renewable Energy Plants Location Selection in Vietnam under a Fuzzy Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
In the context of increasing energy demands in Vietnam, and as a result of the limited supply of domestic energy (oil/gas/coal reserves are exhausted), the potential for renewable energy sources in Vietnam is significant. Thus, building wind power plants in Vietnam is necessary. Access to this type of renewable energy not only contributes to society’s energy supply but also helps to save energy and reduce environmental pollution. Although some works have reviewed applications of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model in wind power plant site selection, little research has focused on this problem in a fuzzy environment. This is the reason why a hybrid Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are developed for wind power plant site selection in Vietnam. In the first stages of this research, an FAHP model is proposed for determining the weight of each potential location for building a wind power plant, based on qualitative and quantitative factors. A TOPSIS is applied for ranking all potential alternatives in the final stage. The authors collected data from seven locations, which have good conditions for investment in a wind power plant. The results indicate that Binh Thuan (Binh Thuan Province is located on coast of South Central Vietnam) is the best place for building a wind power plant in Vietnam. The contributions of this work proposed an MCDM approach under fuzzy environments for wind power plant location selection in Vietnam. This paper also resides in the evolution of a new approach that is flexible and practical for a decision-maker. This work also provides a useful guideline for wind power plant location selection in others countries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Fortune Institute of Technology, Kaohsiung 83160, Taiwan
Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, CanTho University of Technology, Can Tho 900000, Vietnam
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Land use and electricity generation: A life-cycle analysis10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.017 ↗
2. Rana Adib (2011). Global Status Report, Renewables.
3. Global Wind Energy Council (2014). Global Wind Statistics, Global Wind Energy Council.
4. World Wind Energy Association (2014). World Wind Energy Report, World Wind Energy Association.
5. Site Selection for Wind Farm Installation
6. Pamučar, D., Gigović, L., Bajić, Z., and Janošević, M. (2017). Location Selection for Wind Farms Using GIS Multi-Criteria Hybrid Model: An Approach Based on Fuzzy and Rough Numbers. Sustainability, 9.10.3390/su9081315 ↗
7. Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.041 ↗
8. Land suitability assessment for wind power plant site selection using ANP-DEMATEL in a GIS environment: Case study of Ardabil province, Iran10.1007/s10661-014-3883-6 ↗
9. A model proposal for locating wind turbines10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.422 ↗
10. Multi-Criteria Wind Turbine Selection
11. Site selection of wind power plant using multi-criteria decision-making methods in GIS: A case study
12. Wang, C.-N., Nguyen, V.T., Duong, D.H., and Thai, H.T.N. (2018). A Hybrid Fuzzy Analysis Network Process (FANP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Approaches for Solid Waste to Energy Plant Location Selection in Vietnam. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071100 ↗
13. Wang, C.-N., Nguyen, V.T., Thai, H.T.N., and Duong, D.H. (2018). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approaches for Solar Power Plant Location Selection in Viet Nam. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11061504 ↗
14. Selection of suitable site in Pakistan for wind power plant installation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)10.1080/23307706.2017.1346490 ↗
15. AHP with GIS for a Preliminary Site Selection of Wind Turbines in the North West of Jordan10.4236/ijg.2016.710090 ↗
16. Solangi, Y.A., Tan, Q., Khan, M.W.A., Mirjat, N.H., and Ahmed, I. (2018). The Selection of Wind Power Project Location in the Southeastern Corridor of Pakistan: A Factor Analysis, AHP, and Fuzzy-TOPSIS Application. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11081940 ↗
17. Multi-criteria decision making for 1.5 MW wind turbine selection10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.042 ↗
18. Demirel, T., and Yalcin, U. (2008). Multi-criteria wind power plant location selection using fuzzy AHP. Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, World Scientific.10.1142/9789812799470_0174 ↗
19. Wang, C.N., Nguyen, V., Duong, D., and Do, H. (2018). A Hybrid Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in the Rice Supply Chain. Symmetry, 10.10.3390/sym10060221 ↗
20. Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS (IFT) in Site Selection of Wind Power Plants in TURKEY
21. Vagiona, D.G., and Kamilakis, M. (2018). Sustainable Site Selection for Offshore Wind Farms. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10030749 ↗
22. The location optimization of wind turbine sites with using the MCDM approach: A case study
23. A multi-criteria decision making for renewable energy selection using Z-numbers in uncertain environment10.3846/20294913.2016.1261375 ↗
24. Fuzzy sets10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
25. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation, McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804 ↗
26. Role of public participation in sustainability of historical city: Usage of TOPSIS method10.17485/ijst/2012/v5i3.2 ↗
27. Extension of the TOPSIS Method for Decision-Making Problems with Fuzzy Data10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057 ↗
28. Lind, P.G., Vera-Tudela, L., Wächter, M., Kühn, M., and Peinke, J. (2017). Normal Behaviour Models for Wind Turbine Vibrations: Comparison of Neural Networks and a Stochastic Approach. Energies, 10.10.3390/en10121944 ↗
29. Fatigue Load Estimation through a Simple Stochastic Model10.3390/en7128279 ↗
30. Neural network forecast of daily pollution concentration using optimal meteorological data at synoptic and local scales10.5094/APR.2015.060 ↗
31. Air quality prediction using optimal neural networks with stochastic variables10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.072 ↗
32. Scherhaufera, P., Höltinger, S., Salaka, B., Schauppenlehner, T., and Schmidt, J. (2018). A participatory integrated assessment of the social acceptance of wind. Energy Res. Soc. Sci.10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.022 ↗
33. Visualizing social acceptance research: A bibliometric review of the social acceptance literature for energy technology and fuels10.1016/j.erss.2017.12.006 ↗
34. Worldviews as predictors of wind and solar energy support in Austria: Bridging social acceptance and risk perception research10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.012 ↗
35. Mytilinou, V., Lozano-Minguez, E., and Kolios, A. (2018). A Framework for the Selection of Optimum Offshore Wind Farm Locations for Deployment. Energies, 11.10.20944/preprints201804.0298.v1 ↗
36. Developing and applying a GIS-based approach to locating wind farms in the UK10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00169-5 ↗
37. A multi-objective optimisation approach applied to offshore10.1007/s40722-017-0092-8 ↗
38. (2018, August 15). Energypedia. Available online: energypedia.info/wiki/Wind_Energy_Country_Analysis_Vietnam.
39. Application and Development of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process within a Capital Investment Study
40. Bhushan, N., and Rai, K. (2004). Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer.10.1007/b97668 ↗
41. Baker, D., Bridges, D., Hunter, R., Johnson, G., Krupa, J., Murphy, J., and Sorenson, K. (2002). Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods, NASA.