Microbial-Based Heavy Metal Bioremediation: Toxicity and Eco-Friendly Approaches to Heavy Metal Decontamination
Source abstract
Abstract
There are several industrial processes in which heavy metals are used, including but not limited to chrome plating and tanning. Amongst the most toxic heavy metals to human health are arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, copper, nickel, and mercury. The aforementioned toxic metals possess the ability to cause contamination upon their release into the environment. Humans and aquatic and terrestrial animals are at risk from heavy metals in water and soil. Heavy metal toxicity has the potential to result in several health complications, such as renal and hepatic impairment, dermatological afflictions, cognitive lethargy, and potentially oncogenic manifestations. The removal of heavy metals from wastewater and soil can be accomplished using a variety of conventional methods, such as membrane filtration, reverse osmosis, chemical reduction, and adsorption. These methods have several disadvantages, such as generating an abundance of secondary pollutants, and entail significantly higher costs in comparison to biological methods. Conversely, eco-friendly techniques based on microbes have numerous advantages. This review provides a comprehensive overview of biological processes that remove heavy metal ions, both metabolically dependent and metabolically independent. Additionally, we also focused on the source and toxicity of these heavy metals. This study is expected to be particularly beneficial for the development of biological heavy metal treatment systems for soil and water.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chromium effects and bioremediation · Heavy metals in environment · Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Urban and Rural Construction Institute, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
Funding
Key R&D Project of Hebei Province
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Heavy Metal Contamination of Soils and Crops near a Zinc Smelter
2. Okereafor, U., Makhatha, M., Mekuto, L., Uche-Okereafor, N., Sebola, T., and Mavumengwana, V. (2020). Toxic Metal Implications on Agricultural Soils, Plants, Animals, Aquatic life and Human Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17072204 ↗
3. Angulo-Bejarano, P.I., Puente-Rivera, J., and Cruz-Ortega, R. (2021). Metal and Metalloid Toxicity in Plants: An Overview on Molecular Aspects. Plants, 10.10.3390/plants10040635 ↗
4. Nunes, N., Ragonezi, C., Gouveia, C.S.S., and Pinheiro de Carvalho, M.Â.A. (2021). Review of Sewage Sludge as a Soil Amendment in Relation to Current International Guidelines: A Heavy Metal Perspective. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13042317 ↗
5. Zgłobicki, W. (2022). Special Issue on Heavy Metals in the Environment-Causes and Consequences. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12020835 ↗
6. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals10.2478/intox-2014-0009 ↗
7. Ali, S., Abbas, Z., Rizwan, M., Zaheer, I.E., Yavaş, İ., Ünay, A., Abdel-DAIM, M.M., Bin-Jumah, M., Hasanuzzaman, M., and Kalderis, D. (2020). Application of Floating Aquatic Plants in Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals Polluted Water: A Review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12051927 ↗
8. Interactions between Metal Oxides and Biomolecules: From Fundamental Understanding to Applications10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00660 ↗
9. Singh, V., Singh, J., Singh, N., Rai, S.N., Verma, M.K., Verma, M., Singh, V., Chivate, M.S., Bilal, M., and Mishra, V. (2022). Simultaneous removal of ternary heavy metal ions by a newly isolated Microbacterium paraoxydans strain VSVM IIT(BHU) from coal washery effluent. BioMetals.10.1007/s10534-022-00476-4 ↗
10. Abd Elnabi, M.K., Elkaliny, N.E., Elyazied, M.M., Azab, S.H., Elkhalifa, S.A., Elmasry, S., Mouhamed, M.S., Shalamesh, E.M., Alhorieny, N.A., and Abd Elaty, A.E. (2023). Toxicity of Heavy Metals and Recent Advances in Their Removal: A Review. Toxics, 11.10.3390/toxics11070580 ↗
11. Yang, J., Hou, B., Wang, J., Tian, B., Bi, J., Wang, N., Li, X., and Huang, X. (2019). Nanomaterials for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Nanomaterials, 9.10.3390/nano9030424 ↗
12. Wołowiec, M., Komorowska-Kaufman, M., Pruss, A., Rzepa, G., and Bajda, T. (2019). Removal of Heavy Metals and Metalloids from Water Using Drinking Water Treatment Residuals as Adsorbents: A Review. Minerals, 9.10.3390/min9080487 ↗
13. Recent advances in application of iron-manganese oxide nanomaterials for removal of heavy metals in the aquatic environment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153157 ↗
14. Singh, V., Singh, N., Rai, S.N., Kumar, A., Singh, A.K., Singh, M.P., Sahoo, A., Shekhar, S., Vamanu, E., and Mishra, V. (2023). Heavy Metal Contamination in the Aquatic Ecosystem: Toxicity and Its Remediation Using Eco-Friendly Approaches. Toxics, 11.10.3390/toxics11020147 ↗
15. A critical review of biosorption of dyes, heavy metals and metalloids from wastewater as an efficient and green process10.1016/j.clet.2021.100209 ↗
16. Ungureanu, E.L., Mocanu, A.L., Stroe, C.A., Panciu, C.M., Berca, L., Sionel, R.M., and Mustatea, G. (2023). Agricultural Byproducts Used as Low-Cost Adsorbents for Removal of Potentially Toxic Elements from Wastewater: A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15075999 ↗
17. Heavy metal tolerance (Cr, Ag AND Hg) in bacteria isolated from sewage10.1590/S1517-83822012000400047 ↗
18. Bioremediation and tolerance of humans to heavy metals through microbial processes: A potential role for probiotics?10.1128/AEM.01665-12 ↗
19. Adverse effect of heavy metals (As, Pb, Hg, and Cr) on health and their bioremediation strategies: A review10.1007/s10123-018-0012-3 ↗
20. Luhar, I., Luhar, S., Abdullah, M.M.A.B., Razak, R.A., Vizureanu, P., Sandu, A.V., and Matasaru, P.-D. (2021). A State-of-the-Art Review on Innovative Geopolymer Composites Designed for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14237456 ↗
21. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic10.3389/fphar.2021.643972 ↗
22. Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation
23. CPCB (2023, July 09). General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants Part-A: Effluents. SCHEDULE—V. Available online: https://cpcb.nic.in/GeneralStandards.pdf.
24. Review of Heavy Metals Pollution in China in Agricultural and Urban Soils10.5696/2156-9614-8.18.180607 ↗
25. Bioremediation of toxic metal ions from coal washery effluent10.5004/dwt.2020.25996 ↗
26. Seven potential sources of arsenic pollution in Latin America and their environmental and health impacts10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146274 ↗
27. Natural Arsenic in Global Groundwaters: Distribution and Geochemical Triggers for Mobilization10.1007/s40726-016-0028-2 ↗
28. Missimer, T.M., Teaf, C.M., Beeson, W.T., Maliva, R.G., Woolschlager, J., and Covert, D.J. (2018). Natural background and anthropogenic arsenic enrichment in florida soils, surface water, and groundwater: A review with a discussion on public health risk. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.10.20944/preprints201808.0511.v1 ↗
29. Hydrogeochemistry of arsenic pollution in watersheds influenced by gold mining activities in Paracatu (Minas Gerais State, Brazil)10.1007/s11356-016-6089-3 ↗
30. Akhtar, N., Syakir Ishak, M.I., Bhawani, S.A., and Umar, K. (2021). Various Natural and Anthropogenic Factors Responsible for Water Quality Degradation: A Review. Water, 13.10.3390/w13192660 ↗
31. Masindi, V., and Muedi, K.L. (2018). Heavy Metals, InTech.
32. Remediation of inorganic arsenic in groundwater for safe water supply: A critical assessment of technological solutions10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.097 ↗
33. The Role of the Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Stress in the Pathomechanism of the Age-Related Ocular Diseases and Other Pathologies of the Anterior and Posterior Eye Segments in Adults10.1155/2016/3164734 ↗
34. Systemic impact of heavy metals and their role in cancer development: A review10.1007/s10661-023-11399-z ↗
35. Liang, G., Gong, W., Li, B., Zuo, J., Pan, L., and Liu, X. (2019). Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16060909 ↗
36. Heavy Metal Content of Ayurvedic Herbal Medicine Products10.1001/jama.292.23.2868 ↗
37. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals (Pb, Cd, Hg) in Hydroalcoholic Gels of Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire10.1007/s12011-021-02822-y ↗
38. Heavy Metal contamination of Dietary Supplements products available in the UAE markets and the associated risk10.1038/s41598-020-76000-w ↗
39. Consumption of heavy metal contaminated foods and associated risks in Bangladesh10.1007/s10661-017-6362-z ↗
40. Food contamination by metals and pesticides in the European Union. Should we worry?10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00480-5 ↗
41. Heavy metal (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb) analysis and identification of heavy metal resistant bacteria in sediments from Manado Bay10.1088/1755-1315/926/1/012096 ↗
42. Trace Element Deposition on Mount Everest10.2136/sh2010.3.0072 ↗
43. Heavy Metals and Human Health: Mechanistic Insight into Toxicity and Counter Defense System of Antioxidants10.3390/ijms161226183 ↗
44. Metal Binding Proteins10.3390/encyclopedia1010024 ↗
45. A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x ↗
46. An Overview of Carcinogenic Heavy Metal: Molecular Toxicity Mechanism and Prevention10.15430/JCP.2015.20.4.232 ↗
47. Metals and Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021031 ↗
48. Metals and molecular carcinogenesis10.1093/carcin/bgaa076 ↗
49. Mitigation of arsenic-induced acquired cancer phenotype in prostate cancer stem cells by miR-143 restoration10.1016/j.taap.2015.12.013 ↗
50. Epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.03.037 ↗
51. A review on arsenic carcinogenesis: Epidemiology, metabolism, genotoxicity and epigenetic changes10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.09.010 ↗
52. Development of a cost-effective, recyclable and viable metal ion doped adsorbent for simultaneous adsorption and reduction of toxic Cr (VI) ions10.1016/j.jece.2021.105124 ↗
53. YG, T.G., Ballupete Nagaraju, S., Puttegowda, M., Verma, A., Rangappa, S.M., and Siengchin, S. (2023). Biopolymer-Based Composites: An Eco-Friendly Alternative from Agricultural Waste Biomass. J. Compos. Sci., 7.10.3390/jcs7060242 ↗
54. Sustainable reduction of Cr (VI) and its elemental mapping on chitosan coated citrus limetta peels biomass in synthetic wastewater
55. Bilal, M., Rasheed, T., Sosa-Hernández, J.E., Raza, A., Nabeel, F., and Iqbal, H.M.N. (2018). Biosorption: An Interplay between Marine Algae and Potentially Toxic Elements-A Review. Mar. Drugs, 16.10.3390/md16020065 ↗
56. Diverse Metabolic Capacities of Fungi for Bioremediation10.1007/s12088-016-0584-6 ↗
57. Microbial biosorbent for remediation of dyes and heavy metals pollution: A green strategy for sustainable environment10.3389/fmicb.2023.1168954 ↗
58. Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and its microbial reduction10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273 ↗
59. Hossan, S., Hossain, S., Islam, M.R., Kabir, M.H., Ali, S., Islam, M.S., Imran, K.M., Moniruzzaman, M., Mou, T.J., and Parvez, A.K. (2020). Bioremediation of Hexavalent Chromium by Chromium Resistant Bacteria Reduces Phytotoxicity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17176013 ↗
60. Bioreduction and bioremoval of hexavalent chromium by genetically engineered strains (Escherichia coli MT2A and Escherichia coli MT3)10.1007/s11274-022-03235-2 ↗
61. Heavy Metal Removal by Bioaccumulation Using Genetically Engineered Microorganisms10.3389/fbioe.2018.00157 ↗
62. Hussain, C. (2018). Handbook of Environmental Materials Management, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3 ↗
63. Bioremediation Options for Heavy Metal Pollution10.5696/2156-9614-9.24.191203 ↗
64. Role of microbes in bioaccumulation of heavy metals in municipal solid waste: Impacts on plant and human being10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119248 ↗
65. Microbial biomass: An economical alternative for removal of heavy metals from waste water
66. Microbial Interventions in Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Contaminants in Agroecosystem10.3389/fmicb.2022.824084 ↗
67. Ayangbenro, A.S., and Babalola, O.O. (2017). A New Strategy for Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review of Microbial Biosorbents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.3390/ijerph14010094 ↗
68. Ojuederie, O.B., and Babalola, O.O. (2017). Microbial and Plant-Assisted Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.3390/ijerph14121504 ↗
69. Biological approaches to tackle heavy metal pollution: A survey of literature10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.077 ↗
70. A review with recent advancements on bioremediation-based abolition of heavy metals10.1039/C3EM00491K ↗
71. A review of the effects of environmental hazards on humans, their remediation for sustainable development, and risk assessment10.1007/s10661-023-11353-z ↗
72. Agarwal, P., Vibhandik, R., Agrahari, R., Daverey, A., and Rani, R. (2023). Role of Root Exudates on the Soil Microbial Diversity and Biogeochemistry of Heavy Metals. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.10.1007/s12010-023-04465-2 ↗
73. Kanamarlapudi, S.L.R.K., Chintalpudi, V.K., and Muddada, S. (2018). Biosorption, InTech.
74. Sustainable exposure prevention through innovative detection and remediation technologies from the NIEHS Superfund Research Program10.1515/reveh-2016-0037 ↗
75. Torres, E. (2020). Biosorption: A Review of the Latest Advances. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8121584 ↗
76. Characteristic and biosorption capacities of orange peels biosorbents for removal of ammonia and nitrate from contaminated water10.1016/j.clema.2021.100001 ↗
77. Selvasembian, R., and Singh, P. (2021). Biosorption for Wastewater Contaminants, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119737629 ↗
78. Biosorption optimization, characterization, immobilization and application of Gelidium amansii biomass for complete Pb2+ removal from aqueous solutions10.1038/s41598-018-31660-7 ↗
79. State of the art for the biosorption process—A review10.1007/s12010-013-0269-0 ↗
80. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: A comprehensive and critical review10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0 ↗
81. Biosorption technology for removal of toxic metals: A review of commercial biosorbents and patents10.1007/s11356-019-05330-8 ↗
82. An overview of chromium removal techniques from tannery effluent10.1007/s13201-020-01286-0 ↗
83. Adsorption of Cr(VI) and speciation of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in aqueous solutions using chemically modified chitosan10.3390/ijerph9051757 ↗
84. Integrated Approach for Hazardous Cr(VI) Removal: Reduction, Extraction, and Conversion into a Photoactive Composite, CuO/CuCr2O410.1021/acsomega.9b01452 ↗
85. Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions by Phytolacca americana L. biomass as a low cost biosorbent10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.06.011 ↗
86. Biosorption of lead, copper and cadmium by biomass of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PU2110.1016/S0043-1354(97)00008-0 ↗
87. Biosorption of cadmium using a novel bacterium isolated from an electronic industry effluent10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.016 ↗
88. Biosorption of Pb and Cu using fixed and suspended bacteria10.1016/j.jece.2014.05.023 ↗
89. Study on arsenic biosorption using Fe(III)-treated biomass of Staphylococcus xylosus10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.026 ↗
90. Lead metal biosorption and isotherms studies by metal-resistant Bacillus strain MRS-2 bacterium10.1002/jobm.202100155 ↗
91. Biosorption mechanisms involved in immobilization of soil Pb by Bacillus subtilis DBM in a multi-metal-contaminated soil10.1016/j.jes.2014.07.015 ↗
92. Biosorption of heavy metals by dry biomass of metal tolerant bacterial biosorbents: An efficient metal clean-up strategy10.1007/s10661-020-08758-5 ↗
93. Bié, J., Sepodes, B., Fernandes, P.C.B., and Ribeiro, M.H.L. (2022). Enzyme Immobilization and Co-Immobilization: Main Framework, Advances and Some Applications. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10030494 ↗
94. Zdarta, J., Meyer, A.S., Jesionowski, T., and Pinelo, M. (2018). A General Overview of Support Materials for Enzyme Immobilization: Characteristics, Properties, Practical Utility. Catalysts, 8.10.3390/catal8020092 ↗
95. Metals biosorption by sodium alginate immobilizedChlorella homosphaera cells10.1007/BF01033409 ↗
96. Timková, I., Sedláková-Kaduková, J., and Pristaš, P. (2018). Biosorption and Bioaccumulation Abilities of Actinomycetes/Streptomycetes Isolated from Metal Contaminated Sites. Separations, 5.10.3390/separations5040054 ↗
97. Toxicity and Bioremediation of Heavy Metals Contaminated Ecosystem from Tannery Wastewater: A Review10.1155/2018/2568038 ↗
98. Alengebawy, A., Abdelkhalek, S.T., Qureshi, S.R., and Wang, M.-Q. (2021). Heavy Metals and Pesticides Toxicity in Agricultural Soil and Plants: Ecological Risks and Human Health Implications. Toxics, 9.10.3390/toxics9030042 ↗
99. Genchi, G., Carocci, A., Lauria, G., Sinicropi, M.S., and Catalano, A. (2021). Thallium Use, Toxicity, and Detoxification Therapy: An Overview. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11188322 ↗
100. Genchi, G., Lauria, G., Catalano, A., Carocci, A., and Sinicropi, M.S. (2021). The Double Face of Metals: The Intriguing Case of Chromium. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11020638 ↗