An Artificial Intelligence Approach for Improving Maintenance to Supervise Machine Failures and Support Their Repair
Source abstract
Abstract
Maintenance of production equipment has a key role in ensuring business continuity and productivity. Determining the implementation time and the appropriate selection of the scope of maintenance activities are necessary not only for the operation of industrial equipment but also for effective planning of the demand for own maintenance resources (spare parts, people, finances). A number of studies have been conducted in the last decade and many attempts have been made to use artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to model and manage maintenance. The aim of the article is to discuss the possibility of using AI methods and techniques to anticipate possible failures and respond to them in advance by carrying out maintenance activities in an appropriate and timely manner. The indirect aim of these studies is to achieve more effective management of maintenance activities. The main method applied is computational analysis and simulation based on the real industrial data set. The main results show that the effective use of preventive maintenance requires large amounts of reliable annotated sensor data and well-trained machine-learning algorithms. Scientific and technical development of the above-mentioned group of solutions should be implemented in such a way that they can be used by companies of equal size and with different production profiles. Even relatively simple solutions as presented in the article can be helpful here, offering high efficiency at low implementation costs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quality and Safety in Healthcare · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology in Poznan, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
Faculty of Engineering Management, WSB University in Poznan, 61-895 Poznan, Poland
Funding
Kazimierz Wielki University
References (74)
Show source-provided references
1. Integrated production-maintenance strategy considering quality constraints in dry machining10.1080/00207543.2021.1905193 ↗
2. Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review10.1016/j.ress.2021.108140 ↗
3. Human knowledge centered maintenance decision support in digital twin environment10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.10.003 ↗
4. Maintenance 4.0 technologies—New opportunities for sustainability—Driven maintenance
5. Maintenance concepts evolution: A comparative review towards advanced maintenance conceptualization10.1016/j.compind.2021.103531 ↗
6. Maintenance Performance in the Age of Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Performance Analysis and a Systematic Literature Review10.3390/s23031409 ↗
7. Application of machine learning and rough set theory in lean maintenance decision support system development
8. Production and maintenance in industries: Impact of industry 4.0
9. Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889 ↗
10. Cardoso, D., and Ferreira, L. (2021). Application of Predictive Maintenance Concepts Using Artificial Intelligence Tools. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010018 ↗
11. Calabrese, F., Regattieri, A., Bortolini, M., and Galizia, F.G. (2022). Data-Driven Fault Detection and Diagnosis: Challenges and Opportunities in Real-World Scenarios. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12189212 ↗
12. A data-driven predictive maintenance strategy based on accurate failure prognostics
13. Short and long forecast to implement—Predictive maintenance in a pulp industry10.17531/ein.2022.1.5 ↗
14. Maintenance transformation through Industry 4.0 technologies: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.compind.2020.103335 ↗
15. El Kihel, Y., El Kihel, A., and Bouyahrouzi, E.M. (2022). Contribution of Maintenance 4.0 in Sustainable Development with an IndustrialCase Study. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141711090 ↗
16. James, A.T., Kumar, G., Khan, A.Q., and Asjad, M. (2022). Maintenance 4.0: Implementation challenges and its analysis. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., ahead-of-print.10.1108/IJQRM-04-2021-0097 ↗
17. Implementation of total productive maintenance to enhance the overall equipment effectiveness in medium scale industries
18. Decision making in lean smart maintenance: Criticality analysis as a support tool
19. Maintenance strategies and their combine impact on manufacturing performance
20. Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry10.1016/j.ress.2021.107864 ↗
21. Toward cognitive predictive maintenance: A survey of graph-based approaches10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.002 ↗
22. Challenges and Opportunities of Condition-Based Predictive Maintenance: An Overview10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.318 ↗
23. Latest advances and trends in predictive maintenance from a data-driven machine prediction perspective10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110276 ↗
24. Preventive maintenance (PM) planning: A review10.1108/JQME-04-2016-0014 ↗
25. Data mining in predictive maintenance systems: A taxonomy and systematic review10.1002/widm.1471 ↗
26. Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: A machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114598 ↗
27. Data-driven methods for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment: A survey10.1109/JSYST.2019.2905565 ↗
28. Kim, D., Lee, S., and Kim, D. (2021). An Applicable Predictive Maintenance Framework for the Absence of Run-to-Failure Data. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11115180 ↗
29. Methodology for data-driven predictive maintenance models design, development and implementation on manufacturing guided by domain knowledge10.1080/0951192X.2022.2043562 ↗
30. Towards multi-model approaches to predictive maintenance: A systematic literature survey on diagnostics and prognostics10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.008 ↗
31. Sullivan, G.P., Pugh, R., Melendez, A.P., and Hunt, W.D. (2010). Operations & Maintenance Best Practices: A Guide to Achieving Operational Efficiency, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.10.2172/1034595 ↗
32. Development of a lean manufacturing framework to enhance its adoption within manufacturing companies in developing economies10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118726 ↗
33. Greener, cheaper, or more sustainable: Reviewing sustainability assessments of maintenance strategies of concrete structures10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.022 ↗
34. On sustainable predictive maintenance: Exploration of key barriers using an integrated approach10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.023 ↗
35. Nacchia, M., Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A., and Bruton, K. (2021). A Systematic Mapping of the Advancing Use of Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Maintenance in the Manufacturing Sector. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062546 ↗
36. Zhang, M., Amaitik, N., Wang, Z., Xu, Y., Maisuradze, A., Peschl, M., and Tzovaras, D. (2022). Predictive Maintenance for Remanufacturing Based on Hybrid-Driven Remaining Useful Life Prediction. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073218 ↗
37. Abidi, M.H., Mohammed, M.K., and Alkhalefah, H. (2022). Predictive Maintenance Planning for Industry 4.0 Using Machine Learning for Sustainable Manufacturing. Sustainability., 14.10.3390/su14063387 ↗
38. Application of a multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) model for selecting appropriate maintenance strategy for marine and offshore machinery operations10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.065 ↗
39. Roadmap Industry 4.0–implementation guideline for enterprises10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14 ↗
40. The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.010.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057 ↗
41. Katona, A., Panfilov, P., and Katalinic, B. (2018, January 24–27). Building predictive maintenance framework for smart environment application systems. Proceedings of the 29th DAAAM International Symposium, Zadar, Croatia.10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.068 ↗
42. Road map for a Success fulI implementation of a Predictive Maintenance Strategy
43. Exploring the transition from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance within ERPsystems by utilizing digital twins
44. Alexopoulos, K., Hribrenik, K., Surico, M., Nikolakis, N., Al-Najjar, B., Keraron, Y., Duarte, M., Zalonis, A., and Makris, S. (2023, March 10). 2021 Predictive Maintenance Technologies for Production Systems: A Roadmap to Development and Implementation. Available online: https://foresee-cluster.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ForeSee-roadmap-to-the-predictive-maintenance-technologies-for-production-systems-v1.0-final.pdf.
45. Kammerer, K., Pryss, R., Hoppenstedt, B., Sommer, K., and Reichert, M. (2020). Process-Driven and Flow-Based Processing of Industrial Sensor Data. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20185245 ↗
46. Kozma, D., Varga, P., and Larrinaga, F. (2021). System of Systems Lifecycle Management—A New Concept Based on Process Engineering Methodologies. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083386 ↗
47. Çınar, Z.M., AbdussalamNuhu, A., Zeeshan, Q., Korhan, O., Asmael, M., and Safaei, B. (2020). Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance towards Sustainable Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12198211 ↗
48. The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management (COMADEM): A Literature Survey
49. Hinojosa-Palafox, E.A., Rodríguez-Elías, O.M., Hoyo-Montaño, J.A., Pacheco-Ramírez, J.H., and Nieto-Jalil, J.M. (2021). An Analytics Environment Architecture for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems Big Data Solutions. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21134282 ↗
50. Achouch, M., Dimitrova, M., Dhouib, R., Ibrahim, H., Adda, M., Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Ziane, K., and Aminzadeh, A. (2023). Predictive Maintenance and Fault Monitoring Enabled by Machine Learning: Experimental Analysis of a TA-48 Multistage Centrifugal Plant Compressor. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031790 ↗
51. A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance
52. Kobbacy, K.A., Murthy, D.P., and Kobbacy, K.A. (2008). Complex System Maintenance Handbook, Springer.
53. Implementation of Artificial intelligence for maintenance operation in the rail industry10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.277 ↗
54. Artificial intelligence and real-time predictive maintenance in industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis10.1007/s43681-021-00132-6 ↗
55. Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., Macko, M., Szczepański, Z., and Dostatni, E. (2021). Optimization of Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Process Using Neural Networks for Sustainable Development. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14112737 ↗
56. Modern methods in the field of machine modelling and simulation as a research and practical issue related to Industry 4.0
57. Intelligent system supporting technological process planning for machining and 3D printing
58. Safarian, S., Saryazdi, S.M.E., Unnthorsson, R., and Richter, C. (2021). Modeling of Hydrogen Production by Applying Biomass Gasification: Artificial Neural Network Modeling Approach. Fermentation, 2.10.3390/fermentation7020071 ↗
59. Sobri, M.Z.A., Redhwan, A., Ameen, F., Lim, J.-W., Liew, C.S., Mong, G.R., Daud, H., Sokkalingam, R., Ho, C.-D., and Usman, A. (2023). A Review Unveiling Various Machine Learning Algorithms Adopted for Biohydrogen Productions from Microalgae. Fermentation, 3.
60. A feed-forward network for input that is both categorical and quantitative10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00090-4 ↗
61. A hybrid machine-learning model for predicting the waste generation rate of building demolition Project10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134096 ↗
62. Nunes, C., Nunes, R., Pires, E.J.S., Barroso, J., and Reis, A. (2023). A Machine Learning Tool to Monitor and Forecast Results from Testing Products in End-of-Line Systems. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042263 ↗
63. Han, J., Liu, T., Ma, J., Zhou, Y., Zeng, X., and Xu, Y. (2022). Anomaly Detection and Early Warning Model for Latency in Private 5G Networks. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312472 ↗
64. Quatrini, E., Costantino, F., Li, X., and Mba, D. (2022). Fault Detection, Diagnosis, and Prognosis of a Process Operating under Time-Varying Conditions. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094737 ↗
65. Wahid, A., Breslin, J.G., and Intizar, M.A. (2022). Prediction of Machine Failure in Industry 4.0: A Hybrid CNN-LSTM Framework. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094221 ↗
66. Chelmiah, E.T., McLoone, V.I., and Kavanagh, D.F. (2022). Remaining Useful Life Estimation of Rotating Machines through Supervised Learning with Non-Linear Approaches. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094136 ↗
67. Walther, S., and Fuerst, A. (2022). Reduced Data Volumes through Hybrid Machine Learning Compared to Conventional Machine Learning Demonstrated on Bearing Fault Classification. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052287 ↗
68. Chang, R.-I., Lee, C.-Y., and Hung, Y.-H. (2021). Cloud-Based Analytics Module for Predictive Maintenance of the Textile Manufacturing Process. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11219945 ↗
69. Hung, Y.-H. (2021). Improved Ensemble-Learning Algorithm for Predictive Maintenance in the Manufacturing Process. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11156832 ↗
70. Hafez, M.M., Fernández Vilas, A., Redondo, R.P.D., and Pazó, H.O. (2021). Classification of Retail Products: From Probabilistic Ranking to Neural Networks. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11094117 ↗
71. Li, Z., Fei, F., and Zhang, G. (2022). Edge-to-Cloud IIoT for Condition Monitoring in Manufacturing Systems with Ubiquitous Smart Sensors. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22155901 ↗
72. Leonardi, L., Lettieri, G., Perazzo, P., and Saponara, S. (2022). On the Hardware–Software Integration in Cryptographic Accelerators for Industrial IoT. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199948 ↗
73. Frankó, A., Hollósi, G., Ficzere, D., and Varga, P. (2022). Applied Machine Learning for IIoT and Smart Production—Methods to Improve Production Quality, Safety and Sustainability. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22239148 ↗
74. Mugarza, I., Flores, J.L., and Montero, J.L. (2020). Security Issues and Software Updates Management in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Era. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20247160 ↗