journal article·2022-09-05Open access

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastes: Reviewing Current Status and Approaches for Enhancing Biogas Production

Rubén González, Daniela Carrillo Peña, Xiomar Gómez

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 17

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is one of the technologies that will play a key role in the decarbonization of the economy, due to its capacity to treat organic waste, recover nutrients and simultaneously produce biogas as a renewable biofuel. This feature also makes this technology a relevant partner for approaching a circular economic model. However, the low biogas yield of traditional substrates such as sewage sludge and livestock waste along with high installation costs limit its profitability. Further expansion of this technology encounters several barriers, making it necessary to seek improvements to attain a favorable financial balance. The use of co-substrates benefits the overall digestion performance thanks to the balancing of nutrients, the enhanced conversion of organic matter and stabilization, leading to an increase in biogas production and process economics. This article reviews the main co-substrates used in anaerobic digestion, highlighting their characteristics in terms of methane production, kinetic models commonly used and the synergistic effects described in the literature. The main process parameters and their influence on digestion performance are presented, as well as the current lines of research dedicated to improving biogas yields, focusing on the addition of hydrogen, bioaugmentation, supplementation with carbon compounds and nanoparticles, the introduction of bioelectrodes and adsorbents. These techniques allow a significant increase in waste degradation and reduce inhibitory conditions, thus favoring process outcomes. Future research should focus on global process efficiency, making particular emphasis on the extrapolation of laboratory achievements into large-scale applications, by analyzing logistical issues, global energy demand and economic feasibility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation · Membrane Separation Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical, Systems and Automatic Engineering, School of Industrial, Computer and Aeronautical Engeneering, University of León, Campus de Vegazana, 24071 Leon, Spain

Chemical and Environmental Bioprocess Engineering Group, Natural Resources Institute (IRENA), Department of Applied Chemistry and Physics, University of León, Av. de Portugal 41, 24071 Leon, Spain

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Akturk, A.S., and Demirer, G.N. (2020). Improved Food Waste Stabilization and Valorization by Anaerobic Digestion Through Supplementation of Conductive Materials and Trace Elements. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12125222 ↗
2. Pecorini, I., Peruzzi, E., Albini, E., Doni, S., Macci, C., Masciandaro, G., and Lanelli, R. (2020). Evaluation of MSW Compost and Digestate Mixtures for a Circular Economy Application. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12073042 ↗
3. Legal requirements for digestate as fertilizer in Austria and the European Union compared to actual technical parameters10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109756 ↗
4. Rekleitis, G., Haralambous, K.-J., Loizidou, M., and Aravossis, K. (2020). Utilization of Agricultural and Livestock Waste in Anaerobic Digestion (A.D): Applying the Biorefinery Concept in a Circular Economy. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13174428 ↗
5. Chow, W.L., Chong, S., Lim, J.W., Chan, Y.J., Chong, M.F., Tiong, T.J., Chin, J.K., and Pan, G.-T. (2020). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge: A Review of Potential Co-Substrates and Operating Factors for Improved Methane Yield. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8010039 ↗
6. Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes10.1007/s11157-012-9277-8 ↗
7. Energetic and environmental benefits of co-digestion of food waste and cattle slurry: A preliminary assessment10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.006 ↗
8. Enhancing the efficiency of thermal hydrolysis process in wastewater treatment plants by the use of steam accumulation10.1007/s13762-018-1982-6 ↗
9. Enhancing phosphorus release from waste activated sludge by combining high-voltage pulsed discharge pretreatment with anaerobic fermentation10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.153 ↗
10. Arenas-Sevillano, C.B., Chiappero, M., Gomez, X., Fiore, S., and Martínez, E.J. (2020). Improving the anaerobic digestion of wine-industry liquid wastes: Treatment by electro-oxidation and use of biochar as an additive. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13225971 ↗
11. Disintegration of sewage sludge using pulsed electrical field technique: PEF optimization, simulation, and anaerobic digestion10.1080/09593330.2021.1906324 ↗
12. Enhancing anaerobic digestion of poultry blood using activated carbon10.1016/j.jare.2016.12.004 ↗
13. Enhancing anaerobic digestion of dairy and swine wastewater by adding trace elements: Evaluation in batch and continuous experiments10.2166/wst.2019.420 ↗
14. Tang, H., Xu, X., Wang, B., Lv, C., and Shi, D. (2020). Removal of ammonium from swine wastewater using synthesized zeolite from fly ash. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083423 ↗
15. El Nemr, A., Hassaan, M.A., Elkatory, M.R., Ragab, S., and Pantaleo, A. (2021). Efficiency of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles with Different Pretreatments for Enhancing Biogas Yield of Macroalgae Ulva intestinalis Linnaeus. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26165105 ↗
16. Singh, D., Malik, K., Sindhu, M., Kumari, N., Rani, V., Mehta, S., Malik, K., Ranga, P., Sharma, K., and Dhull, N. (2022). Biostimulation of Anaerobic Digestion Using Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs) for Increasing Biogas Production from Cattle Manure. Nanomaterials, 12.10.3390/nano12030497 ↗
17. Nanoparticles in the environment: Where do we come from, where do we go to?10.1186/s12302-018-0132-6 ↗
18. Gadaleta, G., De Gisi, S., and Notarnicola, M. (2021). Feasibility analysis on the adoption of decentralized anaerobic co-digestion for the treatment of municipal organic waste with energy recovery in urban districts of metropolitan areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18041820 ↗
19. Wang, F., Pei, M., Qiu, L., Yao, Y., Zhang, C., and Qiang, H. (2019). Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16122239 ↗
20. Electricity generation using biogas from organic fraction of municipal solid waste generated in provinces of China: Techno-economic and environmental impact analysis10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106381 ↗
21. Thermophilic/mesophilic digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes
22. Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludge and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes10.1016/j.renene.2005.09.029 ↗
23. Co-Digestion of Swine Manure and Crude Glycerine: Increasing Glycerine Ratio Results in Preferential Degradation of Labile Compounds10.1007/s11270-016-2773-7 ↗
24. Effect of char addition on anaerobic digestion of animal by-products: Evaluating biogas production and process performance10.1007/s11356-020-08828-8 ↗
25. Redox-Active Biochar and Conductive Graphite Stimulate Methanogenic Metabolism in Anaerobic Digestion of Waste-Activated Sludge: Beyond Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04109 ↗
26. A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.030 ↗
27. Endogenous ternary pH buffer system with ammonia-carbonates-VFAs in high solid anaerobic digestion of swine manure: An alternative for alleviating ammonia inhibition?10.1016/j.procbio.2018.03.015 ↗
28. Full scale co-digestion of organic waste10.2166/wst.2000.0072 ↗
29. A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 201310.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039 ↗
30. Cheong, W.L., Chan, Y.J., Tiong, T.J., Chong, W.C., Kiatkittipong, W., Kiatkittipong, K., Mohamad, M., Daud, H., Suryawan, I.W.K., and Sari, M.M. (2022). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Sewage Sludge: Simulation and Optimization for Maximum Biogas Production. Water, 14.10.3390/w14071075 ↗
31. Food Waste Valorization Based on Anaerobic Digestion10.1007/s12649-020-01108-z ↗
32. Aromolaran, A., Sartaj, M., and Alqaralleh, R.M.Z. (2022). Biogas production from sewage scum through anaerobic co-digestion: The effect of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and landfill leachate blend addition. Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 1–17.10.1007/s13399-021-02152-y ↗
33. Sevillano, C.A., Pesantes, A.A., Peña Carpio, E., Martínez, E.J., and Gómez, X. (2021). Anaerobic Digestion for Producing Renewable Energy—The Evolution of This Technology in a New Uncertain Scenario. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23020145 ↗
34. High-load anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey and liquid fraction of dairy manure in a one-stage UASB process: Limits in co-substrates ratio and organic loading rate10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.050 ↗
35. Organic loading rate effect on the acidogenesis of cheese whey: A comparison between UASB and SBR reactors10.1080/09593330.2017.1371796 ↗
36. Microbial profiling during anaerobic digestion of cheese whey in reactors operated at different conditions10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.084 ↗
37. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cheese whey: Coupling H2 and CH4 production10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.024 ↗
38. Enhanced biogas production using cow manure to stabilize co-digestion of whey and primary sludge10.1080/09593330.2013.774032 ↗
39. Hallaji, S.M., Kuroshkarim, M., and Moussavi, S.P. (2019). Enhancing methane production using anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge with combined fruit waste and cheese whey. BMC Biotechnol., 19.10.1186/s12896-019-0513-y ↗
40. Comprehensive study on a two-stage anaerobic digestion process for the sequential production of hydrogen and methane from cost-effective molasses10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.135 ↗
41. Chojnacka, A., Szczęsny, P., Błaszczyk, M.K., Zielenkiewicz, U., Detman, A., Salamon, A., and Sikora, A. (2015). Noteworthy Facts about a Methane-Producing Microbial Community Processing Acidic Effluent from Sugar Beet Molasses Fermentation. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0128008 ↗
42. Ali, M.M., Mustafa, A.M., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Danhassan, U.A., Lin, H., Choe, U., Sheng, K., and Wang, K. (2022). Biohythane production from tofu processing residue via two-stage anaerobic digestion: Operational conditions and microbial community dynamics. Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 1–20.10.1007/s13399-022-02736-2 ↗
43. Plant cell walls as fibrous lignocellulosic composites: Relations with lignin structure and function10.1016/0377-8401(91)90019-O ↗
44. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance10.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
45. Cellulose Degradation in Anaerobic Environments10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.002151 ↗
46. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria10.1007/s002530100710 ↗
47. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: An overview10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3 ↗
48. Increasing concentrations of phenol progressively affect anaerobic digestion of cellulose and associated microbial communities10.1007/s10532-015-9751-4 ↗
49. Organic matter characterization during the anaerobic digestion of different biomasses by means of CPMAS 13C NMR spectroscopy10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.11.006 ↗
50. Cellulose Digestion and Metabolism Induced Biocatalytic Transitions in Anaerobic Microbial Ecosystems10.3390/metabo4010036 ↗
51. Methane production through anaerobic digestion: Participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.055 ↗
52. Dutta, N., Usman, M., Luo, G., and Zhang, S. (2022). An insight into valorization of lignocellulosic biomass by optimization with the combination of hydrothermal (HT) and biological techniques: A review. Sustain. Chem., 3.10.3390/suschem3010003 ↗
53. Study of biological stabilization processes of cattle and poultry manure by thermogravimetric analysis and 13C NMR10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.02.065 ↗
54. Characterising the stability of the organic matter during anaerobic digestion: A selective review on the major spectroscopic techniques10.1007/s11157-022-09623-2 ↗
55. Use of biogas digestates obtained by anaerobic digestion and co-digestion as fertilizers: Characterization, soil biological activity and growth dynamic of Lactuca sativa L.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.444 ↗
56. Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.012 ↗
57. Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.034 ↗
58. Hemicellulose conversion by anaerobic digestion10.1016/0144-4565(85)90052-6 ↗
59. Li, P., Li, W., Sun, M., Xu, X., Zhang, B., and Sun, Y. (2018). Evaluation of Biochemical Methane Potential and Kinetics on the Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Crop Residues. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12010026 ↗
60. Waliszewska, H., Zborowska, M., Stachowiak-Wencek, A., Waliszewska, B., and Czekała, W. (2019). Lignin Transformation of One-Year-Old Plants During Anaerobic Digestion (AD). Polymers, 11.10.3390/polym11050835 ↗
61. Wagner, A., Lackner, N., Mutschlechner, M., Prem, E., Markt, R., and Illmer, P. (2018). Biological Pretreatment Strategies for Second-Generation Lignocellulosic Resources to Enhance Biogas Production. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11071797 ↗
62. Ruiz, H., Hedegaard Thomsen, M., and Trajano, H. (2017). Effect of Hydrothermal Processing on Hemicellulose Structure. Hydrothermal Processing in Biorefineries, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-56457-9 ↗
63. Challenges and opportunities of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.005 ↗
64. Formation of degradation compounds from lignocellulosic biomass in the biorefinery: Sugar reaction mechanisms10.1016/j.carres.2013.08.029 ↗
65. Ahmed, B., Aboudi, K., Tyagi, V.K., Álvarez-Gallego, C.J., Fernández-Güelfo, L.A., Romero-García, L.I., and Kazmi, A.A. (2019). Improvement of Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulosic Biomass by Hydrothermal Pretreatment. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183853 ↗
66. Co-digestion of grease trap sludge and sewage sludge10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.024 ↗
67. Effect of Ultrasound Pretreatment on Sludge Digestion and Dewatering Characteristics: Application of Particle Size Analysis10.3390/w7116483 ↗
68. Martínez, E., Sotres, A., Arenas, C., Blanco, D., Martínez, O., and Gómez, X. (2019). Improving Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge by Hydrogen Addition: Analysis of Microbial Populations and Process Performance. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12071228 ↗
69. Keucken, A., Habagil, M., Batstone, D., Jeppsson, U., and Arnell, M. (2018). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sludge and Organic Food Waste—Performance, Inhibition, and Impact on the Microbial Community. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11092325 ↗
70. Li, P., Cheng, C., He, C., Yu, R., Shen, D., and Jiao, Y. (2020). Experimental study on anaerobic co-digestion of the individual component of biomass with sewage sludge: Methane production and microbial community. Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 1–14.10.1007/s13399-020-01049-6 ↗
71. Optimization of the co-digestion of sewage sludge, maize straw and cow manure: Microbial responses and effect of fractional organic characteristics10.1038/s41598-019-38829-8 ↗
72. BMP tests of source selected OFMSW to evaluate anaerobic codigestion with sewage sludge10.1016/j.wasman.2013.03.020 ↗
73. Xue, S., Zhao, N., Song, J., and Wang, X. (2019). Interactive Effects of Chemical Composition of Food Waste during Anaerobic Co-Digestion under Thermophilic Temperature. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11102933 ↗
74. Evaluation of Biogas Production Potential by Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Switchgrass–Animal Manure Mixtures10.1007/s12010-009-8624-x ↗
75. Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with energy crop residues10.1007/s12257-011-0117-4 ↗
76. Enhanced methane productivity from manure fibers by aqueous ammonia soaking pretreatment10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.075 ↗
77. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Microalgae Chlorella sp.: Experimental Studies and Energy Analysis10.1007/s12155-016-9769-4 ↗
78. Rubežius, M., Venslauskas, K., Navickas, K., and Bleizgys, R. (2020). Influence of Aerobic Pretreatment of Poultry Manure on the Biogas Production Process. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8091109 ↗
79. Anaerobic codigestion of poultry manure and sewage sludge under solid-phase configuration10.1002/ep.11860 ↗
80. Mahato, P., Goyette, B., Rahaman, M., and Rajagopal, R. (2020). Processing High-Solid and High-Ammonia Rich Manures in a Two-Stage (Liquid-Solid) Low-Temperature Anaerobic Digestion Process: Start-Up and Operating Strategies. Bioengineering, 7, Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/7/3/80.10.3390/bioengineering7030080 ↗
81. Effect of Lipase Hydrolysis on Biomethane Production from Swine Slaughterhouse Waste in China10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01097 ↗
82. Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure—Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.007 ↗
83. Baek, G., Kim, D., Kim, J., Kim, H., and Lee, C. (2020). Treatment of Cattle Manure by Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Food Waste and Pig Manure: Methane Yield and Synergistic Effect. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17134737 ↗
84. Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production: A lab scale evaluation of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and kinetics10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.032 ↗
85. Gunes, B., Carrié, M., Benyounis, K., Stokes, J., Davis, P., Connolly, C., and Lawler, J. (2020). Optimisation and Modelling of Anaerobic Digestion of Whiskey Distillery/Brewery Wastes after Combined Chemical and Mechanical Pre-Treatment. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8040492 ↗
86. Application of thermal analysis for evaluating the effect of glycerine addition on the digestion of swine manure10.1007/s10973-018-7464-8 ↗
87. Two-stage thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of corn stover and cattle manure to enhance biomethane production10.1080/10934529.2019.1567156 ↗
88. Influence of inoculum–substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: Process stability and kinetic evaluation10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.001 ↗
89. Zhurka, M., Spyridonidis, A., Vasiliadou, I.A., and Stamatelatou, K. (2019). Biogas Production from Sunflower Head and Stalk Residues: Effect of Alkaline Pretreatment. Molecules, 25.10.3390/molecules25010164 ↗
90. Kaldis, F., Cysneiros, D., Day, J.G., Karatzas, K.-A., and Chatzifragkou, A. (2020). Anaerobic Digestion of Steam-Exploded Wheat Straw and Co-Digestion Strategies for Enhanced Biogas Production. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228284 ↗
91. Biogas Potential of Manure and Straw Mixtures
92. Mancini, G., Papirio, S., Lens, P., and Esposito, G. (2019). A Preliminary Study of the Effect of Bioavailable Fe and Co on the Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12040577 ↗
93. Pizarro-Loaiza, C.A., Torres-Lozada, P., Illa, J., Palatsi, J., and Bonmatí, A. (2020). Effect of Harvesting Age and Size Reduction in the Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Pennisetum Grass. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8111414 ↗
94. Investigation of kinetics of anaerobic digestion of Canary grass10.2478/s11696-012-0136-4 ↗
95. Anaerobic Digestion of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) in Two-Phase Dry Digestion System Versus Wet Digestion System10.1007/s12155-020-10110-1 ↗
96. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Agricultural Byproducts with Manure for Enhanced Biogas Production10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02373 ↗
97. Characterization of microalgae cultivated in continuous operation combined with anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and microalgae10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.019 ↗
98. Saleem, M., Hanif, M.U., Bahadar, A., Iqbal, H., Capareda, S.C., and Waqas, A. (2020). The Effects of Hot Water and Ultrasonication Pretreatment of Microalgae (Nannochloropsis oculata) on Biogas Production in Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Cow Manure. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8121558 ↗
99. Treichel, H., and Fongaro, G. (2019). Co-digestion of Animal Manure and Carcasses to Increase Biogas Generation. Improving Biogas Production. Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies, Vol 9, Springer. Available online: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-10516-7_5.
100. Sanitary effectiveness and biogas yield by anaerobic co-digestion of swine carcasses and manure10.1080/09593330.2018.1508256 ↗