Human Activity Recognition through Recurrent Neural Networks for Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study deals with human awareness, which is a very important aspect of human–robot interaction. This feature is particularly essential in agricultural environments, owing to the information-rich setup that they provide. The objective of this investigation was to recognize human activities associated with an envisioned synergistic task. In order to attain this goal, a data collection field experiment was designed that derived data from twenty healthy participants using five wearable sensors (embedded with tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers) attached to them. The above task involved several sub-activities, which were carried out by agricultural workers in real field conditions, concerning load lifting and carrying. Subsequently, the obtained signals from on-body sensors were processed for noise-removal purposes and fed into a Long Short-Term Memory neural network, which is widely used in deep learning for feature recognition in time-dependent data sequences. The proposed methodology demonstrated considerable efficacy in predicting the defined sub-activities with an average accuracy of 85.6%. Moreover, the trained model properly classified the defined sub-activities in a range of 74.1–90.4% for precision and 71.0–96.9% for recall. It can be inferred that the combination of all sensors can achieve the highest accuracy in human activity recognition, as concluded from a comparative analysis for each sensor’s impact on the model’s performance. These results confirm the applicability of the proposed methodology for human awareness purposes in agricultural environments, while the dataset was made publicly available for future research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · IoT-based Smart Home Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
farmB Digital Agriculture, Doiraniis 17, GR54639 Thessaloniki, Greece
Department of Computer Science & Telecommunications, University of Thessaly, GR35131 Lamia, Greece
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. ICT Innovations and Smart Farming10.1007/978-3-030-12998-9_1 ↗
2. Moysiadis, V., Tsolakis, N., Katikaridis, D., Sørensen, C.G., Pearson, S., and Bochtis, D. (2020). Mobile Robotics in Agricultural Operations: A Narrative Review on Planning Aspects. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10103453 ↗
3. Chemical Pesticides and Human Health: The Urgent Need for a New Concept in Agriculture
4. Current Health Effects of Agricultural Work: Respiratory Disease, Cancer, Reproductive Effects, Musculoskeletal Injuries, and Pesticide-Related Illnesses10.13031/2013.8432 ↗
5. Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.003 ↗
6. Benos, L., Tsaopoulos, D., and Bochtis, D. (2020). A Review on Ergonomics in Agriculture. Part II: Mechanized Operations. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10103484 ↗
7. Benos, L., Tsaopoulos, D., and Bochtis, D. (2020). A review on ergonomics in agriculture. Part I: Manual operations. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10061905 ↗
8. Biomechanics of Load Carriage-Historical Perspectives and Recent Insights10.1519/JSC.0000000000001031 ↗
9. Low back disorders in agriculture and the role of stooped work: Scope, potential interventions, and research needs10.13031/2013.24352 ↗
10. Dahnl, N., Grass, H.M., and Fuchs, S. (2018, January 27–31). Situation Awareness for Autonomous Agents. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2018—27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Nanjing, China.10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525511 ↗
11. Salam, H., and Chetouani, M. (2015, January 4–8). A multi-level context-based modeling of engagement in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition FG 2015, Ljubljana, Slovenia.10.1109/FG.2015.7284845 ↗
12. Safety and ergonomics in human-robot interactive agricultural operations10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.09.009 ↗
13. A multisource fusion framework driven by user-defined knowledge for egocentric activity recognition10.1186/s13634-019-0612-x ↗
14. An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and Data Analytics in Agriculture: Benefits and Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2018.2844296 ↗
15. Behera, A., Hogg, D.C., and Cohn, A.G. (2013, January 6–9). Egocentric activity monitoring and recovery. Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Shanghai, China.10.1007/978-3-642-37431-9_40 ↗
16. Kitani, K.M., Okabe, T., Sato, Y., and Sugimoto, A. (2011). Fast unsupervised ego-action learning for first-person sports videos. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995406 ↗
17. Multi-scale Conditional Random Fields for first-person activity recognition on elders and disabled patients10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.11.004 ↗
18. An Egocentric Look at Video Photographer Identity
19. Wang, L. (2016). Recognition of human activities using continuous autoencoders with wearable sensors. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16020189 ↗
20. Deep learning algorithms for human activity recognition using mobile and wearable sensor networks: State of the art and research challenges10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.056 ↗
21. Masum, A.K.M., Bahadur, E.H., Shan-A-Alahi, A., Uz Zaman Chowdhury, M.A., Uddin, M.R., and Al Noman, A. (2019, January 6–8). Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Magnetometer Sensors: Deep Neural Network Approaches. Proceedings of the 2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies, ICCCNT 2019, Kanpur, India.10.1109/ICCCNT45670.2019.8944512 ↗
22. Aguileta, A.A., Brena, R.F., Mayora, O., Molino-Minero-Re, E., and Trejo, L.A. (2019). Multi-Sensor Fusion for Activity Recognition-A Survey. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19173808 ↗
23. A Sensor Fusion Approach to Indoor Human Localization Based on Environmental and Wearable Sensors10.1109/TASE.2018.2874487 ↗
24. Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition10.3390/s140610146 ↗
25. Wu, W., Dasgupta, S., Ramirez, E.E., Peterson, C., and Norman, G.J. (2012). Classification accuracies of physical activities using smartphone motion sensors. J. Med. Internet Res., 14.10.2196/jmir.2208 ↗
26. A classification proposal of digital twin applications in the safety domain10.1016/j.cie.2021.107137 ↗
27. Improving process safety: What roles for Digitalization and Industry 4.0?10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.021 ↗
28. Bulling, A., Blanke, U., and Schiele, B. (2014). A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Comput. Surv., 46.10.1145/2499621 ↗
29. Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., and Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18082674 ↗
30. Recognition of different daily living activities using hidden Markov model regression
31. Human activity recognition on smartphones using a multiclass hardware-friendly support vector machine
32. Shoaib, M., Bosch, S., Incel, O., Scholten, H., and Havinga, P. (2016). Complex Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone and Wrist-Worn Motion Sensors. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16040426 ↗
33. Das, B., Seelye, A.M., Thomas, B.L., Cook, D.J., Holder, L.B., and Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2012, January 14–17). Using smart phones for context-aware prompting in smart environments. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC’2012, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CCNC.2012.6181023 ↗
34. A Survey of Online Activity Recognition Using Mobile Phones10.3390/s150102059 ↗
35. Milenkoski, M., Trivodaliev, K., Kalajdziski, S., Jovanov, M., and Stojkoska, B.R. (2018, January 21–25). Real time human activity recognition on smartphones using LSTM networks. Proceedings of the 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, MIPRO 2018, Opatija, Croatia.10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400205 ↗
36. Patil, P.A., Jagyasi, B.G., Raval, J., Warke, N., and Vaidya, P.P. (September, January 29). Design and development of wearable sensor textile for precision agriculture. Proceedings of the 2015 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks, COMSNETS 2015, Bangalore, India.10.1109/COMSNETS.2015.7098714 ↗
37. Sharma, S., Raval, J., and Jagyasi, B. (2013). Mobile sensing for agriculture activities detection. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, GHTC 2013, IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/GHTC.2013.6713707 ↗
38. Sharma, S., Raval, J., and Jagyasi, B. (2015). Neural network based agriculture activity detection using mobile accelerometer sensors. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE India Conference: Emerging Trends and Innovation in Technology, INDICON 2014, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.10.1109/INDICON.2014.7030539 ↗
39. Sharma, S., Jagyasi, B., Raval, J., and Patil, P. (2015). AgriAcT: Agricultural Activity Training using multimedia and wearable sensing. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops, PerCom Workshops 2015, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.10.1109/PERCOMW.2015.7134078 ↗
40. Agricultural robots for field operations: Concepts and components10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.06.014 ↗
41. (2021, March 01). Open Datasets—iBO. Available online: https://ibo.certh.gr/open-datasets/.
42. Terrain assessment for precision agriculture using vehicle dynamic modelling10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.06.025 ↗
43. Grimstad, L., and From, P.J. (2017). The Thorvald II Agricultural Robotic System. Robotics, 6.10.3390/robotics6040024 ↗
44. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments10.1080/001401399185838 ↗
45. Responses of the lower limb to load carrying in walking man10.1007/BF02335921 ↗
46. (2021, January 07). Calibrate IMUs—IMU Documentation—Vicon Documentation. Available online: https://docs.vicon.com/display/IMU/Calibrate+IMUs.
47. Estimation of Spinal Loading During Manual Materials Handling Using Inertial Motion Capture10.1007/s10439-019-02409-8 ↗
48. (2021, January 07). Blue Trident IMU | Inertial Sensor by Vicon | Biomechanic Tracking. Available online: https://www.vicon.com/hardware/blue-trident/.
49. Burland, J.P., Outerleys, J.B., Lattermann, C., and Davis, I.S. (2020). Reliability of wearable sensors to assess impact metrics during sport-specific tasks. J. Sports Sci.10.1080/02640414.2020.1823131 ↗
50. Garman, C., Como, S.G., Campbell, I.C., Wishart, J., O’Brien, K., and McLean, S. (2020, January 21–23). Micro-Mobility Vehicle Dynamics and Rider Kinematics during Electric Scooter Riding. Proceedings of the WCX SAE World Congress Experience 2020, Detroit, MI, USA.10.4271/2020-01-0935 ↗
51. Tibial Accelerations During the Single-Leg Hop Test: Influence of Fixation
52. A comparison of attachment methods of skin mounted inertial measurement units on tibial accelerations10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110118 ↗
53. (2021, January 19). Capture.U - IMeasureU. Available online: https://imeasureu.com/capture-u/.
54. (2021, January 19). iPad mini—Apple. Available online: https://www.apple.com/ipad-mini/.
55. Yu, H., Pan, G., Pan, M., Li, C., Jia, W., Zhang, L., and Sun, M. (2019). A Hierarchical Deep Fusion Framework for Egocentric Activity Recognition using a Wearable Hybrid Sensor System. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19030546 ↗
56. Effects of an over-ground exoskeleton on external knee moments during stance phase of gait in healthy adults10.1016/j.knee.2017.04.004 ↗
57. Squat, stoop, or semi-squat: A comparative experiment on lifting technique10.1007/s11596-012-1009-3 ↗
58. Vecchio, L. (2017). Del Choosing a Lifting Posture: Squat, Semi-Squat or Stoop. MOJ Yoga Phys. Ther., 2.10.15406/mojypt.2017.02.00019 ↗
59. SEARE: A System for Exercise Activity Recognition and Quality Evaluation Based on Green Sensing10.1109/TETC.2018.2790080 ↗
60. A hierarchical approach to real-time activity recognition in body sensor networks10.1016/j.pmcj.2010.12.001 ↗
61. Bao, L., and Intille, S.S. (2004, January 21–23). Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. Proceedings of the Pervasive Computing, Second International Conference, PERVASIVE 2004, Vienna, Austria.10.1007/978-3-540-24646-6_1 ↗
62. (2021, January 20). sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler—scikit-learn 0.24. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html.
63. Long Short-Term Memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
64. Anagnostis, A., Asiminari, G., Papageorgiou, E., and Bochtis, D. (2020). A Convolutional Neural Networks Based Method for Anthracnose Infected Walnut Tree Leaves Identification. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10020469 ↗
65. Demirkaya, A., Chen, J., and Oymak, S. (2020, January 18–20). Exploring the Role of Loss Functions in Multiclass Classification. Proceedings of the 2020 54th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2020, Princeton, NJ, USA.10.1109/CISS48834.2020.1570627167 ↗
66. Xu, B., Wang, N., Chen, T., and Li, M. (2015). Empirical evaluation of rectified activations in convolutional network. arXiv.
67. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). 6.2.2.3 Softmax Units for Multinoulli Output Distributions. Deep Learning, MIT Press.
68. Shoaib, M., Scholten, H., and Havinga, P.J.M. (2013). Towards physical activity recognition using smartphone sensors. UIC-ATC ’13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing, IEEE Computer Society.10.1109/UIC-ATC.2013.43 ↗
69. Cobots and the benefits of their implementation in intelligent manufacturing10.1088/1757-899X/862/3/032075 ↗
70. Social interactive robot navigation based on human intention analysis from face orientation and human path prediction10.1186/s40648-015-0033-z ↗
71. Recent trends in social aware robot navigation: A survey10.1016/j.robot.2017.03.002 ↗
72. Optimized driving direction based on a three-dimensional field representation10.1016/j.compag.2012.12.009 ↗
73. Conceptual model of fleet management in agriculture10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.09.009 ↗
74. An Optimized Field Coverage Planning Approach for Navigation of Agricultural Robots in Fields Involving Obstacle Areas10.5772/56248 ↗
75. Human-aware robot navigation: A survey10.1016/j.robot.2013.05.007 ↗
76. Robotics and labour in agriculture. A context consideration10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.06.013 ↗
77. Convolutional, Long Short-Term Memory, fully connected Deep Neural Networks
78. Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting