journal article·2020-02-22Open access

X-Ray Bone Fracture Classification Using Deep Learning: A Baseline for Designing a Reliable Approach

Leonardo Tanzi, Enrico Vezzetti, Rodrigo Moreno, Sandro Moos

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 4

Abstract

In recent years, bone fracture detection and classification has been a widely discussed topic and many researchers have proposed different methods to tackle this problem. Despite this, a universal approach able to classify all the fractures in the human body has not yet been defined. We aim to analyze and evaluate a selection of papers, chosen according to their representative approach, where the authors applied different deep learning techniques to classify bone fractures, in order to select the strengths of each of them and try to delineate a generalized strategy. Each study is summarized and evaluated using a radar graph with six values: area under the curve (AUC), test accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, dataset size and labelling reliability. Plus, we defined the key points which should be taken into account when trying to accomplish this purpose and we compared each study with our baseline. In recent years, deep learning and, in particular, the convolution neural network (CNN), has achieved results comparable to those of humans in bone fracture classification. Adopting a correct generalization, we are reasonably sure that a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system, correctly designed to assist doctors, would save a considerable amount of time and would limit the number of wrong diagnoses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Dental Radiography and Imaging · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH BioMEx Center, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, 14157 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. International Osteoporosis Foundation (2020, February 21). Available online: http://share.iofbonehealth.org/EU-6-Material/Reports/IOF%20Report_EU.pdf.
2. Long Radiology Workdays Reduce Detection and Accommodation Accuracy10.1016/j.jacr.2010.03.004 ↗
3. Hallas, P., and Ellingsen, T. (2006). Errors in fracture diagnoses in the emergency department—Characteristics of patients and diurnal variation. BMC Emerg. Med., 6.10.1186/1471-227X-6-4 ↗
4. Detecting hand bone fractures in x-ray images
5. Cao, Y., Wang, H., Moradi, M., Prasanna, P., and Syeda-Mahmood, T.F. (2015). Fracture detection in x-ray images through stacked random forests feature fusion. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), New York, NY, USA, 16–19 April 2015, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI.2015.7163993 ↗
6. Analysis on Detecting of Leg Bone Fracture from X-ray Images
7. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
8. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 ↗
9. IBFDS: Intelligent bone fracture detection system10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.237 ↗
10. Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians10.1073/pnas.1806905115 ↗
11. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
12. ImageNet: Constructing a large-scale image database10.1167/9.8.1037 ↗
13. Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm10.1080/17453674.2018.1453714 ↗
14. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
15. Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs: Deep learning algorithms—Are they on par with humans for diagnosing fractures?10.1080/17453674.2017.1344459 ↗
16. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2015). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv.
17. Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: Transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.015 ↗
18. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2016). Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
19. Detection of Distal Radius Fractures Trained by a Small Set of X-Ray Images and Faster R-CNN10.1007/978-3-030-22871-2_69 ↗
20. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
21. Application of a deep learning algorithm for detection and visualization of hip fractures on plain pelvic radiographs10.1007/s00330-019-06167-y ↗
22. Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., and Batra, D. (2017). Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy, 22–29 October 2017, IEEE.10.1109/ICCV.2017.74 ↗
23. Huang, G., Liu, Z., van der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017). Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
24. Thurston, M., MacKinnon, T., and Kim, D.H. (March, January 28). Fracture detection with artificial intelligence: Improved accuracy with region of interest focusing. Proceedings of the 2018 European Congress of Radiology, Vienna, Austria.
25. The OpenCV Library
26. Rajpurkar, P., Irvin, J., Bagul, A., Ding, D., Duan, T., Mehta, H., Yang, B., Zhu, K., Laird, D., and Ball, R.L. (2018). MURA: Large Dataset for Abnormality Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiographs. arXiv.
27. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic10.11613/BM.2012.031 ↗
28. Jiménez-Sánchez, A., Kazi, A., Albarqouni, S., Kirchhoff, C., Biberthaler, P., Navab, N., Mateus, D., and Kirchhoff, S. (2019). Towards an Interactive and Interpretable CAD System to Support Proximal Femur Fracture Classification. arXiv.
29. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
30. Chen, Y. (2019). Classification of Atypical Femur Fracture with Deep Neural Networks, KTH University.
31. Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons10.1016/j.injury.2005.02.005 ↗
32. Goodfellow, I.J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv.