Johnson–Holmquist-II(JH-2) Constitutive Model for Rock Materials: Parameter Determination and Application in Tunnel Smooth Blasting
Source abstract
Abstract
The Johnson–Holmquist-II(JH-2) model is introduced as the constitutive model for rock materials in tunnel smooth blasting. However, complicated and/or high-cost experiments need to be carried out to obtain the parameters of the JH-2 constitutive model. This study chooses Barre granite as an example to propose a quick and convenient determination method for the parameters of the JH-2 model using a series of computational and extrapolated methods. The validity of the parameters is verified via comparing the results of 3D numerical simulations with laboratory blast-loading experiments. Subsequently, the verified parameter determination method, together with the JH-2 damage constitutive model, is applied in the numerical simulation of smooth blasting in Zigaojian tunnel, Hangzhou–Huangshan high-speed railway. The overbreak/underbreak induced by rock blasting and joints/discontinuities is well estimated through comparing the damage contours resulting from the numerical study with the tunnel profiles measured from the tunnel site. The peak particle velocities (PPVs) of the near field are extracted to estimate the damage scope and damage degree for the surrounding rock mass of the tunnel on the basis of PPV damage criteria. This method can be used in the excavation of rock tunnels subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures, thereby reducing safety risk and economic losses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Johnson, G.R., and Cook, W.H. (1983, January 19–21). A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ballistics, Hague, The Netherlands.
2. Meyers, M., Murr, L., and Staudhammer, K. (1992). A computational constitutive model for brittle materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures. Shock Wave and High-Strain-Rate Phenomena in Materials, CRC Press.10.21236/ADA248665 ↗
3. An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials
4. Response of boron carbide subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures10.1063/1.370643 ↗
5. Response of aluminum nitride (including a phase change) to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures10.1063/1.1589177 ↗
6. On the partition of fracture energy in constitutive modelling of quasi-brittle materials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.11.002 ↗
7. Micromechanical modeling of dynamic compressive responses of mesoscopic heterogenous brittle rock10.1016/j.tafmec.2007.04.008 ↗
8. Normalization of cohesive laws for quasi-brittle materials10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.020 ↗
9. Constitutive model for rockfill materials and determination of material constants10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:4(226) ↗
10. Parameter optimization and sensitivity analysis for disturbed state constitutive model10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:2(75) ↗
11. Determination of Johnson-holmquist constitutive model parameters for fused silica10.1051/epjconf/20122604011 ↗
12. Determination of Holmquist-Johnson-Cook constitutive model parameters of rock
13. Holmquist, T.J., Johnson, G.R., Lopatin, C.M., Grady, D.E., and Hertel, E.S. (1995, January 21–24). High strain rate properties and constitutive modeling of glass. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Ballistics, Jerusalem, Israel.10.2172/41367 ↗
14. Holmquist, T.J., Johnson, G.R., and Cook, W.H. (1993, January 26–29). A constitutive model and data for concrete subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Ballistics, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
15. Meyer, C.S. (2011, January 14–16). Development of geomaterial parameters for numerical simulations using the Holmquist-Johnson-Cook constitutive model for concrete. Proceedings of the Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, Adelphi, MD, USA.
16. Penetration of concrete targets using a modified Holmquist-Johnson-Cook material model10.1142/S0219876212500569 ↗
17. Constitutive modeling of aluminum nitride for large strain, high-strain rate, and high-pressure applications10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00046-4 ↗
18. Characterization and evaluation of boron carbide for plate-impact conditions10.1063/1.2362979 ↗
19. Response of boron carbide subjected to high-velocity impact10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.08.003 ↗
20. A computational constitutive model for glass subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures10.1115/1.4004326 ↗
21. Two-dimensional DDA contact constitutive model for simulating rock fragmentation10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000319 ↗
22. Statistical damage constitutive model of quasi-brittle materials10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2009)22:1(95) ↗
23. A statistical damage constitutive model for softening behavior of rocks10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.05.005 ↗
24. Statistical damage constitutive model for rocks considering residual strength10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000680 ↗
25. A synthesis of geometry effect on brittle fracture10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.022 ↗
26. Simulation of dynamic response of granite: A numerical approach of shock-induced damage beneath impact craters10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.046 ↗
27. Numerical simulation of blasting-induced rock fractures10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.12.002 ↗
28. Numerical simulations of rock mass damage induced by underground explosion10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.02.007 ↗
29. Banadaki, M.M.D. (2010). Stress-Wave Induced Fracture in Rock Due to Explosive Action. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto].
30. Numerical simulation of stress wave induced fractures in rock10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.010 ↗
31. Dynamic crack propagation of granite subjected to biaxial confining pressure and blast loading
32. Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation induced by a single TBM disc cutter close to a side free surface10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.004 ↗
33. Li, X., Zhang, Q.B., and Zhao, J. (2016). Numerical Simulation of Rock Dynamic Failure by Particle-Based Numerical Manifold Method. 22nd DYMAT Technical Meeting, Grenoble, Atlas Copco.
34. Particle-based numerical manifold method to model dynamic fracture process in rock blasting10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000748 ↗
35. Numerical investigation on fracturing of rock under blast using coupled finite element method and smoothed particle hydrodynamics10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.846.102 ↗
36. Gross, D., and Seelig, T. (2018). Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics. Fracture Mechanics. Mechanical Engineering Series, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-71090-7 ↗
37. Static and dynamic fracture strength of Barre granite10.1016/0148-9062(76)91829-5 ↗
38. Hugoniot equation of state of the Bukit Timah granite10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00002-2 ↗
39. Determination of Hugoniot Elastic Limit (HEL) and Equation of State (EOS) of Ceramic Materials in the Pressure Region 20 GPa to 100 GPa10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.058 ↗
40. The dynamic properties of the Atlanta Stone Mountain granite10.1063/1.1780512 ↗
41. Petersen, C.F. (1969). Shock Wave Studies of Selected Rocks. [Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University].
42. Dynamic compression of materials: Metallization of fluid hydrogen at high pressures10.1088/0034-4885/69/5/R05 ↗
43. Wall, W.A., Bletzinger, K.U., and Schweizerhof, K. (2001, January 20–23). Determination of shock equation of state properties of concrete using full-scale experiments and flyer-plate-impact tests. Proceedings of the Trends in Computational Structural Mechanics, Barcelona, Spain.
44. Hugoniot properties for concrete determined by full-scale detonation experiments and flyer-plate-impact tests10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.003 ↗
45. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design10.1090/qam/48291 ↗
46. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on geomaterials
47. JH-2 model and its application to numerical simulation on Al2O3 ceramic under low-velocity impact
48. Plate impact experiments to investigate shock-induced inelasticity in Westerly granite10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.024 ↗
49. Cronin, D.S., Bui, K., Kaufmann, C., McIntosh, G., Berstad, T., and Cronin, D. (2003, January 22–23). Implementation and validation of the Johnson-Holmquist ceramic material model in LS-Dyna. Proceedings of the 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, Ulm, Germany.
50. Effects of microstructures on dynamic compression of Barre granite10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.09.013 ↗
51. Seventeenth Canadian geotechnical colloquium: The effect of cohesion loss and stress path on brittle rock strength10.1139/t97-030 ↗
52. DEM–SPH simulation of rock blasting10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.008 ↗
53. Numerical Simulations of Rock Blasting Damage Based on Laboratory Scale Experiments10.1088/1742-2140/aacf17 ↗
54. Hoek, E. (2007). The development of rock engineering. Practical Rock Engineering, Rocscience.
55. Abbas, S.M., and Konietzky, H. (2014). Rock mass classification systems. Introduction to Geomechanics, Department of Rock Mechanics, Technical University Freiberg (Ebook), Freiberg University of Mining and Technology.
56. Engineering classification of jointed rock masses
57. Bieniawski, Z.T., and Bieniawski, Z.T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications: A Complete Manual for Engineers and Geologists in Mining, Civil, and Petroleum Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
58. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support10.1007/BF01239496 ↗
59. Rock mass conditions dictate choice between NMT and NATM
60. GB/T50218 (2014). Engineering Rock Mass Classification Standard, China National Standards. (In Chinese).
61. TB 10003 (2016). Code for Design of Railway Tunnel, China National Standards. (In Chinese).
62. Mechanism of jointed rock loosing under blasting load
63. Causes, impact and control of overbreak in underground excavations10.1016/j.tust.2004.05.004 ↗
64. Optimizing overbreak prediction based on geological parameters comparing multiple regression analysis and artificial neural network10.1016/j.tust.2013.06.003 ↗
65. Damage evolution analysis and pressure prediction of surrounding rock of a tunnel based on rock mass classification
66. Numerical modeling of the time-dependent development of the damage zone around a tunnel under high humidity conditions10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.012 ↗
67. Murthy, V.M.S.R., Dey, K., and Raitani, R. (2003). Prediction of overbreak in underground tunnel blasting: A case study. J. Can. Tunn. Can., 109–115.
68. Stability analysis of the blast-induced damage zone by continuum and coupled continuum-discontinuum methods10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.07.011 ↗
69. Excavation-damaged zone around tunnel surface under different release ratios of displacement10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000752 ↗
70. Numerical Modeling of Rock Damage during Indentation Process with Reference to Hard Rock Drilling10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000862 ↗
71. The relationship between strain energy, rock damage, fragmentation, and throw in rock blasting10.1080/13855149709408392 ↗
72. Li, Z., and Huang, H. (1994). The calculation of stability of tunnels under the effects of seismic wave of explosions. 26th Department of Defence Explosives Safety Seminar, USA, Department of Defence Explosives Safety Board, Doral Resort.