journal article·2021-01-27Open access

Investigating Health-Related Features and Their Impact on the Prediction of Diabetes Using Machine Learning

Hafiz Farooq Ahmad, Hamid Mukhtar, Hesham Alaqail, Mohamed Seliaman, Abdulaziz Alhumam

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases leading to severe health complications that may cause death. The disease influences individuals, community, and the government due to the continuous monitoring, lifelong commitment, and the cost of treatment. The World Health Organization (WHO) considers Saudi Arabia as one of the top 10 countries in diabetes prevalence across the world. Since most of its medical services are provided by the government, the cost of the treatment in terms of hospitals and clinical visits and lab tests represents a real burden due to the large scale of the disease. The ability to predict the diabetic status of a patient with only a handful of features can allow cost-effective, rapid, and widely-available screening of diabetes, thereby lessening the health and economic burden caused by diabetes alone. The goal of this paper is to investigate the prediction of diabetic patients and compare the role of HbA1c and FPG as input features. By using five different machine learning classifiers, and using feature elimination through feature permutation and hierarchical clustering, we established good performance for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of the models on the dataset implying that our data or features are not bound to specific models. In addition, the consistent performance across all the evaluation metrics indicate that there was no trade-off or penalty among the evaluation metrics. Further analysis was performed on the data to identify the risk factors and their indirect impact on diabetes classification. Our analysis presented great agreement with the risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes stated by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and other health institutions worldwide. We conclude that by performing analysis of the disease using selected features, important factors specific to the Saudi population can be identified, whose management can result in controlling the disease. We also provide some recommendations learned from this research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare · Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins · Machine Learning in Healthcare

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computer Science Department, College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology (CCSIT), King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

Computer Science Department, College of Computers and Information Technology (CCIT), Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia

Information Systems Department, College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology (CCSIT), King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Deputyship for Research \& Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843 ↗
2. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 204510.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023 ↗
3. The Saudi Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and Diabetes Impact Study (SAUDI-DM)10.5144/0256-4947.2014.465 ↗
4. Cost of Diabetes in Saudi Arabia10.2196/10566 ↗
5. Incidence and prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia: An overview10.1016/j.jegh.2017.10.001 ↗
6. Self-efficacy, self-care and glycemic control in Saudi Arabian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional survey10.1016/j.diabres.2017.12.014 ↗
7. Alsuliman, M.A., Alotaibi, S.A., Zhang, Q., and Durgampudi, P.K. (2020). A systematic review of factors associated with uncontrolled diabetes and meta-analysis of its prevalence in Saudi Arabia since 2006. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev.10.1002/dmrr.3395 ↗
8. Mathematical Modelling of Diabetes Mellitus and Associated Risk Factors in Saudi Arabia
9. Machine Learning-Based Application for Predicting Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3035026 ↗
10. Comparison of awareness of diabetes mellitus type II with treatment’s outcome in term of direct cost in a hospital in Saudi Arabia10.4239/wjd.v10.i8.463 ↗
11. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: A consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy10.1007/s00125-006-0316-2 ↗
12. A1C Versus Glucose Testing: A Comparison10.2337/dc10-1546 ↗
13. World Health Organization (2021, January 26). Definition and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Intermediate Hyperglycemia: Report of a WHO/IDF Consultation. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43588/9241594934_eng.pdf.
14. American Diabetes Association (2019). 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes Care, 42, S13–S28.10.2337/dc19-S002 ↗
15. DMP_MI: An effective diabetes mellitus classification algorithm on imbalanced data with missing values10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929866 ↗
16. Kaur, P., and Kaur, R. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Classification Techniques for Diagnosis of Diabetes. Advances in Bioinformatics, Multimedia, and Electronics Circuits and Signals, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-0339-9_17 ↗
17. A novel hybrid approach for diagnosing diabetes mellitus using farthest first and support vector machine algorithms10.1016/j.obmed.2019.100152 ↗
18. Abbas, H., Alic, L., Erraguntla, M., Ji, J., Abdul-Ghani, M., Abbasi, Q.H., and Qaraqe, M. (2019). Predicting long-term Type 2 Diabetes with Support Vector Machine using Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. bioRxiv.10.1101/688804 ↗
19. An Accurate Diabetes Prediction System Based on K-means Clustering and Proposed Classification Approach
20. An effective sample preparation method for diabetes prediction
21. Prediabetes and lifestyle modification: Time to prevent a preventable disease10.7812/TPP/14-002 ↗
22. Ethnic comparisons of the cross-sectional relationships between measures of body size with diabetes and hypertension10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00439.x ↗
23. Liver enzymes in early to mid-pregnancy, insulin resistance, and gestational diabetes risk: A longitudinal analysis10.3389/fendo.2018.00581 ↗
24. Advanced Liver Fibrosis Is Common in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Followed in the Outpatient Setting: The Need for Systematic Screening10.2337/dc20-1997 ↗
25. Prevalence of and risk factors for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in youth with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study10.2337/dc17-0179 ↗
26. Rawshani, A., Rawshani, A., Franzén, S., Sattar, N., Eliasson, B., Svensson, A.M., Zethelius, B., Miftaraj, M., McGuire, D.K., and Rosengren, A. (2018). Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med.10.1056/NEJMoa1800256 ↗
27. Mendola, N.D., Chen, T.C., Gu, Q., Eberhardt, M.S., and Saydah, S. (2018). Prevalence of Total, Diagnosed, and Undiagnosed Diabetes among Adults: United States, 2013–2016.
28. Daanouni, O., Cherradi, B., and Tmiri, A. (2019, January 2–4). Type 2 diabetes mellitus prediction model based on machine learning approach. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Smart City Applications, Casablanca, Morocco.10.1007/978-3-030-37629-1_33 ↗
29. Predictive models for diabetes mellitus using machine learning techniques10.1186/s12902-019-0436-6 ↗
30. Alić, B., Gurbeta, L., and Badnjevic, A. (2017, January 11–15). Machine learning techniques for classification of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Proceedings of the 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), Bar, Montenegro.10.1109/MECO.2017.7977152 ↗
31. Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8 ↗
32. Yu, W., Liu, T., Valdez, R., Gwinn, M., and Khoury, M.J. (2010). Application of support vector machine modeling for prediction of common diseases: The case of diabetes and pre-diabetes. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 10.10.1186/1472-6947-10-16 ↗
33. Semerdjian, J., and Frank, S. (2017). An ensemble classifier for predicting the onset of type II diabetes. arXiv.
34. Dinh, A., Miertschin, S., Young, A., and Mohanty, S. (2019). A data-driven approach to predicting diabetes and cardiovascular disease with machine learning. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 19.10.1186/s12911-019-0918-5 ↗
35. Success/Failure Prediction of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Intensive Care Units10.3414/ME14-01-0015 ↗
36. Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.009 ↗
37. A support vector machine classifier with rough set-based feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.120 ↗
38. Liaqat, S., Dashtipour, K., Zahid, A., Assaleh, K., Arshad, K., and Ramzan, N. (2020). Detection of atrial fibrillation using a machine learning approach. Information, 11.10.3390/info11120549 ↗
39. YA Amer, A., Vranken, J., Wouters, F., Mesotten, D., Vandervoort, P., Storms, V., Luca, S., Vanrumste, B., and Aerts, J.M. (2019). Feature Engineering for ICU Mortality Prediction Based on Hourly to Bi-Hourly Measurements. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9173525 ↗
40. Tomar, D., and Agarwal, S. (2015). Hybrid feature selection based weighted least squares twin support vector machine approach for diagnosing breast cancer, hepatitis, and diabetes. Adv. Artif. Neural Syst.10.1155/2015/265637 ↗
41. Balakrishnan, S., Narayanaswamy, R., Savarimuthu, N., and Samikannu, R. (2008, January 12–15). SVM ranking with backward search for feature selection in type II diabetes databases. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Singapore.10.1109/ICSMC.2008.4811692 ↗
42. Ephzibah, E. (2011). Cost effective approach on feature selection using genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic for diabetes diagnosis. arXiv.10.5121/ijsc.2011.2101 ↗
43. Feature generation using genetic programming with comparative partner selection for diabetes classification10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.003 ↗
44. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, I., Rodríguez, J.V., González-Vidal, A., and Zamora, M.Á. (2019). Feature Selection for Blood Glucose Level Prediction in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus by Using the Sequential Input Selection Algorithm (SISAL). Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11091164 ↗
45. Butterworth, R., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Simovici, D.A. (2005, January 27–30). On feature selection through clustering. Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’05), Houston, TX, USA.
46. Ienco, D., and Meo, R. (2008, January 24–26). Exploration and reduction of the feature space by hierarchical clustering. Proceedings of the 2008 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1137/1.9781611972788.53 ↗
47. Dua, D., and Graff, C. (2021, January 26). UCI Machine Learning Repository. Available online: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml.
48. American Diabetes Association (2018). Standards of medical care in diabetes—2018 abridged for primary care providers. Clin. Diabetes A Publ. Am. Diabetes Assoc., 36, 14.10.2337/cd17-0119 ↗
49. Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: An algorithm for glycemic control10.4158/EP.15.6.540 ↗
50. Zien, A., Krämer, N., Sonnenburg, S., and Rätsch, G. (2009, January September). The feature importance ranking measure. Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Bled, Slovenia.10.1007/978-3-642-04174-7_45 ↗
51. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer Science & Business Media.
52. Permutation importance: A corrected feature importance measure10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 ↗
53. Parr, T., Turgutlu, K., Csiszar, C., and Howard, J. (2021, January 26). Beware Default Random Forest Importances. Available online: https://explained.ai/rf-importance/.
54. Chen, X.w., and Jeong, J.C. (2007, January 13–15). Enhanced recursive feature elimination. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA 2007), Cincinnati, OH, USA.10.1109/ICMLA.2007.35 ↗
55. Parr, T., Wilson, J.D., and Hamrick, J. (2020). Nonparametric Feature Impact and Importance. arXiv.
56. Kuhn, M., and Johnson, K. (2013). Applied Predictive Modeling, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 ↗
57. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00002-9 ↗
58. Caruana, R., and Niculescu-Mizil, A. (2004, January 22–25). Data mining in metric space: An empirical analysis of supervised learning performance criteria. Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/1014052.1014063 ↗
59. Ho-Pham, L.T., Nguyen, U.D., Tran, T.X., and Nguyen, T.V. (2017). Discordance in the diagnosis of diabetes: Comparison between HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0182192 ↗
60. Short adult stature predicts impaired β-cell function, insulin resistance, glycemia, and type 2 diabetes in Finnish men
61. Associations of short stature and components of height with incidence of type 2 diabetes: Mediating effects of cardiometabolic risk factors10.1007/s00125-019-04978-8 ↗
62. Machine learning on big data: Opportunities and challenges10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.026 ↗