journal article·2020-04-01Open access

The Soundscape Indices (SSID) Protocol: A Method for Urban Soundscape Surveys—Questionnaires with Acoustical and Contextual Information

Andrew Mitchell, Tin Oberman, Francesco Aletta, Mercede Erfanian, Magdalena Kachlicka, Matteo Lionello, Jian Kang

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 7

Abstract

A protocol for characterizing urban soundscapes for use in the design of Soundscape Indices (SSID) and general urban research as implemented under the European Research Council (ERC)-funded SSID project is described in detail. The protocol consists of two stages: (1) a Recording Stage to collect audio-visual recordings for further analysis and for use in laboratory experiments, and (2) a Questionnaire Stage to collect in situ soundscape assessments via a questionnaire method paired with acoustic data collection. Key adjustments and improvements to previous methodologies for soundscape characterization have been made to enable the collation of data gathered from research groups around the world. The data collected under this protocol will form a large-scale, international soundscape database.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, The Bartlett, University College London, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, UK

Funding

European Research Council

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. On a tool for measuring soundscape quality in urban residential areas
2. Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.001 ↗
3. Kang, J., Aletta, F., Oberman, T., Erfanian, M., Kachlicka, M., Lionello, M., and Mitchell, A. (2019, January 9–13). Towards soundscape indices. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, Aachen, Germany.
4. International Organization for Standardization (2014). ISO 12913-1:2014 Acoustics—Soundscape Part 1: Definition and Conceptual Framework, International Organization for Standardization. Standard ISO 12913-1:2014.
5. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO/TS 12913-2:2018 Acoustics—Soundscape Part 2: Data collection and Reporting Requirements, International Organization for Standardization. Standard ISO/TS 12913-2:2018.
6. International Organization for Standardization (2019). ISO/TS 12913-3:2019 Acoustics—Soundscape Part 3: Data Analysis, International Organization for Standardization. Standard ISO/TS 12913-3:2019.
7. Classification of soundscapes of urban public open spaces10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.016 ↗
8. Oberman, T., Šćitaroci, B.B.O., and Jambrošić, K. (2018). Towards a virtual soundwalk. Handbook of Research on Perception-Driven Approaches to Urban Assessment and Design, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-3637-6.ch014 ↗
9. Experience sampling: Assessing urban soundscapes using in-situ participatory methods10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.05.026 ↗
10. Lavia, L., Witchel, H.J., Aletta, F., Steffens, J., Fiebig, A., Kang, J., Howes, C., and Healey, P.G. (2018). Non-participant observation methods for soundscape design and urban planning. Handbook of Research on Perception-Driven Approaches to Urban Assessment and Design, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-3637-6.ch004 ↗
11. A Review of Socio-acoustic Surveys for Soundscape Studies10.1007/s40726-018-0094-8 ↗
12. Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.07.011 ↗
13. Soundscape categorization on the basis of objective acoustical parameters10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.01.004 ↗
14. Modeling soundscape pleasantness using perceptual assessments and acoustic measurements along paths in urban context10.3813/AAA.919073 ↗
15. Alsina-Pagès, R.M., Freixes, M., Orga, F., Foraster, M., and Labairu-Trenchs, A. (2020). Perceptual evaluation of the citizen’s acoustic environment from classic noise monitoring. Cities Health, 1–5.10.1080/23748834.2020.1737346 ↗
16. Sound quality indicators for urban places in Paris cross-validated by Milan data10.1121/1.4929747 ↗
17. Effect of soundscape dimensions on acoustic comfort in urban open public spaces10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.11.024 ↗
18. International Organization for Standardization (2016). ISO 1996-1:2016 Acoustics—Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise—Part 1: Basic Quantities and Assessment Procedures, International Organization for Standardization. Standard ISO 1996-1:2016.
19. International Organization for Standardization (2017). ISO 1996-2:2017 Acoustics—Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise—Part 2: Determination of Sound Pressure Levels, International Organization for Standardization. Standard ISO 1996-2:2017.
20. Soundscape expectations of rural tourism: A comparison between Chinese and English potential tourists10.1121/1.5019466 ↗
21. Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.011 ↗
22. De Coensel, B., Sun, K., and Botteldooren, D. (2017, January 27–30). Urban Soundscapes of the World: Selection and reproduction of urban acoustic environments with soundscape in mind. Proceedings of the 46th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (Inter-Noise) 2017, Hong Kong, China.
23. Aletta, F., and Kang, J. (2018). Towards an urban vibrancy model: A soundscape approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.10.3390/ijerph15081712 ↗
24. Exploring the compatibility of “Method A” and “Method B” data collection protocols reported in the ISO/TS 12913-2: 2018 for urban soundscape via a soundwalk10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.05.024 ↗
25. The spectral structure of acoustic time series can predict the perceptual assessment of urban soundscapes10.1121/1.5136681 ↗
26. Making cities smarter with new soundscape indices10.1121/1.5136970 ↗
27. Associations between soundscape experience and self-reported wellbeing in open public urban spaces: A field study10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32814-4 ↗
28. Lionello, M., Aletta, F., and Kang, J. (2019, January 9–13). On the dimension and scaling analysis of soundscape assessment tools: A case study about the “Method A” of ISO/TS 12913-2: 2018. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics ICA, Aachen, Germany.
29. Aletta, F., Molinero, L., Astolfi, A., Di Blasio, S., Shtrepi, L., Oberman, T., and Kang, J. (2019, January 9–13). Exploring associations between soundscape assessment, perceived safety and well-being: A pilot field study in Granary Square, London. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Aachen, Germany.
30. Oberman, T., Jambrošić, K., Aletta, F., and Kang, J. (2019, January 9–13). Towards a soundscape surround index. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Aachen, Germany.
31. A comprehensive methodology for the multidimensional and synchronic data collecting in soundscape10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.061 ↗
32. (2013). International Electrotechnical Commission IEC 61672-1: 2013 Electroacoustics—Sound Level Meters—Part 1: Specifications, International Electrotechnical Commission. Standard IEC 61672-1: 2013.
33. Soundscape reproduction and synthesis10.3813/AAA.918708 ↗
34. Hong, Y.J., He, J., Lam, B., Gupta, R., Gan, W.S., Hong, J.Y., He, J., Lam, B., Gupta, R., and Gan, W.S. (2017). Spatial Audio for Soundscape Design: Recording and Reproduction. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7060627 ↗
35. Quality assessment of acoustic environment reproduction methods for cinematic virtual reality in soundscape applications10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.004 ↗
36. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City, MIT Press.
37. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge University Press.
38. Ewing, R., and Clemente, O. (2013). Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places, Island Press.10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9 ↗
39. Quercia, D., O’Hare, N.K., and Cramer, H. (2014, January 15–19). Aesthetic capital: What makes London look beautiful, quiet, and happy?. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Baltimore, MD, USA.10.1145/2531602.2531613 ↗
40. FaceLift: A transparent deep learning framework to beautify urban scenes10.1098/rsos.190987 ↗
41. The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of ‘tranquil space’10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.006 ↗
42. International Electrotechnical Commission (2017). IEC 60942: 2017 Electroacoustics—Sound Calibrators, International Electrotechnical Commission. Standard IEC 60942: 2017.
43. Non-auditory factors affecting urban soundscape evaluation10.1121/1.3652902 ↗
44. Categorization of environmental sounds10.1037/cjep2007006 ↗
45. Towards standardization in soundscape preference assessment10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.01.001 ↗
46. A principal components model of soundscape perception10.1121/1.3493436 ↗
47. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature10.1159/000376585 ↗
48. Examining functional content in widely used Health-Related Quality of Life scales10.1037/a0023054 ↗
49. Erfanian, M., Mitchell, A., Aletta, F., and Kang, J. (2020). Psychological Well-being, Age and Gender can Mediate Soundscapes: A large sample study, Under Review.
50. American National Standards Institute, Inc. (2013). ANSI/ASA S12.9-2013/Part1 Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound—Part 1: Basic Quantities and Definitions, American National Standards Institute, Inc.. Standard ANSI/ASA S12.9-2013/Part1.
51. Tarlao, C., Fernandez, P., and Guastavino, C. (2016, January 21–24). Comparing soundscape evaluations in French and English across three studies in Montreal. Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE 2016, Hamburg, Germany.
52. A cross-national comparison in assessment of urban park soundscapes in France, Korea, and Sweden through laboratory experiments10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.016 ↗
53. Examination of Soundscape-Quality Protocols in Japanese
54. Soundscape approach for noise management of conflict urban areas. The PTS case in Granada (Spain)
55. Harris, P.A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., and Conde, J.G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform.10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 ↗
56. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 ↗